Commons:Deletion requests/2024/12/16

15 December 2024

17 December 2024

Deletion requests on 16 December 2024

December 16

File:Didier Fiùza Faustino, This is not a Love Song, Cimetière des Rois, 2016, Geneva.jpg

The sculpture is part of the "Open End" exhibition, which is a temporary exhibition, so it cannot benefit from FOP, and permission from the sculptor Didier Faustino is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I give the permission as the author of this work Didier Faustino (talk) 15:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Didier Faustino, please send your permission via COM:VRT. Ratekreel (talk) 17:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Citrus Belt League Logo.jpg

Nothing to indicate that the uploader of this file is its copyright holder or that the file has otherwise been released as licensed. There's also nothing to indicate that this is the official logo of the en:Citrus Belt League. It's possible that this could be considered to fall below COM:TOO US and be OK to relicense as PD, but there probably should be some way of verifying that it's the official logo of the league provided before doing that. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:49, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's COM:INUSE. I don't know whether the stem and leaves take it over COM:TOO US or not. It's not the job of Commons to research whether Wikipedia is using official logos. Feel free if you like, but that shouldn't override COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpaceX Crew-4 (jsc2021e062614).jpg

superseeded by File:SpaceX Crew 4 logo.png HLFan (talk) 05:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: JPG files have value just as much as PNGs. We don't need to choose between one or the other. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per explanation from Huntster. No reason that this file is not useful.--WMrapids (talk) 19:49, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpaceX Crew-4 2022 pillars.jpg

superseeded by File:SpaceX Crew 4 logo.png HLFan (talk) 05:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: ~~As explained by Huntster on similarly nominated files. No reason that this file is not useful.~~--WMrapids (talk) 19:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually... Delete This is identical to File:SpaceX Crew-4 (jsc2021e062614).jpg, is a smaller image, has less of a description and has inaccurate author/licensing information.--WMrapids (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpaceX Crew-5 logo (full).jpg

superseeded by File:SpaceX Crew-5 logo.png HLFan (talk) 05:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: JPG files have value just as much as PNGs. We don't need to choose between one or the other. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per explanation from Huntster. No reason that this file is not useful.--WMrapids (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of the Diocese of San Jose, Nueva Ecija.svg

Per request of author, duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diocese_of_San_Jose_Nueva_Ecija_coat_of_arms.svg, will update this file instead. GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:De Geer veistos.jpg

tallennettu väärään paikkaan Kulttuurinavigaattori (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Google Translate) "Saved in the wrong location". What does that mean? What is the correct location? —holly {chat} 19:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kulttuurinavigaattori: bump. —holly {chat} 18:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Copyright law in Finland this is under coyright (70+). It has to be saved locally as a Wikipedia file.--Kulttuurinavigaattori (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Geer veistos.jpg

Derivative work of De Geer, sculpture by Finnish sculptor Kirsi Kaulanen (Wikidata:Q23040567), born 1969, living. Not in PD. No Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures, only buildings. Htm (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chhatra Odhikar Parishad Logo.jpg

Non-free copyrighted image, not the uploader’s own work. Vengeance • Talk 06:00, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сергей Александрович Пахомов.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 176.59.57.166 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:UKNES Parliament 1975.svg

does not match with the actual results of the October 1974 UK general elections. Fantasy diagram, fake data Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:48, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASB ARIF SETIA BUDI.jpg

I will replace the new photo NNDRDLR22 (talk) 09:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nejsme tací....jpg

This is copyrightred material. Zagothal (talk) 09:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For all these deletion requests: How do you know it's not copyrighted by the uploader? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It seems they are copyrighted by him. I think it has wrong licence, because they contains watermark with copyright mark. And, they have no

value for Commons and other Wikimedia projects. I am sorry for wrongly written request. Zagothal (talk) 19:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The watermarks are bad, yes, but not a cause for automatic deletion. That said, though this is a decent photo of a man with an injured left side of his face, so that has a value, I would tend to agree that the watermarks are so obtrusive that we should

Delete the photo if they are not removed, because as you said, the photo is not really usable with such obtrusive watermarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the image is from SCMP, that’s no doubt that it is copyrighted!!!

