Morburre
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 21:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Flickr licensing
editIt may not be a simple as you & I think! You probably should look here which will give you a link to this. You may want to join in the discussion. Regards --Herby talk thyme 07:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:KurtGerstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Please link images
edit
Hello Morburre!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Ramoneur.jpg is uncategorized since 5 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Sucettes-de-Borne.jpg is uncategorized since 21 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:PalaisCatherine-salle.jpg is uncategorized since 3 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:PalaisCatherine-facade.jpg is uncategorized since 3 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Monument-au-Pythi.jpg is uncategorized since 10 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:EstherGarrel2.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
- Image:Lambrequin-Valence-2.jpg is uncategorized since 23 June 2009.
- Image:GuyLafitte.jpg is uncategorized since 20 July 2009.
- Image:Villexanton-église.jpg is uncategorized since 20 July 2009.
- Image:Bourg-lès-Valence-Cartoucherie.jpg is uncategorized since 26 July 2009.
- Image:Bourg-lès-Valence-St-Pierre.jpg is uncategorized since 26 July 2009.
- Image:Bourg-lès-Valence-Saint-Pierre.jpg is uncategorized since 26 July 2009.
- Image:StJeanBaptiste-clocher-Valence.jpg is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
- Image:Mirmande-rue.jpg is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Mirmande-rue2.jpg is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Valence-StJean-chap2.jpg is uncategorized since 1 August 2009.
- Image:Valence-StJean-chap4.jpg is uncategorized since 1 August 2009.
- Image:Valence-StJean-chap5.jpg is uncategorized since 1 August 2009.
- Image:Valence-StJean-chap1.jpg is uncategorized since 1 August 2009.
- Image:Valence-StJean-chap3.jpg is uncategorized since 1 August 2009.
- Image:Valence-StJean-chap2a.jpg is uncategorized since 1 August 2009.
- Image:ValldeBoi-identifier2.jpg was uncategorized on 26 August 2009.
- Image:PortailStBarnard-Romans.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
- Image:Romans-TourJacquemart.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
- Image:MauriceParisot.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:AdQ.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:JFBladé.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:NezDeJobourg.jpg was uncategorized on 17 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:LegalPictureOfTheLouvreAndThePyramid.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BouedeLapeyrere-Lasseran.jpg was uncategorized on 18 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Buildings by Auguste Perret in France has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Oh mince ! C'est toi qui as chargé ça ? Désolé pour le modèle-qui-tue-une-PdD. -- Coyau (talk) 16:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Bonjour,
J'ai modifié les informations de ce fichier conformément aux pratiques de Commons. Si tu pouvais faire de même pour les autres documents que tu as scannés, ce serait super. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
File:ChMouly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Énorme
editTout simplement énorme vos photos sur la loi Évin ! Binnette (talk) 11:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Les pertucons sur le Wiktionnaire
editwikt:Modèle:Merci IP. Bien sûr, j'ai appris l'existence de ces image sur Vikidia. Si tu en fais de nouvelles, je suis preneur. Elles sont géniales. --Szyx (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Yuval Y § Chat § 20:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Vierge à l'enfant
editBonjour, J'ai vu que vous aviez créé une catégorie "vierge à l'enfant". Or cette catégorie n'est pas forcément opportune car elle fait doublon avec une catégorie existante déjà très bien organisée et bien plus précise, "madonna and child". Comme l'usage de commons veut que les catégories soient en anglais (voir usage sur la dénomination des catégories), la catégorie 'vierge à l'enfant' n'a aucun lieu d'être et doit donc être supprimée. Le plus simple serait donc que vous revertiez vous même le classement que vous avez entammé. Bien cordialement. Christophe.Finot (talk) 21:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- En l'absence d'un support correct du multilinguisme sur Commons, la règle veut effectivement que les catégories soient en anglais, langue véhiculaire la plus commune (voir COM:CAT#Category_name). C'est un problème connu, mais sa résolution prend du temps, parce qu'il faut apparemment des changements profonds du logiciel. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
File:ChMouly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 20:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Mes salutations à la communauté. Morburre (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Bonjour Morburre,
- Je voudrais essayer de réagir un petit peu à ce que vous avez dit. Je comprendrais assez que la famille Mouly soit d'accord pour publier l'image dans Wikipédia. Mais cela resterait une autorisation très limitée et ne correspondrait pas à ce qu'on entend par "licence libre" qui est une autorisation la plus large possible de faire tout et n'importe quoi avec l'image, donc avec les personnages, sans avoir droit à la moindre rémunération ni son mot à dire sur la façon dont c'est utilisé. Si j'étais héritier de personnages avec une longue histoire comme ceux-ci, j'hésiterais avant de mettre le doigt dans un tel engrenage. Teofilo (talk) 13:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
File:KGerstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Désolé
editMon intervention sur la PDD (page de destruction) de * n'était pas intelligente. Je ne pensais pas qu'autant de monde se ruerait dessus. Je te présente mes excuses. --GaAs11671 20:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Un pertucon de plus ?
editSalut à toi,
Je me permets de venir de trouver car je suis un grand admirateur des Pertucons et je m’en sers souvent pour illustrer mes propos ici ou ailleurs.
