Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ommayad7.jpg
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
No source, date or author OsamaK 19:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Information might be better, but as reproduction of mosaic that was already old in the 19th century (whatever its original date might be), I don't see any copyright violation so lean to keep. -- Infrogmation 20:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- How did you know? Source must be given in this case.--OsamaK 20:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- The image description says "Details of Barada Mosaic on the Wall of Umayyad Mosque". The artwork is not of recent generations; maybe more than 1,000 years [1]? In any case, old enough for the original mosaics not to be copyrighted. Might your concern be about the photo-- does the PD-Art tag apply under Syrian law? -- Infrogmation 21:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- mmm, I can't find this image in your source--OsamaK 10:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- The image description says "Details of Barada Mosaic on the Wall of Umayyad Mosque". The artwork is not of recent generations; maybe more than 1,000 years [1]? In any case, old enough for the original mosaics not to be copyrighted. Might your concern be about the photo-- does the PD-Art tag apply under Syrian law? -- Infrogmation 21:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- How did you know? Source must be given in this case.--OsamaK 20:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
PD-Art is included in syrian rights law .. actualy any picture is considered Pd after just 10 years of its production ... no one knows the original painter or the dact date but it si certainl dates back to the mamluk or ottoman period ... in this case .. i wonder why Osama insists to get a source --Chaos 10:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's not Wikimedia Commnos law, SOURCE MUST BE INCLUDED. Some users think source isn't very important in PD-art, but they say: at lest the author and date. That's it! :)--OsamaK 15:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Cecil 15:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
