dbo:abstract
|
- United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (1985), was an important decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court explained how long police are permitted to stop vehicles as part of an investigatory stop before violating the Fourth Amendment. A seven-member majority of the Court determined the twenty minute stop in this case was legal, so the government won. However, the Court declined to adopt a bright line rule, deciding instead that "common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria." The Court announced that the rule for determining whether a detention is too long will depend on whether the police "diligently pursued" an investigation to quickly confirm or dispel their suspicions. The Court clarified that judges should avoid "unrealistic second-guessing" of police and should take into account "swiftly developing situation[s]." Sharpe has been frequently cited, and is the framework used to challenge unduly prolonged police stops in thousands of criminal cases. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 20297 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- United States v. Sharpe, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
|
- Marshall (en)
- Blackmun (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
|
- Stevens (en)
- Brennan (en)
|
dbp:fullname
|
- United States v. William Harris Sharpe and Donald Davis Savage (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- United States v. Sharpe (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
|
- 105 (xsd:integer)
- 172800.0 (dbd:second)
|
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (1985), was an important decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court explained how long police are permitted to stop vehicles as part of an investigatory stop before violating the Fourth Amendment. A seven-member majority of the Court determined the twenty minute stop in this case was legal, so the government won. However, the Court declined to adopt a bright line rule, deciding instead that "common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria." The Court announced that the rule for determining whether a detention is too long will depend on whether the police "diligently pursued" an investigation to quickly confirm or dispel their suspicions. The Court clarified that judges should avoid "unrealistic second-guessing" of (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- United States v. Sharpe (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- United States v. William Harris Sharpe and Donald Davis Savage (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |