Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingston Ontario 4.JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kingston Ontario 4.JPG

it was not needed Timkal (talk) 01:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a valid rationale for deletion. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kingston Ontario 4.JPG

I want it deleted because it was not used. Timkal (talk) 23:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ It is a good image, which is only known to be unused within WM sites. Somebody is potentially using it and linking to this page, but normal HTML won't generate a 'link-back'. There is also a potential future use that we mustn't discount. In other words the fact that the image is "unused" is not a reason to consider it for deletion. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above Sinnamon Girl. Not a valid rationale for deletion. Cekli829 (talk) 04:22, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per last deletion discussion, not a valid reason for deletion. Commons exists as a repository of free images for use by Wikipedia projects and other users. We do not delete images because someone claims it "was not used". --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Unused" is of course no reason to delete. However, the first deletion nomination was made by the uploader when the file had been up for 2 days, which is well within the period for the uploader to request deletion with no other reason imo. This is uploader-requested –⁠moogsi (blah) 05:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I change my vote to Neutral due to argument by moogsi above. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 06:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm inclined to allow the deletion request as it was originally made within 2 days of uploading, basically a "change of heart" even though it was released freely. Yes, the uploader is now using the "unused" reason but I think we need to consider his original request in good faith. However if it had been several weeks or months, I would not agree to delete it. As an aside I don't think it is a really great image anyway. Ww2censor (talk) 08:58, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Author requested deletion of an unused file. Out of respect for our contributors and donators, this kind of request should always be honored -FASTILY 08:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]