Adolescent health•

Physical health complications in children and young people with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a feeding and eating disorder with known acute and longstanding physical health complications in children and young people (CYP) and commonly presents to paediatricians.

Objective To systematically review the published literature on physical health complications in CYP with ARFID using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library was performed on 14 February 2024. Studies reporting physical health complications in CYP ≤25 years with ARFID were included. We pooled studies for meta-analysis comparing ARFID with healthy controls or anorexia nervosa (AN).

Results Of 9058 studies found in searches, we included 132 studies. We found evidence for low weight, nutritional deficiencies and low bone mineral density. CYP with ARFID can present across the weight spectrum; however, the majority of CYP with ARFID were within the healthy weight to underweight range. Most studies reported normal range heart rates and blood pressures in ARFID, but some CYP with ARFID do experience bradycardia and hypotension. CYP with ARFID had higher heart rates than AN (weighted mean difference: 12.93 bpm; 95% CI: 8.65 to 17.21; n=685); heterogeneity was high (I2: 81.33%).

Conclusion There is a broad range of physical health complications associated with ARFID requiring clinical consideration. Many CYP with ARFID are not underweight yet still have complications. Less cardiovascular complications found in ARFID compared with AN may be related to chronicity.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42022376866.

What is already known on this topic

  • Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a feeding and eating disorder which often results in malnutrition and its consequent physical health complications in children and young people (CYP).

What this study adds

  • CYP with ARFID can present across the whole weight spectrum; ARFID is not exclusively a low-weight eating disorder.

  • CYP with ARFID are at risk of several other complications such as low bone mineral density and nutritional deficiencies which do not discriminate based on the individuals weight.

  • CYP with ARFID on average present with higher heart rates and lower levels of hypotension and bradycardia than individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), despite similar levels of underweight.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • Our review has highlighted the need for comprehensive physical health checks for every individual with ARFID, regardless of their weight status.

  • Our review has also highlighted the need for a more nuanced approach when assessing for risk in CYP with ARFID compared with what is currently in use for AN.

  • There are some critical gaps in the literature that warrant further study such as longitudinal analysis and more representative samples.

Introduction

Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a feeding and eating disorder (ED) characterised by persistent restricted intake in quantity or variety of food.1 Such restrictive feeding results in one or more of: a failure to meet nutritional or energy needs; dependence on oral or enteral supplements and/or significant impacts on psychosocial functioning.1 Three non-mutually exclusive presentations tend to motivate food-related behaviour in ARFID: (1) lack of interest in food or lack of appetite; (2) sensory sensitivity to food (eg, based on foods texture, appearance and smell) and (3) fear of the consequences of food (eg, choking, vomiting).1 Consequently, ARFID is distinct from anorexia nervosa (AN) as the driving motivations behind the eating behaviour noticeably lack a focus on body weight or image.1 The onset of ARFID is usually in childhood (<12 years of age),2 with a prevalence between 3.2% and 15.5% in primary school-aged children and ~0.5% across all ages.2

While ARFID is considered primarily a psychological disorder, persistent feeding behaviour regularly results in failure to meet energy/nutritional needs1 leading to physical complications carrying a range of potential risks. These can be acute when weight loss leads to cardiovascular and temperature instability,3 or more longstanding, leading to growth faltering and low bone mineral density (BMD).4 Such physical impacts mean that children and young people (CYP) with ARFID commonly present to paediatricians, and knowledge of physical health assessment and management is essential for those working medically with CYP.

As ARFID is a relatively new diagnosis (first defined in 20131), research has emerged later than for other EDs, and so more established physical health findings from AN (given restricted intake) have been applied as a model, in particular to acute risk assessment.5 This is potentially problematic due to important differences between ARFID and AN, meaning that such application may not be valid. ARFID tends to have an earlier age of onset, malnutrition is generally more longstanding and there are specific food avoidances leading to nutritional deficiencies.2 A larger body of published evidence on the physical impact of ARFID in CYP has emerged, providing opportunity for a synthesis of the literature to aid better prediction, prevention, tailor clinical treatments and identify important areas for further research. A systematic review on this topic has not been published before. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature and meta-analyses using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines6 to examine for both acute and chronic physical health risks in CYP with ARFID.

Methods

Search strategy

We searched for published full-text articles on ARFID with any physical health complication in PubMed, Embase, Web-of-Science, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library from database inception to 14 February 2024. Relevant search terms for ARFID and physical health were used for each electronic database (online supplemental file 1). We also conducted citation searches of included studies. We registered a broader systematic review for physical health complications in ARFID in all ages with PROSPERO, and here we present only the findings for CYP (≤25 years of age).

Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed full-text publications reporting any kind of primary data on physical health parameters in individuals with ARFID except for non-systematic reviews; (2) studies containing one or more participants ≤25 who had been diagnosed with ARFID before or at the time of publication; (3) studies in any language; (4) studies from any geographical area.

Exclusion criteria were: (1) studies mixing adults with CYP throughout reporting; (2) studies not including any data on physical complications in ARFID; (3) studies only reporting physical complications caused by comorbidities of ARFID or other pre-existing conditions.

Two researchers (RMJ and JO) independently screened titles and abstracts for inclusion using the online systematic review tool, Covidence. Once an agreement was met, full-text articles were screened independently for inclusion. LDH provided adjudication on disagreement.

Data extraction and quality assessment

We extracted data using a customised form: (1) general study information; (2) general characteristics of participants; (3) anthropometric measurements (weight, standardised weight for age (weight z-score), body mass index (BMI), standardised BMI for age (BMI z-score) or percentage median BMI (%MBMI, % of subject BMI of median BMI for age and sex); (4) details of physical health complication; (5) any comparisons between ARFID and healthy controls (HCs) or AN.

We assessed bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies, Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies for non-randomised studies and Risk of Bias-2 for randomised, controlled studies. We used the CAse REports guidelines for case studies and series for reporting completeness and evidence quality.

Meta-analysis

We pooled studies reporting continuous variables (anthropometric measures and heart rate (HR)) in ARFID compared with HC or AN in meta-analysis when there were three or more studies, using STATA (V.17, StataCorp). Where the same data were reported in more than one paper, we used the most complete sample. For longitudinal studies, we included baseline data.

We generated standardised mean difference (SMD: Hedge’s-g) for studies reporting same outcomes but different measures (eg, BMI z-score and %MBMI) and weighted mean difference (WMD) where measures were the same across all studies. We used random effects models due to high heterogeneity between the studies (Q (p<0.1) and I2 (>75%)) and performed meta-regression to examine for potential common study variables moderating effect sizes. We ran sensitivity analyses by removing studies with the highest degree of bias and study outliers based on methodology or study population to examine for impact on effect sizes. We assessed for publication bias with funnel plots and Egger’s test for meta-analyses including more than 10 studies.7

Results

A summary of search findings is shown in figure 1. Of 9058 studies found in initial searches, we included 132 studies. All the included studies are described in online supplemental table 1 and referenced in the reference list; however, not all are cited in the text of this paper. Disagreement during the abstract screen was 2.45%. There was no disagreement on the full-text screen. We found studies reporting on the following: anthropometrics (n=128), cardiovascular complications (n=27), BMD (n=12), nutritional deficiencies (n=34), puberty and menstruation (n=13) and other complications that did not fit into the previous categories (n=14). We found 63 cross-sectional studies, 8 longitudinal, 9 research trials (baseline data reported only) and 55 case studies/series. Studies originated from the USA, Canada, Brazil, Japan, Indonesia, Australia, Turkey and Europe. The majority (n=105) of studies were exclusively on children and adolescents ≤18 years, only 15 of which were exclusively on children ≤5 years. The remaining 27 studies were mixed samples of CYP (≤25 years).

Figure 1
Request permissionrequest permission icon
Figure 1

Flow diagram of searches and study selection. ARFID, avoidant restrictive food intake disorder; ED, eating disorder.

Quality of studies

Quality assessments are shown in online supplemental table 1. Median case completeness of case studies was 75% (range: 36%–93%). Median NOS score in observational studies were: case-controls: 6 out of 9* (range: 4–9*); cohorts: 6 out of 9* (range: 4–8*); cross-sectional: 6 out of 10* (range: 4–9*). We also found five out of the nine research trials had moderate risk of bias; the remaining four had high risk of bias.

Anthropometrics

We found 128 studies reporting anthropometric data (online supplemental table 1), including 15 studies which compared HC8–23 and 28 which compared AN with ARFID.8–10 14 16 19 23–45

Seven of the 13 studies reporting weight distribution of CYP with ARFID found the majority were living with underweight (defined within the papers as <5th BMI centile or ≤−2 weight z-score),15 18 46–50 while six found the majority were within a healthy weight range (defined within the papers as 5th to 85th BMI centile or −2 to 1 weight z-score).51–56

We found six studies to pool in meta-analysis comparing BMI z-score or %MBMI in ARFID to HC (figure 2), producing a large overall effect size for lower standardised BMI scores in ARFID (SMD: −0.99; 95% CI: −1.40 to –0.58; n=846)13–15 18 21 23 compared with HC. Heterogeneity was high (I2: 79.81%). All pooled studies were in children ≤18 years old, except one study on CYP aged 10–23 years13 (removal had no significant impact on effect size or heterogeneity). All studies were clinical samples, except one which was a community sample and was the only study of ‘poor’ quality rather than ‘good’ quality as assessed by the NOS21 (removal increased the effect size (SMD: −1.14; 95% CI: −1.46 to –0.82; n=558) and reduced the heterogeneity, I2: 56.95%.

Figure 2
Request permissionrequest permission icon
Figure 2

Forest plot showing standardised mean difference in BMI z-scores and %Median BMI between ARFID (n=228) and HC (n=618). 95% CIs and study weights and indicated. The overall effect size was calculated using a random effects model. ARFID, avoidant restrictive food intake disorder; BMI, body mass index; HC, healthy control.

We also found 15 studies to pool for meta-analysis comparing BMI z-score or %MBMI in ARFID versus AN, producing no overall difference in effect size (SMD: −0.00; 95% CI: −0.31, 0.31; n=1689; figure 3)9 14 16 19 23 25 27 31 33 34 36 38–40 44; heterogeneity was high (I2: 86.57%). Of the 15 studies included, 11 were of children ≤18 years old,14 16 19 23 25 31 33 34 38 40 44 and the remaining four studies included CYP <25 years of age9 16 27 36 39 (the removal of which did not affect effect size or heterogeneity). All studies were in clinical samples, except two16 23 (removal of which did not affect effect size or heterogeneity). Most studies were of ‘good’ quality; however, six were of ‘fair’ quality.19 31 33 38 40 44 Removal of ‘fair’ quality studies19 31 33 38 40 44 increased the difference between ARFID and AN; however, SMD was still insignificant (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: −0.19 to 0.54; n=1004) and heterogeneity was still high (I2: 82.85%). A funnel plot was not perceived to display asymmetry, confirmed with Egger’s test (p=0.64). Meta-regression using available data on age and sex across studies found no significant associations with effect size (data not shown).

Figure 3
Request permissionrequest permission icon
Figure 3

Forest plot showing standardised mean difference in BMI z-scores and %Median BMI between ARFID (n=597) and AN (n=1092). 95% CIs and study weights and indicated. The overall effect size was calculated using a random effects model. AN, anorexia nervosa; ARFID, avoidant restrictive food intake disorder; BMI, body mass index.

Most of the longitudinal anthropometric data we found came from case studies (n=14),57–70 most reporting rapid weight loss in the months before presentation. We found three larger studies reporting longitudinal data.39 46 71 One study found that individuals with ARFID had lower pre-diagnosis BMIs and lost significantly less weight during their illness than patients with AN (%MBMI lost: 15% vs 21%; p=0.03).39 In addition, another study reported individuals with ARFID lost a mean of 9.6±9.1 kg before presentation for treatment.71 The only study that followed individuals with ARFID for multiple years found that the percentage of them that had severe acute malnutrition (weight z-score ≤−2; from 76% at 2 years of age to 52% at 11 years of age) and those who had severe chronic malnutrition (height z-score ≤−2, 51% to 25%) declined over the years.46 Five cross-sectional studies mentioned growth faltering or stunting in ARFID; the reported prevalence of growth delay across all five studies ranged from 1.4% to 51%.46 51 52 54 55

Cardiovascular complications

We found 27 studies containing data on cardiovascular parameters in ARFID (online supplemental table 1).8 19 24 32 33 35 39 41 58 60 61 63 67 70–82 One compared ARFID to HC8 and seven compared ARFID to AN.8 19 24 33 35 39 41

All non-case studies that contained data on HR or blood pressure (BP) in individuals with ARFID found the mean HR and BP to be within a normal range for age.8 19 24 33 35 41 75 78 82 Several studies did, however, report some individuals with ARFID (3.92%–52.6%) had bradycardia, and around 2% had hypotension.32 33 39 70 73–75 Five case studies reported tachycardia in ARFID58 67 72 80 83; most were reported in the context of electrolyte abnormalities or severe nutritional deficiencies. Two studies investigated potential risk factors for variance in HR and BP within the ARFID population.75 77 One study identified a subgroup within ARFID that had rapid weight loss and a shorter length of illness also had a lower HR.77 In contrast, another study found individuals with ARFID who had acute compared with chronic ED symptom onset had similar HRs and BPs (acute: 76.2±15.5 beats per minute (bpm), chronic: 79.4±15.1 bpm, NS).75 The weight status of the ARFID participants also had no significant impact on their HR or BP, but CYP <12 years had significantly higher HRs (82.40±17.84 bpm vs 76.15±12.23 bpm; p<0.05) and lower systolic blood pressure (109.72±10.14 vs 115.61±8.31; p<0.01) than CYP ≥12 years.

All studies comparing ARFID to AN, reported an average higher HRs, lower prevalence of bradycardia and higher BP in ARFID, despite similar BMIs.8 19 24 33 35 39 We found five studies to pool in a meta-analysis comparing HR in ARFID to AN, showing that mean HR was greater in ARFID (WMD: 12.93 bpm; 95% CI: 8.65 to 17.21; n=685; figure 4).8 19 24 33 35 Heterogeneity was high (I2: 81.33%). All studies included were clinical samples, with two studies of ‘good’ quality8 24 and three of ‘fair’ quality.19 33 35 Only one study included had CYP over 18 years old (10–22 years old)8; removal of which increased the difference in HR between ARFID and AN (WMD: 15.5 bpm; 95% CI: 12.87 to 18.19; n=623). All studies used retrospective medical data apart from two, which were cross-sectional studies8 35 which when removed increased the mean difference in HR between ARFID and AN to 16.20 bpm (95% CI: 13.28 to 19.13; n=517) and reduced the heterogeneity to null (I2: 0.00). There was no difference in mean standardised BMI between ARFID and AN in all studies included, except for one19 were individuals with AN had a lower standardised BMI; removal of which slightly reduced the mean difference and heterogeneity (WMD: 11.69; 95% CI: 7.08 to 16.31; n=398; I2: 75.91%). Meta-regression and subgroup analysis found no moderators to this relationship (eg, age, percentage female, type of study, year published).

Figure 4
Request permissionrequest permission icon
Figure 4

Forest plot showing weighted mean difference in heart rates (beats per minute) between ARFID (n=283) and AN (n=402). 95% CIs and study weights and indicated. The overall effect size was calculated using a random effects model. AN, anorexia nervosa; ARFID, avoidant restrictive food intake disorder.

