Accurimbono

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. 99of9 (talk) 12:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! --Accurimbono (talk) 12:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volvariella gloiocephala, (stubble rosegill).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, --Accurimbono (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Micoperi 30 (ship, 1950).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trieste incinerator.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question When was this constructed? cmadler (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. Industrial building, and nothing original on architecture PoV. Yann (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 12:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Termovalorizzatore di Trieste 1.JPG

And also:

• File:Termovalorizzatore di Trieste 2.JPG
• File:Termovalorizzatore di Trieste 3.JPG

Yours sincerely, cmadler (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Visti i tuoi contributi....

.... adesso capisco il senso di quel messaggio in bar di Source. :-( --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 23:37, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Accurimbono⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Reggio Calabria in Sicilia?

Ovviamente io attribuisco questo a svista, non certo a rivendicazioni territoriali fuori tempo massimo, voglio sperare. :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 10:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

@Blackcat: Ah ah ah! :) Grazie per la correzione, sì, trattasi di svista, molto grossolana! :D --Accurimbono (talk) 08:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Accurimbono,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Calcedonio Reina.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Calcedonio Reina.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Calcedonio Reina.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:46, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

CIL XI

Buenos días:

Efectivamente, son la misma inscripción, pero las imágenes son diferentes, por lo que es más que conveniente conservarlas; recuerde que se deben clasificar todas las imágenes, independientemente de si están o no repetidas; a los epigrafistas profesionales nos es muy útil que aparezcan varias imágenes de cada inscripción, por lo que no voy a revertir.

Atentamente --scutum (talk) 11:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Tiene razón; disculpe --scutum (talk) 11:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

EDR Template

Ciao! grazie ancora per il template: fa molto di più di quel che avevo capito! Allora ti chiedo una cosa, visto che io non sarei capace purtroppo: si può cambiare laddove abbiamo inserito il link a mano e mettere il template? e si potrebbe fare un template simile anche per le iscrizioni di EDH con anche la categoria? GRAZIE MILLE! --Pietromarialiuzzo (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Ciao @Pietromarialiuzzo: : certamente, ho fatto una prova:

1) Creato il template EDH del tutto analogo ad EDR (Template:EDH)

2) Il template inserisce in automatico un link verso la Category:Epigraphic Database Heidelberg e verso la pagina web della singola iscrizione con la scheda epigrafica (ad esempio http://edh-www.adw.uni-heidelberg.de/edh/inschrift/HD002066)

3) Il template inserisce automaticamente nell'immagine la categoria Category:Linked to EDH

4) Ho fatto una prova in una iscrizione "cavia", vedi la diff

Per quanto riguarda le iscrizioni con link già presente (centinaia mi pare di aver capito), è un lavoro ripetitivo e bisogna farlo fare a un BOT. Si tratta di individuare le iscrizione (alcune sono qui) con link verso EDH ed EDR in qui sostituire il link con l'apposito template. Non saprei a chi chiedere, ora posso sentire @Jaqen: (che è il primo creatore del template EDR) se ci da una mano ad individuare un bot per questo lavoro. --Accurimbono (talk) 08:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

FANTASTICO! GRAZIE MILLE! grazie mille allora anche a @Jaqen: ! se sapessi come si fa un BOT lo farei io, ma ancora non sono capace... avrei anche altre cose che mi sono reso conto di aver sbagliato e dovrei sistemare, ma non voglio caricare altri di lavoro extra.--Pietromarialiuzzo (talk) 09:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

@Pietromarialiuzzo: : Prego, ci mancherebbe, è un piacere.

Magari intanto scrivi queste cose da fare in una pagina, così vediamo di cosa si tratta e magari se possibile si fa tutto in un'unica passata, ottimizzando i tempi.

