User talk:Fridolin freudenfett/Archive 1

File:HalenseeSeesenerStraße1.JPG

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Fridolin freudenfett!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Schmargendorf Kranzer Straße.jpg was uncategorized on 18 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Dahlem Königin-Luise-Straße Kriegerdenkmal.JPG was uncategorized on 1 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Heiligensee Bekassinenweg..jpg was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Heiligensee Bekassinenweg-1.jpg was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Fridolin freudenfett, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Airlift Painting.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Airlift Painting.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

File move

File:Wernerstraße 17 Berlin-Grunewald.jpg can't be moved because the _target name already exists. Can you choose a different name for it? You could just add 2 to the end if you want. File:Wernerstraße 10-12 Berlin-Grunewald.jpg has the same problem. INeverCry 19:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Foto C. und B. Wulff

Hallo,

ich habe eben mal Dein Bild https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ChristianundBettinaWulff.jpg mit ShiftN korrigiert - aber noch nicht hochgeladen. Was denkst Du. sollte ich das tun, oder das im Moment zu "heiß" ? --Wikinaut (talk) 18:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Wieso ShiftN, das schräge passt doch gut. Lade das doch unter einem anderen Namen hoch. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 19:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Berlin-Moabit Wullenweberstraße

Hallo Peter, überprüfe doch bitte mal Deine Bilder "Wullenwebersteig" in Moabit. Bin mir ziemlich sicher das es Wullenweberstraße und Wullenwebersteg heißt. Schönen Restsonntag von OTFW (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Du hast recht, ich habe das Bild gleich mal umkategorisiert. Der Steig ist die Verlängerung der Straße. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 17:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Kleine Riesin in Berlin.jpg

File:Kleine Riesin in Berlin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Halensee Kurfürstendamm Skulptur Versus-1.jpg

Hallo Fridolin, hast du das Foto von der Straße her aufgenommen oder musstest du in einen Innenhof gehen? --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Die Skulptur ist von der Straße aus sichtbar, siehe auch andere Fotos davon. Also kein Problem. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 14:52, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Kreuzberg Oberbaumbrücke-01.jpg

Hallo Fridolin Freudenfett,

die Oberbaumbrücke liegt in ihrer ganzen Länge im Bezirk(steil) Friedrichshain, insofern ist das Lemma falsch - auch wenn der Fotostandort in Kreuzberg liegt.

Viele Grüße, --Roehrensee (talk) 21:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

File:CharlottenburgFlotowstraße.JPG

Hallo Fridolin, was meinst Du denn mit 5 als Speedy Delete Grund? --Dschwen (talk) 16:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

5=falsche Benennung, habe ich noch in Erinnerung. Bitte löschen, ich habe das selbe Bild für Hansaviertel hochgeladen, wo es hingehört. Das mit Charlottenburg muss in geistiger Umnachtung passiert sein. Danke. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 16:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Fuer solche Faelle gibts {{Duplicate}}. Das nimmt den admins sehr viel Arbeit ab, und erlaubt das setzen einer Weiterleitung um keine Links zu brechen. --Dschwen (talk) 21:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Friedhofsbilder

Hallo Fridolin freudenfett, sind ja gestern viele schöne Bilder dazugekommen vom Alten St.-Matthäus-Kirchhof. Bin da auch gerade fleißig. Dank dir

--StMatthaeus (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Ich habe auch alle Bilder sortiert, indem ich (meist) "Category:Alter St.-Matthäus-Kirchhof Berlin|Name" hinzugefügt habe. Da hatte sich ein ziemliches Durcheinander angesammelt. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 19:10, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Żeromskiego Street 4 in Świnoujście und andern

Żeromski heißt Żeromski, keine ZŻeromski. Zwiadowca ²¹ 17:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

OK, habe ich gesehen, es hatte aber jemand schon ZŻeromski zum Sortieren eingetragen, damit Żeromski unter Z und nicht unter Ż angezeigt wird, was sinnvoll ist. Siehe Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Świnoujście Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 20:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Kannst Du mir mal bitte

diesen Edit erklären. --Mogelzahn (talk) 21:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Mogelzahn, den kann ich dir nicht erklären. Wahrscheinlich habe ich geschaut, welche Bilder ich noch hochladen könnte und schwupps, da es noch früh war, danebengeklickt. Aber gut, dass du aufgepasst hast. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!!

Besten Dank für Deine Kategorisierung. Der Unterschied war mal ein Kino/ ist ein Kino war mir zwar aufgestoßen - aber Category:Former cinemas in Berlin fiel mir gerade erst - mithin zu spät auf. --Paul - eine Silbersonne (talk) 16:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Mitte Central.jpg

File:Mitte Central.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Migebert (talk) 18:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Mitte Central CC 2.0

Lizenz dort: CC-by-nc-sa 2.0 > nicht kompatibel mit den Commons wegen NC --Migebert (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Mitte Babylon.jpg

File:Mitte Babylon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Migebert (talk) 18:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Babylon CC 3.0

Lizenz dort CC-by-nc/3.0 > Nicht kompatibel mit den Commons wegen NC. --Migebert (talk) 14:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Wedding Alhambra 1989.jpg

File:Wedding Alhambra 1989.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Migebert (talk) 18:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Alhambra CC 3.0

Lizenz dort CC-by-nc/3.0 > Nicht kompatibel mit den Commons wegen NC. --Migebert (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden.

Vielen Dank, dass du File:Hittfeld Schulzentrum Gymnasium.jpg hochgeladen hast. Du hast zwar eine Quelle für die Datei angegeben, aber leider fehlt die Bestätigung, dass der Urheber bzw. Rechteinhaber der Nutzung unter der angegebenen Lizenz zugestimmt hat. Bitte gib daher den Link zu der Webadresse an, die die entsprechenden Lizenzinformationen enthält. Solltest du hingegen über eine schriftliche Genehmigung zur Nutzung der Datei verfügen oder selbst der Urheber sein, so benutze bitte unseren Freigabe-Assistenten um eine E-Mail an Wikimedia-Support-Team zu erstellen. Bitte beachte, dass die Datei ohne Genehmigung nach einer Woche schnellgelöscht werden kann. Diese kurze Frist dient hauptsächlich dazu, Missbrauch zu verhindern, und nicht als Fristsetzung für die Genehmigung: Wir können die Datei nach der Löschung jederzeit wiederherstellen. Vielen Dank.

 

Kurz: Die Verbindung zwischen deinem Benutzernamen und G. Nobis ist nicht nachvollziehbar, besonders weil du auf deiner Benutzer einen anderen Namen angibst. Gruß, Flominator (talk) 12:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Erbetener Link

Bitte verwende das auf Deiner Seite und schaue mal, was dann passiert. Melde Dich gern wieder, wenn das nicht zum gewünschten Ergebnis führt. Viele Grüße IvaBerlin (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Aufgehellt aber schmutzig

Danke, oh Fridolin, oh Fridolin. Das ist ein Foto aus einer uralten Tageszeitung. Die Linse habe ich vorher nicht geputzt. Die druckten damals leider noch nicht besser. Als ich das fotografierte wusste ich noch nicht, dass ich das mal brauche. Viel besser wäre ein Scan wohl auch nicht geworden. Aber noch mal danke, frecher Kerl! -- Kürschner (talk) 12:23, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

File:MFS Lichtenberg Führungspersonal.jpg

File:MFS Lichtenberg Führungspersonal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tohma (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Lichterfelde Kommandantenstraße.JPG

File:Berlin-Lichterfelde Kadettenweg 5 Ecke Kommandantenstraße 77.jpg

Hallo Peter, ich kenne mich da nicht aus. Aber wieso Kommandantenstraße? Die Straßenschilder sagen etwas Anderes?

