Abstract

LocDB is a manually curated database with experimental annotations for the subcellular localizations of proteins in Homo sapiens (HS, human) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AT, thale cress). Currently, it contains entries for 19 604 UniProt proteins (HS: 13 342; AT: 6262). Each database entry contains the experimentally derived localization in Gene Ontology (GO) terminology, the experimental annotation of localization, localization predictions by state-of-the-art methods and, where available, the type of experimental information. LocDB is searchable by keyword, protein name and subcellular compartment, as well as by identifiers from UniProt, Ensembl and TAIR resources. In comparison to other public databases, LocDB as a resource adds about 10 000 experimental localization annotations for HS proteins and ∼900 for AS proteins. Over 40% of the proteins in LocDB have multiple localization annotations providing a better platform for development of new multiple localization prediction methods with higher coverage and accuracy. Links to all referenced databases are provided. LocDB will be updated regularly by our group (available at: http://www.rostlab.org/services/locDB ).

INTRODUCTION

Proteins are the fundamental functional components of the machinery of life. The particular cellular compartment, in which they reside, i.e. their native subcellular localization, is a key feature that characterizes their physiological functions. Many careful, hypothesis-driven experimental studies have been contributing to our large body of annotations of cellular compartments ( 1–5 ). Recently, high-throughput experiments have stepped up to the challenge to increase the amount of annotations ( 6–15 ). These data sets capture aspects of protein function and, more generally, of global cellular processes.

UniProt (release 2010_07) ( 16 ) constitutes the most comprehensive and, arguably, the most accurate resource with experimental annotations of subcellular localization. However, even this excellent resource remains incomplete for the proteomes from Homo sapiens (HS) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AT): of the 20 282 human proteins in Swiss-Prot ( 17 ), 14 502 have annotations of localization (72%), but for only 3720 (18%) these annotations are experimental. Similarly, of the 9099 AT proteins only 1495 (17%) have experimental annotations of localization. While LocDB stands on and roots UniProtKB, it encompasses this giant and adds specific value by collecting information about subcellular localization from the primary literature and from other databases. These data are enriched by annotations, links and predictions.

DATA SET

Curated entries with experimental data

LocDB contains experimental annotations for subcellular localization of 19 604 UniProt proteins; 13 342 of these are from Homo sapiens [10 102 Swiss-Prot and 3240 TrEMBL ( 17 )] and 6262 from AT (3466 Swiss-Prot, 2796 TrEMBL). This raises the experimental annotations for human from 3720 (18%) to 13 342 (66%), and for thale cress from 1495 (16% of the UniProt subset of AT; note that this subset may constitute as little as 30% of all AT proteins) to 6262 (69% of the UniProt subset of AT). We classify all proteins according to the Gene Ontology ( 18 ) (GO) hierarchy into 12 primary classes of subcellular localization, i.e. use the following classes: cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, endosome, extracellular, Golgi apparatus, mitochondrion, nucleus, peroxisome, plasma membrane, plastid, vacuole and vesicles ( Table 1 ). The proteins are further classified in subclasses of above primary classes denoted as secondary protein localizations, for example, protein RL21_HUMAN is experimentally annotated to be localized in primary: Nucleus and Secondary: Nucleolus.

Table 1.

Comparison between different localization annotation resources a

Subcellular localizationHomo sapiens
Arabidopsis thaliana
LocDBLOCATEUniprot (2010_07)LocDBSUBA IIUniprot (2010_07)
Cytoplasm478710541194912452161
Endoplasmic reticulum102736718529228552
Endosome4094486561016
Extracellular2266380331888
Golgi apparatus90950313417917151
Mitochondrion884282151724700164
Nucleus45602705118111041031326
Peroxisome1311282124026523
Plasma membrane3940170287818353189449
Plastid incl. chloroplast24201945267
Vacuole2972503486284935
Vesicles25899341
Subcellular localizationHomo sapiens
Arabidopsis thaliana
LocDBLOCATEUniprot (2010_07)LocDBSUBA IIUniprot (2010_07)
Cytoplasm478710541194912452161
Endoplasmic reticulum102736718529228552
Endosome4094486561016
Extracellular2266380331888
Golgi apparatus90950313417917151
Mitochondrion884282151724700164
Nucleus45602705118111041031326
Peroxisome1311282124026523
Plasma membrane3940170287818353189449
Plastid incl. chloroplast24201945267
Vacuole2972503486284935
Vesicles25899341

a The numbers in columns show the number of experimentally annotated proteins in each subcellular location in the resources LocDB, LOCATE ( 1 ), SUBA ( 4 ) and UniProt (2010_07) release ( 16 ).

