Allan warren
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Allan warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Noel Coward Allan warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Laurence Olivier Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Christopher Isherwood Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:The Duke of Marlborough Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:David Niven Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Cary Grant Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Sir Cliff Richard Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Emlyn Williams 2 allan warren.jpg was uncategorized on 13 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Dame Vera Lynn 3 Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 14 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Rudolph Nureyev 4 Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tito Gobbi Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 27 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Henry Moore 4 Allan Warren.jpg was uncategorized on 27 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Phyllis Calvert.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
OTRS Permission
edit
|
The permission for this user to upload work by "Allan Warren" has been verified and archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system. It is available at for users with an OTRS account. To confirm the permission, please contact someone with an OTRS account. |
-Andrew c (talk) 13:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Allan warren,
is there any problem with File:Peter Sellers Allan Warren.tif as you have re-tagged it as "dupe"? Though TIFF files are currently not displayed on Wikimedia pages (that may change soon), they are of value as they are not compressed, in contrast to jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
editYour images are beautiful. Thanks for donating them to Wikimedia Commons!//Hannibal (talk) 18:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, thank you. A glorious collection indeed. --SJ+ 22:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Truly priceless. Thank you. Surtsicna (talk) 13:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, fantastic collection. Thanks. --viniciusmc (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Wonderful photos. Thank you! --Avenue (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Wow, what an interesting collection of beautiful photos! I’m from the Netherlands, thank you very much for sharing them with us! Mr. D. E. Mophon (talk) 08:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Just another fan letter. Greatly admire your photographs. Figureofnine (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hallo, could you provide additional information about the three photos of Peter Ustinov by using Template:Photo Information and provide some input on why and where this picture was taken? Regards.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 21:00, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Rod_Sewart_Allan_Warren.jpg
edit
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rod_Sewart_Allan_Warren.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but I had to revert you dupe-tag of File:Margaret Duchess of Argyll Allan Warren.jpg as the other file has no OTRS-ticket. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Prince Philip
editHello. I've flipped your image File:HRH The Duke of Edinburgh Allan Warren.jpg back again. This time using the original file though, instead of the cropped version of the wider field image. Sorry about uploading another version, I realize now that that was inappropriate. I'm hoping you'll accept the newest flipped version because the image appears to be digitized in reverse. The facial features seem more recognizable in the flipped orientation, and the button hole and pocket on the jacket should be on the left side not on the right. Also, in your wider field photo, File:The Duke of Edinburgh (2).jpg, there is a clock in the background, which also appears to confirm that the switched orientation is correct. If you want to switch it back again, could you let me know on my talk page and I'll upload the flipped version as a separate file? Thanks, DrKiernan (talk) 21:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Peters Sellers in Belgravia?
editHello Allan Warren, I've noticed your photo of Peter Sellers at home (File:Peter Sellers at home Allan Warren.jpg), thank you to share it on Commons. I've also noticed the adjunct below the information box: "portrait of Peter Sellers at his mews home in Belgravia London". Could you confirm it? I ask you the question because of that discussion. Thanks and regards, --Myrabella (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
James Callaghan?
editHi Allan - just curious...do you have any photos of James Callaghan that you'd be willing to upload? We seem to be lacking in good quality free images of him. Thanks Connormah (talk | contribs) 02:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Would you also happen to have anything of Harold Macmillan that you may be willing to share? Same image problem with him. Thanks. Connormah (talk | contribs) 03:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the 
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Your uploaded photos
editThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and global sites thereof. If you are concerned about distributions and reproduction and other kinds, try changing to {{Attribution}} from any other license tag. --George Ho (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
G'day!
editDear Allan, thank you for your extraordinary generosity! I love your photos, and have had such enjoyment looking through those you have uploaded. I particularly love the portraits in interiors: Noel Coward and Cole Lesley, Gracie Fields, Debbie Reynolds and the various dukes.
I was prompted, purely by his face, which has a very Ocker appearance, to look up the Duke of Manchester. Lo, I discovered that his brother, the succeeding Duke and who looks exactly like an Australian used-car salesman, has had a long and devious history of bigamy, assault, fraud and the on-selling of a hired car, not to mention the promulgation of conspiracy theories concerning the Royal Family..... they do hail from Victoria.... maybe they are descendants of Ned Kelly.....