Bone mineral density

We found 12 studies that reported data on BMD within ARFID (online supplemental table 1)22 24 25 59 84–88; eight of which were case studies,59 70 80 81 84–87 one compared BMD in ARFID to HC22 and two compared BMD in ARFID to AN.24 25

In the case studies/series that stated BMD z-score, all individuals with ARFID, except for two,85 86 had BMD z-scores ≤−2 (BMD z-score range: spine 0.4 to –4.1; hip −3.1 to –4.6).59 81 85 87 Furthermore, one cross-sectional study reported that 25% of individuals with ARFID had BMD z-scores ≤−2 in their spine while 77% had BMD z-scores ≤−1.24 Another study found that the mean BMD z-score in individuals with ARFID was −2.46.88 Only one study mentioned Bone Mineral Density Apparent Density (BMAD) z-scores, where the mean BMAD z-score in individuals with ARFID was −1.44.25 Lower BMI, lower BMI z-score, amenorrhea and delayed puberty were associated with low BMD.25 BMI and BMI z-scores were associated with BMAD z-scores. Despite a lower BMI being a risk factor for low BMD, two cases of severe osteoporosis were reported in teenage boys with healthy weight (hip BMD z-scores: −4.1 to −4.6).59 87

In the one study that compared BMD z-scores in ARFID to HC, individuals with ARFID had significantly lower BMD z-scores in Total body (−1.41 vs −0.5; p=0.021) and total body less head (−1.67 vs −0.74; p=0.055); however, in the lumbar spine the difference not significant (−0.95 vs −0.67).22

Two studies compared BMD z-scores in ARFID to AN. One study found that individuals with ARFID had lower BMD z-scores in their lumbar spine than those with AN (−2.00 vs −1.38, ARFID vs AN, p<0.001).24 Another study reported that although scores were low in both ARFID and AN (−1.88±0.91 and −1.43±1.18, respectively), there was no significant difference between the two.25

Nutritional deficiency

We found 34 studies mentioning micronutrient levels in ARFID (online supplemental table 1).15 43 50 52–54 57–59 69 70 72 80–100 However, only two studies compared dietary nutritional content in ARFID to HC15 94 and one study to AN.96

Five studies contained detailed data on the dietary nutritional content in ARFID; all of which reported a high prevalence of individuals with ARFID not eating the daily recommended intake (DRI) of several micronutrients.15 52 53 94 96 One study found that 67% of individuals with ARFID consumed <80% of the DRI of six or more micronutrients.52 Furthermore, our searches identified 22 individuals with ARFID suffering from severe micronutritional deficiencies which led to clinical disorders: xeropthalmia due to vitamin A deficiency86 87 90 99; nutritional optic neuropathy due to vitamin B12 and folate deficiency87 91; Wernicke encephalopathy due to vitamin B12 deficiency43; severe osteoporosis due to vitamin D and/or vitamin B12 deficiencies59 80 81 84 87; scurvy due to vitamin C deficiency52 70 80 84; pulmonary artery hypertension from vitamin C deficiency70; rickets due to vitamin D deficiency81 and iron deficiency anaemia.72 80 83 90 91 93 95 97

In comparison to HC, a higher percentage of individuals with ARFID were not meeting the DRI and were consuming a lower percentage of the DRI in almost all micronutrients tested.15 94 In contrast, individuals with ARFID consumed less of some micronutrients, such as vitamin C and A, than those with AN but more of others, such as selenium and magnesium.96

Puberty and menstruation

We identified 13 studies containing data on puberty and menstruation in ARFID (online supplemental table 1).8 9 22 29 33 36 38 62 63 67 75 76 101 Six studies compared pubertal and menstrual measurements in ARFID to AN,8 9 29 33 36 38 and three compared them to HC.8 9 22

Amenorrhea (primary and secondary) prevalence was reported at around 10% in females with ARFID.33 75 Where menstruation data in women with ARFID were compared with those with AN, all studies found significantly more individuals with AN experienced problems with their menstrual cycles, such as a higher prevalence of amenorrhea and more irregular periods, despite similar BMIs.8 29 33 36

Pubertal data were reported in three studies; however, all three included participants recruited from the same pool. One study reported that age at menarche in ARFID was older than in HC (13.1 and 12.7 years, respectively); however, this was not statistically significant.8 In contrast, age at menarche in AN was similar to ARFID (13.2 years). Two of the three studies reported that individuals with ARFID were at significantly lower Tanner stages in breast and pubic hair development than AN and HC.8 9 However, the individuals with ARFID were significantly younger than the HC, and those with AN. Therefore, the differences in Tanner stage and age at menarche were most likely due to the age difference. In contrast, the final study, which contained individuals with ARFID who were of similar ages to the HCs, found that they were at similar breast and pubic hair tanner stages to those HCs.22

Other physical complications

We found 21 studies that reported physical health complications associated with ARFID, which did not fit into the previously described categories (online supplemental table 1).32 39 58 60 61 67 72–74 97 98 102 103

The prevalence of electrolyte abnormalities in ARFID was reported to be between 23.1% and 73.7%,32 39 73 with one study reporting that 23.1% of individuals with ARFID had hypokalaemia and 7.7% had hypophosphatemia.32 Other electrolyte abnormalities mentioned across studies were hypochloraemia and elevated bicarbonate.32 58 67 72 Furthermore, in one case of ARFID in a 3-year-old boy, his hypokalaemia was so severe it led to rhabdomyolysis.58 Another study found that significantly more individuals with ARFID had electrolyte abnormalities than those with AN (23% and 10% respectively, p=0.03).39

Several other common physical complications associated with low weight and EDs were reported in ARFID, such as lanugo, lethargy, dizziness, syncope, pale skin, muscle wasting, dehydration, cognitive problems, headaches, hypothermia, diarrhoea and constipation.60 61 72 76 97 98 One study found that 93 out of 207 (44.9%) CYP with ARFID had one or more of these medical symptoms associated with their ED.76 Furthermore, some severe, but rare, conditions associated with ARFID, such as Ogilvie’s syndrome, hypoalbuminemia and superior mesenteric artery syndrome, were reported by included studies, but the prevalence rates remain unknown.60 67 72 74

Discussion

In this systematic review, we have synthesised the current evidence for physical health complications in ARFID, providing important information for clinicians working with CYP with ARFID. We found evidence for several physical health complications commonly associated with undernutrition to be present in ARFID, such as low weight, nutritional deficiencies and low BMD. We found many studies reporting individuals with ARFID at healthy weight or overweight, which is an important observation and highlights that ARFID is not an exclusively low-weight ED, and individuals can present across the weight spectrum. This has important relevance to clinicians, especially where gateways into ED services can be on weight-based criteria.

We pooled studies for meta-analysis to compare weight status between ARFID and HC, and ARFID and AN, and HRs differences between ARFID and AN. However, high levels of heterogeneity in these analyses (I2: 79.8, 86.6%, and 81.3%, respectively) introduce complexity and are an important limitation for their interpretation,104 even though we applied random effects models. The high levels of heterogeneity are not a surprise given that the majority of studies were retrospective, variables extracted were not necessarily primary outcomes and most data came from clinical samples with likely non-standardised approaches to measuring anthropometrics as well as pulse rates (eg, some studies did this using electrocardiograms while others did this manually). That said, in the HR analysis the removal of one study8 in sensitivity analysis hugely reduced heterogeneity without affecting overall WMD, which is reassuring for the validity of the findings of higher HRs in ARFID versus AN, and remains consistent with all of other studies included in the review. We examined for potential effects on heterogeneity using consistently reported factors such as age and percentage female using meta-regression and found no significance. This all calls for prospective, standardised approaches to measurement of anthropometry and other recognised risk factors, including in clinical settings where important routinely collected data in clinical populations can be collated for analysis.

