Framawiki
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- bonjour, j'ai eu l'image sur la page officielle du gouvernement. Et le copyright n'est pas réservé et aucune mention sur les droits d'auteur.
- Je suis nouveau, comment puis-je corriger. Merci Diakhisto (talk) 14:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
OTRS agent
editIt would be great if you could add a note (or user box) that you are an OTRS agent on your user page. While I found it on French Wikipedia, it is a bit complicated to confirm it that way. :) --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Done :) --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 19:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Adding new author and books
editNew contributor here. Attempting to add an author and her books including book cover images to Wiki. Just having a hard time finding the proper procedures/etiquette. The images are owned by author, so what am I doing wrong?
File:My drawing (15445013475).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Question
editCould you clarify why you believe the picture that File:Lukyanenko O. V. In the Grip of De-Stalinization.jpg is a derivative work of has sufficient permission based on the OTRS ticket? I see no evidence that the permission is valid for the picture itself. Feel free to respond in a ticket note if you want to discuss specifics that can't be talked about on-wiki, but please ping me here when you respond. ~ Rob13Talk 10:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Rob13, please see ticket. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Responded. ~ Rob13Talk 23:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Just pinging noting that my response in the ticket is still waiting for your input. ~ Rob13Talk 03:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Rob13, thanks for pinging. I post a proposal on the ticket, can you review ? Thanks --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Just pinging noting that my response in the ticket is still waiting for your input. ~ Rob13Talk 03:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Responded. ~ Rob13Talk 23:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
File:NHM FirstFridays LeslieKalohi (1).jpg
editPlease see & comment on my section on the Village pump about this file. Elisfkc (talk) 03:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for investigation. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
File talk:Церква (МП, Чемерівці).jpg
editI do not understand claims that file. This is my own work. Copyright belongs to me. Please explain more what's the problem? P.S. If you found somewhere in the same file, it also belongs to me.--Garrik1966 (talk) 08:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Garrik1966, no problem. We just want to have a prove / declaration that you are been the author. Please see my second message in your talk page and send an email with filled template. Don't hesitate to contact me if needed. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- I do not understand yours claims. I repeat, no matter where you found the image, it is mine. Give a link where you found it. If you accuse me of stealing, then it must be good reasons. Feel free to move evidence.--Garrik1966 (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Garrik1966, I found this website. I'm not a Russian speaker, but it's look like this website is not in a free licence. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, So I placed a picture on the site. This is my profile on this site Garrik1966. To identify I wrote to you comments to this image.you letter--Garrik1966 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Garrik1966: Ok, nice. I've removed the deletion template. Thanks ! --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you too!--Garrik1966 (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Garrik1966: Ok, nice. I've removed the deletion template. Thanks ! --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, So I placed a picture on the site. This is my profile on this site Garrik1966. To identify I wrote to you comments to this image.you letter--Garrik1966 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Garrik1966, I found this website. I'm not a Russian speaker, but it's look like this website is not in a free licence. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- I do not understand yours claims. I repeat, no matter where you found the image, it is mine. Give a link where you found it. If you accuse me of stealing, then it must be good reasons. Feel free to move evidence.--Garrik1966 (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings!
editFriendly admin here! Could I ask for a fine tuning of how you do speedy deletion nominations? It would really rock if you would include the URL of the page on which you found the image; otherwise, you find it - then the closing admin has to go find it all over again. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll try to add an sample URL. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Tagging copyvios
editBonjour, Pourrais-tu donner la source de l'image sur le Net ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Drenowe (talk) 00:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Doesn't his give permission for the photo to be used?
w:en:Creative Commons attribution This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
You are free:
to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Permission
editw:en:Creative Commons
Doesn't the following permit the photo to be uploaded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drenowe (talk • contribs) 00:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
attribution This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
You are free:
to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amherstburg,_Gordon_House,_1798_wiki.1_jpg.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drenowe (talk • contribs) 00:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour (j'espère que le français convient),
Vous avez ajouté un bandeau d'admissibilité sur le poster de film que je viens d'uploader indiquant qu'« Il manque une preuve de permission pour ce fichier ». Je ne comprends pas car il s'agit d'une oeuvre anonyme publiée il y a plus de 60 ans (cela fera 79 ans dans 4 mois pour être exact) donc dans le domaine public en Inde, comme je l'ai indiqué. Le poster lui-même fait très probablement partie du fond du NFAI (National Film Archive of India) dont toutes les photographies antérieures à 1957 (aujourd'hui) sont dans le domaine public conformément à la législation indienne.
Pour information, ce film n'est jamais sorti ailleurs qu'en Inde et donc le poster n'a jamais été publié non plus ailleurs. De plus, le film est probablement perdu. Il ne reste aujourd'hui que ce poster, le "song booklet" et quelques photographies promotionnelles.
Cordialement, MelAntipam
- MelAntipam: D'accord, vous avez raison, le poster est trop ancien pour être sous droits d'auteur. Merci de votre vigilance ! Cordialement --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- (c'était marqué sur la page en dessous... pas vu, désolé) --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Made a mistake by uploading screenshot of Google maps, but can anyone help me out please?
editHi!
I am pretty new at Wikipedia and it was a first time upload to Wikimedia commons, so sorry if I violated any copyright rule for uploading a screenshot of Google Maps to Wikipedia
I consider my paragraph about the discovery of the remains of the lost castle an important contribution to Wikipedia and would like that the reader has the possibility to see for himself. I read that it is possible to add a geolocation of the place but as I am a rookie, I dont know how to add it.
Is anybody able to do this edit on my behalf?
Thanks
Please do a better research before tagging images uploaded by regulars, and better ask them when something is unclear to you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Licence (réponse)
editBonsoir ! Pourquoi avoir mis comme licence le domaine public pour File:Front-tres-popu.png ? Cordialement --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Salut, Framawiki. Sauf quand elles dérivent d'un travail placé sous une licence précise, quand je suis le simple relais d'une œuvre existante ou quand leur objet ou leur sujet le requièrent, je place toutes mes contributions à Commons dans le domaine public. Ici, le sujet de l'image ne me semble pas susceptible de licence donc, domaine public. Bien à toi. O.M.H ♦ H.M.O 20:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- O.M.H: Pour moi, un screenshot est sous la même licence que celle de l'application en question, non ? --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- C'est une question. Une capture plein écran ou la capture d'une part significative d'un écran, spécialement si elle intègre des éléments qui singularisent l'image, entre autre l'organisation de la page et les logos, pourrait être dans ce cas. La capture d'une part restreinte d'écran qui donne à voir du texte organisé de manière très convenue, en ce cas la forme devenue canonique pour les moteurs de recherche généraux ou locaux, ne me paraît pas susceptible de pouvoir faire l'objet d'une licence. En fait, même si cette capture est proprement identifiable comme provenant d'une page de Google c'est discutable : pratiquement tous les procès engagés par des entreprises du logiciel en se basant sur l'apparence, y compris fonctionnelle, de leur produit, ont conduit à un non-lieu, précisément parce qu'une présentation ne peut pas faire l'objet d'une licence, sauf comme mentionné quand des éléments ou l'ensemble de cette présentation (logos, nom de produit, organisation entièrement semblable de l'ensemble, ce qui en ces cas ressort de la copie ou du plagiat) peut être invoqué.
- Là-dessus, si tu n'es pas convaincu par mes arguments tu peux, et je t'en remercie d'avance le cas échéant, m'indiquer quelle licence invoquer et en quels termes, ou faire toi-même la correction, ou rogner l'image pour qu'elle devienne vraiment anonyme (je pense à la partie inférieure, non nécessaire pour l'usage que j'en ai eu), ou demander la suppression de l'image s'il n'existe pas de licence compatible avec celle de Commons qu'on puisse utiliser. Cette dernière solution m'ennuierait, bien sûr, mais bon, ça ne serait pas bien grave non plus. Bien à toi et en tout cas, merci de ta vigilance. O.M.H ♦ H.M.O 22:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Bonsoir O.M.H et merci pour cette précise explication.
- De part les éléments que tu m'as précisé, je pense que en effet l'image ne présente pas de caractéristiques suffisantes pour la soumettre au même droit que celui du logiciel.
- Bonne soirée --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- O.M.H: Pour moi, un screenshot est sous la même licence que celle de l'application en question, non ? --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Photo Marc Duret
editBonjour,
quel est le problème ici ? C'est le sujet de la photo qui m'a contacté parce qu'il souhaitait changer sa photo sur wikipédia, et qui m'en a fourni une prise par son fils. Il y a un souci quelconque, le fiston n'a pas envoyé le modèle de mail correctement rempli ? Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 18:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Bonsoir JJG, comme tu le sais, je ne peux pas te dire le contenu des emails (m:OTRS). Je peux juste te dire que je lui ait répondu, et qu'il peut consulter sa boite mail :) Bonne soirée --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- C'est un peu dommage quand on fournit clés en main le formulaire type aux personnes qui donnent des photos, et qu'il y a encore des choses à régler... Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 05:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Jean-Jacques Georges: Je ne peux pas valider l'autorisation en l'état. Que dire de plus... --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Justement, ça ne m'aide guère si je ne sais pas pourquoi et s'il revient me demander de l'aide... Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Jean-Jacques Georges: Je ne peux pas valider l'autorisation en l'état. Que dire de plus... --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- C'est un peu dommage quand on fournit clés en main le formulaire type aux personnes qui donnent des photos, et qu'il y a encore des choses à régler... Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 05:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.Elisfkc (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Elisfkc: Yes, I used few pictures as tests for phab:T162527 :) Thank you for cleaning the page --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Your VFC installation method is deprecated
editHello Framawiki, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
OTRS - Photos du pavillon du Québec
editBonjour Framawiki,
J'ai envoyé à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org les permissions pour les 2 fichiers suivant:
File:La_ville_(vue_par_les_visiteurs_depuis_la_rampe_descendante),_Pavillon_du_Québec,_Expo_67.jpg ET
File:Le_sous-sol_(minerai_et_rouleau_de_cuivre),_Pavillon_du_Québec,_Expo_67.jpg
Je vois qu'un avertissement persiste au bas de ces pages.
Dois-je faire des démarches additionnelles?
Merci de confirmer --Celestin1967 (talk) 01:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour Celestin1967, le bandeau que j'ai mis sur les deux pages indique simplement que le mail a bien été reçu. Il n'a pas encore été traité par un membre de l'équipe, nous avons beaucoup d'images à consulter. Vous recevrez à ce moment là une réponse à votre email. Pas de soucis donc :) Bonne soirée --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
edit
Hi Framawiki, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
Daphne Lantier 22:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Code issues in User:Framawiki/common.js
editHi Framawiki, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.
Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:
- You edited User:Framawiki/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
- Though, that change appears to introduce 4 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
- To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
- ISSUE:
line 34 character 39
: Unclosed string. - Evidence:'talk_tag' : '
- ISSUE:
line 35 character 18
: Unclosed string. - Evidence:== [[:%FILE%]] ==
- ISSUE:
line 43 character 39
: Unclosed string. - Evidence:'talk_tag' : '
- ISSUE:
line 44 character 61
: Unclosed string. - Evidence:== {{Autotranslate|1=:%FILE%|base=No watermarks/heading}} ==
Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC).
Code issues in User:Framawiki/common.js
editHi Framawiki, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.
Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:
- You edited User:Framawiki/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
- Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
- To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
- ERROR: Cannot parse
line 34 column 22
: Unexpected token ILLEGAL
Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC).
File:Statue of Antarah ibn Shaddad.jpg
editHi! you can find the license for this file here: http://wikimapia.org/terms_reference.html this file is from Wikimapia and it is under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 International.--MohammadHuzam (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Great ! Thanks MohammadHuzam ! --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Plovdiv flag.svg
editHello, you added a "missing evidence of permission" warning to the Plovdiv-coat-of-arms.svg-file I uploaded. I created it using file Plovdiv-coat-of-arms.svg which has been released in the public domain by its creator and the rest is my own work. I don't understand what other "evidence of permission" is needed. I also included the original coat-of-arms-file in the file description. --Kreuzkümmel (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- No problem Kreuzkümmel Don't forget {{Derived from}} template :) --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Nl-Westerwald-article.ogg
editHi Framawiki, you changed File:Nl-Westerwald-article.oga to File:Nl-Westerwald-article.ogg. Now I and other filemovers cannot change File:Nl-Pringles-article1.oga to File:Nl-Pringles-article.ogg. Maybe you have the solution? Kind regards, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Richardkiwi (talk), as I can understand a page already exist with the new name. You have to contact an administrator to perform this task, ie. Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Hope it'll help you. Regards --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, I already thought so. :) But the question is that I also tried to move the file you changed and I did not succeed (same problem). You did, or did you also ask an administrator? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Richardkiwi (talk), No : I suppose there was not a redirect that used the name when I renamed the file :) --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- I see that Jdx renamed the file to File:Nl-Pringles-article.ogg. Thanks a lot! Wikiwerner (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Richardkiwi (talk), No : I suppose there was not a redirect that used the name when I renamed the file :) --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, I already thought so. :) But the question is that I also tried to move the file you changed and I did not succeed (same problem). You did, or did you also ask an administrator? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bus à Haut Niveau de Service de Douai 2010-2014.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bus à Haut Niveau de Service de Douai 2010-2014.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
This is my own work based on an OpenStreetMap background. I've already drawn those 2 maps for which I have had any problem concerning licencing as they are my own work.
File:Ancien réseau de transports en commun Lille Roubaix Tourcoing 1955.png
File:Ancien réseau de transports en commun Lille 1955.png
And the SVG comes with two other PNG files as stated in the description for easier use on wikipedia articles.
File:Bus à haut niveau de service de Douai de Douai 2014-present (540pp).png
File:Bus à haut niveau de service de Douai de Douai 2010-2014 (540pp).png
Do I need to send an email to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" ? Dldwg (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Openstreetmap demande a être crédité. J'ai ajouté le modèle adéquat sur les pages. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 12:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Tout d'abord merci pour tes/vos conseils, j'en ai profité pour rajouter les informations concernant la licence Openstreetmap sur mes 2 autres cartes.
Concernant le renommage du fichier SVG il est vrai que doubler le SVG est superflux mais ce fichier contient les 2 cartes des 2 autres cartes PNG de Douai. Je publie la version SVG uniquement pour permettre à d'autre personnes de réutiliser les cartes vectorielles, on ne peut pas l'utiliser dans les articles du fait qu'elle a une taille beaucoup trop importante et contient plusieurs cartes (pour celle-ci les 2 cartes 2010-2014 et 2014-présent). Dldwg (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merci pour ton explication Dldwg, les images SVG ne me semblent pas problématiques. Bon week-end. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 11:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
File renamer right
editHola Framawiki:
Siguiendo tu consejo he solicitado convertirme en "Filemover". Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 11:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- has hecho bien :) -Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 11:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Joelle Jones (5498515535).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, PierreSelim (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Su Friedrich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
OTRS pending
editBonjour Framawiki ! Merci pour la validation du ticket OTRS des deux photos suivantes de Joseph Carlucci : File:Rhett Forrester 1984-08 Close-up.jpg et File:Rhett Forrester 1984-08.jpg . J'en profite pour te demander si tu pourrais valider la permission envoyée par Ueli Frey le 3 octobre dernier concernant deux autres images : File:Camel - Peter Bardens (1975).jpg et File:Camel - Andy Ward (1975).jpg. Cela fait 10 jours que le mail a été envoyé et l'autorisation n'a pas encore été délivrée. Si le mail n'a pas été reçu à l'adresse des permissions FR de Wikimedia, merci beaucoup si tu peux m'en avertir pour que je dise à Ueli Frey de refaire un nouveau mail avant la suppression automatique des fichiers en OTRS pending. Merci beaucoup ! --ΛΦΠ (talk) 13:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mouvement.jpg
editBonjour, Voir Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mouvement.jpg. À partir des informations contenues dans la communication OTRS, il faudrait probablement clarifier, sur la page de description du fichier, les informations au sujet de la mention «own work», du modèle «self» et de la licence. Qu'est-ce qui concerne le travail de l'artiste et qu'est-ce qui concerne le travail de reproduction photographique ? -- Asclepias (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Répondu. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
OTRS
editBonsoir, je vous écris suite à la photo que j'ai posté sur "wikicommons" il y a quelques mois et qui semble poser problèmes.
Il s'agit du fichier "Vincent_french_singer.jpg" , libre de droits, ticket: 2017103010012764 que j'ai déposé sous licence CC BY-SA 4.0
Je ne sais pas bien où vous écrire mais j'ai reçu un message me demandant de le faire. Je l'ai fait à plusieurs endroits mais ceux-ci étant sans réponse, je pense que vous n'avez pas eu les messages et donc je le fais ici.
Je ne comprends pas ou se trouve le problème, le 30/10/2017 j'ai envoyé le formulaire indiqué, en attestant de ma bonne foi du fait que je suis bien l'auteur de ce cliché. J'avais, à l'époque pris cette photo, le 27 Avril 1999, en photo argentique, je l'ai donc scannée afin de la mettre sur wikicommons. Je ne vois pas ce que je peux faire de plus, j'ai laissé mes coordonnées dans mon premier courriel, vous pouvez me contacter sans soucis.
je peux vous envoyer la photo originale par courrier postal.
