An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Ex parte Vallandigham, 68 U.S. (1 Wall.) 243 (1864), is a United States Supreme Court case, involving a former congressman Clement Vallandigham of Ohio, who had violated an Army order against the public expression of sympathy for the Confederate States and their cause. Vallandigham was tried before a military tribunal by Major General Ambrose E. Burnside for treason after he delivered an incendiary speech at Mount Vernon; he then appealed the tribunal's verdict to the Supreme Court, arguing that he as a civilian could not be tried before a military tribunal.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Ex parte Vallandigham, 68 U.S. (1 Wall.) 243 (1864), is a United States Supreme Court case, involving a former congressman Clement Vallandigham of Ohio, who had violated an Army order against the public expression of sympathy for the Confederate States and their cause. Vallandigham was tried before a military tribunal by Major General Ambrose E. Burnside for treason after he delivered an incendiary speech at Mount Vernon; he then appealed the tribunal's verdict to the Supreme Court, arguing that he as a civilian could not be tried before a military tribunal. In February 1864, the Supreme Court avoided ruling on the question by instead unanimously holding that they could not take appeals from military tribunals at all. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 22613854 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6557 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1068148281 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1864 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Ex parte Vallandigham, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Nelson joined by Grier, Field (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1864 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Ex parte Clement Vallandigham (en)
dbp:holding
  • The Supreme Court of the United States has no power to review by certiorari the proceedings of a military commission ordered by a general officer of the United States Army, commanding a military department. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Taney, Catron, Clifford, Swayne, Davis (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Ex parte Vallandigham (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Wayne (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Miller (en)
dbp:openjurist
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • This case arose on the petition of Clement L. Vallandigham for a certiorari, to be directed to the Judge Advocate General of the Army of the United States, to send up to the Court, for its review, the proceedings of a military commission, by which Vallandigham had been tried and sentenced to imprisonment. (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 243 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 68 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Ex parte Vallandigham, 68 U.S. (1 Wall.) 243 (1864), is a United States Supreme Court case, involving a former congressman Clement Vallandigham of Ohio, who had violated an Army order against the public expression of sympathy for the Confederate States and their cause. Vallandigham was tried before a military tribunal by Major General Ambrose E. Burnside for treason after he delivered an incendiary speech at Mount Vernon; he then appealed the tribunal's verdict to the Supreme Court, arguing that he as a civilian could not be tried before a military tribunal. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Ex parte Vallandigham (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Ex parteClement Vallandigham (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
  NODES