Table 1.

Comparison between different localization annotation resources a

Subcellular localizationHomo sapiens
Arabidopsis thaliana
LocDBLOCATEUniprot (2010_07)LocDBSUBA IIUniprot (2010_07)
Cytoplasm478710541194912452161
Endoplasmic reticulum102736718529228552
Endosome4094486561016
Extracellular2266380331888
Golgi apparatus90950313417917151
Mitochondrion884282151724700164
Nucleus45602705118111041031326
Peroxisome1311282124026523
Plasma membrane3940170287818353189449
Plastid incl. chloroplast24201945267
Vacuole2972503486284935
Vesicles25899341
Subcellular localizationHomo sapiens
Arabidopsis thaliana
LocDBLOCATEUniprot (2010_07)LocDBSUBA IIUniprot (2010_07)
Cytoplasm478710541194912452161
Endoplasmic reticulum102736718529228552
Endosome4094486561016
Extracellular2266380331888
Golgi apparatus90950313417917151
Mitochondrion884282151724700164
Nucleus45602705118111041031326
Peroxisome1311282124026523
Plasma membrane3940170287818353189449
Plastid incl. chloroplast24201945267
Vacuole2972503486284935
Vesicles25899341

a The numbers in columns show the number of experimentally annotated proteins in each subcellular location in the resources LocDB, LOCATE ( 1 ), SUBA ( 4 ) and UniProt (2010_07) release ( 16 ).

Statistics

Each entry in LocDB has some experimental localization data. However, we have explicit annotations of a particular experiment type for only 25% of the entries. This is a work in progress as, curation is tedious and manual, and we are planning to update details regarding experiments with every new release of LocDB. Most annotations in LocDB are for the nucleus (20%), cytoplasm (20%) and the plasma membrane (20%). Almost two in three of all HS proteins are annotated in one of the largest three compartments (23% nucleus, 25% cytoplasm, 20% plasma membrane). Similarly, two in three of the AT proteins fall into one of the compartments (28% plastid (incl. chloroplast), 21% plasma membrane, 13% nucleus). The distribution of proteins within each region is accessible from the LocDB statistics page http://www.rostlab.org/services/locDB/statistics.php .

Multiple localizations

Many proteins travel, i.e. they stay in more than one subcellular localization at one point of their ‘life’. Most proteins annotated by traditional detailed biochemical experiments, point to one single compartment as the major native environment of each protein ( 19 ) . By contrast, most high-throughput experiments identify most proteins in more than one compartment. Clearly, high-throughput experiments are noisy. Nevertheless, are noisy large-scale experiments closer to the truth than small-scale approaches? The answer remains unclear. About 40% of the LocDB entries have experimental evidence for more than one localization. This may imply that 60% of all proteins are primarily native to a single compartment. In fact, previous analyses suggest a similar value ( 19 ). However, this does not imply that only 40% of the proteins ever ‘travel through’ more than one compartment: many traveling proteins are likely not captured in the experimental data due to limited coverage and limitations in the experimental resolution (false negatives). On the other hand, some fraction of this 40% of proteins evidenced in several localizations may also indicate experimental errors (false positives). It remains unclear how to weigh those effects.

Most proteins unique

LocDB also clusters proteins into families or groups of related proteins ( Figure 1 ). For instance, 1160 (8%) of all HS proteins and 74 (1%) of all AS proteins have more than 98 percentage pair wise sequence identity (PIDE) to another protein in the data set. Clustering at PIDE<25% yields 5587 proteins in HS (42%) and 2744 proteins in AS (47%). This implies that conversely about 7755 proteins annotated in HS and 3518 in AT are sequence-unique at the 25% PIDE threshold. The percentage of proteins with multiple localizations is higher when considering sequence-unique subsets, e.g. while 40% of all proteins are annotated with multiple localizations, 4.6% of those clustered at 98% PIDE and 45% of those clustered at 25% PIDE.

 Clustering of LocDB. We clustered the LocDB entries by BLASTclust ( 26 ) to explore whether or not some families are highly over-represented in LocDB, and found that they are not. For instance, 46% of HS and 43% of AT proteins in LocDB have levels of PIDE <25%, i.e. differ substantially in sequence. On the other end of the spectrum, only 8% of HS and 1% of AT proteins are very similar to each other (PIDE >98%). Note that levels of PIDE>70% usually suffice to infer similarity in localization at levels of about 75% ( 31 ), i.e. for over 80% of the LocDB entries no other entry could be used to predict localization by homology.
Figure 1.

Clustering of LocDB. We clustered the LocDB entries by BLASTclust ( 26 ) to explore whether or not some families are highly over-represented in LocDB, and found that they are not. For instance, 46% of HS and 43% of AT proteins in LocDB have levels of PIDE <25%, i.e. differ substantially in sequence. On the other end of the spectrum, only 8% of HS and 1% of AT proteins are very similar to each other (PIDE >98%). Note that levels of PIDE>70% usually suffice to infer similarity in localization at levels of about 75% ( 31 ), i.e. for over 80% of the LocDB entries no other entry could be used to predict localization by homology.

Experimental and predicted localization

Each LocDB entry corresponds to one protein, and contains protein identifiers, experimental annotations of protein localization, types of experiments performed and the respective publication PubMed ( 20 ) identifiers, as well as predicted localization annotations from LOCtree ( 19 ), WOLFPSORT ( 21 ), MultiLoc ( 22 ), _targetP ( 23 ), PredictNLS ( 24 ) and Nucpred ( 25 ). Prediction results are given in both basic and detailed formats along with the respective reliability and probability scores ( Figure 2 ).

Example for screen dump from LocDB. The example shows a search with the protein CIPKN_ARATH. Arrows highlight input, output and the distinction between different aspects of the output.
Figure 2.

Example for screen dump from LocDB. The example shows a search with the protein CIPKN_ARATH. Arrows highlight input, output and the distinction between different aspects of the output.

Data mining from primary literature

Data for LocDB are collected from reports of many low- and high-throughput experiments. Citations to the appropriate experiments are displayed on the LocDB protein entry pages. Protein sequences and identifiers from the experimental papers are extracted and BLASTed ( 26 ) against UniProt. The sequences with ≥98% PIDE over the entire sequence are assigned UniProt and Ensembl ( 27 ) identifiers for HS and TAIR ( 28 ) identifiers for AT.

Data mining from external databases

Data are also mined from external databases, e.g. LOCATE ( 1 ), SUBA ( 4 ) and many other resources. LocDB reports all the references with the entries in the database which link directly to their PubMed ( 20 ) abstracts.

Comparison with other resources

Many excellent subcellular localization resources are available with experimental annotations of proteins for HT and AT such as LOCATE ( 1 ) for HT and SUBA ( 4 ) for AT. The comparison and overlap between these resources together with UniProt release (2010_07) are shown in Figure 3 a and b. In addition, the comparison in number of proteins annotated in various compartments in these resources is shown in Table 1 . These comparisons show that we have added ∼10 000 human protein localization annotations and ∼900 Arabidopsis protein localization annotations over LOCATE, SUBA and UniProt.

 Comparison between LocDB, UniProt, LOCATE and SUBA for experimental annotations of protein subcellular localizations. ( a ) The Venn diagram shows that LocDB has added annotations for 9469 HS proteins, not annotated in UniProt (2010_07) release ( 16 ) and LOCATE ( 1 ). ( b ) The Venn diagram shows that LocDB has added annotations for 827 AT proteins, not annotated in UniProt (2010_07) release ( 16 ) and SUBA ( 4 ).
Figure 3.

Comparison between LocDB, UniProt, LOCATE and SUBA for experimental annotations of protein subcellular localizations. ( a ) The Venn diagram shows that LocDB has added annotations for 9469 HS proteins, not annotated in UniProt (2010_07) release ( 16 ) and LOCATE ( 1 ). ( b ) The Venn diagram shows that LocDB has added annotations for 827 AT proteins, not annotated in UniProt (2010_07) release ( 16 ) and SUBA ( 4 ).

As mentioned above, UniProt database contains both experimental and general annotations such as ‘Probable’, ‘By similarity’ and ‘Potential’ for protein subcellular locations. A very high level of discrepancies is found in the annotations for locations involved in secretory pathway such as Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum etc., especially in human proteins (shown in Figure 1 a and b in Supplementary Data ). In Arabidopsis, there is high discrepancy in all the compartments except nucleus and plastid. Comparison with databases DBSubLoc ( 29 ) and eSLDB ( 30 ) is also done; however, they are not shown as the annotations in these resources are mostly derived from Swiss-Prot database.

LocDB will be updated once every 3 months. There is also a provision for users to contribute to the resource by adding information on the contribution page of website as well as by sending an email to locdb@rostlab.org, if they come across any inaccuracies. We will use the database as a portal to access state-of-the-art prediction methods, which will enable users and developers to test prediction methods. We will also add predictions for proteins without experimental annotations that will be clearly marked as predictions. More eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes will be available in future through the database such as Escherichia coli and yeast. Moreover, we plan to add curated protein expression data and protein–protein interaction data in the following versions of locDB.

Availability

LocDB data can be retrieved as individual entries or downloaded as HTML and text files from http://www.rostlab.org/services/locDB . The database is a MySQL database and can be obtained upon request ( locdb@rostlab.org ) as an SQL file.

FUNDING

Funding for open access charge: The National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS; grant R01-GM079767) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Conflict of interest statement . None declared.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are pleased to thank Amos Bairoch (SIB, Geneva), Rolf Apweiler (EBI, Hinxton), Phil Bourne (San Diego University) and their crew for maintaining excellent databases. Furthermore, thanks to all experimentalists who enabled this analysis by making their data publicly available.

REFERENCES

1
Sprenger
J
Lynn Fink
J
Karunaratne
S
Hanson
K
Hamilton
NA
Teasdale
RD
LOCATE: a mammalian protein subcellular localization database
Nucleic Acids Res.
2008
, vol. 
36
 (pg. 
D230
-
D233
)
2
Elstner
M
Andreoli
C
Klopstock
T
Meitinger
T
Prokisch
H
The mitochondrial proteome database: MitoP2
Methods Enzymol.
2009
, vol. 
457
 (pg. 
3
-
20
)
3
Keshava Prasad
TS
Goel
R
Kandasamy
K
Keerthikumar
S
Kumar
S
Mathivanan
S
Telikicherla
D
Raju
R
Shafreen
B
Venugopal
A
et al. 
Human Protein Reference Database – 2009 update
Nucleic Acids Res.
2009
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
D767
-
D772
)
4
Heazlewood
JL
Verboom
RE
Tonti-Filippini
J
Small
I
Millar
AH
SUBA: the Arabidopsis subcellular database
Nucleic Acids Res.
2007
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
D213
-
D218
)
5
Dellaire
G
Farrall
R
Bickmore
WA
The Nuclear Protein Database (NPD): sub-nuclear localisation and functional annotation of the nuclear proteome
Nucleic Acids Res.
2003
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
328
-
330
)
6
Dunkley
TP
Hester
S
Shadforth
IP
Runions
J
Weimar
T
Hanton
SL
Griffin
JL
Bessant
C
Brandizzi
F
Hawes
C
et al. 
Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
2006
, vol. 
103
 (pg. 
6518
-
6523
)
7
Benschop
JJ
Mohammed
S
O'Flaherty
M
Heck
AJ
Slijper
M
Menke
FL
Quantitative phosphoproteomics of early elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis
Mol. Cell Proteomics
2007
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
1198
-
1214
)
8
Zybailov
B
Rutschow
H
Friso
G
Rudella
A
Emanuelsson
O
Sun
Q
van Wijk
KJ
Sorting signals, N-terminal modifications and abundance of the chloroplast proteome
PLoS ONE
2008
, vol. 
3
  
