An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

The Trade-Mark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1879), were a set of three cases consolidated into a single appeal before the United States Supreme Court, which in 1879 unanimously ruled that the Copyright Clause of the Constitution gave Congress no power to protect or regulate trademarks. Congress then passed the , which was based on the Commerce Clause power, and therefore passed constitutional muster. The opinion was written by Justice Samuel Freeman Miller.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • The Trade-Mark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1879), were a set of three cases consolidated into a single appeal before the United States Supreme Court, which in 1879 unanimously ruled that the Copyright Clause of the Constitution gave Congress no power to protect or regulate trademarks. Congress then passed the , which was based on the Commerce Clause power, and therefore passed constitutional muster. The three cases were United States v. Steffens, United States v. Wittemann, and United States v. Johnson. Steffens and Wittemann dealt with alleged counterfeiting of marks associated with champagne, while Johnson dealt with alleged counterfeiting of a mark associated with whiskey. The opinion was written by Justice Samuel Freeman Miller. The Court did not exclude all possibility of Congress regulating trademarks. Congress, however, read the decision very strictly and in a new trademark law enacted in 1881 regulated only trademarks used in commerce with foreign nations, and with the Indian tribes, areas specified under the Commerce Clause. It was not until 1905 that Congress would again enact a trademark law generally governing marks in use in the United States, though the 1905 act was also carefully worded to fall within the Commerce Clause. (en)
dbo:argueDate
  • 1879-10-22 (xsd:date)
dbo:decideDate
  • 1879-11-17 (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 19277485 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3929 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1104956853 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 1879-10-22 (xsd:date)
dbp:case
  • Trade-Mark Casess, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 1879-11-17 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • 705 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • United States v. Steffens; United States v. Wittemann; United States v. Johnson (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The Copyright Clause of the Constitution does not give Congress power to protect or regulate trademarks. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Clifford, Swayne, Field, Strong, Bradley, Hunt, Waite, Harlan (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • In re Trade-Mark Cases (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Miller (en)
dbp:openjurist
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 25 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 82 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 100 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • The Trade-Mark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1879), were a set of three cases consolidated into a single appeal before the United States Supreme Court, which in 1879 unanimously ruled that the Copyright Clause of the Constitution gave Congress no power to protect or regulate trademarks. Congress then passed the , which was based on the Commerce Clause power, and therefore passed constitutional muster. The opinion was written by Justice Samuel Freeman Miller. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Trade-Mark Cases (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States v. Steffens; United States v. Wittemann; United States v. Johnson (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
  NODES