Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/11/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Why would Hagen Drasdo or Katharina Drasdo license their images freely? All their images seem to be ARR. So this is a copy vio. Leoboudv (talk) 06:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio from http://www.flickr.com/photos/29485597@N06/2827709168/ /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, non-free Flickr license. Podzemnik (talk) 08:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
This is a poor partly out of focus image which failed flickrreview. It is only used on 1 wikipedia page. There must be better images of this church elsewhere.. Leoboudv (talk) 10:38, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete "Non-Commercial" restriction on Flickr; no confirmation image was ever adiquately free licensed. -- Infrogmation (talk) 10:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted as being NC licensed on source http://www.flickr.com/photos/hugovk/76026472/. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Buena for deletion more like. -Nard the Bard 22:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete And File:2_Buena_tv.JPG, which is flagged as a duplicate. Inductiveload (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - logo
This looks like a publicity photo. There is no description, useful filename, source, author or permission. It is also unused. 188.220.112.213 22:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, my session expired. That request was by me, inductiveload. Also, there are no categories. Inductiveload (talk) 22:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Next time use {{Nld}} (you must subst it) or {{Copyvio}}. Delete -Nard the Bard 22:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Next time use {{Nld}} (you must subst it) or {{Copyvio}}.
Deleted by Polarlys: copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Es handelt sich um ein Duplikat des Bildes File:Linderhof Venusgrotte.JPG. Es ist weder kategorisiert, noch wird es von anderen Projekten genutzt. Bitte löschen. --Pe-sa (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- deletion request fixed, copied here from the log. --Martin H. (talk) 19:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Bitte {{duplicate|Duplikat.ext}} in solchen Fällen verwenden. --Martin H. (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
nothing links to it; starting positions of king/queen are transposed incorrectly 71.236.20.12 07:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Also the other ones in this series:
- File:AAA SVG Chessboard and chess pieces 01.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AAA SVG Chessboard and chess pieces 02.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AAA SVG Chessboard and chess pieces 03.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AAA SVG Chessboard and chess pieces 04.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AAA SVG Chessboard and chess pieces 05.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
The queens (
, 
) should get their color on line d. None of these are used. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep it can harm no one, and images on Commons don't need to be true. There was plenty of incorrect maps / flags deletion reviews, and most of them were kept.--Lilyu (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)- Delete Inaccurate images, likely to confuse. Not useful for educational purpose. -Nard the Bard 19:50, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment don't fully understand the problem, but cant it be corrected by positioning figures correctly? --Justass (talk) 21:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I looked at that, but the SVG code is not easily read by humans. Also, there are plenty of correct diagrams in the category. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand queen must be placed on it's own colour at all images? --Justass (talk) 22:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- If you rotate the chess board incorrectly and start a game either the queen will be on the wrong color or the wrong side. Yes, the queen is in the wrong spot. Unless the image is intentionally trying to illustrate incorrect positioning it should be deleted. -Nard the Bard 22:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Repositioned queens on all images, please verify that all is correct --Justass (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent! You also reduced the amount of code with one half. Keep /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent! You also reduced the amount of code with one half.
- Repositioned queens on all images, please verify that all is correct --Justass (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- If you rotate the chess board incorrectly and start a game either the queen will be on the wrong color or the wrong side. Yes, the queen is in the wrong spot. Unless the image is intentionally trying to illustrate incorrect positioning it should be deleted. -Nard the Bard 22:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand queen must be placed on it's own colour at all images? --Justass (talk) 22:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I looked at that, but the SVG code is not easily read by humans. Also, there are plenty of correct diagrams in the category. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept - problem was fixed by Justass (non-admin closure). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Image description says the image is copyrighted. Powers (talk) 01:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete The author and original uploader do not appear to be the same. So we don't seem to have the necessary permission. --Simonxag (talk) 12:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission. Sv1xv (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Image appears to be from the http://www.rediff.com website and therefore copyright Eastmain (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete Given the watermark it is obviously from there. No evidence of permission at the original source site or of any connection between that and the Flickr account. --Simonxag (talk) 12:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted Copyvio. Sv1xv (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
"Own work" for logo seems unlikely; we need OTRS for the logo or it should be deleted. Jmabel ! talk 03:35, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 12:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted Copyvio: artistic logo. Sv1xv (talk) 06:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
What permission was given by the 'Socialist Alternative'? No OTRS permission is given and this is only 1 of 2 of the uploader's work here. The uploader also has had many images deleted according to his talkpage. Leoboudv (talk) 10:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete Failed Flickr review. We need OTRS permission (or a changed license on Flickr). --Simonxag (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Failed Flickr review (all rights reserved). Sv1xv (talk) 06:32, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Vanity photo, outside project scope. -Nard the Bard 19:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unencyclopedic, Low Quality, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Não deletar, pois é uma imagem livre de direitos autorais e é uma imagem de domínio público, não há nenhum motivo para esta imagem ser eliminada.
- Do not delete, it is an image free of copyright and is an image in the public domain, there is no reason why this image is eliminated.--Eduzão88 (talk) 19:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Porque no me parece lo suficiente enciclopédica para ser conservada. Algo tiene de mala intención. Basilio (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Delete, per Nard the Bard opinion. -- Bugoslav (talk) 00:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Useful to illustrate underarm hair and categorized as such. --Simonxag (talk) 13:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete Out of COM:SCOPE, poor quality. Sv1xv (talk) 06:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Unclear copyright situation: invalid source. The URL is not justifying a PD-USGov-Military-Navy. Evidence is not given that this image is a work of a sailor or employee of the U.S. Navy. High Contrast (talk) 00:35, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Unlikely to be in public domain. Website clearly says copyrighted. No permission given. mahanga (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete No permission at "source" site or (rather odd) site where permission is supposed to come from. --Simonxag (talk) 12:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
"Own work" for logo seems unlikely; we need OTRS for the logo or it should be deleted. Jmabel ! talk 03:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm just trying to do my job and make this site for my employer. Please direct me as to the appropriate way to use my company's logo. Kitetails 09:27, 16 November 2009
Ah. As I said above, see OTRS. But "make this site for my employer"? You and your employer are certainly entitled to release materials using Commons—in general, we welcome that—but assuming "this site" means something on Wikipedia, you probably shouldn't be writing about your own employer there. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. - Jmabel ! talk 16:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Also, do you understand that if your company is releasing its logo under a CC license they are giving up most control of the copyright? And if under public domain, then they are giving up all control of the copyright? If they still have trademark rights, they keep those, but most companies with copyrighted logos prefer to keep things that way. - Jmabel ! talk 16:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Permission should go to OTRS first. Huib talk 21:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Where is the permission for this image? Uploader Dianaross is not H. Drasdo and there is no proof the evidence is not a copy vio....which this seems to be. The uploader has had several images from his/her talkpage deleted already. Leoboudv (talk) 06:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete "Source: Hagen Drasdo per E-Mail" does not imply permission for a free licence. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Pieter. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
The uploader, Onderwijsgek, did not order a {{Flickrreview}} at upload and now the flickr image has been deleted. Secondly, there is a personality rights issue with this photo. Leoboudv (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete effectively unsourced. --Simonxag (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Scan of a book cover. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete A 1980 book cover is definitely copyrighted. The uploader seems to upload many other copy vios as his talkpage indicates. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
The same photo is at http://www.flickr.com/photos/29485597@N06/2820880745/ with "all rights reserved". The flickr resolution is lower than this file, so it is likely that the uploader received this by email from Drasdo. Hoever, there is no proof of permission for a free license. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete One cannot trust this uploader from the image deletion messages on his talkpage. No OTRS permission at all. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Irrelevent unused image, questionable source. User uploaded a sexually explicit photo, then later uploaded generic winter scene artwork over it. No other contributions by uploader, no use of image in Wikimedia. --Infrogmation (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- speedy delete this abomination. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The Commons is not censored, but the uploader's behaviour raises questions about the copyright status of these images. --Simonxag (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
converted to rfd by me from a speedy by the uploader for "Ich habe unter File:Thomas Prammer, Schiedsrichter (1).jpg ein besseres Bild hochgeladen / I've uploaded a better Foto File:Thomas Prammer, Schiedsrichter (1).jpg" --Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Believe me, that's a bad quality, I don't want to keep it for a longer time and it is not used in any poject. I'll make some more photos frpm Thomas Prammer soon. – Regards Steindy (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
According to [1], this image is a fake from an original NASA-image, where Dr. Serkan Anilir added his face. PD-USGov-NASA does no longer apply, an OTRS-permission from Serkan Anilir is not available. --myself488 (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 12:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I previously tagged this one as having no verifiable source or authorship information. This was removed, stating that "Image description is satisfactory now," although the description had not been modified since the image was tagged. I maintain that "personal database" is not a verifiable source and that there is no evidence that the author died more than 70 years ago, as it is claimed. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep From 1901, keep with {{PD-Cuba}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah, I was going to say that. -Nard the Bard 19:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
A duplicate of File:Jaguar head shot.jpg apart from the black rectangle over the jaguar's eyes. I'm not sure what this modification is supposed to accomplish. The file is not used anywhere and appears to fall outside the project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete duplicate with no educational purpose --Justass (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Out of project scope. --Abujoy (talk) 12:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Image was uploaded to en.wp with the license en:Template:PD-US - and the claim that it is used as non-free fair use. The PD-US claim is missing a verifiable source. Martin H. (talk) 17:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 12:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Appears to be a photomanipulated derivative of a photo which is credited to Reuters in several websites (for example, here), which would mean that it's not withint the Flickr uploader's legitimate rights to license the work and that it is probably also falls outside our project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete same flickr user freely uploads not his own images as those [2], [3] --Justass (talk) 21:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Converted from a speedy deletion, original reason was: This file has the wrong license and a copyrighted logo is used. --Sv1xv (talk) 18:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I don't normally vote keep when the only terms are "use freely" because there is always the risk that derivative works and commercial use are not included, but the terms[4] clearly indicate the intent that low-resolution versions are freely available and higher resolution versions require special licensing. I changed the license template to the more accurate {{Attribution}}. -Nard the Bard 19:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Have to agree with Bard. Its a generally low resolution photo and no restriction on its use is stated in the copyright source. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Huib talk 21:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Just an additional note. Image nominated again in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dk adm regions 2007.png --MGA73 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned personal image, not used in any page and not potentially usefull. Out of scope. Martin H. (talk) 19:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unencyclopedic, Low Quality, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
There is not a proper license for this file and it is out of scope. -Nard the Bard 21:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unencyclopedic, Low Quality, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete Given the alleged source I doubt the license. --Simonxag (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Not a photograph. Looks copyrightable to me. -Nard the Bard 21:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unusable file type. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Unidentified person. -Nard the Bard 21:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Licensing and source don't match reality. -Nard the Bard 21:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low quality, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Email pasted onto the file description page suggests no derivative works allowed, therefore not compatible with Commons. Stifle (talk) 21:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -FASTILY (TALK) 23:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Unused, useless. -Nard the Bard 22:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated, possible copyvio? -FASTILY (TALK) 23:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Commons is not a private webhost. -Nard the Bard 22:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality, very unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:47, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Commons is not a private webhost. -Nard the Bard 22:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
a 2006 self made photo with PD-old Licence is impossible. A bot Commons transfer from de: - see de:Datei:Kirche Riesenrad.jpg Jutta234 (talk) 21:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Might be changed to PD-self as the original uploader on :de (no longer active) explicitely claimed it to be own ("selbst fotografiert") and put it under {{Bild-PD-alt}}[5] (likely erroneously, instead of PD-self). --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- The German disc of the original uploader indicates that the user generally was unaware of or indifferent to potential license issues. Three of five discussion entries there deal with licensing topics. IMO it is very likely that PD-Old was chosen in error. Considering the general undertone on his discussion page I think it is safe to assume that the user would have chosen PD-self or similar upon having been made aware (presuming his claim of ownership for the file is correct). My summation: Change license and keep. --Hagar66 (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
![[5]](https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Kirche_Riesenrad.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=27508512){kind=link}
- Yes thats true. It seems realy that the uploader just not understand the difference between PD-old and PD-self. see also this Edit: [6] on the de:-Image. I would like to cancel the deletion request and keep the image. I will change the Licence now... regards. --Jutta234 (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
![[6]](https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Kirche_Riesenrad.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=66857653){kind=link}
Kept by Jutta234. Sv1xv (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
I, the original author of this image, do not want it on wikipedia. Down isthenew up (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- converted by me to rfd from a speedy by alleged author (see above) for "Author Request" and "Recommending deletion as the band do not want this on wikipedia or the commons" --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
We have (only) one more image of this band: File:KisschasyHardRock1.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- There is also an image on Wikipedia, here, but that was supposedly (/dubiously) posted by the label. I'm not sure about the criteria for deletion, but it seems this is no reason for deletion, you'd need to change the copyright of the image (is that even possible?)... not just "they say they don't like the photo". Anyway, at the time I uploaded this, these were the only photos of the band on Flickr, there appears to be more now, so doesn't bother me, there's better pics available. Kiac (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment Was uploaded to Flickr with free license but seems to have been removed. A few months have passed since upload but Flickr isn't as clear about the implications of a free license as we are and I think we should take the original license as a mistake by the author. So delete but only if they identify themselves to OTRS. --Simonxag (talk) 13:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
_____________________
Deleted,Flichr washing--Fanghong (talk) 09:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
There is no evidence the photo was published on a free license...and this is a relatively recent upload (less than 4 months old) Since the attributed author only has one image, I think on balance, that it is safer for Commons to delete here. Leoboudv (talk) 06:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Agree. Cuando subí la imágen a Commons, estaba correctamente licenciada como CC-BY-SA. Desconozco el motivo por el que el autor ha decidido eliminarla de su álbum, pero así las cosas, deberá ser borrada. Gracias por el aviso.
⇒ 
(I'm not an english-speaker. Sorry for my bad english.)When I uploaded the photo, it was correctly licensed as CC-BY-SA. I don't understand why the autor has change it. This way, it must be deleted. Thanks for the notice.
- Comment I believe it was under a free license at one time. The question of whether the flickr user was the author remains however. -Nard the Bard 19:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 23:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
This File was copied from a page with identical name on en:Wikipedia. If the File can be used on Wikipedia, why not on Commons? Estillbham (talk) 02:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Commons:Fair use. --Martin H. (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
This appers to fall outside of prject scope, personal picture of a user on wikipedia no use except for on that userpage Marcusmax(speak) 22:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Such images fall within the Commons:Project scope; "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (eg of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". Adambro (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
My picture, and I decided I dont like it. Faazshift (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm the uploader and owner and I want it deleted. Faazshift (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Personal user photo no longer in use, deletion requested by uploader/subject; no particular usefulness in any other context within project scope evident. -- Infrogmation (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Adambro (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Images of Category:John Quinlan (wrestler)
edit- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan 1998 File Photo.gif
- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan 9-1998 3.jpg
- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan 9-1998 4.jpg
- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan 9-1998 5.jpg
- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan 9-1998 6.jpg
- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan 9-1998.jpg
- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan On Stage Side Tricep Pose.jpg
- File:Bodybuilder John Quinlan at The 1998 Junior USA's.jpg
- File:John Quinlan 11-1999.jpg
- File:John Quinlan 1998 Nationals 10.jpg
- File:John Quinlan 1998 Nationals 8.gif
- File:John Quinlan 1998 Nationals 9.jpg
- File:John Quinlan Nationals 1.jpg
- File:John Quinlan Nationals 2.gif
- File:John Quinlan Springfield College 1997.jpg
- File:John Quinlan.GIF
- File:Peter Karalekas.gif
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan & Manager Miss IIXtreme File Photo 2000.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 1-2000.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 1999 File Photo.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 2000 In Ring File Photograph.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 2000 Tag Match Intro.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 2001 Television Taping.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 3-2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 6-2000 Photo.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 7-2000.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 4-2000.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan Intermission Photo 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan March 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan Photograph Taken From 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan Ring Shot 3-2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan Ringside Photo 2-2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan Steel Cage Match File Photo.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan as Irish Shane O'Kane at Ringside 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan as Shane O'Kane & The Boston Brawler in 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan as Shane O'Kane (masked) 2001.gif
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan as Shane O'Kane (unmasked) Summer 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan as Shane O'Kane 2001 File Photo.gif
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan as Shane O'Kane 7-2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan as Shane O'Kane Irish Flag Promo Photo 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler The Boston Brawler With John Quinlan in 2001.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 2001 Television Taping.jpg
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan 3-2001.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan 3-31-2001.gif
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan Autograph Signings.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan House Show Intermission 2001.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan June 2000 File Photo.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan March 2001 House Show Entrance.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan Post Match File Photo.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan Post Match Photo From April 2000.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan Post Match Signings 2000.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan Powerbombed Through Table On Pavement In Front of 14,000 Fans.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler's John Quinlan & The Boston Brawler (Jerry Bowser).jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler's Tony Roy, The Boston Brawler & John Quinlan in 2001.jpg
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan as Shane O'Kane 2001.gif
_2001.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Summer_2001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
