Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:BrockenSnowedTrees.jpg

Image:BrockenSnowedTrees.jpg, Not Featured

When I putted Image:BrockenSnowedTreesInSun.jpg on the FPC list some voters (norro,SehLax) prefered this image and I have putted this image into WikiMedia according an explicite request of another member. So this image seems to have something ...

Self- Nominate

(I do not vote for my own pictures) Andreas Tille 10:16, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Looks good, but it is blurred -- Godewind 11:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tatoute 11:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD 11:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
<joke>I prefered this so I have to Support now.</joke> But i really do. It's a good illustration for very snowed trees. If you want you could retouch the little part of another tree at the left side. --SehLax 15:23, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Too bad it's not christmas anymore. Husky 17:30, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support we can think of Christmas 2006 in advance :) --che 18:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Boring composition, hard shadows, blurry and partly overexposed norro 21:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ups, was Image:BrockenSnowedTreesInSun.jpg that bad, that even if you like this image much more you can not support it? I wouldn't have put it on the FPC list if you would not have added an explicite link. Andreas Tille 06:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't want to be hostile to you, but it doesn't matter, if i like this picture or not (i really like it). It just matters, if i think, that this is one of the best pictures of the commons. Due to the given reasons i think, it's not, so i vote against featuring it. I didn't want to mislead you with adding a link to this picture. Kindly, norro 16:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the image is blury and there look to be some JPEG artifacts around the tops of the trees, particularly on the left of the image. Thryduulf 22:19, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 01:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 02:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Neutrality 05:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's either not in focus or a bad scan. At fullsize it looks very blurry. --Dschwen 21:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rex 02:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes, it's blurred at full size, but full size fills 6 computer screens and I've only got one so I don't look at it full size. At single-screen size, it looks great. - MPF 00:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--Buchling 18:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

8 Support, 5 Oppose, 2 Neutral => Not Featured--Shizhao 03:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]