Small fix needed- one of the Chomondely photos has a missing "h" in its filename.
Cheers!
Amandajm (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry just learning how to reply on this .. Thank you for your kindness.
Best,
Allan
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm trying to add some relevant categories to David Ward's image. Could you confirm that this is the Scottish bass-baritone born in 1922 who sang a lot of Wagner? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- yes that is the Scottish baritone as far as I am aware.
- Best,
- Allan
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mr Warren, could you add a date to this image, if possible? A year would be enough. As a side note, do you have images of R A Butler or Harold Macmillan which could be released under a free license? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Mister Warren, it seems that the current version and the former version which you replaced are two completely different photos of the Duke that may have even a 10 difference with each other. Why don't you upload them both separately?--77.49.131.150 22:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
jack wild?
edithello & many thanks for sharing your wonderful photo collection on wikimedia!
was just wondering if you had any photos of the late jack wild (actor; Oliver!, etc.) that you'd be willing to share here? i noticed that you've uploaded a lovely shot of mark lester (in-use on his wikip bio), & we have no picture at all for jack's bio, which is a shame. it occurred to me that you would most likely have had opportunities to photograph jack as well, so i thought i'd ask/mention that we needed one.
if you do happen to have a shot of him that you want to share, let me know when it's uploaded, & i'll add it to his bio?
in any case, thanks again for providing such really great material! it would be exceedingly hard to find pictures of these people that we could use on here (much less GOOD pictures) without your contributions.
regards & best wishes,
File:Jonathan King Allan Warren.jpg
edit
Is File:Jonathan King Allan Warren.jpg w:en:Jonathan King? Or another JK? (Oh, and if you have a photograph of Jane Northumberland, that would be very much appreciated. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Tom Courtenay
editHi, Allan. I noticed that the date from this image and this image is given as 1973, but for this image and this image it's 1974. They look like they're from the same shoot: do you know which year is correct so I can reconcile them?
Incidentally, although I'm sure you've heard this before, please let me take the opportunity to thank you for your generosity to the project. Cheers. --Rrburke (talk) 19:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes it is 1973..
thanks,
Allan
Tools and statistics for Allan Warren uploads
editAllan, I've spent a few days further categorising your images, and thought you might be interested in some tools and statistics.
You've uploaded 815 images to date. A total of 361 of those are being used on Wikipedia articles of all languages; in total 2,271 copies of your images are in use across all Wikipedia languages. There's obvious scope for much more image use as other language versions of Wikipedia catch on to the fact that the English Wikipedia has images available. And, indeed, there is still plenty of scope for reuse of the images on a range of as yet unvisited English Wikipedia pages.
The hold-on-to-your-hat part of the statistics is, pages on which your images now reside were viewed 9,538,810 times in the month of September 2012 alone. Your most viewed image is file:Sir_Roger_Moore_Allan_Warren.jpg, used on 42 pages, which was viewed 569,056 times. You can reckon on, easily, 150 million pairs of eyeballs on your images per annum on current reckoning; and many more than that as images percolate across the language versions.
As to tools, let me introduce you to:
- Category:Photographs by Allan Warren - you're probably familiar with, the most basic list of your uploads.
- User uploads, a rather pedestrian table of your images
- Gallery with various sort options
- Gallery tool - another gallery, slightly different user interface
- GLAMorous - Number of images used in each language Wikipedia, a list of pages using each image, and the number of page-views per image per month. Source of the statistics above. May take a good while to load the page. (Currently set to show September 2012 stats ... you can select other time periods for stats).
