Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gynecomastia001.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gynecomastia001.jpg

The image filename is misleading and implies that this is an image of gynecomastia in a male, but almost certainly it is not; actual gynecomastia doesn't look like that, as the numerous other images here will attest. Mathglot (talk) 07:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed the filename is misleading, but the Chinese description says "Feminine breasts" (Google translate), which fits with what the image shows. The English translation is wrong. The problem can be solved by deleting that English word and renaming the file to for example 女性化乳房.jpg Wouter (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it's in use so someone thinks it's useful. If the filename is wrong then rename it. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For a possible rename I checked whether 女性化乳房.jpg already exists in Commons. It appears that it existed and has been deleted. It has been uploaded by the same user so I suspect that 女性化乳房.jpg and Gynecomastia001.jpg are the same image. See also this image. The link http://113.34.24.37/m/m/38497/img/0025783484.jpg for "other versions" is not available (for me). The file Gynecomastia001.jpg is the only file uploaded by the user that has not been deleted sofar. Google gives also many hits. As this all is very suspect, I tend to suggest to have this file deleted. Wouter (talk) 18:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: would you like to advise, as the deleting admin? The only sidebar I'd like to make is that this is an old upload. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless if @Fæ, Jeff G., and Mattbuck: can explain why this has other educational means than sexual organs, or how this is fairly high definited, the COM:NUDITY applies, that said, low quality nudity images are not Commons needed. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have not voted in this DR, only asked an involved admin for clarification. --Fæ (talk) 07:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: very simple - it's in use on other projects, and COM:INUSE states A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattbuck: This image can be more useful than File:Weibliche_brust_en.jpg (found in Category:Breasts)? COM:NUDITY#New uploads states that New files of low resolution or poor quality which provide little descriptive information of a subject we already have files of may be nominated for deletion citing appropriate rationale(s). I don't think that why Mathglot's DR rationales are invalid. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Super. Go ahead and swap the usage to the photographs you think are superior, before making the point about COM:INUSE. Make sure you add notes to the related talk pages so you don't just get reverted. --Fæ (talk) 09:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fæ: You can see why I oppose your opinions here by reading 18 USC § 2256, § 2257 and § 2257A. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: What makes you think the subject is underage? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: This file may be more useful where it is COM:INUSE in Japanese and Chinese language Wikipedias than File:Weibliche brust en.jpg because that file has English language writing on it. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: We can translate words of Weibliche brust en, and hence multiple versions have same level of qualities and shares knowledges of breasts in many languages, why a dark breast image is "more useful" than light one? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: Please feel free to do so. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: I don't know what makes this image more useful than others, I only know that it is in use, and therefore it is within our scope. Further, I would say that even if you were to replace every usage of it, it would still be in scope, because it had been in use (and frankly it's not our place to decide what files other projects use so long as they are suitably licensed). -mattbuck (Talk) 14:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use, therefore in scope. Rename if necessary. --Yann (talk) 20:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gynecomastia001.jpg

Dubious copyright and the source page cannot be checked. All other images by this uploader have already been deleted. TadejM ^(t/p) 17:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]