e1994
9
Jaquinod
M
Villiers
F
Kieffer-Jaquinod
S
Hugouvieux
V
Bruley
C
Garin
J
Bourguignon
J
A proteomics dissection of Arabidopsis thaliana vacuoles isolated from cell culture
Mol. Cell. Proteomics
2007
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
394
-
412
)
10
Marmagne
A
Ferro
M
Meinnel
T
Bruley
C
Kuhn
L
Garin
J
Barbier-Brygoo
H
Ephritikhine
G
A high content in lipid-modified peripheral proteins and integral receptor kinases features in the arabidopsis plasma membrane proteome, Mol
Cell. Proteomics
2007
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
1980
-
1996
)
11
Anderson
NL
Polanski
M
Pieper
R
Gatlin
T
Tirumalai
RS
Conrads
TP
Veenstra
TD
Adkins
JN
Pounds
JG
Fagan
R
et al. 
The human plasma proteome: a nonredundant list developed by combination of four separate sources
Mol. Cell Proteomics
2004
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
311
-
326
)
12
Calvo
S
Jain
M
Xie
X
Sheth
SA
Chang
B
Goldberger
OA
Spinazzola
A
Zeviani
M
Carr
SA
Mootha
VK
Systematic identification of human mitochondrial disease genes through integrative genomics
Nat. Genet.
2006
, vol. 
38
 (pg. 
576
-
582
)
13
Leung
AK
Trinkle-Mulcahy
L
Lam
YW
Andersen
JS
Mann
M
Lamond
AI
NOPdb: Nucleolar Proteome Database
Nucleic Acids Res.
2006
, vol. 
34
 (pg. 
D218
-
D220
)
14
Sheng
S
Chen
D
Van Eyk
JE
Multidimensional liquid chromatography separation of intact proteins by chromatographic focusing and reversed phase of the human serum proteome: optimization and protein database
Mol. Cell Proteomics
2006
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
26
-
34
)
15
Gassmann
R
Henzing
AJ
Earnshaw
WC
Novel components of human mitotic chromosomes identified by proteomic analysis of the chromosome scaffold fraction
Chromosoma
2005
, vol. 
113
 (pg. 
385
-
397
)
16
The UniProt Consortium
The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) 2009
Nucleic Acids Res
2009
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
D169
-
D174
)
17
Boeckmann
B
Bairoch
A
Apweiler
R
Blatter
MC
Estreicher
A
Gasteiger
E
Martin
MJ
Michoud
K
O'Donovan
C
Phan
I
et al. 
The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003
Nucleic Acids Res.
2003
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
365
-
370
)
18
Ashburner
M
Ball
CA
Blake
JA
Botstein
D
Butler
H
Cherry
JM
Davis
AP
Dolinski
K
Dwight
SS
Eppig
JT
et al. 
Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium
Nat. Genet.
2000
, vol. 
25
 (pg. 
25
-
29
)
19
Nair
R
Rost
B
Mimicking cellular sorting improves prediction of subcellular localization
J. Mol. Biol.
2005
, vol. 
348
 (pg. 
85
-
100
)
20
NLM
Free Web-based access to NLM databases
NLM Tech. Bull
1997
, vol. 
296
 
21
Horton
P
Park
KJ
Obayashi
T
Fujita
N
Harada
H
Adams-Collier
CJ
Nakai
K
WoLF PSORT: protein localization predictor
Nucleic Acids Res.
2007
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
W585
-
W587
)
22
Hoglund
A
Donnes
P
Blum
T
Adolph
HW
Kohlbacher
O
MultiLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using N-terminal _targeting sequences, sequence motifs and amino acid composition
Bioinformatics
2006
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
1158
-
1165
)
23
Emanuelsson
O
Brunak
S
von Heijne
G
Nielsen
H
Locating proteins in the cell using _targetP, SignalP and related tools
Nat. Protoc.
2007
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
953
-
971
)
24
Cokol
M
Nair
R
Rost
B
Finding nuclear localization signals
EMBO Rep.
2000
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
411
-
415
)
25
Brameier
M
Krings
A
MacCallum
RM
NucPred – predicting nuclear localization of proteins
Bioinformatics
2007
, vol. 
23
 (pg. 
1159
-
1160
)
26
Altschul
SF
Madden
TL
Schaffer
AA
Zhang
J
Zhang
Z
Miller
W
Lipman
DJ
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Nucleic Acids Res.
1997
, vol. 
25
 (pg. 
3389
-
3402
)
27
Hubbard
T
Barker
D
Birney
E
Cameron
G
Chen
Y
Clark
L
Cox
T
Cuff
J
Curwen
V
Down
T
et al. 
The Ensembl genome database project
Nucleic Acids Res.
2002
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
38
-
41
)
28
Garcia-Hernandez
M
Berardini
TZ
Chen
G
Crist
D
Doyle
A
Huala
E
Knee
E
Lambrecht
M
Miller
N
Mueller
LA
et al. 
TAIR: a resource for integrated Arabidopsis data
Funct. Integr. Genomics.
2002
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
239
-
253
)
29
Guo
T
Hua
S
Ji
X
Sun
Z
DBSubLoc: database of protein subcellular localization
Nucleic Acids Res.
2004
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
D122
-
D124
)
30
Pierleoni
A
Martelli
PL
Fariselli
P
Casadio
R
eSLDB: eukaryotic subcellular localization database
Nucleic Acids Res.
2007
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
D208
-
D212
)
31
Nair
R
Rost
B
Sequence conserved for subcellular localization
Protein Sci.
2002
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
2836
-
2847
)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.