Non c'è una pagina progetto EAGLE qui su Commons in cui coordinare i lavori? Sarebbe utile per radunare gli utenti interessati, discutere le best practice da tenere e coordinare gli sforzi. --Accurimbono (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Mi sa che non c'è ed è un peccato. Io sto imparando mano a mano queste ottime pratiche di Wikimedia... per esempio, ho appena imparato che c'è il bottone THANK nella history: un motivo in più per pensare che tutto questo è davvero straordinario! la faccio subito una pagina di progetto e davvero molto volentieri: dove e come è meglio metterla? grazie infinite!--Pietromarialiuzzo (talk) 09:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Non saprei, intanto penso che puoi iniziare a scrivere in una tua sottopagina utente tipo User:Pietromarialiuzzo/EAGLE o qualcosa del genere, poi a spostare si fa subito.

Bisognerebbe trovare un piccolo progetto da cui prendere ispirazione per la struttura. --Accurimbono (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

OK, mi ci metto appena possibile! GRAZIE! --Pietromarialiuzzo (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Anton Giulio Barilli.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Anton Giulio Barilli.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Anton Giulio Barilli.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Richiedi una borsa "Alessio Guidetti" per Wikimania

Ciao Accurimbono, ti segnalo il programma borse di partecipazione "Alessio Guidetti" per Wikimania 2015, che potrebbe esserti utile per partecipare al raduno mondiale degli utenti Wikimedia. Abbiamo prorogato i termini, c'è tempo fino alle 23.59 di martedì 28 aprile per fare richiesta.

Ti scrivo perché ho visto che ti dai da fare da queste parti e non hai ancora fatto richiesta. Perdonami se la segnalazione non è di tuo interesse. Nemo 08:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Ciao @Nemo bis: , grazie per il pensiero, avevo già letto della borsa, purtroppo non sono in grado di sapere ora se sarò libero da impegni lavorativi in quel periodo, per cui non riesco a programmarmi. Sarebbe stato molto bello ed interessante, spero di poter partecipare alle prossime edizioni. Grazie di nuovo, --Accurimbono (talk) 07:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Fasti Ostienses

Hello Accurimbono, as you're experienced with Latin inscriptions do you know by chance where is this inscription located right now? Is it in Italy? Is there any possibility to take its photo? It's part of Fasti Ostiences so maybe you know anything about it? Thanks. Jaqeli 11:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Jaqeli: !

As you can read here the inscription is nowadays in a private collection in Germany. (latin/italian: "Locus adservationis: Germania, Collezione Privata")

No further details about the identity/location. The inscription has been recorded in the EDR database by "Mizzoni ELISA" on 23-07-2012.

I don't know how can I help you. I'm sorry. --Accurimbono (talk) 14:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks anyways. Cheers. Jaqeli 18:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gaetano Trezza.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gaetano Trezza.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gaetano Trezza.JPG]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno. Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione. Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link. La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST. Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-) per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Adolfo De Bosis.jpeg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Adolfo De Bosis.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Adolfo De Bosis.jpeg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 13:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili

Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Accurimbono, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Emilio Teza 2.jpg

File:Emilio Teza 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

File:It-piede.ogg

File:It-piede.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--94.39.220.96 17:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

---

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Valentina Vezzali 01.jpg

File:Valentina Vezzali 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Pronunciazioni italiani

Buongiorno,

Vorrei sapere quale è la provincia, o la città, dove la persona è originata e che ha fatto le registrazioni File:It-luce.ogg e File:It-arco.ogg ? È un aspetto veramente interessante di un punto di vista linguistica. Ad esempio, sulla pagina fr:wikt:luce c’è la pronunciazione di una donna di Milano.

Anche, conosci il progetto Lingua libre (è possibile di utilizzare il stesso account Wikimedia) ? È un progetto per la registrazione di tutte le parole del mondo… Otourly (talk) 18:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Zencheri - Meridiana.jpg

Ciao! Riguardo a questo, è dialetto trentino ("me desmisia el sol", letteralmente "mi sveglia il sole"). Non so se c'è un modo per categorizzarlo. -- Syrio posso aiutare? 12:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Grazie, ho inserito il motto nella descrizione del file. Per la categorizzazione non saprei... Ciao, Accurimbono (talk) 13:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Busto di Raffaele Fabretti.jpg

File:Busto di Raffaele Fabretti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Limoncellista (talk) 12:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Accurimbono. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting transclusion, the subpage, year, month, day, and notice to the page creator. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 11:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Jeff, I am sorry for my error. I will try to made correct deletion requests in the future. Regards, Accurimbono — Preceding unsigned comment added by Accurimbono (talk • contribs) 03:37, 19 December 2023‎ (UTC)

I accept your apology, but you forgot to ping me. See also Commons:Talk page guidelines.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 13:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

And yet you made another one in these edits: omitting transclusion, the subpage, and notice to the page creator. At least you included year, month, and day this time. The next time, I will be forced to report your actions.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Giacomo Zanella.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Giacomo Zanella.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 08:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi Caulfield,

I am not the creator of the image File:Giacomo Zanella.jpg, I have only trasferred it from it.wikipedia, as indicated in the upload comment field.

Therefore, I cannot add the required information.

Regards,

Accurimbono (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Diocesi San Benedetto del Tronto.png

File:Diocesi San Benedetto del Tronto.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Un appunto su croci viarie e simili...

Ciao, vedendo che ci seguiamo a vicenda e che mi dai spesso una mano nella categorizzazione delle immagini mi permetto di condividere l'esperienza che ho acquisito (e che mi è stata insegnata) circa "robe "vecchie" che stanno in mezzo o ai margini di una strada e che pare diano una qualche indicazione" che si distinguono da "robe "vecchie e meno vecchie (perché la religione non ha perso la sua funzione)" che stanno in mezzo o ai margini di una strada e che pare diano una qualche indicazione sì, ma religiosa". Tralasciando queste ultime, erette spesso come ex voto (tranne i crocifissi montani che spesso affiancano la loro vocazione religiosa e anche laica) si tratta di identificare, o ancora meglio fare affidamento alle fonti, nella funzione principale che hanno, una commemorazione, un segnaposto, un segna via, e in un ambito prettamente a noi straniero un modo per riconoscere una piazza da mercato (se mal non ricordo (almeno) Inghilterra e Scozia). Nella categoria madre Category:Wayside crosses trovi anche i riferimenti a Category:Wayside shrines e Category:Calvaries, e un mio spassionato consiglio è di leggere le voci a loro correlate sulle wikipedie in lingua inglese e italiana, nella prima perché spero siano annoverati anche quei casi particolari che non si trovano nel territorio italiano (e immagino anche quello svizzero). Tra l'altro stubbai io tempo fa in it.wiki W:it:Croce viaria che si distingue dalla "semplice" croce, dove (mia estrapolazione) nella prima ci mettevano una crocina "perché non sia mai che non perdiamo un'occasione di ricordarci che una preghiera in più non fa mai male" (erano tempi in cui il cattolicesimo permeava molto di più ogni ambito sociale, anche quello prettamente laico) e nella seconda la croce era (ed è) così preponderante che il messaggio cristiano non può essere frainteso o sottovalutato (crocina piccina vs crocione). Mi sembra chiaro che al pastore che cercava una via per la transumanza, che ci fosse una palo, una croce, un cumulo di sassi o altro modo di indicare che era sulla via giusta in mezzo al nulla, l'importante è che ci fosse qualcosa, e probabilmente essendo passati molti e molti secoli da allora non stento a credere che al posto di croci ci potessero essere simboli che richiamavano a divinità locali che proteggevano raccolti, pastorizie, salute e quant'altro; @DenghiùComm: dimentico qualcosa?. Concludendo, tutto sto pippone è in funzione di stare attenti a non mischiare mele con pere ;-). Threecharlie (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Ciao,

innanzitutto grazie per il tuo consiglio e i tuoi contributi.

In questo periodo sto cercando di sistemare/categorizzare tutte le chiese delle Marche (sia lato Commons che lato Wikidata) ma a volte sconfino nel lavoro sporco di altre regioni :)

Su Commons ci sono tante foto di chiese non categorizzate adeguatamente e non connesse a Wikidata ed è un peccato, ma progressivamente sto cercando di contribuire a fare ordine.