Ayant vu aussi le message que la photo posait des problèmes à cause de sa résolution, je l'ai re-scannée, entière cette fois-ci et avec un scan de meilleure qualité.
Je ne l'ai peut-être pas postée au bon endroit, dans quel cas je m'en excuse et dans ce cas merci de me le préciser.
Je reviens vers vous car la créatrice de la page sur l'artiste m'a envoyé un courriel pour me dire que votre message y était toujours et que la photo allait être supprimée d'ici 30 jours.
merci de me tenir informé de l'avancée de notre affaire et de m'aider car je ne sais pas quoi faire de plus pour aider cette personne.
Bien cordialement
--Steven Deegler (talk) 19:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
2017103010012764
- Bonsoir Steven Deegler. Le ticket:2017103010012764 (comme l'indique le numéro) a été envoyé il y a une semaine. Comme indiqué sur fr:Wikipédia:Requête aux agents OTRS/Statut des Files, le délai maximal avant clôture des tickets de la file permissions::fr est de 60 jours, le votre sera donc sûrement prochainement résolu. Et ne vous inquiétez pas, un fichier dit "supprimé" pourra toujours être restauré après que le ticket soit traité par un volontaire, moi ou un autre. Bonne soirée --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup pour la réponse, ça me rassure un peu. Bonne journée --Steven Deegler (talk) 05:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour, j'ai vu que Steven Deegler à appelé la photo remplaçante en résolution maximale exactement du même nom que la précédente. Est-ce peut-être ce qui pose problème car il y a toujours le message que vous avez mis demandant de remplacer la photo par une de plus grande résolution. Peut-être faut-il supprimé la première? merci, bon week-end --Ophélie Ravel (talk) 11:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Josué Guébo.jpg
editBonjour Framawiki,
Je suis Zenman, membre de Wikimedia Community User Group Côte d'Ivoire, plus particulièrement actif sur le volet éditorial.
A notre demande, une première tentative visant à importer cette image sur Wikimedia Commons a été effectuée par l'écrivain Josué Guébo, lui-même, le 20 octobre 2017. Le fichier a néanmoins été supprimé parce qu'il n'y avait, semble-t-il, « pas de preuve que l'auteur ou le détenteur des droits ait accepté de placer le fichier sous la licence qui figure sur la page de description du fichier ».
Nous avons contacté à nouveau M. Guébo à ce sujet, et lui avons conseillé de demander à son photographe (M. Marc Dja dont le nom apparaît dans les métadonnées du fichier), de suivre la procédure exigée par Wikimedia Commons en envoyant un courrier électronique à l'équipe OTRS afin de placer l'image sous licence libre. Apparemment, la procédure a été suivie, mais des insuffisances persisteraient.
Pourriez-vous, si possible nous faire part des insuffisances constatées et/ou des démarches complémentaires à entreprendre pour confirmer de manière indiscutable que M. Marc Dja est bien la source d'origine du fichier ?
D'avance merci. --Zenman (talk) 12:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, effectivement le ticket:2017110710012092 concerne l'image en question. J'ai posé une question à l'expéditeur, et attend sa réponse. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 06:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merci pour la réponse. Nous attendons donc. --Zenman (talk) 08:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Zenman: C'est fait : File:Josué Guébo.jpg. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Vu. Merci encore. --Zenman (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Zenman: C'est fait : File:Josué Guébo.jpg. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merci pour la réponse. Nous attendons donc. --Zenman (talk) 08:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
File:My Can On camera (8754783130).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tool de demandes de restauration
editHello,
Tu avais trouvé un moyen d'avoir le formulaire de undel sur la page des images supprimées ?
--AntonierCH (d) 21:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- (Re-)Bonsoir AntonierCH, je n'ai pas eu plus d'informations sur le projet de gadget que le lien que tu as mis ci-dessus, malgré ce que mon mauvais anglais peut refléter :) Bonne soirée --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships
editThere is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. A user of fr.WP, fr:Utilisateur:Catherine LS, asks me why this image was deleted, because she said the photographer has sent an OTRS permission. (I do not know why she asks me, because I have never modified this file page.) In the history of the file page, I see that you have added a link to an OTRS-ticket, then you removed it. I am not an OTRS volunteer, so I have no access to the ticket. Can you please tell me the reason why you erased the ticket reference, so I can answer this user? (If you want, you can answer her directly if you know French.) Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 08:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- BrightRaven Actually the permission seems correct to me, but I didn't validate it and I don't remember why:) can you restore the picture with {{Temporarily undeleted}} ? Thanks ! --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. I see that Arthur Crbz already did it. Thank you for your answer. BrightRaven (talk) 07:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
|
File:Line-style-icons-twitter.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
editDear Framawiki,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
editA community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Licence des captures d’écrans
editMerci pour la modif. J’avoue que j’ai pas pris le temps de me documenter pour savoir comment on était supposé faire pour les captures d’écrans. Par contre c’est pas dans les options proposées par l’outil d’import, si ? TomT0m (talk) 16:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Bonsoir TomT0m, l'usage est effectivement d'utiliser {{Wikimedia screenshot}} dans la section Licence du fichier. Je pense que le faible nombre de captures envoyées ne justifie pas l'ajout d'option dans le système d'upload. A noter que idéalement un crédit des auteurs (par ex via un lien vers l'historique de la page concernée) et des images présentes dans les screenshots serait à mettre en description des fichiers, sinon cela peut être vu comme du copyvio (gentil copyvio, mais tout de même) Bonne soirée --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
|
File:IMG 9378.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect))
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 219.78.190.126.
And also:
- File:IMG 9356.jpg ( Nominator : 219.78.190.126 | Reason : CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect) )
- File:IMG 9396.jpg ( Nominator : 219.78.190.126 | Reason : CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect) )
- File:IMG 9381.jpg ( Nominator : 219.78.190.126 | Reason : CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect) )
- File:IMG 9359.jpg ( Nominator : 219.78.190.126 | Reason : CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect) )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Baroness Boothroyd.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Toicon-icon-fandom-sprout.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Relicensing via Wikimedia-screenshot
editI’ve noticed you’ve changed some files to use {{Wikimedia-screenshot}} (e.g. Special:Diff/777048772 and Special:Diff/777051424). I don’t think this is appropriate. In the first case, the Wikimedia project in the screenshot is Wikidata, so all the content shown is CC0, and there’s no reason to apply the GFDL; there’s also no WMF logo anywhere. In the second case, the screenshot doesn’t even depict any Wikimedia wiki, and the software shown is unrelated to MediaWiki, nor is it licensed under the GPL (the query service UI actually uses the Apache License). Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Lucas Werkmeister: Hello! the Category:Wikidata screenshots & co categories are I have the impression a mess in term of license. Half, as you say, is just text under cc-0, the other half contains logos, other licensed images ( File:Wikidata Q42 screenshot 2018-06-10.png ), or even some maps from openstreetmap without attribution, that, as far I remember, is required (File:Screenshot_WDQS_location_features_on_a_map.png).
- I did the best I could without checking them one by one: adding the appropriate template, which isn't wrong but may not be ideal in the case where only cc-0 text is present. The worst my modifications can add is to put {{Wikimedia-screenshot}} on a screenshot that contains only cc-0, which I don't think is materially wrong. (or it is?)
- Now, if you don't think it's the good way to deal with the issue and you'd rather have someone manually check each photo, I can revert.
- Regarding Mediawiki oustide wikimedia wikis, either I've used wrong category or the image itself is wrongly categorised (wikidata/wikibase). File:WDQS - Table Result View.png is in Category:Wikidata SPARQL data visualisations, I assume it's wikimedia sparql server, I'm sorry if it's not the case.
- Have a nice day Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 14:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Framawiki: Yes, I would prefer a revert. I agree that the category is a mess, but I think an automated modification does more harm than good: only a manual cleanup can check for issues like the ones you described. And I don’t know whether it’s “materially” wrong to add the template, but to me it feels morally wrong to add additional licenses to files I uploaded without even asking me.
- Perhaps part of the problem is that {{Wikimedia-screenshot}} does too much at once? It combines two licenses, some informational text, and several disclaimers, with only a minimal amount of configuratibility (
|logo=no
can be used to suppress the Wikimedia logo inside the template, but doesn’t change the text content at all). I wouldn’t mind a smaller template, e.g. “this is a Wikidata screenshot” (without any license blocks). - (Also, I just noticed that {{Wikimedia-screenshot}} now seems to contain a mixture of CC BY-SA 3.0 and 4.0 references… I’ll bring that up on the template talk page.) Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Lucy Letby.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
LittleDwangs (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)== Rollback right given ==
Rollback
editI have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
|
File:Logo Lulu dans ma rue.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Emilio Blanco, nutricionista altruista de reconocido prestigio (21546204776).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)