Falls du noch mal da vorbei kommst. Ich hätte für einen entstehenden Artikel gerne Fotos der Kommandantenstraße Nr. 20/21 und Nr. 40? Wie es so schön heißt: Im Voraus besten Dank vom -- Kürschner (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich habe das in dem Straßenartikel gleich mal korrigiert. Es ist schön, dass du einen Artikel schreiben willst. Wenn ich dich richtig verstanden haben, meist du, ich sollte doch mal Bilder von den Häusern machen. Wikipedia ist ja bekanntlich ein Mitmachprojekt für jeden, auch für Fotos. Solange das Wetter noch so schön ist will ich mal sehen, was ich machen kann und so schön sind meine Aufnahmen auch nicht. Ich hab's mir schon mal notiert. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Prima! Es ist ein Artikel über die Pelzkonfektionsfirma A. & S. Segall. In dem einen Haus wohnte ein Inhaber, in dem anderen hatten sie eine Zeitlang ihre Werkstatt. - Ich habe auch nach zwei Jahren mein Fahrrad für Wikipedia wieder abgestaubt, und zum Beispiel Günter Weseler besucht, der jetzt einen eigenen Artikel bekommt. Der alte Herr kam übrigens auch mit dem Rad. Gutes Gelingen! -- Kürschner (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo @Kürschner: , ich habe das gute Wetter heute Vormittag genutzt und die Kommandantenstraße 20+21 fotografiert. Die Nummer 40 gibt es allerdings nicht, die Berner Straße erhielt 1908 einen eigenen Namen und war zuvor Teil der Kommandantenstraße. Die Nummerierung ist allerdings etwas konfus, so dass wir nicht sicher sein können, ob die Berner Straße 40 die ehemalige Kommandatenstraße 40 war. Ich habe diese Bilder aber noch nicht hochgeladen. Das Haus schien mir eher aus den 1920ern sein. Es gibt die Histomap, die aber nur bis 1928 zurück reicht. Ich wurde dort gleich angemacht ("Mein Mann ist Rechtsanwalt....") und belehrt, dass man das Haus nicht fotografieren darf, dem ist aber Gott sei Dank noch nicht so. Lass mich wissen, ob ich das Bild auch noch hochladen soll. Jetzt dürfte ja erst mal Essig mit Fotos sein. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 15:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Vorschlag: Behandeln wir die Nummer 40 vorerst so, als ob es die Hausnummer der Kommandantenstraße wäre. Vielleicht lässt sich ja mehr herausfinden. Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Verständnisfrage: Ich bin bei dir auf der falschen Kommandantenstraße, peinlich?

Stadtkommandant von Berlin, der in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts das Haus Nr. 15 in der Straße besaß 1846 Die Straße verläuft im Ortsteil Mitte von der Axel-Springer-Straße bis zur Alten Jakobstraße und setzt sich im Ortsteil Kreuzberg bis zur Alexandrinenstraße fort. Nur die Grundstücke mit den Nummern 70–80 auf der nordöstlichen Straßenseite gehören zum Ortsteil Mitte. Die vorherigen Namen der Straße waren Scheunengasse (1678 bis Anfang 18. Jh.), Jouanengasse (Anfang 18. Jh. bis 1763) und Neue Kommandantenstraße (1763–1846). [1]

Oh weh!? -- Kürschner (talk) 20:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Ich fürchte, du warst in der falschen Kommandantenstraße, ebenso wie ich. Nicht so schlimm, das ist nicht ungewöhnlich, dass Straßennamen nicht eindeutig sind. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 11:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Wenigstens bei schönem Wetter, tut mir trotzdem sehr leid. Ich hätte mich nicht bloß wundern, sondern einmal nachdenken sollen. Ich gucke nachher bei dem Segall-Artikel vorbei. Danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

next thursday u can have a lokk in TU-Forschungsbrauerei; still be there befor 1pm Dtuk (talk) 09:42, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Mitte Gartenstraße Stadtbad Foyer-002.jpg

File:Mitte Gartenstraße Stadtbad Foyer-002.jpg: Die Skulptur stammt von einem 1966 verstorbenen Künstler. Da innen kein FoP gilt wäre hier eine Freigabe der Urheberrechtsinhaber an das OTRS nötig. Holst Du das bitte nach?

