Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gruppo del Sella.jpg

File:Gruppo del Sella.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2011 at 12:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dmottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 12:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 12:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support which planet is this? I have to support!! W.S. 16:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing! W.S. supporting a candidate! :D --Citron (talk) 17:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow! Great composition, lighting, exposure...well done! --LeavXC (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive lighting. --Cayambe (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 17:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Very good! Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support If W.S. is supporting, there really can be no flaws. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment i think that it is exactly what he wants you think...--Jebulon (talk) 22:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terrific! --Murdockcrc (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 01:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I think a little more light will enhance the image.. it is a little bit dark.. or no? Ggia (talk) 12:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have a sun glasses that time ;) --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
tentative Oppose: There is noticeable posterisation in the sky...provide a higher quality version, please? Maedin\^talk 22:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Can't find any. Please check your monitor bit depth. Does somebody else notices posterisation? --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 06:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm per Ggia, it's very dark overall - Benh (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Says the fan of night shots :-o W.S. 09:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Night shots are dark by nature, sunset shots on the other hand... Only tiny part of this picture is actually lit by the sun. - Benh (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So if an image proposed as FPC is not a night shot you will always oppose it? Ggia (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do like night shots, but no I've supported many many non such FPC. - Benh (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment –Very nice indeed, but the visual impact could have been even greater with a slightly different position of the sun, illuminating larger areas of the rock. What can be interpreted as posterization in the sky, details I can see too like Maedin but not as noticeable as he said, are maybe/possibly only slight differences in the thickness of the high altitude clouds. Sting (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No lager highlighted areas due to shadows from other high mountains. This shot was done with Cokin gradient filter. --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 13:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous! Steven Walling 21:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —stay (sic)! 07:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 12:44, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural