Strong oppose - First time I've ever used this but it fits. The image seems fake, perhaps if the angle were higher it could prove it's real. --Golbez08:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeI can see nothing to indicate this is a trick photo change vote - at full size it is clearly faked (signpost is too sharply focussed compared to rest of pic) - MPF16:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Trick or not, that is not really the question. An image is an image. The paintings depicted in some of the nominees here are they not tricks? They are interpretations not only of reality, but even of fantasies. Or what is depicted in Eugène Delacroix´s "La liberté guidant le peuple" really happened just like that? Are we judging the symbol or a picture of a painting? An image is a conveyor of an idea, symbol or message. An image does not exist in a vacum, it has (or should) have a purpose. I doubt that Michaelangelo´s paintings are a literal interpretaion of what he saw. Did he really see Adam like that? No, he tricked him!!! He used nature and its forms to piece together his vision. Painters have often “flattered” their subjects… and in many cases improved the work of nature, or the message. Are women (or men) who use make up not tricked? Photography is a medium. And yes, it is a photo composition. And yes, you have the right to not like it. And yes, the trash was there. Please hate this image, but hate it not because it is a "tricked" image, but as the reflection of who we are.--Tomascastelazo17:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the relevance of the trick issue is that if it weren't a trick image it would have some informative value. --Artefacto21:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose — look carefully at the image, yes its constructed but of greater concern is that a corporation is clearly identifiable in the image. The formatting and title sufficiently suggest that the corporation is responsible for the rubbish(trash, garbage). Yet look through the rubbish I could not find anything that appears to be from this corporation. I wonder if by keeping and thus publishing this image Wikimedia and the creator are exposed to potential deformation actions this image should be in the Commons:Deletion requests nomination page not here Gnangarra14:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Info created by Tomas Castelazo - uploaded by Tomas Castelazo - nominated by Tomascastelazo 00:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Support --Tomascastelazo 00:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose edited image --Artefacto 02:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Strong oppose Ss181292 06:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC) -- this photo is: 1. not informative i any way; 2. probably this is trick photo; 3. upload it on http://www.allfunnypictures.com, not on http://commons.wikimedia.org.
Neutral Bat Colors, but an unpleasant example of our company of consomation --Luc Viatour 11:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Comment Trick or not, that is not really the question. An image is an image. The paintings depicted in some of the nominees here are they not tricks? They are interpretations not only of reality, but even of fantasies. Or what is depicted in Eugène Delacroix´s "La liberté guidant le peuple" really happened just like that? Are we judging the symbol or a picture of a painting? An image is a conveyor of an idea, symbol or message. An image does not exist in a vacum, it has (or should) have a purpose. I doubt that Michaelangelo´s paintings are a literal interpretaion of what he saw. Did he really see Adam like that? No, he tricked him!!! He used nature and its forms to piece together his vision. Painters have often “flattered” their subjects… and in many cases improved the work of nature, or the message. Are women (or men) who use make up not tricked? Photography is a medium. And yes, it is a photo composition. And yes, you have the right to not like it. And yes, the trash was there. Please hate this image, but hate it not because it is a "tricked" image, but as the reflection of who we are.--Tomascastelazo 17:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
