Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 08 2016

Consensual review

edit

File:Naples_from_the_Castello_Sant_Elmo_with_Abbazia_San_Martino.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination View of the gulf of Naples from the Castel Sant'Elmo with the Certosa di San Martino. --Moroder 19:56, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:09, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There´s a vertical, thin white line on the right side. I don´t know what it is, but it´s a bit disturbing. I´ve made a note there. --Milseburg 22:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   fixed The stitching problem, thanks @Milseburg: --Moroder 02:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support of course now. --Milseburg 10:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 09:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 09:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

File:16-03-30-Ста́рый_го́род_Иерусали́ма-RalfR-DSCF7650.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Old City of Jerusalem --Ralf Roletschek 19:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 21:00, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but there are a lot of dust spots to be removed. --Basotxerri 22:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)  Support OK now. --Basotxerri 15:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Yep. (Maybe add personality warning since many of the Haredi don't like being photographed.)--Peulle 10:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Haeferl 00:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --King of Hearts 04:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Harders_kasseapparat.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The oldest cash register which is in use in Denmark, is in menswear store Harder in Aarhus and is from 1917. --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Too noisy and partially unsharp, not a QI for me, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment Noise removed. --Villy Fink Isaksen 16:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
      •   Comment Noise had been removed and looks better now. --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Sorry, but in my opinion, the depth of field is too shallow and the glare on the left side is also a problem. -- Ikan Kekek 05:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, as Ikan Kekek, and too tight IMO. Left vertical lines are tilted CW--Lmbuga 15:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 09:58, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Sendero_botanico_Hoz_de_Beteta_04.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Botanical trail in Hoz de Beteta. Beteta, Cuenca, Spain. --ElBute 10:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Uoaei1 11:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Just saying it's a photo taken using a (very good, indeed) mobile phone doesn't mean anything at all about its quality. I've got several QI taken with this mobile (Nexus 6P). Could you please give some objective reason to support your rejection? --ElBute 12:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Distortion (probably not fixable, I think) and seeming chromatic aberration (excessive blue) in shadows. -- Ikan Kekek 07:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as others --Hubertl 14:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you all guys for the review. It's very valuable to me. --ElBute 08:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 10:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Amphitheatre_of_El_Jem_Mahdia.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Amphithéâtre. By User:Yassin Grayaa --Touzrimounir 20:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support PRO! The blue sky rocks me, really- You have some small green CA´s at contours, and 1/60tel kills some sharpness, but WTF. A really impressive image! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 23:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. The pic is heavily oversaturated, it has very distinct CA and purple fringes almost everywhere, most of it is unsharp and it needs perspective correction, sorry. --W.carter 14:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As for W.carter. --Smial 21:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The CA fringes are unacceptable and the perspective has to be fixed.--Ermell 09:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per others. --Basotxerri 09:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 16:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
  NODES
Idea 1
idea 1
Note 3