dbo:abstract
|
- United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h). (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 2862 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-04-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- United States v. Davila, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- United States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- United States v. Davila (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:ref
| |
dbp:reference
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h). (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- United States v. Davila (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- United States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |