Viewpoint
Street and working children (SWC) globally are among the most vulnerable to violence, exploitation and exposure to hazardous and toxic environments. As such, they experience profound violations of their human rights. This is a global crisis with the burden being disproportionately borne by the low-income and middle-income countries. By prioritising the rights, health, development and well-being of these children, a future can be created where they have opportunities to thrive.
The United Nations (UN) Committee on the Rights of the Child, in its General Comment (GC) 21,1 provides authoritative guidance to states on developing comprehensive, long-term national strategies for children in street situations using a holistic, child rights-based approach. The GC defines the term ‘children in street situations’ as comprising children who depend on the streets to live and/or work, whether alone, with peers or with family; as well as a wider population of children who have formed strong connections with public spaces and for whom the street plays a vital role in their everyday lives and identities. The International Labour Organization convention 182 and the Sustainable Development Goals’ _target 8.7 call on countries to ‘take immediate and effective measures’ to eradicate forced labour and secure the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labour.2
Despite these international conventions stating what is expected of nation states in terms of promoting the rights of SWC, they remain largely invisible; their health and well-being have had poor visibility in healthcare and research. Conservative estimates put the number of children living in street situations worldwide at over 100 million, including in high-income countries.3 A fluid, mobile population, often without birth certificates or legal identities, SWC cannot be accurately counted in official statistics, thus this number is very likely an underestimate.
The latest global estimates show the progress against child labour has stalled, with at least 160 million children engaged in labour; and this is before the effects of the pandemic were felt on children’s lives.2 In low-income and middle-income countries, SWC can be seen inside railway stations and markets, along road sides, selling flowers, shining shoes, carrying tea, picking rags, and vending trinkets and plastic toys. And often they are hidden from view—confined to factories, informal sector businesses, back-room bars or inside tarpaulin-covered huts. In high-income countries, they can be found toiling long hours in agriculture, cleaning meat packing plants, repairing roofs, working on conveyor belts, trafficked and exploited in the fast-food industry.
The root causes of both children in street situations and working children may differ within and between countries and regions. Poverty, demographic change, migration, armed conflict, climate change and natural disasters are key drivers that force children onto the street and into hazardous labour. These drivers both contribute to and are amplified by trafficking, exploitation, and physical, sexual and/or psychological abuse and neglect in homes or childcare institutions. Health crises in families are an all too frequent catalyst for a child to engage in child labour and/or become dependent on the street for their survival. Moreover, we are currently witnessing wars and genocides, which have had a profound and devastating impact on children’s rights worldwide, contributing significantly to the increase in the number of SWC. This issue transcends borders and affects low-income, middle-income and high-income countries alike.
SWC experience multiple adverse childhood experiences, harsh living and working conditions, and thus bear the burden of a range of short, medium and long-term health consequences.3 Access to appropriate and quality healthcare is challenging for both groups of children and young people. SWC seek appropriate healthcare services in diverse settings, but most importantly in public healthcare institutions. There is a significant role that supportive adults—non-governmental organisation workers or family members—can play in facilitating these young peoples’ access to healthcare.4