You may see its Copyright section in the Chapter 3 of its Terms and Conditions.

https://www.scmp.com/terms-conditions Oscar Wai (talk) 10:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bullet boy.png

This File Does not Appear To be Used on Any Wikimedia Project Nor it provide any important information or knowledge. So it may be removed From Wikimedia As per the rule. Blurrygim (talk) 10:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bullet boy.png

File must be speedy deleted as it appears a personal photography.Since personal photos are again commons rules. Kingkongs76 (talk) 13:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Callmehelper

A film still, copyright is exclusively held by filmmaker (producer or director) of the film. Several copies can be found on the internet, hence cannot be used here.

GaiusAugustine (talk) 10:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I was unable to determine the films from which these photos were taken to determine the copyright status in India. However, the movie may still be copyrighted (even if it's PD in India, which is hard to determine with the lack of information) in US due to URAA. So, delete. Ratekreel (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It took me some time but both the images of Meena Kumari are from the film Baiju Bawra which was released in October 1952. The film from which the image of Dilip Kumar Sahab is taken looks hard to find. Also, since these images are definitely not own works, so I have made some changes to all the three files. Replaced self-cc with PD-India license. Although that's not entirely correct but still better than the previous versions. Now after knowing the name of the film, can we make some more corrections? Or is there any way that this gets a valid US tag too so we can keep these? ShaanSengupta^Talk 12:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the works are PD in India, they're still copyrighted in the US due to URAA. Ratekreel (talk) 15:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MIUMIUMIUMIU.jpg

duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Foto_1_Landriano.jpg Ivanbranco (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bristol IMGP9170 (2726731552).jpg

Motion blurred. There's no shortage of better photos of this location in Category:Hannover Quay (Bristol), including a few taken at almost exactly the same time, such as File:Bristol_MMB_52_Harbour_Festival_2008.jpg. Steinsky (talk) 11:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 Antonino Ibarrondo Oleaga.jpg

There are no pages that use this file. It's my mistake on the nomination. I'll change it Iñazio Irizar (talk) 11:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PIERROT UND COLOMBINE (PIERROT AND COLOMBINE).PNG

if Lise Gujer is one of the creators, then this artwork is not in PD Goesseln (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foxconn workers protest in zhengzhou henan china by luminemains dhb4pnu.jpg

This 2024 Deviantart image shows up on news sites from 2022 in TinEye (eg. https://i0.wp.com/media.globalnews.ca/videostatic/news/c0swznioje-ea2v9d8nf1/221124-MIKE-A.jpg) Belbury (talk) 13:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pingu2.png

Either fan art or a copyvio screenshot of the animated children's show Pingu (compare https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/articles/clylyrppp80o). Belbury (talk) 13:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Волгоград Сталинградский ТЮЗ.jpg

We don't know an author. — Redboston 13:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is that a deletion reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

** Because we have no evidence that the correct license is indicated. If we don't know the author we don't know his date of death. If we don't know his date of death we can't use {{PD-old-70}}. — Redboston 16:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Первый колхоз слободы Михайловки. Артель «Краснознаменец».png

No rason to PD. Unknown author. — Redboston 13:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is that a deletion reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Because we have no evidence that the correct license is indicated. If we don't know the author we don't know his date of death. If we don't know his date of death we can't use {{PD-old-70}}. — Redboston 16:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  How old does a Russian photo have to be to be in the public domain if the photographer's name or death date are unknown? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  endlessly — Redboston 21:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Give a serious answer, maybe? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Maybe my answer is serious? See: w:ru:Шаблон:PD-Russia (especially notes ## 3 and 11) and discussion (w:ru:Википедия:Форум/Архив/Авторское право/2024/07#Закон о сиротских произведениях). We must prove with the Reliable sources that the author is unknown. E.g. File:Вышибем кулаков из колхозов 1930.jpg — #Автор, мастер/Изготовитель: Художник неизвестен" ([1]). The is no such source for the photo under discussion — there is no information about the author [2]. — Redboston 13:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  So even if the photo dated from 1850, unless it could be proven that the photographer's name was unknown, it wouldn't be in the public domain? I'm sorry, I don't read Russian. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  And I don't write English well... =( No, There was no copyright in the Russian Empire until 1917, see: {{PD-RusEmpire}}. In general, this problem is not unique to Russia. See, e.g.: w:en:Orphan work, w:en:Orphan works in the United States. — Redboston 12:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beaulieu school.jpg

