An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

The usual judgment is a single-winner electoral system invented by Adrien Fabre, a French social scientist, in 2019. It is a highest median voting method, a system of cardinal voting in which the winner is decided by the median rather than the mean. Just like the majority judgment, the usual judgment uses verbal appreciations − Bad, Inadequate, Passable, Fair, Good, Very Good, Excellent − rather than numerical to evaluates the candidates or options. However, the usual judgment uses a more reliable method to break ties between candidates.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • El juicio usual es un modo de escrutinio inventado por Adrien Fabre, investigador francés en economía, en 2019.​ Es un : un sistema de que se distingue por la determinación del ganador por la mediana antes que la media. Como el en el que está inspirado, el juicio usual utiliza apreciaciones verbales − por ejemplo : Excelente, Muy Bien, Bien, Bastante Bien, Regular, Insuficiente, A Rechazar − antes que numéricas para evaluar los candidatos o opciones.​ El juicio usual utiliza no obstante un método más fiable para desempatar las igualdades entre candidatos.​ (es)
  • Le jugement usuel est un mode de scrutin inventé par Adrien Fabre, chercheur français en économie, en 2019. C’est une méthode de la meilleure médiane : un système de vote par valeurs qui se distingue par la détermination du gagnant par la médiane plutôt que la moyenne. Comme le jugement majoritaire dont il est inspiré, le jugement usuel utilise des appréciations verbales plutôt que numériques pour évaluer les candidats ou options. Le jugement usuel utilise cependant, selon son inventeur, une méthode plus fiable pour départager les égalités entre candidats. (fr)
  • The usual judgment is a single-winner electoral system invented by Adrien Fabre, a French social scientist, in 2019. It is a highest median voting method, a system of cardinal voting in which the winner is decided by the median rather than the mean. Just like the majority judgment, the usual judgment uses verbal appreciations − Bad, Inadequate, Passable, Fair, Good, Very Good, Excellent − rather than numerical to evaluates the candidates or options. However, the usual judgment uses a more reliable method to break ties between candidates. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 65472385 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 17363 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1111477170 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:above
  • Part of the politics and election series (en)
dbp:group
dbp:list
  • * Approval voting ** Combined approval voting ** Unified Primary * Borda count * Bucklin voting * Contingent vote ** Supplementary vote * Condorcet methods ** Copeland's method ** Dodgson's method ** Kemeny–Young method ** Minimax Condorcet ** Nanson's method ** Ranked pairs ** Schulze method * Exhaustive ballot * First-past-the-post voting * Instant-runoff (ranked choice) voting ** Coombs' method * Majority judgment * Simple majoritarianism * Plurality * Positional voting system * Score voting * STAR voting * Two-round system * Usual judgment (en)
  • * Condorcet criterion * Condorcet loser criterion * Consistency criterion * Independence of clones * Independence of irrelevant alternatives * Independence of Smith-dominated alternatives * Later-no-harm criterion * Majority criterion * Majority loser criterion * Monotonicity criterion * Mutual majority criterion * Pareto efficiency * Participation criterion * Plurality criterion * Resolvability criterion * Reversal symmetry * Smith criterion (en)
  • * Ballot * Election threshold * First-preference votes * Spoilt vote * Sortition (en)
  • * Parallel voting * Single non-transferable vote * Cumulative voting * Limited voting * Proportional approval voting * Sequential proportional approval voting * Satisfaction approval voting * Alternative vote plus (en)
  • * CPO-STV * Dual member * Hare-Clark * Highest averages method ** Webster/Sainte-Laguë ** D'Hondt * Largest remainder method * Mixed-member * Party-list * Schulze STV * Single transferable vote (en)
  • * Droop quota * Hagenbach-Bischoff quota * Hare quota * Imperiali quota (en)
  • * Comparison of voting systems * Voting systems by country (en)
dbp:listclass
  • hlist (en)
dbp:name
  • Voting systems (en)
dbp:state
  • collapsed (en)
dbp:title
  • Electoral systems (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • El juicio usual es un modo de escrutinio inventado por Adrien Fabre, investigador francés en economía, en 2019.​ Es un : un sistema de que se distingue por la determinación del ganador por la mediana antes que la media. Como el en el que está inspirado, el juicio usual utiliza apreciaciones verbales − por ejemplo : Excelente, Muy Bien, Bien, Bastante Bien, Regular, Insuficiente, A Rechazar − antes que numéricas para evaluar los candidatos o opciones.​ El juicio usual utiliza no obstante un método más fiable para desempatar las igualdades entre candidatos.​ (es)
  • Le jugement usuel est un mode de scrutin inventé par Adrien Fabre, chercheur français en économie, en 2019. C’est une méthode de la meilleure médiane : un système de vote par valeurs qui se distingue par la détermination du gagnant par la médiane plutôt que la moyenne. Comme le jugement majoritaire dont il est inspiré, le jugement usuel utilise des appréciations verbales plutôt que numériques pour évaluer les candidats ou options. Le jugement usuel utilise cependant, selon son inventeur, une méthode plus fiable pour départager les égalités entre candidats. (fr)
  • The usual judgment is a single-winner electoral system invented by Adrien Fabre, a French social scientist, in 2019. It is a highest median voting method, a system of cardinal voting in which the winner is decided by the median rather than the mean. Just like the majority judgment, the usual judgment uses verbal appreciations − Bad, Inadequate, Passable, Fair, Good, Very Good, Excellent − rather than numerical to evaluates the candidates or options. However, the usual judgment uses a more reliable method to break ties between candidates. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Juicio usual (es)
  • Jugement usuel (fr)
  • Usual judgment (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
  NODES
todo 2