Generic placeholder image

Current Cardiology Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-403X
ISSN (Online): 1875-6557

Review Article

Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?

Author(s): Kenneth Nugent*, Gilbert Berdine and Camilo Pena

Volume 18, Issue 5, 2022

Published on: 18 April, 2022

Article ID: e040322201771 Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573403X18666220304202556

Price: $65

Abstract

The management of sepsis requires the rapid administration of fluid to support blood pressure and tissue perfusion. Guidelines suggest that patients should receive 30 ml per kg of fluid over the first one to three hours of management. The next concern is to determine which patients need additional fluid. This introduces the concept of fluid responsiveness, defined by an increase in cardiac output following the administration of a fluid bolus. Dynamic tests, measuring cardiac output, identify fluid responders better than static tests. Passive leg raising tests provide an alternative approach to determine fluid responsiveness without administering fluid. However, one small randomized trial demonstrated that patients managed with frequent passive leg raising tests had a smaller net fluid balance at 72 hours and reduced requirements for renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation, but no change in mortality. A meta-analysis including 4 randomized control trials reported that resuscitation guided by fluid responsiveness does not improve mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis. Recent studies have demonstrated that the early administration of norepinephrine may improve outcomes in patients with sepsis. The concept of fluid responsiveness helps clinicians analyze the clinical status of patients, but this information must be integrated into the overall management of the patient. This review considers the use and benefit of fluid responsiveness tests to direct fluid administration in patients with sepsis.

Keywords: Sepsis, fluid responsiveness, passive leg raising, norepinephrine, hypotension, hemodynamic parameters.

Graphical Abstract
[1]
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44(6): 925-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0] [PMID: 29675566]
[2]
Chaudhuri D, Herritt B, Lewis K, et al. Dosing fluids in early septic shock. Chest 2021; 159(4): 1493-502.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.269] [PMID: 33058814]
[3]
Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, MacLean K, Sirounis D, Ayas NT. Will this hemodynamically unstable patient respond to a bolus of intravenous fluids? JAMA 2016; 316(12): 1298-309.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12310] [PMID: 27673307]
[4]
Douglas IS, Alapat PM, Corl KA, et al. Fluid response evaluation in sepsis hypotension and shock: A randomized clinical trial. Chest 2020; 158(4): 1431-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.025] [PMID: 32353418]
[5]
Monnet X, Jabot J, Maizel J, Richard C, Teboul JL. Norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and reduces preload dependency assessed by passive leg raising in septic shock patients. Crit Care Med 2011; 39(4): 689-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206d2a3] [PMID: 21263328]
[6]
Foulon P, De Backer D. The hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine: Far more than an increase in blood pressure! Ann Transl Med 2018; 6(Suppl. 1): S25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.09.27] [PMID: 30613600]
[7]
Beurton A, Teboul JL, Girotto V, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension is responsible for false negatives to the passive leg raising test. Crit Care Med 2019; 47(8): e639-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003808] [PMID: 31306258]
[8]
Ehrman RR, Gallien JZ, Smith RK, et al. Resuscitation guided by volume responsiveness does not reduce mortality in sepsis: A meta-analysis. Crit Care Explor 2019; 1(5)e0015
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000015] [PMID: 32166259]
[9]
Cooke K, Sharvill R, Sondergaard S, Aneman A. Volume responsiveness assessed by passive leg raising and a fluid challenge: A critical review focused on mean systemic filling pressure. Anaesthesia 2018; 73(3): 313-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14162] [PMID: 29171669]
[10]
Mansoori JN, Linde-Zwirble W, Hou PC, Havranek EP, Douglas IS. Variability in usual care fluid resuscitation and risk-adjusted out-comes for mechanically ventilated patients in shock. Crit Care 2020; 24(1): 25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2734-9] [PMID: 31992351]
[11]
Marik PE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Bittner EA, Sahatjian J, Hansell D. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: An analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43(5): 625-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y] [PMID: 28130687]
[12]
Jagan N, Morrow LE, Walters RW, et al. Sepsis, the administration of IV fluids, and respiratory failure: A retrospective analysis-SAIFR Study. Chest 2021; 159(4): 1437-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.078] [PMID: 33197405]
[13]
Klein Klouwenberg PMC, Spitoni C, van der Poll T, Bonten MJ, Cremer OL. MARS consortium Predicting the clinical trajectory in critical-ly ill patients with sepsis: A cohort study. Crit Care 2019; 23(1): 408.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2687-z] [PMID: 31831072]
[14]
Permpikul C, Tongyoo S, Viarasilpa T, Trainarongsakul T, Chakorn T, Udompanturak S. Early use of norepinephrine in septic shock resuscitation (CENSER). a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 199(9): 1097-105.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC] [PMID: 30704260]
[15]
Ospina-Tascón GA, Hernandez G, Alvarez I, et al. Effects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock: A propensity score-based analysis. Crit Care 2020; 24(1): 52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2756-3] [PMID: 32059682]
[16]
Li Y, Li H, Zhang D. Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2020; 24(1): 488.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03204-x] [PMID: 32762765]
[17]
Hamzaoui O, Shi R. Early norepinephrine use in septic shock. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12(Suppl. 1): S72-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.50] [PMID: 32148928]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy
  NODES
admin 16
Idea 1
idea 1
INTERN 1
Note 1