Copyright violation. File contains BBC News logo and has been previously published (see https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c841jn3pd7eo). File not likely to be the uploader's own work. WikiEditor50 (talk) 13:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Hron.webp

clearly a copyvio, school photo with no proof whatsoever of own work. 213.102.90.251 13:56, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there are copyright permissions on it though, since i've seen other people use it and it is literally everywhere DTKCEKDRK (talk) 14:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't mean its public domain. The newspapers likely paid or asked permission from his school. Wikipedia doesn't work like say Youtube, where you can claim fair use because you show 1 second of a photo in a 10 minute video. Permissions here need to be airtight. 213.102.90.251 14:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not posting on Wikipedia. This is Commons, which is much stricter than Wikipedia and has no COM:FAIRUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amand Alliger, Zagreb, Hrvatska May 06, 2024 05-25-16 PM.jpeg

Clearly a photograph of some newspaper or magazine pcture, not own work. Lymantria (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly or not - it is just your opinion. Why you are doing this claim? To make ti difficult to make article about one long time dead artist? Or what is the purpose? You do not know is this my work or not. Druidpepo (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Herbert Walker Bush (1924-2018) was de 41e president van de Verenigde Staten van Amerika en, SFA002008367.jpg

Photograph very recent to be expired under {{PD-anon-70-EU}} license. As the file depicts US president George H. W. Bush, it possibly may be in the public domain in the United States. However, more information about where the photograph was taken and first published may be needed for verification. 81.41.185.128 14:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:۲محسن شورگشتی خراسانی.jpg

اطلاعات مفیدی ندارد Ali2174 (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:China national flag.gif

recently uploaded, redundant to File:Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 16:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AHL Primary Color (8050921807).jpg

This file may be a copyright violation. A potential alternative exists on English Wikipedia, though after reviewing similar logos for the NBA and the NFL, this appear unlikely.--WMrapids (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It does appear that this file was placed on Flickr by the AHL itself with a CC BY 2.0 license. Not sure if this changes anything, but important to note.--WMrapids (talk) 19:59, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ottogi journey13.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photographs of original artworks Yann (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Bizarrely, the items in the picture that are not the natural world are original artworks! 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These looks like very simple items. How is there a copyright on that? Yann (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are definitely artworks? They look like buoys or something, though they're on land. But I think that in the U.S. and many other countries, if you took an ordinary object like a pencil and exhibited it as art, it would be treated us such under the law. Correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're sculptural works. See e.g. [3]. Omphalographer (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack and the Beanstalk (1952).webm

Here is the renewal for the film. This is not public domain. SDudley (talk) 17:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack and the Beanstalk (1952) 1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack and the Beanstalk 1952.webm SDudley (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Donaldd23 noted that the notice was for 1951 and would not have been valid for 1980 renewal due to the 28 year limit (1979 in this case).

We are waiting to here back from a copyright lawyer at Duke for their thoughts on the songs of the film which do seem to have valid notices in 1952 and 1980 renewals. The question is if the 1951 notice for the film and subsequent publication of the film in 1952 conflict in anyway with the songs of the film. We might have to mute the songs of the film instead of deleting this. SDudley (talk) 18:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to drop a link to the other discussion at en:User talk:Donaldd23#Jack and Beanstalk, I had some trouble at finding it at first. The enwiki sources about the film's copyright status are a little shaky, so thank you SDudley for reaching out to someone with expertise. If we do end up needing to mute some portion of the audio, feel free to ping me and I can take care of that. hinnk (talk) 04:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hinnk

Hi I think we have our answer. I wrote up the following it was backed by the copyright lawyer.

"In terms of the film being public domain due to its early notice and defective renewal, the answer is yes. But the reuse of the underlying songs is limited since their copyrights are valid. To me it seems that the copyrights for the 1952 songs would be valid since they were not distributed sans notice in 1951 as the movie never saw distribution. It feels like a little nuance of exact conditions that make it happen."

