Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 29 2024
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Portal of the St Bartholomew church in Étais, Côte-d'Or, France. --Tournasol7 04:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Castle of Montbard, Côte-d'Or, France. --Tournasol7 04:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Musée François Pompon, Côte-d'Or, France. --Tournasol7 04:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Municipal library in Saulieu, Côte-d'Or, France. --Tournasol7 04:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Alter Krahn on the Mosel. Detail (Attachment ring)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Trier, Alter Krahn on the Mosel. Detail (Attachment ring)
-
- Nomination Flower bud of a Magnolia, Focus stack of 17 photos.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Flower bud of a Magnolia, Focus stack of 17 photos.
-
- Nomination Warthogs, Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa --XRay 04:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moon, Makalali Game Reserve (Greater Makalali Private Game Reserve), Maruleng, Limpopo, South Africa --XRay 04:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bourke’s Luck Potholes, Blyde River Canyon Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga, South Africa --XRay 04:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape, Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa --XRay 04:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cherry blossom on Breite Straße in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thuy Trung Tien Pagoda, Hanoi --Jakubhal 03:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset in Ninh Hải, Ninh Binh province, Vietnam --Jakubhal 03:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Bai Chay beach, Ha Long, Vietnam --Jakubhal 03:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Stone Boat, Chinese Garden, Montreal Botanical Garden --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, this is nice scene but actual resolution and detail is really now due extreme NR applied. --Plozessor 03:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boulder Mountain above the Mountain View Cemetery, Revelstoke, British Columbia, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MV Spirit of Vancouver Island navigating Active Pass, British Columbia, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Mismaloya Arches, Jalisco, Mexico. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Hotel Zone waterfront, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest hiking trail in Plaschischen, Keutschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest hiking trail in Plaschischen, Keutschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest hiking trail in Plaschischen, Keutschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest hiking trail in Plaschischen, Keutschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest hiking trail in Plaschischen, Keutschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paris Quai de la Mégisserie (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 22:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Liberty, New York City (by Jakubhal) --Sebring12Hrs 22:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Michael church in Bertre (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 22:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Garrigues (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 22:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medeu–Shymbulak Cableway in Almaty --MB-one 21:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lightning strike over Es Vedrà island, Ibiza, Spain. By User:Elkiwi68 --Yann 21:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A dunlin (Calidris alpina) on a rock in Trouviller-sur-Mer, France. --Alexis Lours 17:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Cetti's warbler (Cettia cetti) in a blossoming tree in Trilbardou, France. --Alexis Lours 17:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) on a roof in Île d'Aix, France. --Alexis Lours 17:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male northern wheatear in Île d'Aix, France. --Alexis Lours 17:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Greater plantain (Plantago major) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 13:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marienleuchte lighthouse (island of Fehmarn). By User:Unukorno --Maximilian Reininghaus 12:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 16:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sea purslane (Halimione portulacoides) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination St Mary's Basilica in Gdańsk - Jesus Crucifixion Stained Glass --Scotch Mist 09:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Mary's Basilica in Gdańsk - large reproduction of The Last Judgement (Memling) --Scotch Mist 09:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline The blue reflection at the left is very disturbing. Sometimes it is difficult to get a good photo of suchs paintings. -- Spurzem 13:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madonna and Child in an Evening Landscape - Titian --GoldenArtists 08:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Excellent quality. --Scotch Mist 09:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lexus RZ 450e in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 07:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agapetes moorei at Kew Gardens --Mike Peel 07:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 'Bush Lily', Clivia miniata, at Kew Gardens --Mike Peel 07:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Echium nervosum at Kew Gardens --Mike Peel 07:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inside Aga Khan Palace --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Lack of detail, sorry. --Alexander-93 07:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Float of the 2023 flower parade of Zundert titled "Emptiness" --ReneeWrites 06:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Float of the 2023 flower parade of Zundert, titled "You'll never walk alone" --ReneeWrites 06:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Les Eucherts, La Rosière, France. --DimiTalen 06:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Téléski Bellecombe, La Rosière, France. --DimiTalen 06:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter landschape with Mont Blanc, La Thuile, Italy. --DimiTalen 06:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La Chaufferie Huet, Rue du Pré Catelan, in La Madeleine, France --Velvet 06:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination School, Rue du Moulin, in La Madeleine, France --Velvet 06:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Goldstone Pneumatic valve. --Wasiul Bahar 05:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Too blurry, sorry. --Alexander-93 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
@Alexander-93 Thanks for the review. But are you talking about background blur?--Wasiul Bahar 10:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
No, the main object and the letters. --Alexander-93 17:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Info Reset to "/Decline". Please do not revert to "/Nomination" if there is a vote. Please set to "/Discuss" instead if you wish to challenge it. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of the Chapel of Our Lady of Fatima in Obergreuth --Ermell 05:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sambach Castle aerial view --Ermell 05:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of the church in Staffelbach --Ermell 05:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Assumption church in Montigny/Aube, Côte-d'Or, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Germain of Auxerre church in Courban, Côte-d'Or, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Bartholomew church in Étais, Côte-d'Or, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Bartholomew church in Le Mayet-d'École, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Holy Innocents church in Bussieres, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier-Pallien, Kirche St. Simon und Juda (built in 1786), Statue of saints on pedestal in the church.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Trier-Pallien, Kirche St. Simon und Juda (built in 1786), Statue of saints on pedestal in the church.
-
- Nomination Trier-Pallien, Kirche St. Simon und Juda, altar in the church.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Trier-Pallien, Kirche St. Simon und Juda, altar in the church.
-
- Nomination Natural monument "English oak" south of Schwebheim --Plozessor 03:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Qutub Minar with lady --Rangan Datta Wiki 09:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment I dont recomend f/18 at this camera. Some f/11-14 max --PetarM 09:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
CA --Nikride 14:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I dont see CA, but sharpnes is lost due to diffraction. --PetarM 18:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
on female silhouette and shadow --Nikride 18:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
* Insufficient quality. --Smial 09:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motława River in Gdańsk - Western Embankment --Scotch Mist 08:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motława River in Gdańsk - Rotating Bridge --Scotch Mist 08:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Żuraw (Crane - Water Gate), Motława River in Gdańsk --Scotch Mist 08:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Jaguar XF (X260) Sportbrake Facelift in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 07:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Škoda Scala Facelift in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 07:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A swan brooding in the former basin of the Monthey wastewater treatment plant, which has been converted into a pond. --Espandero 21:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose the swan is overexposed --MIGORMCZ 22:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
MIGORMCZ I tried to correct the lighting on the swan. Let me know if it works better this way. --Espandero 18:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
@Espandero: Still, when I look at the swan's back and neck, I see significant overexposure (as well as some of the reed stalks). It's not QI for me, but you can send it to the CR process. --MIGORMCZ 07:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Member of Ankor (banda) --Brackenheim 14:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination A jebba embroiderer in medina of Tunis --IssamBarhoumi 14:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline A bit dark and too tight crop. We should see the complete hand and head of the tailor. -- Spurzem 12:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC) dear Spurzem I do not have a better crop with this hand postion but I changed the file with another hand position have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 09:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Oppose Sorry, out of focus --Alexander-93 09:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC) dear --Alexander-93 thank you so I will revert the previous file it is better and I like the hand position even it is badly cropped thank you I will do better in others photos --IssamBarhoumi 11:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Star of David, valid SVG code (original by Zscout370) --Thi 15:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Nice, but too simple for QI IMO --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Orthodox cross, valid SVG code (by Анатолий Деманов) --Thi 15:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Also too simple IMO --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ichthys symbol. The SVG code is valid (by Fibonacci) --Thi 15:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Also to simple IMO; sorry --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz GLB in Leonberg --Alexander-93 08:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Eibergen-NL, church: the Oude Mattheüskerk --Michielverbeek 06:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fish market --Wasiul Bahar 05:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Would be nice to have more information about the type of fish shown --MB-one 19:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaevich photographed from above. Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Красный --Екатерина Борисова 00:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gardener house, Znamenka. Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Красный --Екатерина Борисова 00:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Review
This depicts a small part of the house, not the whole house. Description (and CAT) needs to be more precise. --Tagooty 02:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Done --Екатерина Борисова 03:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cargo bike racing at VELOBerlin 2024 --MB-one 09:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diesel locomotives of Bangladesh --Wasiul Bahar 05:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Its a bit overexposed (the roof of the coaches are blending into the sky). A location info would be nice as well --MB-one 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
@MB-one Location added, Tried to fixed exposure. Ok now?--Wasiul Bahar 13:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Support Good enough now. But keep an eye on banding (sky) and mask out of focus areas before sharpening in the future. --MB-one 19:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wood worker at dhaka --Wasiul Bahar 05:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose It seems it's not in focus enough. --Sebring12Hrs 17:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz W210 AMG 50 in Bietigheim-Bissingen --Alexander-93 17:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion The hood, windshield and roof are too bright. I'm also bothered by the many people with their heads cut off in the background. -- Spurzem 17:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Comment @Spurzem: thanks for the review, I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 16:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Better now, but no good surroundings -- Spurzem 11:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of residencial building in Visby, Sweden. --ArildV 17:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
I don't mind the leaning of the sides, but the round part in the centre should be vertical IMO. Wikicode in the SDC caption should be removed also. --MB-one 08:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Done, thank for review --ArildV 08:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Support Nice. Thank you --MB-one 19:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eid shopping at market --Wasiul Bahar 16:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Shadows should be raised a bit. Otherwise good --MB-one 08:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
@MB-one Tried to fix. Ok now?
It's better, but not enough yet --MB-one 14:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
@MB-one Raised more, now? :-) --Wasiul Bahar 13:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Support Looks good t me now --MB-one 19:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: La Vièze à Monthey en 2024. --Espandero 19:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Needs a better description (name of prominent mountain, bridge). Otherwise good. --Tagooty 00:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Tagooty I've added the name of the mountains in notes but they're not the main point of the picture so I don't know if adding them to the description is a good idea. For the bridge I honestly don't know anything about it. It's not a public bridge, it just looks like two metal beams with a metal cover and probably pipes under the cover. - Espandero 12:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The three towers of the Pruneyard complex in Campbell, California, with CA-17 visible to the left. The view is looking generally north. --Grendelkhan 07:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Slightly tilted CW. Otherwise good --MB-one 15:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Rotated slightly, thanks. --Grendelkhan 06:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
That was a little too much. The flat horizon should be level. --MB-one 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Tried again; how's that? Grendelkhan 09:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality now. --MB-one 19:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tirthankara Statue inside the Deuli Temple --Rangan Datta Wiki 06:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Review Comment What are those white areas at the right and left top ? --Sebring12Hrs 13:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mosque in Algeria --Riad Salih 22:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Review Comment Perspective correction is needed, not centered. --Sebring12Hrs 09:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mosque in Algeria --Riad Salih 22:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Perspective correction needed, otherwise ok --MB-one 07:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Oppose 
Not done --MB-one 19:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Listed house in Karlsruhe --Killarnee 18:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Good photograph but essential categories are missing (type of building, time of erection, protection status, etc.) --MB-one 07:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Oppose Not done Please renominate after the issues are fixed --MB-one 19:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
_edited.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
editFile:Gdansk_2023_40.jpg
edit
- Nomination National Museum in Gdańsk - Archangel Michael in Memling's Last Judgement --Scotch Mist 09:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry, not a QI with that reflexion on the right --Poco a poco 10:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Image The area with the reflection was retained because it highlighted the condemned sinners - should that area have been cropped? --Scotch Mist 11:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You need to change from a ambiguous file name to one that briefly describes the image. --Tournasol7 05:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The reflection is on the right and in the central part too. --MIGORMCZ (talk) 06:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It might not be possible to take a better picture during a regular visit of that museum, but sorry, the reflections are really disturbing. --Plozessor 03:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → 
Declined --Mike Peel 12:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined --Mike Peel 12:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)File:Gdansk_2023_42.jpg
edit
- Nomination National Museum in Gdańsk - Mary Triptych --Scotch Mist 09:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Too blurry, sorry. Also, the file name and description are a bit misleading. --Peulle 09:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Beautiful image though it ist taken with 800 ISO and it is not so sharp as we like it. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 10:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose With an exposure time of 1/13 it'd have been better to use a tripod. As above, too blurry. --Alexander-93 10:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You need to change from a ambiguous file name to one that briefly describes the image. --Tournasol7 05:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too blurry for QI. --MIGORMCZ (talk) 06:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurred --Jakubhal 06:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurred. Which is not a result of high ISO but of camera movement, should probably have used even higher ISO (or a tripod of course). --Plozessor 03:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Mike Peel 12:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined --Mike Peel 12:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)File:Église_de_Choëx_-_Tribune_de_l'orgue_et_entrée.jpg
edit