Hélas, je voulais trouver une de tes célèbres images pour illustrer la surprise. À mon grand désarroi, je n’en ai pas trouvé C’est pour ça que je viens ici pour t’en suggérer la création. Sans doute as-tu plus urgente occupation et trouveras-tu bien cavalière ma démarche, mais si tu as le temps de t’y pencher, je t’en serai infiniment reconnaissant !
Bien cordialement, Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
File:KGerstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
File:MauriceParisot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nueit-contarela.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nueit-contarela.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
J'ai corrigé le lien vers l'image source [5], tu pourrais vérifier si c'est bien le bon ? --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 15:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Moi je trouve ton « bidouillage infâme » excellent. Merci de m'avoir répondu (même si je devrais te réclamer deux mois et demi de pénalités de retard ). --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 17:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Du coup j'ai reformaté la description selon les canons actuels de Commons (en particulier en citant les auteurs des images originales) [6]. Amitiés. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 18:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Et changé la licence, car File:All_Gizah_Pyramids.jpg ne permet que la CC-BY-SA-2.0. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 18:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Lectoure-MonumentauxMorts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Your file was used in Popular Science
editSee [7] ;-) Hurricanefan24 (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
File:KGerstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Poeticbent talk 21:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- As you say, you don't care if the file is deleted. But keep in mind the file is widely used, and the two previous DRs were resolved to keep. Also, the nominator presented very weak reasons for deleting the file, so is highly probable the file will be kept again (unless you are not the actual copyright holder of the drawing...). Anyway, is important to contact OTRS, because the file is not only yours, is part of the community and a good drawing to illustrate the subject in the several WP pages that is used. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- As you followed the OTRS process, please place
{{subst:OP}}
in the description of the file, to indicate the file has OTRS pending. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)- OK, I do this. I suppose it needs a rather long time before obtaining the response? Thanks. --Morburre (talk) 17:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- As you followed the OTRS process, please place
Source ?
editBonjour. Je souhaitais juste connaître la raison de ta modification dans cette description d'image. J'avais trouvé cette source issu de la bibliothèque qui indiquait bien "albigeois" (ainsi que le texte du document original, juste sous l'image), mais peut-être as-tu d'autres sources par ailleurs. Merci d'avance. Mel22 (talk) 13:28, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Effectivement, merci pour cette précision. En fait, après vérification, même le texte original parle de bien de « tous les hommes et les femmes du pays et des villes voisines qui là estoient ». Mel22 (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Bonjour, La licence et la description de ce fichier sont incorrectes. Il faut mentionner le nom du peintre, et vérifier qu'il est bien mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Si vous avez scanné ces cartes vous-mêmes, il serait utile de vérifier le dos de celles-ci. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Charles Joisten ((1936-1981), conservateur au Musée dauphinois de 1970 à 1981.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Charles Joisten ((1936-1981), conservateur au Musée dauphinois de 1970 à 1981.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, I didn’t upload this picture, I just modified it after it was uploades by musee dauphinois. The rights on the pictures may be detained by the Musée Dauphinois in Grenoble (France) or more precisely by Alice Joisten, widow of Charles Joisten. I try to contact somebody there. 06:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Jarekt (talk) 11:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
File:SantQuircTaull2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Can you help creating an ambigram, please?
editHi! I saw you as an author of "WIKIPEDIA" ambigram. That's a cool thing! I'm looking for someone to create one for "ВІКІПЕДІЯ" which is the same in Cyrillic. And I thought maybe you can help… 'cause no one from my friends can do it. What do you think? -- Ата (talk) 10:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
2017
editbonne année à toi, ô excellent dessinateur qui égaie chaque jour des pages de WP ou vikidia par tes croquis. Je fais de la catégorie, ici depuis quelques semaines.--Macassar (talk) 13:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Overcategorising
editI noticed you added a parent category to images that were already in a subcategory. We don't usually do that, so I have removed those I happened to notice, such as some images that were in Category:Château gascon. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 10:25, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. --Morburre (talk) 10:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- No problem. Merci beaucoup. Ww2censor (talk) 11:43, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
26 avril
editFile:LegalPictureOfTheLouvreAndThePyramid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |