Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Delicatearch.png

Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2009 at 20:44:41

Info Image has a low resolution. It is nice, but its composition and quality is not on par with current FPs from Arches National Park, such as File:Double-O-Arch Arches National Park 2.jpg. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Slaunger (talk) 20:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist This would get FPXed instantly if it was nominated today. Some people seem to think that older FPs somehow deserve to be kept simply for their age even though they have shortcomings that would get them an FPX nowadays ("2006 Featured Pictures") which is a really dangerous development IMO. It shows that nostalgia truly is everywhere, and everywhere equally irrational (or what other "justification" save nostalgia could be given for an argument like "2006 FP"?). I say delist all FPs that wouldn't make FP today! -- JovanCormac 12:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Korall (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I guess I am "some people" :) , I do not see any "real danger" with keeping old FPs though and this one is really nice. /Daniel78 (talk) 16:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No strong mitigating reasons for this low resolution --S23678 (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist —kallerna™ 14:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /FPCBot (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]