Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by NCroatie

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NCroatie (talk · contribs)

COM:NUDE, personal spam/F10

Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While it's true that images of human anatomy, such as labia, buttocks, and breasts, often carry cultural and social taboos, it is essential to recognize that these images can serve educational, referential, and artistic purposes. In medical, biological, and educational contexts, visual representations of human anatomy are invaluable for study, research, and the promotion of understanding about the body. Furthermore, these images can be used to convey important information regarding health, anatomy, and human diversity. Artistically, depictions of the human form—whether in classical art or contemporary expressions—serve to explore themes of identity, beauty, and vulnerability. Unfortunately, despite their significance, images of these body parts are often underrepresented on platforms like Wikimedia Commons, where content is intended to be a comprehensive and accurate reflection of human knowledge. This lack of imagery limits access to valuable resources for education, research, and artistic exploration, depriving users of a complete and nuanced understanding of human anatomy in a respectful, informed, and thoughtful context. NCroatie (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ai written reply is a big no for me. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So with my own words (sorry for the grammar, English is not my mother tongue): Female parts especially breasts, buttocks, and labia have been used against women throughout history to shame and control them, despite these parts being natural and beautiful. Artistic photography of them has the power to normalise them and to end the unecessary taboo around them. You'd have 100 pictures of the same mountain of Wikimedia commons, but almost inexistant Female parts pictures (at least good quality ones), and I believe mine are as I take great care in taking them the most difficult part being having the right lighting. Modern times give us cameras that would have been before painting and sculpting. I hope that this answers any questions. Thanks. NCroatie (talk) 20:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to add, you said it all... Keep R. A. Sterling (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) Need your insight here please NCroatie (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My feeling is that we don't need so many similar photos of a woman's ass, for example, but my inclination would be to oppose deletion of all of these files en masse and instead want to focus on specific groups of similar views and determine whether some of them should be kept. I'll say Keep for now, but if you renominate the buttocks pics as a group, I'll be happy to give my opinion about which 1-2 we should keep. Etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All I see is a whole lot of images of asses and pudendas (pudendae?) which we both have a lot of. Unless an image is of truly exceptional quality I will pretty much always vote to delete it if it’s just a butt, a penis, a vulva, boobs, nudity etc. since we have plenty of those and they’re more likely to just be used as vandalism even if good quality and uploaded in good faith. Dronebogus (talk) 07:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Dronebogus, may I ask how my images can be used for vandalism? There is nothing shocking about them, they are just natural. Also, I don't see plenty images of asses and pudendae, it seems to me that it's pretty empty, outdated, and of miserable quality. I take all of my pictures with great care so it's quite disappointing to see them as marked for deletion. I'll admit there is a set of similar ones called Artistic Female Buttocks Reference followed by a number, I didn't think it would be an issue as I saw someone uploading dozens of similar pictures of the same mountain. I wouldn't mind the series to be deleted for repetition and number 7 to be kept though, this is the higuest quality one of the set. NCroatie (talk) 07:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dumb people like putting pictures of butts or penises in inappropriate contexts Dronebogus (talk) 07:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: Another bunch of nominated files at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Artistic Representation of a Woman 3.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A1CafelThese two deletion requests of several pictures are being dismissed by the large majority of voters. I hope that next time you will think twice before submitting files for deletion. And I of course want my images to be used in appropriate contexts and on the appropriate pages. My goal is to contribute and to enrich, and the nudity sections on wikimedia commons desperately need an update with high quality content (litterally, pixel wise) and a photograph would be able to appreciate the quality of my pictures. Waiting for the right light, shooting hundreds of shots and selecting only a few good ones, less than a dozen! This took several hours. So it is very disappointing for me to see such requests on my pictures. I hope you understand that now. NCroatie (talk) 07:57, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i didnt exactly check up files, just put my eyes on these with little effort. but i say Keep. because some of these are good. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 10:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do not see these images as spam, only as quality images of the female body - we have loads of images of naked women with downright lousy quality - and therefore they should be kept. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. I'm unconvinced that these files is _targeted for educational use, and they are not at good quality too. I think we had enough photos of women buttocks and vulva, so it won't be a big loss to delete them. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:34, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @A1Cafel These file are _targeted or educational, referential, and artistic use. I must disagree with your statements, and strongly: these files are of very high quality, please check their resolution. Also, these pictures have been taken with professional cameras for all of them, most of them also in professional settings for many of those inside in a studio with professional equipment. The ones outside were taken on sunny days, wuen the sun was at the zenith to have the best possible lighting. And lastly, there are not enough good photos of buttocks and vulva, the ones there are are of horrible quality and very old. NCroatie (talk) 07:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Iwaqarhashmi. Adding a long AI-generated text (according to Zerogpt, the text is very likely to be AI/GPT Generated) did not convince me that these files are educationally useful. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, didn't convince me either. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 08:13, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Iwaqarhashmi Here is why these files should be kept on wikimedia commons: these files are of very high quality pixel wise and DPI wise. They also have amazing lighting and the pictures were taken in professional settings with professional equipment while maintaining a normal/natural aspect. They have several educational values being artistic reference (for drawing, painting, photography, etc), anatomy reference, health reference. They can also be used on wikipedia pages or similar platforms, or for publications, articles, etc. And the most important point: these pictures convey the message that nudity is normal, just a state, and a part of the body that should be considered as normal as a nose for example and that have been made unjustly taboo and shamed by outdated cultural norms. It cannot be argued rationally or scientifically that nudity is not normal and by repeateadly viewing such images, of normal nudity settings, nudity comes accross as normal, as a state of being. Shaming and hiding such pictures only lead to a sick and unhealthy society where nudity can be used against people through manipulation or blackmailing and this wouldn't be the case if nudity was seen as normal by everyone. And this is written by me. NCroatie (talk) 11:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, on the basis of pixel count and lighting. I took a look, for science, and they appear to be... erm... educational and well-composed. 12000x16000 pixels! JayCubby (talk) 20:58, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Educational ass?! 🤔 186.174.134.136 22:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, you could almost say Educassional 😂 Joke aside, this is a high quality image that wouldn't deserve censorship. It could be used in an art class where you have people painting. A nude model can be expensive and this image printed in large as it is of high quality could be an alternative. All body parts are needed in these classes. 🎨 TheMediaReviewer (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We have only few such hq pictures in the human body categories. --Veliensis (talk) 19:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: keep. could have been no consensus, but in that case it would be defaulted to keep anyway. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NCroatie (talk · contribs)

this is looking too much memey. it looks like a meme. we shouldnt use this for anscylopedic(i cant write ansiklopedik :/) purposes. so, remove please.

File:The Origin of the Heart Shape.jpg

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 10:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OOS Dronebogus (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No educational value -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 06:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]