The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis
- PMID: 2002427
- DOI: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis
Abstract
The predictability of branemark implants has been well documented. High success rates in the maxilla and mandible in fully and partially edentulous patients can be expected. A host of factors may be attributed to the etiology of fixture loss. However, the quality of bone stands out as the single greatest determinant in fixture loss. Types I, II, and III bone offer good strength. Type IV bone has a thin cortex and poor medullary strength with low trabecular density. Ninety percent of 1,054 implants placed were in Types I, II, and III bone. Only 3% of these fixtures were lost; of the 10% of the fixtures placed in Type IV bone, 35% failed. Presurgical determination of Type IV bone may be one method to decrease implant failure.
Similar articles
-
Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1254-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01586.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. PMID: 19040440 Clinical Trial.
-
Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Summer;6(2):142-6. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991. PMID: 1809668
-
Success and failure rates of cylinder implants in type IV bone.J Periodontol. 1993 Nov;64(11):1085-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.11.1085. J Periodontol. 1993. PMID: 8295096
-
Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Apr;31(4):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00527.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2004. PMID: 15016259 Clinical Trial.
-
Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Fall;5(3):272-81. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990. PMID: 2098330 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of mandibular bone mineral density using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry technique in edentulous subjects living in an endemic fluorosis region.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Jul;41(5):405-10. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/20380362. Epub 2012 Jan 12. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22241885 Free PMC article.
-
An animal study on the bone behaviour of Ca-P-coated implants: influence of implant location.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997 Sep;8(9):531-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1018542630017. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997. PMID: 15348704
-
Biomechanical Evaluation of Bone Atrophy and Implant Length in Four Implants Supporting Mandibular Full-Arch-Fixed Dentures.Materials (Basel). 2022 May 4;15(9):3295. doi: 10.3390/ma15093295. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35591628 Free PMC article.
-
Dental implants installed in irradiated jaws: a systematic review.J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):119S-30S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513504947. Epub 2013 Oct 24. J Dent Res. 2013. PMID: 24158336 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of different implant placement techniques to improve primary implant stability in low-density bone: A systematic review.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):11-16. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_244_18. Epub 2020 Jan 27. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020. PMID: 32089594 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