We found little evidence for the impact of ARFID on growth and puberty, though we would still advocate for monitoring growth and development in CYP with ARFID given the nutritional concerns and the known association between nutrition and growth.105 Further investigation into the impact on growth, especially longitudinally is needed. We found evidence for micronutrient deficiencies (in some cases associated with very serious complications), electrolyte abnormalities and low BMD in ARFID, all of which did not necessarily discriminate based on the patient’s weight (though low BMD was found to be associated with lower BMI status). Some of the most severe cases of micronutrient deficiencies and low BMD were reported in individuals of healthy or overweight status. Therefore, detailed dietetic assessments and physical health assessments should be considered when assessing CYP with ARFID, alongside and irrespective of weight and height measurements.

Most studies of ARFID in CYP reported HRs and BPs to be in normal ranges, (although some did have bradycardia and hypotension) and, as discussed above, our meta-analysis suggests higher HRs in ARFID versus AN in the context of no difference in weight status between participants in included studies. Put together, these are important comparative findings, given the well-known association of starvation in AN and bradycardia.106 One possible explanation for the greater HR in ARFID versus AN could be that CYP with ARFID tend to be younger than those with AN,2 and pulse rates are on average are higher at younger ages.107 That said, in meta-regression we found no association between age or age difference and effect size. In contrast, one study found that the difference in HR between AN and ARFID was no longer significant after correcting for age.8 We hypothesise that differences in HR between ARFID and AN, despite similar levels of underweight, may be moderated by the often more chronic nature of underweight in ARFID.108 This is supported by a surveillance study, which reported that CYP with ARFID presenting with more rapid weight loss and a shorter duration of illness were more likely to have a low HR.77 While we did not find published studies in our searches reporting deaths from ARFID or mortality analyses such as those found for AN,109 risk of death from malnutrition is very real109 and ARFID has been reported as cause of death in a child.110 As we have outlined, ARFID carries the potential for significant and profound physical complications and so here we call for multi-agency vigilance and attention to physical risk. That said, our findings also raise questions about the suitability of using AN exclusively as a model for physical health risk in ARFID,111 and highlight the need to design risk-based assessment approaches and protocols that are inclusive of all types of EDs.105 A nuanced and balanced approach to risk in the context of chronicity for when and why to admit in ARFID in relation to weight status would be of value given the common association with neurodevelopmental problems,112 which themselves are known to carry greater risk for distress and trauma related to hospitalisation.113

Our review has strengths and limitations. We used systematic searching by two independent researchers across a broad range of databases. This ensured a wide net to catch all the published studies on any physical health complication in ARFID. Consequently, creating a comprehensive guide to the physical health complications associated with ARFID. Studies included in our meta-analyses were all observational studies and mostly scored similarly in quality assessments. However, we also ran sensitivity analyses, removing the poorest quality studies and study outliers based on samples and methodology. We have already commented on the limitations of high levels of heterogeneity in our meta-analysis. Further to this, a key limitation of our review is that most studies found were small, clinical samples rather than population-based, which may have accounted for the wide prevalence estimates for many physical health complications. We found only five studies on true community samples17 21 51 55 95 and six from general paediatric clinical settings.12 18 48 76 77 103 Given the relatively new status of ARFID as a diagnosis, it is perhaps not surprising that many studies are of pragmatic, clinical samples from ED services. However, we emphasise the need for more representative samples, such as population-based studies or at least those seen by General Practitioners or paediatricians, rather than just specialist ED teams. Many of the included studies were also cross-sectional, with few studies identified describing longitudinal changes in physical parameters. This is especially important for understanding the impact on growth and development, with growth faltering being a key consideration in underweight CYP.114 Therefore, longitudinal studies should be a high priority to investigate ARFID’s long- and short-term risks.

In summary, our systematic review has highlighted the broad range of important physical health complications in ARFID, emphasising a need for comprehensive physical health assessments of CYP with ARFID. We have shown that these complications do not always discriminate based on weight, which has implications for gate-keeping access to services based on low-weight cut-offs alone. This review has also highlighted many gaps in the literature regarding the physical impacts of ARFID, particularly a need for more longitudinal growth data. Finally, our review has emphasised important similarities and differences between ARFID and AN, which should be considered in the approach to patients with EDs in the assessment and treatment of physical risk.

  • Contributors: RMJ co-designed the review, wrote the research protocol (and registered with PROSPERO), performed searches, extracted data, performed analyses, and produced the first draft of the paper as part of her PhD thesis. LDH conceived and co-designed the review, supervised screening and data collection, provided adjudication for study inclusion where RMJ and JO disagreed, supervised analyses, supported the first draft, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript into its final submitted form. JO performed searches, extracted data and contributed to the final paper as submitted. SR and NM co-designed the review, supported the first draft, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript into its final submitted form. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. RMJ is the guarantor.

  • Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created in this study, and all analysed data are included in this published article and the supplementary table.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication:
Ethics approval:

Not applicable.

  1. close First MB. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition, and clinical utility. J Nerv Ment Dis 2013; 201:727–9.
    doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a2168a•Google Scholar
  2. close Bourne L, Bryant-Waugh R, Cook J, et al. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a systematic scoping review of the current literature. Psychiatry Res 2020; 288:112961.
    doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112961•Google Scholar
  3. close Brigham KS, Manzo LD, Eddy KT, et al. Evaluation and treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in adolescents. Curr Pediatr Rep 2018; 6:107–13.
    doi:10.1007/s40124-018-0162-y•Google Scholar
  4. close Alderman H, Hoddinott J, Kinsey B, et al. Long term consequences of early childhood malnutrition. Oxford Economic Papers 2006; 58:450–74.
    doi:10.1093/oep/gpl008•Google Scholar
  5. close Nitsch A, Knopf E, Manwaring J, et al. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): its medical complications and their treatment—an emerging area. Curr Pediatr Rep 2021; 9:21–9.
    doi:10.1007/s40124-021-00239-8•Google Scholar
  6. close Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339.
    doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535•Google Scholar
  7. close Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011; 343.
    doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002•Google Scholar
  8. close Aulinas A, Marengi DA, Galbiati F, et al. Medical comorbidities and endocrine dysfunction in low‐weight females with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder compared to anorexia nervosa and healthy controls. Int J Eat Disord 2020; 53:631–6.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23261•Google Scholar
  9. close Becker KR, Mancuso C, Dreier MJ, et al. Ghrelin and PYY in low-weight females with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder compared to anorexia nervosa and healthy controls. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2021; 129.
    doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105243•Google Scholar
  10. close Izquierdo A, Plessow F, Becker KR, et al. Implicit attitudes toward dieting and thinness distinguish fat-Phobic and non-fat-phobic anorexia nervosa from avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in adolescents. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:419–27.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22981•Google Scholar
  11. close Eddy KT, Thomas JJ, Hastings E, et al. Prevalence of DSM‐5 avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a pediatric gastroenterology healthcare network. Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:464–70.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22350•Google Scholar
  12. close Murray HB, Rao FU, Baker C, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in pediatric neurogastroenterology patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2022; 74:588–92.
    doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000003369•Google Scholar
  13. close Murray HB, Becker KR, Harshman S, et al. Elevated fasting satiety-promoting cholecystokinin (CCK) in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder compared to healthy controls. J Clin Psychiatry 2022; 83.
    doi:10.4088/JCP.21m14111•Google Scholar
  14. close Cañas L, Palma C, Molano AM, et al. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: psychopathological similarities and differences in comparison to anorexia Nervosa and the general population. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2021; 29:245–56.
    doi:10.1002/erv.2815•Google Scholar
  15. close Schmidt R, Hiemisch A, Kiess W, et al. Macro-and micronutrient intake in children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Nutrients 2021; 13.
    doi:10.3390/nu13020400•Google Scholar
  16. close Schmidt R, Hiemisch A, Kiess W, et al. Validation study on the child, adult, and parent version of the ARFID module 2.0 for the eating disorder examination. Int J Eat Disord 2022; 55:1708–20.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23805•Google Scholar
  17. close Schmidt R, Kirsten T, Hiemisch A, et al. Interview‐based assessment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): a pilot study evaluating an ARFID module for the eating disorder examination. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:388–97.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23063•Google Scholar
  18. close Schöffel H, Hiemisch A, Kiess W, et al. Characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a general paediatric inpatient sample. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2021; 29:60–73.
    doi:10.1002/erv.2799•Google Scholar
  19. close Zanna V, Criscuolo M, Mereu A, et al. Restrictive eating disorders in children and adolescents: a comparison between clinical and psychopathological profiles. Eat Weight Disord 2021; 26:1491–501.
    doi:10.1007/s40519-020-00962-z•Google Scholar
  20. close Wilken M, Hesse M, Jockenhöfer A, et al. Are feeding disorders and feeding tube dependency the same?: a discrimination study between feeding disorders, feeding tube dependency and healthy eaters. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:63–8.
    doi:10.1111/jpc.15641•Google Scholar
  21. close Dovey TM, Kumari V, Blissett J, et al. Eating behaviour, behavioural problems and sensory profiles of children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), autistic spectrum disorders or picky eating: same or different. Eur Psychiatry 2019; 61:56–62.
    doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.06.008•Google Scholar
  22. close Sella AC, Becker KR, Slattery M, et al. Low bone mineral density is found in low weight female youth with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and associated with higher PYY levels. J Eat Disord 2023; 11.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-023-00822-y•Google Scholar
  23. close Datta N, Lock JD. Exploration of Interoceptive capabilities in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and anorexia nervosa. J Eat Disord 2023; 11.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-023-00914-9•Google Scholar
  24. close Norris ML, Robinson A, Obeid N, et al. Exploring avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in eating disordered patients: a descriptive study. Int J Eat Disord 2014; 47:495–9.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22217•Google Scholar
  25. close Alberts Z, Fewtrell M, Nicholls DE, et al. Bone mineral density in anorexia nervosa versus avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. Bone 2020; 134.
    doi:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115307•Google Scholar
  26. close Breithaupt L, Kahn DL, Slattery M, et al. Eighteen-month course and outcome of adolescent restrictive eating disorders: persistence, crossover, and recovery. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2022; 51:715–25.
    doi:10.1080/15374416.2022.2034634•Google Scholar
  27. close Fisher M, Gonzalez M, Malizio J, et al. Eating disorders in adolescents: how does the DSM-5 change the diagnosis? Int J Adolesc Med Health 2015; 27:437–41.
    doi:10.1515/ijamh-2014-0059•Google Scholar
  28. close Ornstein RM, Rosen DS, Mammel KA, et al. Distribution of eating disorders in children and adolescents using the proposed DSM-5 criteria for feeding and eating disorders. J Adolesc Health 2013; 53:303–5.
    doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.025•Google Scholar
  29. close Forman SF, McKenzie N, Hehn R, et al. Predictors of outcome at 1 year in adolescents with DSM-5 restrictive eating disorders: report of the national eating disorders quality improvement collaborative. J Adolesc Health 2014; 55:750–6.
    doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.014•Google Scholar
  30. close Bryson AE, Scipioni AM, Essayli JH, et al. Outcomes of low‐weight patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and anorexia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up after treatment in a partial hospitalization program for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 2018; 51:470–4.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22853•Google Scholar
  31. close Lange CRA, Ekedahl Fjertorp H, Holmer R, et al. Long‐term follow‐up study of low‐weight avoidant restrictive food intake disorder compared with childhood‐onset anorexia nervosa: psychiatric and occupational outcome in 56 patients. Intl J Eating Disorders 2019; 52:435–8.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23038•Google Scholar
  32. close Makhzoumi SH, Schreyer CC, Hansen JL, et al. Hospital course of underweight youth with ARFID treated with a meal‐based behavioral protocol in an inpatient‐partial hospitalization program for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:428–34.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23049•Google Scholar
  33. close Keery H, LeMay-Russell S, Barnes TL, et al. Attributes of children and adolescents with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. J Eat Disord 2019; 7:31.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-019-0261-3•Google Scholar
  34. close Kurotori I, Shioda K, Abe T, et al. An inpatient observational study: characteristics and outcomes of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in children and adolescents in Japan. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2019; 15:3313–21.
    doi:10.2147/NDT.S218354•Google Scholar
  35. close Lieberman M, Houser ME, Voyer A-P, et al. Children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and anorexia nervosa in a tertiary care pediatric eating disorder program: a comparative study. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:239–45.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23027•Google Scholar
  36. close Middleman AB, Griffin B, DeShea L, et al. Menstrual patterns among patients with anorexia nervosa and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: does “junk food” play a role? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2021; 34:811–4.
    doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2021.07.005•Google Scholar
  37. close Peebles R, Lesser A, Park CC, et al. Outcomes of an inpatient medical nutritional rehabilitation protocol in children and adolescents with eating disorders. J Eat Disord 2017; 5:7.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-017-0134-6•Google Scholar
  38. close Tamura A, Minami K, Tsuda Y, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in Japanese elementary-school students on total parenteral nutrition. Pediatr Investig 2021; 5:293–8.