best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
From George Ho
editI read your message, and thank you for contacting me. I could not figure out specifically what you meant. So to what file are you referring about attribution or something? --George Ho (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- I read all of the messages, and gleaned that George Ho had, for some reason, suggested the use of the {{Attribution}} license rather than a combination of {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} and {{GFDL}} currently being used (see 'Your uploaded photos', above). Allan responded by asking what the difference was between the licences. To be honest, I think there's little practical difference. All three licenses require re-use of the images to be attributed to Allan Warren, and, otherwise, place virtually no other limitations on use. In my opinion, Allan, stick to what you're doing now. (I make the presumption that you are aware of the terms of the license under which you're releasing your image. As near as damn it you are putting them in the public domain; not quite, but for all practical purposes.) --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, just wasn't sure why there were som many variations of them... will do and thanks again
Allan
Natalie Wood!
editYour photos of Natalie Wood are amazing. Why don't you replace the horrible image that is currently on her Wikipedia page with one of the excellent ones that you have uploaded? Her page is protected so I cannot do it, only established editors can. 130.157.201.14 01:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Category:Screen Hero for TV/Movie actors?
editHi, I have seen that you use the Category:Screen Hero for TV/Movie actors. Screen Hero is a Racehorses of Japan, the Category:Film actors or the Category:Television actors is maybe what you looking for. --Nordlicht8 (talk) 19:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Allan, what's the problem especially with this image, compared to the others in Category:Allan Warren? --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
editYour images bring me great joy, they are a wonderful slice of history preserved. Thank you for contributing them. I am always sad when I see that one of your images has been deleted. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:51, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Sharing your story with us
editHi Allan,
My name is Victor Grigas, I'm a storyteller and video producer for the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that supports Wikipedia. It's my role to find and share stories with our users about the people who write and illustrate Wikipedia. I came across your fabulous portraits and wanted to know if you would be interested in being interviewed about your work with Wikipedia for our blog?
I can be reached at vgrigas(at)wikimedia.org and I can answer any questions you may have. Thank you for uploading such wonderful imagery!
Best, Victor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vgrigas (talk • contribs)
A barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Greetings Allan. Your work is truly amazing and it is an honour for us to have you here in Wikimedia community. Hope you'll keep contributing your value-able work. With love from Pakistan. Thank you! Saqib (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
- +1 to that sentiment. Thank you, Allan, for your extremely valuable and generous contributions to Wikimedia Commons. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
edit |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lord Montagu of Beaulieu in studio Allan Warren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
File:Image1-47 Allan Warren.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Lord & Lady Miles Allan Warren.jpg
edit
|
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Lord & Lady Miles Allan Warren.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
 |
File:Gordon Ramsay colour Allan Warren.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
|
|
File:Gordon Ramsay Allan Warren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Salvador Dali Poster Allan Warren.jpg
edit
|
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Salvador Dali Poster Allan Warren.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Michael Bednarek: To be clearer, my concern is more about the pictures displayed (see COM:DW), than about the right for the overall photograph. Also why not showing the OTRS ticket in the description? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. Your concern wasn't clear to me when I noticed the {{No permission since}} template. Those two depicted images are drawings by Dalí of Gala. When Dalí placed them in this photo shoot, he must have been aware that they were part of the photo that Warren took. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Your photo on Repubblica
editYour photo File:Nureyev_11_Allan_Warren.jpg was used on https://necrologie.repubblica.it/necrologi/1993/Rudolf-Nureev-1993-01-06 without attribution. Nemo 20:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Dali Allan Warren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hi. I saw you tagged this as speedy delete / lacking permission. I'm not sure why. I changed it to a deletion request; if you think the photo should be deleted perhaps you could explain why there. Thank you. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:13, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
edit |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 7th Marquis of Colmondeley 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
|
File:Duke of Edinburgh 33 Allan Warren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Duke of Edinburgh 33 Allan Warren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Suggestion about Userpage on the commons
editHello there, I simply wanted to suggest changing it from the link being w:Allan Warren to Allan Warren so that the w: is no longer there in the text. Thank you for your time and thank you also for all of the amazing work you do, Wikipedia wouldn't be the same without you. --CIN I&II (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's very kind of you, thank you. Yes, you're right, it makes more sense.
