Graham Beards

Hello Graham I am completing the second edition of my book Quantum Reality and would like to include one of your images in the section on wave/particle duality. Specifically, I would like permission to use the image of a double slit interference pattern in green light: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment#/media/File:Young's_slits.jpg

Many thanks! Jonathan — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.51.67.147 (talk) 10:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Jonathan, I am am happy (and pleased) for you to include my image in your book. Please credit Dr Graham Beards, and provide a link if possible.

Best regards,

Graham Beards

Excellent! Many thanks. Would you like a link to the image, or to something else (eg this page??) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.51.67.147 (talk) 17:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

A link to the image would be a bonus. Good luck with the book. Graham Beards (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Graham, I am an anaesthetist editing a text book for obstetric anaesthetists with Springer Publishers. We would really like to use your image 'coagulation in vivo' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coagulation) in one of our chapters. Could you let me know if this is possible?

Many thanks Signed Phillips

Yes of course. You can down load the image from this link.File:Coagulation in vivo.png Graham Beards (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks Graham, thats much appreciated.

Sioned

Image:ShinglesDay1.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

August Blue

The picture you provided for "August Blue", a painting by Henry Tuke, is actually a scanned image of a print of that painting. You can see the paper grain and "flat" look of an inkjet print - not a painting. The best image I could find of it was provided at the Tate,but I'm not sure how their license works. http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/tuke-august-blue-n01613 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelt65 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

electron microscope

Hello,

I work at CNN and would like to use your image of an electron microscope for our shows and platforms. We would gladly credit you. Please let me know if we can have your permission. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Siemens-electron-microscope.jpg

Thank you, Adrienne

electron microscope

Hello,

I work at CNN and would like to use your image of an electron microscope for our shows and platforms. We would gladly credit you. Please let me know if we can have your permission. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Siemens-electron-microscope.jpg

Thank you, Adrienne adrienne.zulueta@cnn.com

You have my permission to use the image as you wish in accordance with the license. Graham Beards (talk) 23:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Factor XI - Plasma thromboplastin

Hello, and thank your for sharing files on Wiki. I am a Laboratory medicine student. I think there is a mistake on the scheme: where it said "Factor XI - Plasma thromboplastin, antecedent serine protease" may be it should said "Factor XI - Plasma thromboplastin antecedent, serine protease". Excuse me if there is a misunderstand from myself. Kind regards, Armando

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Graham Beards!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image:Rabies cartoon circa 1826.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Capileira 2000.jpg was uncategorized on 3 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tuke The Bather (1924).jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

OUP : Hires Image & Permission

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

I am writing to you from Six Red Marbles, the largest development house for learning material in the United States. At Six Red Marbles we are dedicated to bringing the power of natural learning to every classroom, pre-K through adult. The company has developed thousands of creative, effective multi-media educational material for leading publishers including McGraw-Hill, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Scholastic and Pearson.

The book we are at present working on is titled IB Biology Study Guide.

We are interested in using the attached photo. We believe this picture is under your copyright and we would be obliged if you could give us a high-res version and the permission to use it in our book.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Antibiotic_sensitvity_and_resistance.JPG

I am sending you the details of the project below:

Book title : IB Biology Study Guide. Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP) Clearance details: World All languages, Print & Electronic. Usage: Interior Duration: 15 years Print Run : 40,000

Please do let me know if you would need further information to help process our request.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards, Bhaskar.

Bhaskar Chandra Visual Editor Six Red Marbles 317/318, Unitech Trade Centre, Sushant Lok 01, Gurgaon, Haryana, India, 122002 b.chandra@sixredmarbles.com | www.sixredmarbles.com Tel: +91-124-4496850/55 | Mo: +91-9818970659 Twitter: https://twitter.com/sixredmarbles Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sixredmarbles

sixredmarbles

           FUN IDEAS. SERIOUS LEARNING.

Think Creativity. See Beauty. Explore Learning. Feel Progress

Hi, the image is high resolution; just download it and you have my permission to use it in your book. Best wishes, Graham Beards (talk) 23:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Classic Coagulation figure

Dr. Graham Beards, I would like to use the Classic Coagulation figure in a chapter for Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America Critical Care. The chapter is "Coagulopathy in the Critically Ill". I am writing for permission to use this figure and see if I and how to obtain a copyright? Please email me, taraannpaterson@gmail.com. Thank you. Tara

use an image of yours

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Graham - I am a retired pathologist and editor of Lab Tests Online Australasia. I would like to use your image: File:_target cells and spherocytes.jpg to illustrate a short case of beta thalassaemia trait with _target cells. We are using these short cases in Lab Tests Online contributions to a GP newspaper called Medical Observer. If you have a better image to illustrate _target cells in beta thal trait I would be grateful. I think I would crop the image to just the top left corner where there are fewer _target cells as there are too many for just the trait in this image.