    doi:10.1002/ped4.12293•Google Scholar
  39. close Strandjord SE, Sieke EH, Richmond M, et al. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: illness and hospital course in patients hospitalized for nutritional insufficiency. J Adolesc Health 2015; 57:673–8.
    doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.08.003•Google Scholar
  40. close Nicely TA, Lane-Loney S, Masciulli E, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a cohort of young patients in day treatment for eating disorders. J Eat Disord 2014; 2.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-014-0021-3•Google Scholar
  41. close Norris ML, Santos A, Obeid N, et al. Characteristics and clinical trajectories of patients meeting criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder that are subsequently reclassified as anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2020; 28:26–33.
    doi:10.1002/erv.2710•Google Scholar
  42. close Knatz Peck S, Towne T, Wierenga CE, et al. Temperament-based treatment for young adults with eating disorders: acceptability and initial efficacy of an intensive, multi-family, parent-involved treatment. J Eat Disord 2021; 9.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-021-00465-x•Google Scholar
  43. close Mahr F, Billman Miller MG, Quaill MA, et al. Serum zinc levels in youth with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and anorexia nervosa: clinical correlation with weight and psychopathology. Nutr Health 2023;
    doi:10.1177/02601060231191658•Google Scholar
  44. close Mahr F, Miller MGB, Quaill MA, et al. Neuropsychological profiles and clinical correlates of youths with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and anorexia nervosa: an exploratory charter investigation. J Pediatr Neuropsychol 2023; 9:200–13.
    doi:10.1007/s40817-023-00147-3•Google Scholar
  45. close Düplois D, Brosig L, Hiemisch A, et al. Distribution and clinical comparison of restrictive feeding and eating disorders using ICD‐10 and ICD‐11 criteria. Int J Eat Disord 2023; 56:1717–29.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23994•Google Scholar
  46. close Lucarelli L, Sechi C, Cimino S, et al. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a longitudinal study of malnutrition and psychopathological risk factors from 2 to 11 years of age. Front Psychol 2018; 9.
    doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01608•Google Scholar
  47. close Waddle C, Gillespie SE. Examination of pediatric tube feeding schedules and oral intake: a retrospective cross‐sectional study. Nutr Clin Pract 2023; 38:458–64.
    doi:10.1002/ncp.10912•Google Scholar
  48. close Eddy KT, Thomas JJ, Hastings E, et al. Prevalence of DSM-5 avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a pediatric gastroenterology healthcare network. Intl J Eating Disorders 2015; 48:464–70.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22350•Google Scholar
  49. close Thomas JJ, Becker KR, Kuhnle MC, et al. Cognitive‐behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: feasibility, acceptability, and proof‐of‐concept for children and adolescents. Intl J Eating Disorders 2020; 53:1636–46.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23355•Google Scholar
  50. close Brosig L, Düplois D, Hiemisch A, et al. Birth-related, medical, and diagnostic characteristics in younger versus older children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). J Eat Disord 2023; 11.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-023-00908-7•Google Scholar
  51. close Prasetyo YB. The effects of socio-demographical factors and perceived seriousness upon motherly skill of managing eating disorder on children with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). J Global Pharma Technol 2020; 12:496–503.
    Google Scholar
  52. close Sharp WG, Postorino V, McCracken CE, et al. Dietary intake, nutrient status, and growth parameters in children with autism spectrum disorder and severe food selectivity. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018; 118:1943–50.
    doi:10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.005•Google Scholar
  53. close Volkert VM, Burrell L, Berry RC, et al. Intensive multidisciplinary feeding intervention for patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder associated with severe food selectivity: an electronic health record review. Int J Eat Disord 2021; 54:1978–88.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23602•Google Scholar
  54. close Zickgraf HF, Murray HB, Kratz HE, et al. Characteristics of outpatients diagnosed with the selective/neophobic presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:367–77.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23013•Google Scholar
  55. close Dinkler L, Yasumitsu-Lovell K, Eitoku M, et al. Development of a parent-reported screening tool for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): initial validation and prevalence in 4-7-year-old Japanese children. Appetite 2022; 168.
    doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105735•Google Scholar
  56. close Dahlsgaard KK, Bodie J. The (extremely) picky eaters clinic: a pilot trial of a seven-session group behavioral intervention for parents of children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 2019; 26:492–505.
    doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.11.001•Google Scholar
  57. close Becker KR, Breithaupt L, Lawson EA, et al. Co-occurrence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and traditional eating psychopathology. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2020; 59:209–12.
    doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2019.09.037•Google Scholar
  58. close Cao LL, Gaffney LK, Marcus C, et al. Hypokalemia-induced rhabdomyolysis in a child with autism affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2022; 43:e356–60.
    doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000001035•Google Scholar
  59. close Chandran JJ, Anderson G, Kennedy A, et al. Subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord in an adolescent male with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a clinical case report. Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:1176–9.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22450•Google Scholar
  60. close Katsumi Y, Kodo K, Goto S, et al. Case report: COVID-19 pandemic exacerbates eating disorder by social and intrafamilial isolation. Front Pediatr 2022; 10.
    doi:10.3389/fped.2022.819214•Google Scholar
  61. close Katzman DK, Stevens K, Norris M, et al. Redefining feeding and eating disorders: what is avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Paediatr Child Health 2014; 19:445–6.
    doi:10.1093/pch/19.8.445•Google Scholar
  62. close Milligan T, Middleman AB. Facing an eating disorder: a case of body dysmorphic disorder and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2022; 10.
    doi:10.1177/2050313X221111679•Google Scholar
  63. close Naviaux A-F. Management of ARFID (avoidant restrictive food intake disorder) in a 12-year-old on a paediatric ward in a general hospital: use of mirtazapine, partial hospitalisation model and family based therapy. Psychiatr Danub 2019; 31:421–6.
    Google Scholar
  64. close Rienecke RD, Drayton A, Richmond RL, et al. Adapting treatment in an eating disorder program to meet the needs of patients with ARFID: three case reports. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020; 25:293–303.
    doi:10.1177/1359104519864129•Google Scholar
  65. close Reid DB. A case study of hypnosis for phagophobia: it’s no choking matter. Am J Clin Hypn 2016; 58:357–67.
    doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1048544•Google Scholar
  66. close Soffritti EM, Lomar Passos BC, Rodrigues GA, et al. Adult avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a case report. J Bras Psiquiatr 2020; 68:252–7.
    Google Scholar
  67. close Thomas JJ, Brigham KS, Sally ST, et al. Case 18-2017—an 11-year-old girl with difficulty eating after a choking incident. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:2377–86.
    doi:10.1056/NEJMcpc1616394•Google Scholar
  68. close Yaşar AB, Abamor AE, Usta FD, et al. Two cases with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): effectiveness of EMDR and CBT combination on eating disorders (ED). J Clin Psy 2019; 22:493–500.
    doi:10.5505/kpd.2019.04127•Google Scholar
  69. close Basouny N, Spigos J, Khvolis D, et al. Wernicke encephalopathy in a pediatric patient with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: a rare presentation of thiamine deficiency. Am J Case Rep 2023; 24.
    doi:10.12659/AJCR.940717•Google Scholar
  70. close Quinn LA, Gilley SP, Ta AD, et al. Case report: pulmonary hypertensive crisis leading to cardiac arrest during endoscopic evaluation in a 6-year-old boy with autism, severe malnutrition, and undiagnosed scurvy. Front Pediatr 2022; 10.
    doi:10.3389/fped.2022.1008507•Google Scholar
  71. close Cooney M, Lieberman M, Guimond T, et al. Clinical and psychological features of children and adolescents diagnosed with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a pediatric tertiary care eating disorder program: a descriptive study. J Eat Disord 2018; 6.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-018-0193-3•Google Scholar
  72. close Bertrand V, Dhenin C, Déchelotte P, et al. Delayed avoidant restrictive food intake disorder diagnosis leading to Ogilvie’s syndrome in an adolescent. Eat Weight Disord 2022; 27:1913–8.
    doi:10.1007/s40519-021-01315-0•Google Scholar
  73. close Tsang KK, Hayes LC, Bujoreanu S, et al. Characterization study of patients presenting to an acute care pediatric hospital identified with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Hosp Pediatr 2020; 10:600–7.
    doi:10.1542/hpeds.2020-0010•Google Scholar
  74. close Yazdani S, Bloomberg Z, Klauber R, et al. Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder emerging during COVID-19 pandemic resulting in superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Eat Weight Disord 2022; 27:2943–5.
    doi:10.1007/s40519-022-01415-5•Google Scholar
  75. close Duncombe Lowe K, Barnes TL, Martell C, et al. Youth with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: examining differences by age, weight status, and symptom duration. Nutrients 2019; 11.
    doi:10.3390/nu11081955•Google Scholar
  76. close Katzman DK, Spettigue W, Agostino H, et al. Incidence and age- and sex-specific differences in the clinical presentation of children and adolescents with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175.
    doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.3861•Google Scholar
  77. close Katzman DK, Guimond T, Spettigue W, et al. Classification of children and adolescents with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Pediatrics 2022; 150.
    doi:10.1542/peds.2022-057494•Google Scholar
  78. close Norris ML, Spettigue W, Hammond NG, et al. Building evidence for the use of descriptive subtypes in youth with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2018; 51:170–3.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22814•Google Scholar
  79. close Schermbrucker J, Kimber M, Johnson N, et al. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in an 11-year old South American boy: medical and cultural challenges. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017; 26:110–3.
    Google Scholar
  80. close Kim GC, Davidson AM, Beyda RM, et al. Scurvy, abnormal MRI, and gelatinous bone marrow in an adolescent with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. J Eat Disord 2023; 11.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-023-00770-7•Google Scholar
  81. close Islam N, Hathaway KL, Anderson BS, et al. Brief report: decreased bone health in children with autism spectrum disorder and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2023;
    doi:10.1007/s10803-023-05976-x•Google Scholar
  82. close Gorrell S, Vendlinski SS, Thompson AS, et al. Modification of an inpatient medical management protocol for pediatric avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: improving the standard of care. J Eat Disord 2023; 11.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-023-00895-9•Google Scholar
  83. close Yanagimoto Y, Ishizaki Y, Kaneko K, et al. Iron deficiency anemia, stunted growth, and developmental delay due to avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder by restricted eating in autism spectrum disorder. Biopsychosoc Med 2020; 14.
    doi:10.1186/s13030-020-00182-y•Google Scholar
  84. close Benezech S, Hartmann C, Morfin D, et al. Is it leukemia, doctor? No, it’s scurvy induced by an ARFID!. Eur J Clin Nutr 2020; 74:1247–9.
    doi:10.1038/s41430-020-0640-5•Google Scholar
  85. close Hadwiger AN, Middleman AB, Pitt PD, et al. Case series: gaming vs. eating—comorbidity of ARFID and IGD. Eat Weight Disord 2019; 24:959–62.
    doi:10.1007/s40519-019-00639-2•Google Scholar
  86. close Mahoney GL, Larcombe PJ, Ling J, et al. Vitamin A deficiency in avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:1899–900.
    doi:10.1111/jpc.16069•Google Scholar
  87. close Mina J-A, Greeff S. The'I'In nutrition: paediatric nutritional optic neuropathy secondary to avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and multi-micronutrient deficiency. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:1672–3.
    doi:10.1111/jpc.15891•Google Scholar
  88. close Richmond TK, Carmody J, Freizinger M, et al. Assessment of patients with ARFID presenting to multi-disciplinary tertiary care program. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2023; 76:743–8.
    doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000003774•Google Scholar
  89. close Alten ED, Chaturvedi A, Cullimore M, et al. No longer a historical ailment: two cases of childhood scurvy with recommendations for bone health providers. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1001–5.
    doi:10.1007/s00198-019-05264-4•Google Scholar
  90. close Barney A, Bruett LD, Forsberg S, et al. Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) and body image: a case report. J Eat Disord 2022; 10.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-022-00583-0•Google Scholar
  91. close Chiarello F, Marini E, Ballerini A, et al. Optic neuropathy due to nutritional deficiency in a male adolescent with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a case report. Eat Weight Disord 2018; 23:533–5.
    doi:10.1007/s40519-017-0409-6•Google Scholar
  92. close Cuttin K, Neri C, Tang M, et al. Social determinants of health and the role of routine pediatric care in a medically complex toddler. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2020; 41:583–5.
    doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000831•Google Scholar
  93. close Dolman L, Thornley S, Doxtdator K, et al. Multimodal therapy for rigid, persistent avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) since infancy: a case report. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2021; 26:451–63.
    doi:10.1177/1359104520981401•Google Scholar
  94. close Harshman SG, Wons O, Rogers MS, et al. A diet high in processed foods, total carbohydrates and added sugars, and low in vegetables and protein is characteristic of youth with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Nutrients 2019; 11.
    doi:10.3390/nu11092013•Google Scholar
  95. close Nygren G, Linnsand P, Hermansson J, et al. Feeding problems including avoidant restrictive food intake disorder in young children with autism spectrum disorder in a multiethnic population. Front Pediatr 2021; 9.
    doi:10.3389/fped.2021.780680•Google Scholar
  96. close Santiago A, Zimmerman J, Feinstein R, et al. Diet quality of adolescents with eating disorders. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2017; 31.
    doi:10.1515/ijamh-2017-0033•Google Scholar
  97. close Lim TSH, Aw M, Slosky L, et al. Beyond picky eating. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2020; 41:656–8.
    doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000846•Google Scholar
  98. close Taylor T. Increasing food texture and teaching chewing for a clinical case within the home setting in Australia. Learning and Motivation 2020; 71:101651.
    doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101651•Google Scholar
  99. close Dean M, Selvarajan L, Fernandez D, et al. G15 irreversible blindness in two children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontline Gastroenterol 2022; 13:A26–7.
    doi:10.1136/flgastro-2022-bspghan.35•Google Scholar
  100. close Watts R, Archibald T, Hembry P, et al. The clinical presentation of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents is largely independent of sex, autism spectrum disorder and anxiety traits. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 63.
    doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102190•Google Scholar
  101. close Pitt PD, Middleman AB. A focus on behavior management of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): a case series. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2018; 57:478–80.
    doi:10.1177/0009922817721158•Google Scholar
  102. close Bergonzini L, Pruccoli J, Parmeggiani A, et al. Avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder in a male patient with Goldenhar syndrome. Eat Weight Disord 2022; 27:3803–7.
    doi:10.1007/s40519-022-01497-1•Google Scholar
  103. close Boerner KE, Coelho JS, Syal F, et al. Pediatric avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder and gastrointestinal-related somatic symptom disorders: overlap in clinical presentation. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022; 27:385–98.
    doi:10.1177/13591045211048170•Google Scholar
  104. close Imrey PB. Limitations of meta-analyses of studies with high heterogeneity. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3.
    doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19325•Google Scholar
  105. close Hudson LD, Chapman S. Paediatric medical care for children and young people with eating disorders: achievements and where to next. London, England, SAGE Publications Sage UK 2020;
    Google Scholar
  106. close Sachs KV, Harnke B, Mehler PS, et al. Cardiovascular complications of anorexia nervosa: a systematic review. Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49:238–48.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22481•Google Scholar
  107. close Fleming S, Thompson M, Stevens R, et al. Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies. The Lancet 2011; 377:1011–8.
    doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62226-X•Google Scholar
  108. close Fisher MM, Rosen DS, Ornstein RM, et al. Characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents: a "new disorder" in DSM-5. J Adolesc Health 2014; 55:49–52.
    doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.013•Google Scholar
  109. close Rice AL, Sacco L, Hyder A, et al. Malnutrition as an underlying cause of childhood deaths associated with infectious diseases in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78:1207–21.
    Google Scholar
  110. close Mutch A. Alfie Nicholls: prevention of future deaths report. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary 2024;
    Google Scholar
  111. close Isner JM, Roberts WC, Heymsfield SB, et al. Anorexia nervosa and sudden death. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102:49–52.
    doi:10.7326/0003-4819-102-1-49•Google Scholar
  112. close Dinkler L, Yasumitsu-Lovell K, Eitoku M, et al. Early neurodevelopmental problems and risk for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in 4‐7‐Year‐Old children: a Japanese birth cohort study. JCPP Adv 2022; 2.
    doi:10.1002/jcv2.12094•Google Scholar
  113. close McGuire K, Erickson C, Gabriels RL, et al. Psychiatric hospitalization of children with autism or intellectual disability: consensus statements on best practices. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015; 54:969–71.
    doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2015.08.017•Google Scholar
  114. close Neale J, Pais SMA, Nicholls D, et al. What are the effects of restrictive eating disorders on growth and puberty and are effects permanent? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adolesc Health 2020; 66:144–56.
    doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.032•Google Scholar
  115. Bąbik K, Ostaszewski P, Horvath A, et al. Nutritional versus behavioural intervention in children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Psychiatr Psychol Kli 2021; 21:3–14.
    doi:10.15557/PiPK.2021.0001•Google Scholar
  116. Billman MG, Forrest LN, Johnson M, et al. Preliminary effectiveness of a cognitive‐behavioral, family‐centered partial hospitalization program for children and adolescents with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2022; 55:1621–6.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23806•Google Scholar
  117. Brewerton TD, D’Agostino M. Adjunctive use of olanzapine in the treatment of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents in an eating disorders program. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2017; 27:920–2.