- Very Best,
- Allan Allan warren (talk) 22:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Frank Dunlop Allan Warren.jpeg
edit
Copyright status: File:Frank Dunlop Allan Warren.jpeg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Frank Dunlop Allan Warren.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg
edit
Copyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
[[Category:]]== Copyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg == Copyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Derek fowlds 2 Allan Warren.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Lionel Bart
editI added to the description of this image] that Bart is leaning against a mirror, to clarify what is being shown in the image. Feel free to modify the description if you wish to clarify further. -- 65.78.11.223 01:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Great work
editHello! Thank you so much for your wonderful images. You were there with so many of my childhood heroes and with each one you captured something so essential of them. I was wondering if you had any images of Annabel's in Berkeley Square or any other of the great clubs of the 1960s and 70s, as my Wikipedia research has focused on them in recent months. Once again, thank you so much. No Swan So Fine (talk) 21:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Very kind of you, thank you. I'm sorry but I don't have any images of Annabelle's or the others tending at the time.
- best,
- allan Allan warren (talk) 12:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Barnstar
edit
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| I just wanted to say thank you so much for the images you've uploaded! It's really appreciated. Blythwood (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC) |
- That is really kind of you. thank you very much
- Allan 213.78.165.17 09:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:June Bronhill.jpeg
edit
Copyright status: File:June Bronhill.jpeg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:June Bronhill.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:June Bronhill.jpeg
editCopyright status: File:June Bronhill.jpeg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:June Bronhill.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:6th Marquess & Duchess of Bath.jpg
edit
Copyright status: File:6th Marquess & Duchess of Bath.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:6th Marquess & Duchess of Bath.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:18th Duke of Somerset.jpg
edit
Copyright status: File:18th Duke of Somerset.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:18th Duke of Somerset.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Laurence Harvey at home.jpeg
edit
Copyright status: File:Laurence Harvey at home.jpeg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Laurence Harvey at home.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kyle Schroeder.jpg
edit
Copyright status: File:Kyle Schroeder.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kyle Schroeder.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I attempted to update the license on my photographs to indicate they are for Non-Commercial Use Only. Could you assist me with a code or method that would clearly display that these photographs are licensed for non-commercial use? Thank you! Allan warren (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kyle Schroeder.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Kyle Schroeder.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kyle Schroeder.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I attempted to update the license on my photographs to indicate they are for Non-Commercial Use Only. Could you assist me with a code or method that would clearly display that these photographs are licensed for non-commercial use? Thank you! Allan Allan warren (talk) 14:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
edit|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for sharing your pictures. I recategorized your homeless pictures in a separate subcategory. I also started renaming some of them with a meaningful name. However I find that we have a privacy issue with some of them. People can often be easily recognized, and in some cases (i.e. File:Homeless man in St. James's Park, Allan Warren.jpg) it is not even obvious that they are homeless. Did you ask them if it is OK to publish their pictures on the Internet? And in here, the description is wrong, as the person is not sleeping. At the very least, we need a {{Personality rights}} template to all of them. Could you add that please? You can do that in a batch with Help:VisualFileChange.js. Yann (talk) 12:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- they are just candid snaps I took on the street.. I didn't ask them so if any problem feel free to delete. Allan warren (talk) 10:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Subcategories
editHi, I would like to create subcategories for your pictures to facilitate searching: nobility, politicians, entertainers, etc. What do you think? Yann (talk) 21:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I have proposed your picture as Featured pictures here: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg. Do you remember the date? Yann (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- 1973. Very kind of you. thank you. Allan warren (talk) 16:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Do not try to subvert Commons' processes
editDo not do this. Sometimes decisions go against you. If you want to appeal a decision there are acceptable ways to do that. This is not one of them.
You have made a large number of excellent contributions to Commons, which I appreciate, but it does not exempt you from the rules. If it is somehow not clear how the linked edit broke rules, feel very free to ask, but I'm guessing you already understand. I really do not want to have to block you, and certainly will not do so if you refrain from this sort of thing in the future, but consider this a strong warning. - Jmabel ! talk 00:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
FP promotion
edit |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
FP Promotion
edit |
The image File:Sophia Loren 62 Allan Warren.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sophia Loren 62 Allan Warren.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
