Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success
- PMID: 14752967
- DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000091140.76130.a1
Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effects of the biomechanical aspects of dental implant design on the quality and strength of osseointegration, the bone-implant interface, and their relationships to the long-term success of dental implants. The engineering design of implants is based on many interrelated factors, including the geometry of the implant, mechanical properties, and the initial and long-term stability of the implant-tissue interface. There is no one "optimal" design criterion. However, implants can be engineered to maximize strength, interfacial stability, and load transfer by using different materials, surfaces, and thread designs. Limited information is currently available in addressing how implant thread design influences the overall implant success. Therefore, this article reviews and discusses design elements of various dental implant systems currently in use as they affect the quality of osseointegration and their relationship to overall long-term success patterns.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.Clin Mater. 1992;10(3):153-201. doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-y. Clin Mater. 1992. PMID: 10149982 Review.
-
The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1317-26. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4091. Epub 2015 Oct 16. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015. PMID: 26478976
-
Distribution of micromotion in implants and alveolar bone with different thread profiles in immediate loading: a finite element study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):e96-101. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012. PMID: 23189316
-
Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):383-92. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012. PMID: 22442779
-
Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: part II.Implant Dent. 2004 Dec;13(4):310-21. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000148556.73137.24. Implant Dent. 2004. PMID: 15591992 Review.
Cited by
-
Macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of a new implant design supporting immediately loaded full arch rehabilitation.Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012 Apr;3(2):44-50. Epub 2012 Aug 9. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012. PMID: 23087785 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of implant design on primary stability using torque-time curves in artificial bone.Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40729-015-0024-0. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Int J Implant Dent. 2015. PMID: 27747643 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Single Tooth Implant Placement in the Mandibular Region: A Case Report.Cureus. 2024 Aug 7;16(8):e66379. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66379. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39246892 Free PMC article.
-
Soft Tissue Interface with Various Kinds of Implant Abutment Materials.J Clin Med. 2021 May 28;10(11):2386. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112386. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34071480 Free PMC article.
-
Novel Design and Finite Element Analysis of Diamond-like Porous Implants with Low Stiffness.Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 16;14(22):6918. doi: 10.3390/ma14226918. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34832321 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
