| dbo:abstract
|
- Fraser v Her Majesty's Advocate (2011) UKSC 24 is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom relating to the effect of non-disclosure of evidence to the defence at trial and the role of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Scots criminal law. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 11289 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:imagesize
| |
| dbp:judges
|
- Lord Hope of Craighead , Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore and Lord Dyson (en)
|
| dbp:keywords
|
- Fairness, Disclosure Article 6 of ECHR, devolution issues (en)
|
| dbp:name
|
- Fraser v Her Majesty's Advocate (en)
|
| dbp:opinions
|
- Lord Hope of Craighead and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood (en)
|
| dbp:priorActions
|
- Fraser v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2009] ScotHC HCJAC 27 (en)
|
| dbp:subsequentActions
|
- Re-trial of the appellant Fraser (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Fraser v Her Majesty's Advocate (2011) UKSC 24 is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom relating to the effect of non-disclosure of evidence to the defence at trial and the role of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Scots criminal law. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Fraser v HM Advocate (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