Regards

Bruce Campbell

Dear Bruce, feel free to use the image as you wish. Graham. Graham Colm (talk) 06:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Graham

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Graham i want to know if i can use your file Antibiotic sensitvity and resistance.JPG in a essay for Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University in Bihar India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigsofrods (talk • contribs) 21:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes of course you can. Best wishes Graham Beards (talk) 21:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

permission use figure

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Dear dr Beards,

I am writing a manuscript on EQA in coagulation as well as preparing a presentation on this topic. I highly appreciate if you give me permission to use your figure on Wikipedia on Blood Coagulation in vivo. Thank you in advance.

Piet Meijer

Hi Piet, of course you may use the figure, please attribute it to Dr Graham Beards and if necessary include this license [1]. Graham Beards (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello Dr Beards, I am writing to request permission to use your image of bacteriophages attached to a cell. I will use the image in training materials for food safety personnel. The project I am creating is funded by USDA-NIFA and so will be free for anyone to access. May I use your image? Thank you, Christina

Hi Christina, yes of course. Best wishes, Graham Beards (talk) 07:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:RNA-codons.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RNA-codons.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 12:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:RNA-codons.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:RNA-codons.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. In Africa two weeks later.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

UK is still open, USA and ireland are closed.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Khrushchev's Grave.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Khrushchev's Grave.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martinevans123 (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sapovirus electron microscopy

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Mr. Beards,

I am a physician and postgraduate student in Germany. For the completion of my dissertation it would be great to be able to use your electron microscopic image of sapovirus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapovirus#/media/File:Sappovirus.jpg). Would that be ok?

yours sincerely Pia Mann — Preceding unsigned comment added by P1aMann (talk • contribs) 13:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, of course. Graham Beards (talk) 17:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much, this is much appreciated. Pia P1aMann (talk) 04:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)P1aMannReply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Papilloma Virus (HPV) EM (new version).jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Papilloma Virus (HPV) EM (new version).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Neutrophils

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I'm studying biotechnology and I am currently writing my master thesis. It would be great if I could use your Image "Neutrophil white blood cells (leukocytes)" for the introduction part.

Yours sincerely,

Urban Leitgeb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urban Leitgeb (talk • contribs) 14:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear Urban, please use the image as you wish. Regards, Graham Beards (talk) 16:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! Urban Leitgeb (talk) 07:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

rotavirus image virion and genome

Latest comment: 1 year ago9 comments3 people in discussion

SIB images are ok this has been already discussed long ago. See User:Ernsts#ViralZone and see also bottom right at https://viralzone.expasy.org. --Ernsts (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. February 2021 was not that long ago in my life! That note on the bottom right is not clear in that it refers to all images. Graham Beards (talk) 21:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Graham, I have a question about your photo of CsCL density gradient purification of rotaviruses? Is this the right way to contact you? Best Denis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Didistein711 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Denis, yes. Graham Beards (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Graham,

Wow very fast. You got really two nice separated bands of rotavirus, so I'm interested in how did you prepare the CsCL gradient and for how long did you centrifugate at 100 000 x g?

Best

Denis Didistein711 (talk) 12:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Denis, the details are in this paper: Beards GM (August 1982). "A method for the purification of rotaviruses and adenoviruses from faeces". Journal of Virological Methods 4 (6): 343–52. DOI:10.1016/0166-0934(82)90059-3. PMID 6290520. Graham Beards (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Graham

Thank you very much for sharing your work. One question please, Do you prefer CsCL density gradient or Sucrose density gradient as your final purification step? Have you noticed some big changes in sample purity between these two methods?

Best

Denis Didistein711 (talk) 13:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Denis, it depends on the species of virus. For nonenveloped viruses the last stage I used was CsCl, for enveloped viruses I just used sucrose. I have never directly compared the two. Graham Beards (talk) 14:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Graham,

Thank you for your very fast reply once again. I noticed that with sucrose gradient I got better distinctions between the two bands for VSV virus (enveloped), so I was thinking maybe that my CsCl gradient is not optimal or that I need to use more x g which my ultracentrifuge (250 000 x g for 20h) can not achieve.

Best

Denis Didistein711 (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic