About: Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the Sixteenth Amendment to, the United States Constitution, allowing a federal income tax. The Sixteenth Amendment had been ratified earlier in 1913. The Revenue Act of 1913 imposed income taxes that were not apportioned among the states according to each state's population.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the Sixteenth Amendment to, the United States Constitution, allowing a federal income tax. The Sixteenth Amendment had been ratified earlier in 1913. The Revenue Act of 1913 imposed income taxes that were not apportioned among the states according to each state's population. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 174591 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 12819 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1101845677 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedatea
  • 0001-10-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb
  • 15 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1915 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-01-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1916 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Frank R. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The Sixteenth Amendment removes the requirement that income taxes be apportioned among the states according to population ; the Federal income tax statute does not violate the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against the government taking property without due process of law; the Federal income tax statute does not violate the uniformity clause of Article I, section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • White (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • McReynolds (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 36 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • Dismissed by the District Court for the Southern District of New York (en)
dbp:subsequent
  • None (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 240 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the Sixteenth Amendment to, the United States Constitution, allowing a federal income tax. The Sixteenth Amendment had been ratified earlier in 1913. The Revenue Act of 1913 imposed income taxes that were not apportioned among the states according to each state's population. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Frank R. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
  NODES