    doi:10.1089/cap.2017.0133•Google Scholar
  118. Brown M, Hildebrandt T. Parent-facilitated behavioral treatment for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a case report. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 2020; 27:231–51.
    doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.05.002•Google Scholar
  119. Bryant-Waugh R. Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: an illustrative case example. Int J Eat Disord 2013; 46:420–3.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22093•Google Scholar
  120. Buleza KA, Mathews N, Curran KA, et al. A weighty issue: refeeding an adolescent patient on dialysis. Eat Weight Disord 2021; 26:739–41.
    doi:10.1007/s40519-020-00873-z•Google Scholar
  121. Burton C, Allan E, Eckhardt S, et al. Case presentations combining family-based treatment with the unified protocols for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in children and adolescents for comorbid avoidant restrictive food intake disorder and autism spectrum disorder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2021; 30:280–91.
    Google Scholar
  122. Burton Murray H, Becker KR, Breithaupt L, et al. Food neophobia as a mechanism of change in video‐delivered cognitive‐behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a case study. Int J Eat Disord 2022; 55:1156–61.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23761•Google Scholar
  123. Chatoor I, Begtrup R, Cheng IY, et al. Failure to thrive in toddlers with lack of interest in eating and food and their cognitive development during later childhood. Front Pediatr 2023; 11.
    doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1179797•Google Scholar
  124. Datta N, Matheson B, Walker AC, et al. Psychoeducational and motivational treatment for low-weight avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): three case reports in school-aged children. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023; 28:1123–34.
    doi:10.1177/13591045231169141•Google Scholar
  125. Dolan SC, Kambanis PE, Stern CM, et al. Anticipatory and consummatory pleasure in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. J Eat Disord 2023; 11.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-023-00921-w•Google Scholar
  126. Dumont E, Jansen A, Kroes D, et al. A new cognitive behavior therapy for adolescents with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a day treatment setting: a clinical case series. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:447–58.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23053•Google Scholar
  127. Finn DM, Menzel JE, Gray E, et al. Pharmacotherapy for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in youth with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: a case series of patients prescribed stimulant medication in a partial hospitalization program for eating disorders. J Eat Disord 2023; 11.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-023-00954-1•Google Scholar
  128. Gray E, Chen T, Menzel J, et al. Mirtazapine and weight gain in avoidant and restrictive food intake disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2018; 57:288–9.
    doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.011•Google Scholar
  129. Izquierdo A, Plessow F, Becker KR, et al. Implicit attitudes toward dieting and thinness distinguish fat-phobic and non-fat-phobic anorexia nervosa from avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in adolescents. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:419–27.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22981•Google Scholar
  130. Kerem L, Van De Water AL, Kuhnle MC, et al. Neurobiology of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in youth with overweight/obesity versus healthy weight. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2022; 51:701–14.
    doi:10.1080/15374416.2021.1894944•Google Scholar
  131. Calisan Kinter R, Ozbaran B, Inal Kaleli I, et al. The sensory profiles, eating behaviors, and quality of life of children with autism spectrum disorder and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Psychiatr Q 2024; 95:85–106.
    doi:10.1007/s11126-023-10063-6•Google Scholar
  132. Krom H, van der Sluijs Veer L, van Zundert S, et al. Health related quality of life of infants and children with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:410–8.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23037•Google Scholar
  133. Krom H, van Oers HA, van der Sluijs Veer L, et al. Health-related quality of life and distress of parents of children with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2021; 73:115–24.
    doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000003150•Google Scholar
  134. Lane-Loney SE, Zickgraf HF, Ornstein RM, et al. A cognitive-behavioral family-based protocol for the primary presentations of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): case examples and clinical research findings. Cogn Behav Pract 2022; 29:318–34.
    doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2020.06.010•Google Scholar
  135. Lock J, Robinson A, Sadeh-Sharvit S, et al. Applying family‐based treatment (FBT) to three clinical presentations of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: similarities and differences from FBT for anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:439–46.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22994•Google Scholar
  136. Lock J, Sadeh-Sharvit S, L’Insalata A, et al. Feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial using family‐based treatment for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:746–51.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23077•Google Scholar
  137. Lu ZA, Mu W, Osborne LM, et al. Eighteen-year-old man with autism, obsessive compulsive disorder and a SHANK2 variant presents with severe anorexia that responds to high-dose fluoxetine. BMJ Case Rep 2018; 2018.
    doi:10.1136/bcr-2018-225119•Google Scholar
  138. Maertens C, Couturier J, Grant C, et al. Fear of vomiting and low body weight in two pediatric patients: diagnostic challenges. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017; 26:59–61.
    Google Scholar
  139. Mahr F, Billman M, Essayli JH, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and hydroxyzine in the treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents: rationale and evidence. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2022; 32:117–21.
    doi:10.1089/cap.2021.0038•Google Scholar
  140. Ornstein RM, Essayli JH, Nicely TA, et al. Treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a cohort of young patients in a partial hospitalization program for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:1067–74.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22737•Google Scholar
  141. Rebollo Román Á, Barrera Martín A, Alcántara-Laguna MD, et al. Non-oropharyngeal dysphagia with frequent emergency room attendance. Nutr Hosp 2018; 35:996–8.
    doi:10.20960/nh.1933•Google Scholar
  142. Pennell A, Couturier J, Grant C, et al. Severe avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and coexisting stimulant treated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49:1036–9.
    doi:10.1002/eat.22602•Google Scholar
  143. Robson J, Laborda T, Fitzgerald S, et al. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in diet-treated children with eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 69:57–60.
    doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000002323•Google Scholar
  144. Rosania K, Lock J. Family-based treatment for a preadolescent with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder with sensory sensitivity: a case report. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11.
    doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00350•Google Scholar
  145. Schmidt R, Kirsten T, Hiemisch A, et al. Interview-based assessment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): a pilot study evaluating an ARFID module for the eating disorder examination. Int J Eat Disord 2019; 52:388–97.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23063•Google Scholar
  146. Shafiq R, Aziz A, Asif G, et al. Assessing dietary practices of children with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID)-a cross-sectional study. J Liaq Uni Med Health Sci 2023; 22:179–84.
    doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2023.01010•Google Scholar
  147. Sharp WG, Stubbs KH, Adams H, et al. Intensive, manual-based intervention for pediatric feeding disorders: results from a randomized pilot trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016; 62:658–63.
    doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000001043•Google Scholar
  148. Sharp WG, Volkert VM, Stubbs KH, et al. Intensive multidisciplinary intervention for young children with feeding tube dependence and chronic food refusal: an electronic health record review. J Pediatr 2020; 223:73–80.
    doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.04.034•Google Scholar
  149. Shimshoni Y, Silverman WK, Lebowitz ER, et al. SPACE‐ARFID: a pilot trial of a novel parent‐based treatment for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2020; 53:1623–35.
    doi:10.1002/eat.23341•Google Scholar
  150. Spettigue W, Norris ML, Santos A, et al. Treatment of children and adolescents with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: a case series examining the feasibility of family therapy and adjunctive treatments. J Eat Disord 2018; 6.
    doi:10.1186/s40337-018-0205-3•Google Scholar
  151. Stubbs KH, McMahon MXH, Popler J, et al. Multidisciplinary feeding treatment for a patient with interstitial lung disease. Pediatric Pulmonology 2022; 57:3183–5.
    doi:10.1002/ppul.26146•Google Scholar
  152. Tomioka K, Nishiyama M, Tokumoto S, et al. Behavioral therapy for children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder dependent on tube or oral enteral nutrient formula: a feasibility study. Kobe J Med Sci 2022; 67:E155–60.
    Google Scholar
  153. Webb J, Dhopatkar N, Croft P, et al. Clinical reflections and treatment adaptations for avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: a case study. Clinical Case Studies 2023; 22:453–67.
    doi:10.1177/15346501231190913•Google Scholar

  • Received: 28 February 2024
  • Accepted: 18 June 2024
  • First Published: 8 July 2024

Compose a Response to This Article
Article metrics
Altmetricopen-url
Dimensionsopen-url
  NODES
Association 5
chat 2
COMMUNITY 2
INTERN 2
Note 2