An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 34445484 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2868 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 895894837 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Baggett v. Bullitt, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Clark (en)
dbp:fullname
  • Baggett, et al. v. Bullitt, et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • A State cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Goldberg (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Baggett v. Bullitt (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • White (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior
  • Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 360 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 377 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Baggett v. Bullitt (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Baggett, et al. v. Bullitt, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
  NODES