--C.Suthorn (talk) 15:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Gerhard Casper.jpg

File:Gerhard Casper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whpq (talk) 12:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Fridolin freudenfett/Archive 1,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Fridolin freudenfett/Archive 1,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Fridolin freudenfett/Archive 1,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Charlottenburg vom Funkturm

Hallo, du hast eben File:Berlin, Richtung Nord-Ost, Charlottenburg.JPG und File:Berlin, Richtung Ost, Charlottenburg.JPG aus Category:Berlin-Charlottenburg entfernt. Die Bilder haben jetzt keine Charlottenburg-Kategorien mehr, obwohl derartige Fotos gut als Übersichtsbilder für den Stadtteil geeignet wären. Offensichtlich fehlt in Berlin ein genauer Cityscapes-Zweig (Stadtlandschaften/Stadtübersichten). Unter Category:Cityscapes in Germany gibt es für Berlin nur Views ohne spezifische Citiyscapes. Auch in Category:Cityscapes in Germany by viewpoint fehlt Berlin noch. Da sehe ich noch Ausbaupotenzial, durch das die Charlottenburg-Bilder wieder heim nach Charlottenburg kommen könnten, etwa in eine Category:Views of Charlottenburg from the Funkturm, die Unterhalb Category:Cityscapes of Berlin-Charlottenburg und Category:Views from Funkturm Berlin stünde. Vom Funkturm kann man ja auch nicht nur Charlottenburg fotografieren. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 22:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Sitacuisses, ich bin dabei die überkategorisierten Bilder von User:Neuköllner zu ordnen. Er hat hier mehr oder weniger willkürlich die Kategorie Charlottenburg angegeben. Man schaut bei den Bildern ja tatsächlich auf Charlottenburg, der Funkturm aber steht in Westend. Die beiden Bilder sind zwar von einem anderen Benutzer, ich habe aber versucht etwas Ordnung zu schaffen, füge die Kategorie einfach wieder hinzu, wenn du meinst, dass sie wichtig ist. Mit den Cityscapes habe ich mich noch nicht beschäftigt, da sollte man sich an anderen Städten orientieren. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 22:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Charlottenburg Walter-Benjamin-Platz-008.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Fridolin freudenfett, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 13:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Email

Grafsteen

Is it possible you did send me an email. At the moment I can't receive emails (I don't know why). Can you repeat it here? Thank you,Ceescamel (talk) 13:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Ceescamel, ik heb je foto Beethovenstraat 3-9 (2).jpg een beetje verbeterd en toegevoegd aan mijn artikel de:Jan Frederik Staal. Ik vond een foto van het graf op https://amsterdamse-school.nl/personen/architecten/jan-frederik-staal/. Het zou mooi zijn als je er een foto van kon maken. Bedankt.

Groeten uit Berlijn --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Fridolin; heb je niets gezelligers dan me in januari naar een begraafplaats te sturen:-) Zodra het beter weer is, zal ik eens kijken of ik het graf kan vinden (het is een hele grote begraafplaats); het kan dus wel even duren. We vangen dan wel twee in een; zijn vrouw (Margarete Kropholler) is ook beroemd architect, ook binnen de Amsterdamse School,Ceescamel (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Even nog een aanvulling op het artikel; ze liggen er dus beiden begraven (Neuen Ostfriedhof),Ceescamel (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Ik heb onder "Categorie:De Nieuwe Ooster" gekeken en niets gevonden. BTW van Margaret Staal-Kropholler Ik kwam naar de Amsterdamse school en vond vele, vele Redlinks. Margaret Staal-Kropholler was een ontbrekend artikel in de de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Frauen/100wikiwomen