I am personally outraged at the fact these image files were uploaded without my knowledge! Several friends have access to this account/password which is owned by me simply to modify it when they see fit. About a month ago I found out that a friend went in and uploaded these horrible quality images (all of which I NEVER would have approved to upload here on Commons) as well as personal photos for private scrapbook use. I personally have to much respect for the project for a stunt like this! I feel violated having my photos uploaded without my consent. I have wanted to notify Commons right away but have been pressed for time as of late. Please remove these image files immediatley due to the nature in which they were added......without the consent of me the sole owner and person being wrongfully depicted in these images. I know Commons will do the ethically right thing and remove these images as soon as possible because it is a very well respected project with good humane values. Thank you very much and I look forward to the resolution of this mishap,
Jaderocker (talk) 22:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comment In addition to whatever problems there are with the individual images, it seems that your account is compromised, and being used by others without your permission? This is certainly something that needs to be resolved. -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
I had previously given others the password to use on this account to modify it when they had addition information to add to it. Unfortunately some of these people can't be trusted because they went in without my knowledge and uploaded photos of horrible quality and photos I never would have approved because they are private scrapbook photos. I have just changed the password on this account so it is now secure and look forward to all these images marked for deletion to be DELETED as soon as possible. Thank you for your input.
Jaderocker (talk) 16:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per uploader request. Irrespective of quality, we cannot take any of these as being freely licensed as we have no way of telling who actually uploaded them. --Simonxag (talk) 13:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Simonxag! I just added 2 more file images to this list to be deleted. I think that's all of them. Yeah, the guy used my password to go in and upload some private pro wrestling pics! So wrong! Some people have nerve and no respect for others. Thanks again man!
Jaderocker (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Bottom line, somebody leaked my password and they uploaded these photos WITHOUT CONSENT! Password has been securely changed and look forward to these file images to be RIGHTFULLY deleted!
Jaderocker (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 21:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Images of Category:John Quinlan (wrestler)
edit- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan 3-2001.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Professional Wrestler John Quinlan 2001 Television Taping.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Pro Wrestler John Quinlan In Ring File Photo 2000.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
These images should have been deleted already with all the rest but they were titled wrong in the previous deletion request so they are unfortunately still there. These are the correct titles above. They should have been titled correctly in the first place in:
Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Category John Quinlan (wrestler)
The reason for the deletion of these image files is the same as all of the image files in the category above.....uploaded without proper consent of owner. Deletion of these image files ASAP would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time and appreciated effort along with the rest of the editors here on commons,
Jaderocker (talk) 14:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Jaderocker. The quicker the better. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
deleted Huib talk 09:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Banknotes and coins are not in public domain in Japan. Coins released in 2009 Justass (talk) 01:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Japanese coin Issue of Japan gobement. According to article 13 of the Copyright Act of Japan, ministerial announcements are PD (Ministry can't claim copyrights of announcements).--Carpkazu (talk) 01:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete unless someone can find Japanese written law or case law which makes currency "ministerial announcements". --Simonxag (talk) 12:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- 報道資料ですcome here(Japanese only)--Carpkazu (talk) 16:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per Simonxag. Kameraad Pjotr 19:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Doubtful that uploader made this film; anyway, the artist's permission is needed for a free license. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
What sort if permision? Scanned letter? Or interview? Don't ask send an Email to OTRS. --Gaeser (talk) 18:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- This was uploaded to Youtube on January 16. That version has credits in Georgian. It also has the little detail on what work is performed (Ballade nr 4 in f-moll). All this indicates copyvio - Delete. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
I repeat - what sort of permission do you need. It's not a problem to get it. P.S. Do you want a permission from a YouTube uploader? It's also not a problem.--Gaeser (talk) 07:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Permission is needed from the pianist and from the people who have the copyright on the film. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- What sort of it?--Gaeser (talk) 08:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 12:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- You know, cool. I'm asking what sort of permision you need, & there is no answer. Pretty nice.--Gaeser (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- First remember that you need permission from both the author of the video and the pianist. (If the film maker has already got permission from the pianist you can use that). Now follow this link. --Simonxag (talk) 13:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- You know, cool. I'm asking what sort of permision you need, & there is no answer. Pretty nice.--Gaeser (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- There's an OTRS ticket at OTRS:4058176, but I'm not altogether clear on what to do with it. Stifle (talk) 12:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Replied to the ticket. Essentially said a similar statement as Simonxag (talk · contribs), above. Cirt (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Gentlemen, please explain what do you want me to do. If your aim is to delete the file, so do it. --Gaeser (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied to the ticket. Essentially said a similar statement as Simonxag (talk · contribs), above. Cirt (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, can only be restored when both the author of the video and the pianist give permission for the file to be used under a free licence. See OTRS. Kameraad Pjotr 19:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