- Nomination The organ loft and main entrance to Choëx church. --Espandero 20:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 21:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunate lighting. The organ is too dark and the entrance is much too bright. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 10:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Spurzem well the organ is made of darker wood and the entrance has a light right on top of it so I don't know what I could have done different while taking this picture. You can see on another file that the organ's wood is dark. I feel like the details on the file we're discussing here are sufficient to prove it's not a lighting issue. I don't feel very comfortable trying to play with lights settings in Lightroom to alter the reel lighting but I could try if I have to. - Espandero 18:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light is ok, there are neither pitch black shadows nor blown out highlights. IMO the picture is good. --Plozessor 03:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted --Mike Peel 12:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Promoted --Mike Peel 12:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)File:Flamants_à_Thyna_(Sfax)_edited.jpg
edit
- Nomination Greater flamingos at Thyna salt plains, Tunisia (by El Golli Mohamed, edited by Aristeas). – Aristeas 14:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Derivative work of an image that is already QI, I don't understand this nom, to bo honest --Poco a poco 19:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Exactly that’s the point. The original image is a QI in spite of being noticeably underexposed, tilted, and showing CAs. This version improves all these points. To be honest I wonder why the original image has ever been promoted to QI status. I do not want to propose to delist it (seems we do not have rules for delisting or replacing QIs, do we?), but if people search for a QI of that subject they should at least find also this improved version, not only the defective original one. This is why I have nominated the derivative version, and why IMHO this deserves a discussion. --Aristeas 09:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The source is also a featured picture with ten supporting votes and five opposing votes. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, that’s a different story. The nominator did not offer the edited version as an alternative although several users suggested that and even more voters noted shortcomings of the original picture. Hence the FP status does not mean that the original version is better. Therefore I would suggest that we assess the edited image (the one nominated here) according to the usual QI criteria. If one thinks that it is bad (or even worse than the original one), clearly one should vote with “oppose”. If one thinks both images are equally good, one can vote “oppose” for the reason given by Poco a Poco above (no need to promote a derivative version when the original one is rightly a QI). However if one thinks that this edited image fulfills the criteria of the QI guidelines and is better than the original one, one could vote with “support”. --Aristeas 13:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I did not create this derivative version in order to get “yet another QI” etc., but just because I wanted to help other people – the photographer did not react to the suggestions made by several people for improving the original image. Now IMHO it would be just correct that people who search for a “good image” (QI etc.) of this subject will not find only the original one, but also the edited version. – Aristeas 13:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am fine with a replace (this one becomes QI, the other one revokes it) but not with granting 2 QI stamps to the same picture Poco a poco 20:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Question OK, but how can we make a replace? – Aristeas 16:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support This image clearly meets the criteria for QI. We have no rules against nominating derivative work. I don't see why this very good image should not get the QI mark. --Kritzolina 20:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Poco.--Ermell 08:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The problem is homemade. Photos that have already been given a badge must not be overwritten. FP can have their status revoked, but QI cannot. I could not find a rule that very similar or (improved) derived photos may not have a QI badge. In a pragmatic world, such a revision would have simply been copied over the existing version with the note "If you don't like it as the image author, please reset". I've done this a few times with QI candidates. But, see rule 1: You're not allowed to do that with photos that have already won an award. I don't currently see anything that would prohibit the QI status for both images. --Smial 11:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Kritzolina. --Smial 11:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Kritzolina and Smial --Plozessor 03:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nominating derivative versions of QI's, even if they're slightly improved, is a stance that's incredibly easy to abuse. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Smial's comment --MIGORMCZ 08:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I found this discussion by coincidence: A few months ago, there was a similar discussion where the consensus was against re-nominating an improved derivative. I admit that the improvements were less than in this image. Just for reference in the context of this discussion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support In my opinion, the significant improvement justifies a promotion. I would like to agree with the statements of Aristeas and Smial. --Radomianin 13:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Smial --Jakubhal 18:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support given the fundamental QI objective of making better quality images available via Commons, the argument of Aristeas appears sound providing appropriate credit is given to the original author which seems to be the case here! --Scotch Mist 09:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Mike Peel (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Promoted --Mike Peel (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)