Natuurlijk wil ik niet dat je een longontsteking krijgt op het begraafplaats. Wacht tot het warmer wordt! Bovendien zijn de Nederlanders zo "gezellig" (zelfs op de begraafplaats). --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Zie deze link waarbij Margaret wel architecte wordt genoemd en Jan Frederik niet. Ik zie dat je m'n foto van de Holendrechtstraat al hebt gevonden:-). Overigens heb ik van Staals Wolkenkrabber (officieel 12-verdiepingenhuis) vorig jaar maart nieuwe foto's gemaakt, want het is afgelopen jaren opgeknapt (Category:De Wolkenkrabber (Amsterdam)). Het ziet er stukken fleuriger uit; je schijnt je echt blauw te stoken want het zou er behoorlijk tochten.... Mocht je andere foto's willen, dan kan je mij gewoon berichten; ik trek regelmatig de wijken in. Mijn email doet het inmiddels ook weer,Ceescamel (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Helaas was de steen besmeurd; ik kon niet zien of het ongelukje was of vernielzucht. Ik heb het gemeld bij de Nieuwe Ooster. Als ze mij berichten dat het schoongemaakt is, ga ik nog wel eens kijken. Ik moet er nog een keer naar toen voor de Ajaxbruggen,Ceescamel (talk) 14:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Dat ziet er erg vreemd uit, vooral niet vandalisme. Bedankt voor de moeite. Misschien is de grafsteen ooit weer schoon. Ik heb je foto van de Wolkenkrabber in het Staal artikel gezet. Margaret Staal-Kropholler zal binnenkort op de pagina "Wist je dat" staan. Als ik de gunst kan teruggeven, just whistle... --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Ik heb nieuwe foto's geplaatst van de grafsteen. Op mijn verzoek was ze schoongemaakt. Ze lagen nog wel in de blubber,Ceescamel (talk) 12:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Bedankt, ik heb het al een beetje geknipt en er in gestopt. Ga door de Corona-crisis heen. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 14:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

File:EU 2013.png

Hi Fridolin freudenfett, regarding your renaming of this file: you probably didn't notice what I wrote on File talk:EU 2013.png and on the uploader's talk page. The 2013 version map should never have been updated in the first place, nor should it have been moved, because it is a historical map of the 2013 EU situation. The 2020 version should have been uploaded separately. Could you fix this please? Thanks and regards, Wutsje 01:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello Wutsje, of course you are right, but the map has now been adjusted to reflect the situation in 2020. I have now created a map EU 2019, still with our British friends. I hope that everyone can cope with it. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 10:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Fridolin, yes, that solves the problem. Thank you, Wutsje 15:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Reinhard Naumann SPD.jpg

File:Reinhard Naumann SPD.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mutter Erde (talk) 06:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Rapide-Wedding Bierkrug.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rapide-Wedding Bierkrug.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Wetterstation Katholische Universität Eichstätt 2.jpg usw.

Hallo Fridolin freudenfett! Ich hatte mir schon was gedacht, als ich die Fotos hochgeladen hatte. "KU" ist die offizielle Abkürzung der Uni und damit keineswegs "meaningless or ambiguous". Die Alternative wäre gewesen, den Langnamen zu wählen. Kann man von mir aus auch tun, aber dann wird der Dateiname sehr lang. So wie es jetzt ist, ist der Titel aber eigentlich falsch, denn die Uni heißt "Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt". Du hast also mal eben eine ganze Fakultät unterschlagen. Chaddy (talk) 23:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Chaddy, ich glaube dir, dass du dir was beim Upload der Bilder gedacht hast. Benutzer PerfektesChaos aber auch, als er die Umbenennung veranlasste. Do wirst nicht bestreiten können, dass "Wetterstation Katholische Universität Eichstätt 2" wesentlich aussagekräftiger ist als "Wetterstation KU 2", IMHO "meaningless or ambiguous". Was ich dabei unterschlagen haben soll, weiß ich nicht, es ist sogar mehr da, als vorher, so what? Wenn du meinst, dass der Dateiname unpassend ist, dann ändere ihn halt nochmal oder werde selber Dateiverschieber, du bist schließlich kein Neuling mehr. Mir sagte bisher das Kürzel "KU" nichts, ich bin eher auf FU, HU, TUB oder LMU geeicht, aber nun hab' ich wieder was dazu gelernt. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

correct name

Thanks for correcting it. 138.229.19.202 22:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Rename my files, please

Hello Fridoline, Could you confirm renaming of my other files please, that I have uploaded. I am preparing an article. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Fingertipsandcompany&ilshowall=1 --Fingertipsandcompany (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much! And this file (You have missed it): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Imgpsh_fullsize_anim-_1_.jpg --Fingertipsandcompany (talk) 13:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Fingertips, you did not provide a reason for renaming, therefore no one did it. Even more important is to categorize the pictures convinient, the categories art, painting or portrait are too unspecific. Please follow the category tree to find a proper one or look at a comparable picture as sample. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Mistake by me

Hello!

You moved these files:

• File:Eclectus roratus Male by Nick Hobgood.jpg
• File:Eclectus roratus Female by Nick Hobgood.jpg
• File:Rhinopias aphanes Lacy scorpionfish by Nick Hobgood.jpg
• File:Thromidia catalai Heavy Starfish by Nick Hobgood.jpg
• File:Aegires gardineri by Nick Hobgood-001.jpg
• File:Cymbacephalus beauforti Crocodilefish by Nick Hobgood.jpg

, however the move was incorrect due to a blunder of me. See Special:Diff/416921219. Please replace PNG with Papua New Guinea as in the diff instead. Sorry for the inconvenience.Jonteemil (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Kannst du bitte diese Dateien umbenennen?Jonteemil (talk) 17:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

OK, task completed --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 22:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Danke aber ich denke dass PNG mit Papua New Guinea ersetzen soll. Gemäß Kriterium 2. Jetzt hast du nur die Umbenennung rückgängig gemacht.Jonteemil (talk) 22:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Auch diese Dateien: File:Plant nursery 2008. Photo- AusAID (10713286416).jpg und File:Students from Caritas Technical Secondary School in various classrooms, East Boroko. (10725936106).jpg.Jonteemil (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Ich hoffe, diesmal ist es OK --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 19:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Ganz OK! Danke schön :).Jonteemil (talk) 20:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Danke...

...Fridolin freudenfett bei dieser Wiedergutmachung meines Fehlers beim Erstellen einer neuen Version des Bildes, die für das Layout unserer neuen WAF-Tabelle gedacht war, in der bei sämtlichen Bildern, auch denen von mir, das Ausgangsbild unzulässigerweise mit einer gecroppten Version überschrieben wurde. Gibt es einen Weg, das im Pulk zu revertieren und eine neue gecroppte Version des Bildes zu erstellen? Grüße --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 07:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Nicht dass ich wüsste. Ich bin drauf gekommen, weil ich Umbenennungswünsche auf Commons abarbeite. Da möchte ein Korean Railfan hunderte von Bilder umbenannt haben, mit zweifelhaften Dateinamen. Betrifft dein Problem noch mehrere Bilder? Welche denn? Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 08:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Es betrifft praktisch alle Bilder in dieser Tabelle, ein paar davon sind von mir. Wenn ich wüßte wie es geht, würde ich die Bilder mit der gecroppten Version gerne umbenennen, und die ursprüngliche Version wieder herstellen. Gruß und Dank --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 13:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Request to rename a file

Hello Fridolin freudenfett. I would like to apologize for being again asking for the modification of this file. The reason for this is that I thought the species had been renamed Cyrtotrachelus borealis before finding this 2019 article which confirms that the species cited is a subspecies of Cyrtotrachelus buquetii ; called Cyrtotrachelus buquetii borealis . Once again I would like to apologize hundreds of times for giving you this job again. Mário NET (talk) 01:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your help in renaming the files C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 16:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Here is another cup of coffee for you --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 16:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Umbenennung von File:Babakin crater.jpg

Tach, Fridolin. Warum hast Du File:Babakin crater.jpg umbenannt? Oder in deutlich: Was an Commons:File renaming#Which files should not be renamed?, Punkt 4, ist unverständlich? Wenns ums Englische geht, dann sieh in Commons:File renaming/de#Welche Dateien sollten nicht umbenannt werden? nach. Der Löschantrag ist überdeutlich zu Beginn der Dateibeschreibung zu sehen. — Speravir – 22:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Postillon

https://www.der-postillon.com/2020/09/hildmann-merkel.html Immerhin mit (kleinem) Link. --84.173.71.45 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Danke, hab ich schon gesehen. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Municipalities of Athens 2008