So if you can mute the songs we would be okay to leave the rest of the film up. :) SDudley (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack and the Beanstalk 1952.webm

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack and the Beanstalk (1952).webm SDudley (talk) 17:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack and the Beanstalk (1952) 1.jpg

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack and the Beanstalk (1952).webm SDudley (talk) 17:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazimierz lisowski.jpg

Not own work. Work of w:pl:Irena Bierwiaczonek-Polak, died in 2009. No proof that this user is deceased artist, nor copyright holder. Source of information: https://www.wzielonej.pl/informacje/zielona-gora/kazimierz-lisowski-rzemieslnicy-i-gestapo-nieznana-zielona-gora/ 87.205.242.69 17:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le général de corps d’armée Patrick Destremau, directeur de l’Institut des hautes études de défense nationale (IHEDN) et de l’Enseignement militaire supérieur (EMS).jpg

copyright violattion. I seriously doubt this is the uploaders own work Czarking0 (talk) 18:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you doubt it? The uploader's username is User:Pierremmanuel PROUX and the author field in the Metadata is Pierremmanuel / IHEDN. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altı tane insansı boğa ve bir kara ördek konsey odasında tartışıyor 16-12-2024 at 10-56-22.jpg

Out of scope: unused AI-generated joke image ("a clip from the council meeting" - depicting a group of animals at a conference table). Omphalographer (talk) 18:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As well as File:Generated-image-2024-12-16T08 26 10 16-12-2024 at 11-26-10.jpg; similar content. Omphalographer (talk) 18:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doug with Lap Steel and Push.jpg

This is not notable. It is artist PROMO content Czarking0 (talk) 18:21, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Logo of the Free Idlib Army.svg

No evidence of permission. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Free Syrian Interim Government coat of arms.png, deleted years ago The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CapelaDasVitorias.jpg

Appears to be from https://www.brzesko.pl/metaboxl/photos/Mundo-afora-terceiro-grande-do-Uruguai-Rampla-tem-est-dio/9477991.htm Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link doesn't open for me. But I'm wondering why the website of a Polish commune would have a photo of a Brazilian chapel. Nakonana (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nakonana Trying the link now and it's not opening for me either, so I'm confused as well. I'll withdraw the nom since I'm not convinced it's a web photo anymore. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Connie Chan 1960s.jpg

Not PD in the US due to COM:URAA: 1960+50>1996 Wcam (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fanmade logo kp.png

this is a fan made logo, not even close to the original logo for the tour. The original logo has been uploaded, so no need for this anymore Despechi.ro (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be that as it may (and an image search supports your point), it's COM:INUSE and should be removed from sister-site articles before we should consider (and support) deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the deletion. As I mentioned in another deletion request, images without copyright cannot be uploaded to Wikipedia. Our only option is to create a representative image that does not necessarily have to be identical to the original, which falls under the category of FANMADE. Since there is now an image that faithfully represents the original, I consider it unnecessary for my work to remain current. I have already removed my creation from the corresponding articles and replaced it with the new proposal. —Aopou {talk} 23:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Newtball (talk · contribs)

User has uploaded a mix of personal photos, screenshots, and professional photos with no distinction between them, no EXIF data available

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All photos uploaded are pictures I took myself while attending various events. I checked the radio button that they were my works when I uploaded them. None of these pictures are proffessional pictures. (ZERO professional pictures) I did find one that someone posted on the platform X that was my photo they must have take off my Facebook pages. As stated before all works are totally mine and came from my phone. If they have been published somewhere else I have no idea how they got them. Please explain in more detail if I am doing something wrong by uploading my own photos. Ryin Miller is a popular athlete and several people repost pictures of her, but everything I uploaded are my personal work. Newtball (talk) 22:18, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ryin Miller is my Granddaughter and I attend all her sporting events. This is why I have so many pictures of her. Thank you for the compliment of considering some of my pictures professional but I assure you they were all take with an my iPhone. I have 100's more personal images that I took and I am planning on uploading as I keep adding to this page. Hopefully they do not get marked for deletion as well. Newtball (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Newtball Are you Evert Nelson of the Topeka Capital-Journal? If not, why did you take credit for his work? You also uploaded couple of photos that are clearly the work of Gatorade. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which photo are you saying is Evert’s? Also, there are no photos that are the work of Gatorade. Yes the banner they made. Yes the uniform that says Gatorade they made. The photo that has my granddaughter in it from behind is one I created from a picture I took as she celebrated after the finish of a race and superimposed onto an internet grab that no one owns. If anything, maybe that one is incorrect. Which exactly are you referring to as belonging to Gatorade? Newtball (talk) 01:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gatorade made the banner, her trophy, and her jersey but none of the photos I uploaded. The photos are mine. I took the banner picture standing in the hallway of her high school. Newtball (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Newtball File:State Defeat 2024.jpg and File:Foot Skills.jpg were both deleted because they were the work of Evert Nelson. File:Gatorade 2024 Player of the Year.jpg and File:Gatorade Banner.jpg anre obviously Gatorade templates. File:Ryin Miller 2024.jpg is a social media post that incorporates a web photo. Now, you credited yourself as the creator/copyright holder for all of these uploads. You can see how that raises doubts when you ask other users to take you at your word that the other uploads are just fine.