recent flags are not in public domain in France (no Public domain for work by or for governement). Also, the Cyber-flag are only drawers of those versions, dunno if they can claim copyright, but even if they do, they only allowed a "usage for wikipedia", this is not compatible with copyleft. (but as i said, they are not creators of this flag) Lilyu (talk) 03:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- also, derivative : File:Bandera Province Sud.svg--Lilyu (talk) 07:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 09:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Images of Category Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari
edit- File:CABINET_DES_DR_CALIGARI_01.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-02.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-03.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-04.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-05.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-06.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-07.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-08.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-082.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-1.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Caligari_1920_still_01.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Caligari_1920_still_02.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Caligari.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Caligari01.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
See Commons:Categories for discussion/Current_requests/2009/05/Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari.
I believe that each of the above images found in Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari (see below for the posters) is still under copyright in Germany because the last main creator of the film has not been dead for more than 70 years.
While director Robert Wiene died 1938, producer Erich Pommer died 1966 and writer Hans Janowitz died 1954, so the earliest PD-date (for Commons) should be 2036. Exceptions might be posters that were made in the United States using work wholly not derived from the film creators' work.
However, I also believe they are all eligible to be moved to the English Wikipedia under the tag {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}, see en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad. See en:File:Schreck.jpg for an example from Nosferatu. If Commons agrees I can transfer them to Wikipedia before they get deleted here.
Possibly free posters
These posters may be in public domain but each needs date of death of poster artist, or does a claim that it is a work for hire suffice for Commons?
- File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-poster.jpg. Given source is now stale and Wayback machine is under maintenance so we need to wait for this one
- File:Das_Kabinett_des_Doktor_Caligari_1920_Poster.jpg. Polish source http://www.filmweb.pl/f30689/Gabinet+doktora+Caligari,1920/plakaty show a thumbnail but I cannot find any more details.
-84user (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete delete the movie stills, sadly, as it appears they may still be copyrighted in Germany. The posters appear to be anonymous work and should be safe. File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-poster.jpg should especially be safe, since it's in English it is from the United States version and would qualify as having first published in the USA. -Nard the Bard 19:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- As a separate image, File:CABINETOFDRCALIGARI-03.jpg probably wouldn't qualify for copyright in Germany (unsure about the U.S. due to the background design, but it is pre-1923 anyways). However, I'm not entirely sure that would apply to a still lifted from a still-copyrighted film. Delete other stills from the move per Nard the Bard. As mentioned though, the posters would not be covered under the same copyright as the movie, so those should be kept (or processed through separate DRs if need be). PD-US is not a valid copyright tag for anything first published in Germany (the English poster was probably either first published in the US or UK though). Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - PD in the United States. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC))
- Strong Keep - PD in most of the English speaking world. Germany's laws are irrelevant to English WP.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.41.225 (talk • contribs)
- You appear to have gotten lost. This is not the English Wikipedia. This is Wikimedia Commons. -Nard the Bard 22:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not sure... copyrighted on Germany, PD on USA (where servers are located. Weren't they sysplexed to Europe yet?)... USA wins, but always desirable to respect all laws. Preferable moving it first to en.WP as stated, before deleting, if deleted. So, also File:Caligari02.jpg. -Aleator (talk) 00:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Can't the use of those constitue Fair Use? It's not like they're there for making money or being put on tshirts, just to give a general idea at what the film looks like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.139.81 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Fair-use does not allow editing, free-sharing and commercial use. That + it is not allowed in all countries (United States isn't everything). Therefor it is not allowed on Commmons, see also Commons:Fair use. –Krinkletalk 13:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, the film screenshots, kept the posters under {{Anonymous-EU}} & {{PD-US}}. Kameraad Pjotr 09:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)