Oltre alle chiese, mi capita anche di trovare delle "wayside shrines" che nelle Marche chiamiamo comunemente "edicole votive" mentre al nord vedo che sono chiamati "capitelli votivi", rispetto alle chiese queste sono molto numerose nella realtà, ma poco fotografate e documentate in Commons/Wikidata: c'è molto lavoro da fare per raccoglierle e credo che sia fondamentale avere foto georeferenziate per queste, che altrimenti sono spesso impossibili da collocare/categorizzare.

Più raramente incontro le croci votive stradali. Ignoravo l'esistenza dei Calvari... lettura molto interessante. Penso che siano tutti elementi di religiosità popolare che meritino di essere documentati e raccolti in Commons/Wikidata.

Grazie di nuovo per la segnalazione. Accurimbono (talk) 08:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

@Threecharlie: non so se devo pingarti a mano o il sistema lo fa in automatico, non sono molto pratico con questo nuovo sistema di discussione. :) Accurimbono (talk) 08:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Sì, ok,va bene pingare perché diversamente da wikipedia dove si risponde nella pagina utente di chi ti ha lasciato un messaggio qui funziona che rispondi nella tua ma poi devi pingare perché se no l'utente non se ne accorge. La cosa della diversa denominazione dei vari soggetti che hai citato l'ho già riscontrata ad esempio nelle cappelle, che poi si chiamano anche oratori, ma che derivano dalle cappelle gentilizie che altro non erano che le chiesette (o oratori) privati che i signori del luogo costruivano per farsi fare la messa in casa ed evitare il disagio di spostarsi alla parrocchiale, alla volte distante chilometri, dove era possibile l'incontro di malviventi nel tragitto; queste nel bolognese vengono chiamati chiesulin, ma qui in Veneto non mi risulta che un passante li chiamerebbe chiesina, e nemmeno cappella, ma oratorio. Comunque sia il buon @DenghiùComm: ha pensato bene di creare una descrizione per togliere ogni incertezza, facendone una distinzione per dimensioni o "area calpestabile". A proposito delle croci viarie mi sono dimenticato di un uso importante che se ne faceva in tempi storici, ovvero indicare le vie di pellegrinaggio, che in quel caso la struttura aveva evidenze nette religiose. Concludo,stando da oramai diversi anni su Commons mi sono reso conto di quante siano le possibilità di riconoscere e incasellare in un gruppo omogeneo, e ritengo la cosa importante perché più sono particolareggiati e più si aiuta il ricercatore o il semplice curioso a trovare quel che gli serve (un dipinto a olio di una Madonna col Bambino del XVII secolo che sia una pala d'altare in un determinato territorio? fatto, e da quello magari si riesce a risalire pure il pittore e dargli degno spazio in wikipedia). Citando il Bruno Pizzul Nazionale"tutto molto bello" :-D. Ah, dimenticavo, grazie moltissimo del lavoro che fai qui e su wikidata (cosa che faccio anche io, completare le schede inserendo immagini e categorie commonare, diocesi, religione, rito, controllo geolocalizzazione, link esterni affidabili...).--Threecharlie (talk) 10:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Ciao @Threecharlie: Non ricordo di aver dato descrizioni che distinguiono le une dalle altri... Deve essere avvenuto nella notte dei trempi... Mi ricordi dove ? DenghiùComm (talk) 12:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

:-o sono appena andato a vedere le crono di Category:Wayside chapels in Italy, Category:Wayside shrines in Italy,Category:Aediculae in Italy e ho visto che sono stato io... che sia il risultato delle nostre discussioni all'epoca? Perché dubito mi sia svegliato al mattino con una "meravigliosa idea" :-D o forse è solo un eccesso di (falsa?) modestia da parte miada attribuire le cose ad altri perché troppo insicuro? Threecharlie (talk) 17:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Museo archeologico (Fano) 167.jpg

File:Museo archeologico (Fano) 167.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tytoalba (talk) 06:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Palazzo Malatestiano (Fano) 12.jpg

File:Palazzo Malatestiano (Fano) 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tytoalba (talk) 06:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Palazzo Malatestiano (Fano) 13.jpg

File:Palazzo Malatestiano (Fano) 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tytoalba (talk) 06:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Chiesa di San Benedetto 11.jpg

File:Chiesa di San Benedetto 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Accurimbono (talk) 10:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Organi e categorie

Ciao, occhio che già in più di un caso hai rimosso delle categorie da alcuni file, per poi categorizzarli in categorie specifiche di organi, senza però inserire nella nuova categoria quelle rimosse dai file. In particolare mi sono accorto della cat Category:Church organs in Marche che avevi rimosso da alcuni file ma non l'avevi inserita nelle nueve cat dei singoli organi. Per favore fai attenzione quando rimuovi le categorie. --Phyrexian ɸ 14:51, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@Phyrexian: Mi dispiace. Ci sto attento in genere, se mi sono scordato di spostare qualche categoria mi scuso, non era mia intenzione. Se mi segnali dove ho rimosso le categorie, cerco di rimediare. Grazie per la segnalazione. Accurimbono (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Le ho già inserite io quando mi è capitato di vedere la mancanza, non ti preoccupare. Te l'ho segnalato solo perché ho visto che la cosa si è ripetuta. --Phyrexian ɸ 15:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Grazie mille. Tra l'altro noto che sotto "Church organs" ci sono raccolte poche categorie e file. Bisognerà integrarli, mano a mano che rivedo le categorie del tipo "Pipe organs". Accurimbono (talk) 15:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@Phyrexian: Più in generale, in questo ultimo periodo, sto cercando di documentare (fotografare) e categorizzare gli organi storici della mia zona e magari di sistemare quelli delle Marche già presenti ma non categorizzati bene. Ma c'è molto lavoro da fare: rispetto a tutti gli organi esistenti qui in Commons ce n'è una minima quantità. Accurimbono (talk) 15:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Sì gli alberi di categorie "church organs" e "pipe organs" sono separate, anche se a tutti gli effetti quasi completamente sovrapposte. Questo perché naturalmente la maggioranza degli organi a canne si trovano nelle chiese, e chi carica i file si accontenta di mettere solo una categoria o l'altra. È vero che mancano tantissime foto degli organi, per questo quando mi capita di fotografare l'interno delle chiese faccio sempre almeno una foto anche agli organi, perché quasi certamente su Commons non ce n'è. --Phyrexian ɸ 15:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Inscriptions of Roman military personnel

Hi Accurimbono,

I've seen that you've created lots of inscriptions of ancient Rome, including some with Roman military personnel. Thanks a lot for that. I've made changes to Category:CIL XI 006167 and I'd like you to have a look at it.

1) I've created Category:Honorific inscription for Lucius Octavius Rufus, that contains all the pictures pertaining to this single object, that is displayed. It also contains Category:Ancient Roman inscriptions in Palazzo Ducale (Urbino), i.e., the place, where this object is on display. There might be copies of the object in other places, which would then get their own category, for example Category:Honorific inscription for Lucius Octavius Rufus (copy in Rome).

2) I use categories for inscriptions, like Category:CIL XI 006167, only to store information pertaining to the inscription itself, but not information pertaining to the place, where the object is on display. Therefore, I've removed Category:Ancient Roman inscriptions in Palazzo Ducale (Urbino) from Category:CIL XI 006167.

3) You've created categories for the EDR- and EDCS-numbers, which is fine, since they are kind of concordances, and you've added them to Category:CIL XI 006167, which makes perfect sense to me. But I was wondering, if it is beneficial, to add for example, Category:Lucius Octavius Rufus to the EDR- and EDCS-numbers, because now I have 3 inscriptions in the Category:Lucius Octavius Rufus, which are basically only one single inscription. Therefore I was first thinking to remove Category:Lucius Octavius Rufus from the EDR- and EDCS-numbers, but then I had second thoughts about it. The EDR- and EDCS-numbers are additional information, which might be helpful, so I left them untouched.

Please let me know, what your thoughts are about it. Greetings Agentjoerg (talk) 05:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)