It might be helpful to upload your original photos — as far as I can tell, all your uploads are at web/social media resolution (and I see a couple of photos that are likely screenshots). The recommendation on Commons is to upload at the highest resolution possible. And uploading with tHE EXIF data intact is one way to minimize the doubt.

Oh, and off-topic here, but I would not recommend creating a Wikipedia article about your granddaughter. If she achieves notability as defined by Wikipedia’s standards, someone will create an article about her. If you do go continue to create the article, please follow the guidelines at en:WP:COI and be sure to declare your relationship to the subject in the article talk page. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help and pointing out my mistakes. I will make sure in the future to better my upload standards. I do have concerns about your statement on the Gatorade banner.jpg photo. That is a picture I took while standing in the high school where the banner is hanging. My phone was on “ live” photos which I did not realize when I took the picture. Maybe that makes it appear odd? It is definitely not a template.

Thanks again for your comments Newtball (talk) 11:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was the same template used for other Gatorade athletes (I'm seeing [4], [5], [6], and [7]). The identical backdrop and angle make me think it's a template vs an original photo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also wanted to add that for photos that are already published on social media or the web, please follow the steps at COM:VRT to verify that you are the copyright owner and agree to release the images under a free license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your comments. I have looked but can't find the duration of the deletion nomination cases. Is there a set duration for these cases or is it just case by case? Newtball (talk) 12:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Newtball There's no set time period, and the amount of time it takes to close a discussion depends on a bunch of factors, including the complexity of the case and how busy the reviewers are. It's generally weeks, if not months before any deletion (if appropriate) happens. In the meantime, I strongly encourage providing high-res versions of the photos and for images that have been published on social media, I'd provide the links and submit licensing statements via COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Potassium Aspartate coordination complex.svg

H-Asp-OH is neutral, so it it not the aspartate base to coordinate as the salt with K+. Have File:Potassium aspartate.svg that makes chemical sense DMacks (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ALCS-Imagery.jpg

This file was initially tagged by JayCubby as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From USGS: The provided maps are not for purchase or for download; they are to be used as a guide for reference and search purposes only; they are not owned or managed by the USGS.|source=https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/%7Chelp=off

Uploader challenges this at COM:UDR, says ESRI licenses it as cc-by-4.0 Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for copying over. IIRC the footage is captured by Boeing et al JayCubby (talk) 20:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Олена Шагровська (Джейн), літо 2022.png

Taken from https://life.rayon.in.ua/news/632480-khudozhnitsya-z-ostroga-zobrazila-komiks-kota-inzhira-v-obrazi-paramedikini/ No permission from author Venzz (talk) 20:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phylogenetic tree derived from mitochondrial DNA sequences of 207 dogs with haplotypes A2b (Mutton) and A1a (non-woolly village dog from the nearby Semiahmoo Bay region, "SB dog") expanded.Semiahmoo Bay “perro SB”).jpg

This article uses the default licence of science: https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse this licence is not a CC licence and not compatible with Commons. Rights are reserved/held. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Landing-Bacon.PNG

This has been superseded by a higher resolution version here. This version is also a much narrower crop; compare the position of the ship on the horizon (the Mayflower) in relation to the left margin in each. Denniscabrams (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is stated as being from 1938 in w:South Adams Junior/Senior High School. The edit was made by w:User:Brianboramha11, whose most recent contribution to Wikipedia was in February, 2024 and whose most recent contribution to Commons was in April, 2023. It would be great to hear from him on how he knows when this photo was shot, so I hope he sees this message. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]