dbo:abstract
|
- R v Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534 is an English case in which the Court for Crown Cases Reserved found that a bare-knuckle fight was an assault occasioning actual bodily harm, despite the consent of the participants. This marked the end of widespread public bare-knuckle contests in England. The case also found that voluntary attendance as a spectator was evidence that could be put to the jury to support a charge of aiding and abetting the assault. It was found however that an ordinary citizen is not under any duty to prevent an offence being committed and that failing to prevent it does not create liability as an accomplice. (en)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 2814 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:citations
| |
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:fullName
|
- The Queen v Coney and others (en)
|
dbp:judges
|
- Lord Coleridge, Chief Justice, Messieurs Justices Cave, Matthew, Stephens, Lopes, North, Hawkins, Manisty, Denman, Lord Huddleston, Lord Pollock (en)
|
dbp:keywords
|
- (en)
- Actual bodily harm (en)
- bare-knuckle fighting in public place (en)
- brutal sport (en)
- prize-fighting (en)
- propensity to result in actual or grievous bodily harm (en)
|
dbp:name
| |
dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
dbp:priorActions
|
- Referral from Magistrates Court ; Divisional Court in turn referred matter to Crown Cases Reserved (en)
|
dbp:subsequentActions
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- R v Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534 is an English case in which the Court for Crown Cases Reserved found that a bare-knuckle fight was an assault occasioning actual bodily harm, despite the consent of the participants. This marked the end of widespread public bare-knuckle contests in England. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |