Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tri-bowl
Files in Category:Tri-bowl
editAll freely-licensed images here are infringements of architectural copyrights. South Korea does not provide commercial Freedom of Panorama. The work was completed in 2010 and authored by IARC Architects.
- File:20141231 122553 HDR.jpg
- File:20141231 123804 HDR.jpg
- File:Songdo IBD Tri-Bowl.jpg
- File:Songdo International Business District 05.JPG
- File:트라이볼 - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 03:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- What really annoys me is that nobody from Korean Wikipedia / Wikimedia seems to care to even bring it to the legislators. I asked. Silence. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Piotrus at least, there is already some stepping stones (the Korean Wikimedians are aware of the need to have a liberal FoP in their country, see also File:ESEAP 2024 - Awareness of copyright issue in South Korea.pdf). Still, there is lack of awareness outside Wikimedian circles. I also suspect that some government bodies there are benefitting from restrictive FoP law, since the copyrights of some monuments in the country are held by the relevant government ministries and bodies themselves, having transferred the copyrights from the sculptors and architects. See also Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2024-07#File:Statue of King Sejong (4273003660).jpg (failed undeletion request). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 07:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Thanks for the update. What about transferring such files to English Wikipedia, which AFAIK can host them? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Songdo_International_Business_District_05.JPG @IronGargoyle Frankly, I feel this is something we should bot, as well undelete and bot-transfer deleted images. We are loosing a lot of goodwill by not doing so (speaking for myself, one of the reasons I mostly stopped contributing stuff to Commons was the annoyance at having so much of it deleted due to FoP issues). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Piotrus possible, but there's no bot at the moment. IronGargoyle and others may need to manually import files to enwiki. French Wikipedia had a working bot in the past but it seems to have been discontinued; also, the locally-hosted files on frwiki have no guarantee of long-term retention, and frwiki admins will take the local images down if valid complaints from architects or estates have been filed (see the last section of COM:FOP France). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- If complains are filed, fine, but the commons pracautionary principle, is, well, I already said - the reason I don't bother to upload stuff much, and I know others who said the same. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Piotrus possible, but there's no bot at the moment. IronGargoyle and others may need to manually import files to enwiki. French Wikipedia had a working bot in the past but it seems to have been discontinued; also, the locally-hosted files on frwiki have no guarantee of long-term retention, and frwiki admins will take the local images down if valid complaints from architects or estates have been filed (see the last section of COM:FOP France). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 02:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 Thanks for the update. What about transferring such files to English Wikipedia, which AFAIK can host them? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Songdo_International_Business_District_05.JPG @IronGargoyle Frankly, I feel this is something we should bot, as well undelete and bot-transfer deleted images. We are loosing a lot of goodwill by not doing so (speaking for myself, one of the reasons I mostly stopped contributing stuff to Commons was the annoyance at having so much of it deleted due to FoP issues). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Piotrus at least, there is already some stepping stones (the Korean Wikimedians are aware of the need to have a liberal FoP in their country, see also File:ESEAP 2024 - Awareness of copyright issue in South Korea.pdf). Still, there is lack of awareness outside Wikimedian circles. I also suspect that some government bodies there are benefitting from restrictive FoP law, since the copyrights of some monuments in the country are held by the relevant government ministries and bodies themselves, having transferred the copyrights from the sculptors and architects. See also Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2024-07#File:Statue of King Sejong (4273003660).jpg (failed undeletion request). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 07:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- What really annoys me is that nobody from Korean Wikipedia / Wikimedia seems to care to even bring it to the legislators. I asked. Silence. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)