I think must removed the line between rest of athens and piraeus regional unit and renamed to Athens urban area minicipalities--WIJIDE (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Which line? Do you mean an exact distinction between Athens and Piraeus? Go for it! I hope you have discussed this with the other users!? --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 22:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Illustration of Nautch in 'Around the World in Eighty Days' by Neuville and Benet.jpg

Hi! I've change you ill-considered renaming this file. It is one of 59 files which were numbered in the order of their appearance in the book. They can be used not only in wikipedias but also in wikisourses and outside the wikimedia projects. Everey ill-considered renaming of bunch of files that are being named in a logical way also disturbs the order of their display not only in the category -> Category:Illustrations from Around the World in Eighty Days by Neuville and Benett but also in the book. So it is not recommended and should always be carefully considered. If you need according to you "a better name", you can allways make a redirect to this file, make a better description or add next category. Electron ツ ➧☎ 23:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Electron, you are right, the renaming suggested by श्रीमान २००२ was not a good idea. Just the fact that the name Benett was misspelled should have taken me aback. But unfortunately I only thought about that afterwards. As a file mover you have to be careful and sometimes you have to reject a move request. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Rename

Hallo, würdest Du bitte aufhören, den Ansinnen von Renaming zu folgen? [Filippo Ganna (2020-02-28) - UCI Track World Championships 2020.jpg] Ich habe wie andere Fotografen auch ein System der Benennung, und es besteht kein Grund, diese Benennung zu ändern. Du hast das mE schon ein zweites Mal bei einem meiner Dateien gemacht - wenn Du mal geschaut hättest, hättest Du gesehen, dass die Bilder in Folge benannt sind. Danke, --Nicola (talk) 14:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Nicola, sorry für das Ungemach. Der Benutzer Vandcykel wollte ja schon mehrere Dateien umbenannt haben. Wir können die Umbenennung natürlich wieder rückgängig machen wenn du das möchtest. Ich persönlich finde es logischer, wenn der Name vorne steht, aber da hat jeder sein eigenes System. Besser ist es IMHO, wenn du im Kategorieeintrag nach | das Sortiermerkmal angibst. Grüße--Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Renaming Tibia insulaechorab

Hello Fridolin freudenfett. It is not necessary to move Tibia insulaechorab Röding, 1798 to Tibia insulaechorab, as you had proposed.

In zoological nomenclature, it is common that after naming a species, the surname of the person who classified it is placed, together with the date on which this classification was made. I actually did this by copying from an important marine zoology data platform that names species in the same way (here). I also decided to put the description of the species in the same way, to reinforce this.

In fact, with or without the author's name, the link naming is already correct. Good week. Mário NET (talk) 14:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Lee_Jeno_DreamLike_Magazine.jpg

Hello. Please don’t rename files which have copyright issues like this one did. Please read no.4 at COM:FRNOT. Thank you. -Green Giant (talk) 22:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Wrong renaming

I saw here that you renamed an image picturing footballers Désiré Segbé Azankpo and Razak Omotoyossi to only "File:Désiré A.jpg", which IMO is wrong since there are two persons in the photo. It should be remaned "File:Désiré Segbé Azankpo and Razak Omotoyossi.jpg". -- Jsdo1980 (talk) 11:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Another wrong renaming

I see you moved File:FeH Molecule.png with the rationale "obvious error". The original name was correct, and is what is used in astronomy for this molecule. Putting the -3D and vdW might be consistent with similar diagrams however, But the 3• part you added is a bit dubious. Overall I say tat renaming was unnecessary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Incorrect renaming

Initially, you correctly renamed the file File:Google Drive icon 2020.svg to File:Google Drive icon (2020).svg[2]. This was to harmonise the naming with the other files from the same series Category:Google Workspace logos. Your subsequent revert of the rename was mistaken IMHO. Can I ask you to restore the correct name? Cheers, — kashmīrī 11:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Please ask User:Haideronwiki and agree on a correct name. Then simply contact me again. Greetings --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 12:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Its fine to rename to the file's old name because there is a series of files that have same sequence and was not aware about that. Haideronwiki (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)