Haraldbischoff
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kessler_Zwillinge.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kessler_Zwillinge.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Yann (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Es ist sowohl Quelle, Autor und Lizenz ordentlich eingetragen
File source is not properly indicated: File:CvWagner_1984.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CvWagner_1984.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Christian Näthe.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:Gerlis Zillgens.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:Paetz 01.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:Frank Sauer.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:LaLeLu-acapella.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:Gerd Weismann.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:Lüder Wohlenberg.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:Brustmann 1981.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:Barbara Dickmann.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.
- Image:MahareshiYogi2.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:J Waidele.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:FreiburgerLeiter01.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:NWoodl-Gast SMG klein.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:Astor-SMG 30 5698.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:GeroldRudle 1852.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:Ringsgwandl 5919.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:Lafranz 6810.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:VvQuast 5215.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:Patrik 6273.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:Traublinger-Rede2.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:Avapella-LaLeLu03.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
- Image:SaschaKorf 5334.jpg was uncategorized on 29 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Werner Schmidbauer bg 5627.jpg was uncategorized on 15 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Andreas Borcherding 350.jpg was uncategorized on 13 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Soho01-1000.jpg was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schatkowo278580-1000.jpg was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SpeakersCorner01-640px.jpg was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:1958-alteMesseMünchen-EingangNord-450px.jpg was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:1958-Hauptbahnhof-München-innen-800px.jpg was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MINSK-Airport-1000-278768.jpg was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:OlyStadion-München-im Bau-1-800px.jpg was uncategorized on 8 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Petra Schürmann 5179.jpg was uncategorized on 13 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Heino Trusheim 5123.jpg was uncategorized on 13 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2196.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2152.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2193.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2133.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2247.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2129.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2177.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2227.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2143.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:G8-Heiligendamm 2078.jpg was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:WalkingMan 7663.jpg was uncategorized on 17 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Heu 0036.jpg was uncategorized on 18 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Schlachthof 3737.jpg was uncategorized on 18 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:WernerWinkler-1622a.jpg was uncategorized on 19 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kind mit Seifenblase.jpg was uncategorized on 26 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Villemaur-sur-Vanne 9540.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Villemaur-sur-Vanne 9542.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Philipp_Weber_1806.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Philipp_Weber_1806.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
1958 (Filename) oder 1968 (Beschreibung)?
editWas stimmt? File:1958-Hauptbahnhof-München-innen-800px.jpg --FA2010 (talk) 11:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Dito für: File:1958-alteMesseMünchen-EingangNord-450px.jpg. --FA2010 (talk) 11:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
File:OlyStadion-München-im_Bau-1-800px.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kategorienamen
editHallo, bitte beachte, dass Kategorien hier auf Commons im Allgemeinen englische Namen haben. Um eine passende, vorhandene Kategorie zu finden, hilft es oft, über die Suchfunktion ähnliche Bilder zu finden und von denen die Kategorien zu übernehmen. Oder du gehst in den Wikipedia-Artikel zum Thema des Bildes, schaust ob es dort bereits andere Bilder oder einen Link zu einer Kategorie auf Commons gibt, und folgst diesen. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
File:ClaudiaCane01a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Questions
editHello,
I'd have some questions to ask you about the photos you provided : this one states, in its title, that it shows Miou-Miou with Bertrand Blier, yet the description credits the man as "Jean-Pierre Blanc". The guy in the picture could be Bertrand Blier (it does look a little like him), but then again I don't know what Jean-Pierre Blanc looked like. If it is Bertrand Blier, which movie were they making at the time. Was it "Les Valseuses" ?
Then, about these pictures : 1, 2, 3 : the date states "1973", yet the film Miou-Miou and Julien Clerc made together, "D'Amour et d'eau fraîche", was released in 1976 ? Are you sure about the date ? 1975 would be a more likely one...
Again, if the first picture was taken on the set of the same movie (Miou-Miou has the same looks and wears the same clothing), I'd have to assume that the man is Jean-Pierre Blanc, who was the director of "D'Amour et d'eau fraîche".
I'm asking you this because the first picture is actually used on the French wikipedia as a picture taken on the set of "Les Valseuses", which WAS shot in 1973 by Bertrand Blier. If this is a mistake, I'll have to correct it, but I guess I'll need your help. Thanks, JJ Georges (talk) 11:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello again. I found the answer myself, see here : the man is indeed Jean-Pierre Blanc, not Bertrand Blier. JJ Georges (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Anke Geissler 4226a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Anke Geißler 4226.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.5.194.4 20:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
You are right: I just wanted more accounts than one to give some systematic order in my pics - but I have the impression - that s.o. do not like it
Rutluk and Seleizos
editThe accounts Rutluk and Seleizos claim to belong to you. Are they your accounts? I just want to make sure someone isn't playing a prank on you. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes. This accounts under my name are done to sort my pics in a certain way. But some anonymous wpusers startet shitstorm because of this additional accounts ...
FYI Discussion about your fotos
edithttp://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Fotos_werden_Hochgeladen_-_gesucht_und_dann_gezielt_abgemahnt_.3F --93.198.143.211 16:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus for _targets whose architects/ designers are still alive or it is less than 50 years since their death. Thus even excellent photos which violate copyright laws, could be deleted from Commons. Kindly note, however, that citation use might still be allowed. In such a case this (these) photo(s) should be - without delay - saved to and used from national wikipedia (as they are likely to be deleted in Commons). BR, Paju (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Rolf Miller-BFa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MdL
editHallo, Ihr habt ja offenbar schwere Kämpfe mit den Abgeordneten :-) Frau Waldmann riskiert natürlich, dass ihr doch sehr vorteilhaftes Bild durch einen wesentlich weniger gelungenen Schnappschuss ersetzt wird, den irgendjemand gelegentlich mal an einem Parteiabend macht. Aber das ist ihre Sache. Ich habe Deinen Löschantrag auf Englisch ergänzt, das erhöht die Chance auf rasche Abarbeitung. Gruß, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 20:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Danke für das Lob bezgl Foto Waldmann. Ich bin eigentlich auch der Meinung daß das Foto brauchbar ist - aber warum sich mit jemandem anlegen?
File:87-14-Titel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 20:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Tja liebe Aufpasser - nach lamgem Suchen stelle ich fest dass es sich um einen eingescannten Titelblatt der Jugendzeitschrift POP/Rocky handelt aus einer Zeit zu der ich selber in der Chefredaktion gearbeitet hatte.Probleme mit dem Urheberrecht kann es also garnicht geben! Was steckt noch dahinter?
Bitte lesen
editHallo Haraldbischoff, bitte befasse dich mit dem Kategoriesystem, bevor du zahlreiche falsche Kategorien einsetzt. Das Wichtige steht unter ausführlich unter Commons:Categories bzw. auf Deutsch unter Commons:Kategorien. Bitte unterlasse beispielsweise das Einsetzen deutschsprachiger, rotverlinkter Kategorienamen, wo die Systematik englischsprachig ist. Bemühe dich bitte, den passenden vorhandenen Zweig zu finden und ordne die Bilder darin möglichst weit unten, also möglichst spezifisch ein. Bei File:Efeu Haus 270242.jpg ist Category:Efeu falsch, (falsche Sprache, zu generell), richtig ist Category:Ivy-covered buildings. Auch eine Kategorie "Kruzifix" gibt es beispielsweise nicht. --Sitacuisses (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Danke für die Nachricht.... Das ist schwieriger als ich dachte! Vielleicht überlasse ich das lieber anderen. Ich weis wirklich nicht, warum bei mir auf einmal alles in englisch kommt.Ich sehe gerade bei einigen zufällig kontrollierten Bildbeschreibungsseiten (wikimedia), daß alle Kategorieen auf englisch sind und nicht von mir gemacht worden sind. Also: Ist da noch jemand anders dran?
- Hallo Haraldbischoff, ja - da war noch jemand anders dran, nämlich ich :-) Ich versuche gelegentlich, Bilder aus Category:Munich oder Category:Bavaria in die zutreffenderen Unterkategorien zu verteilen, und das Efeu-Haus war einer der Fälle, wo das geschehen ist. Ihr habt natürlich beide recht: Sitacuisses, wenn er sagt, dass Bilder nicht "freischwebend" kategorisiert warden sollten, weil sie dann nicht entlang der Kategorienbäume erschlossen sind. Und Du mit der Feststellung, dass das leider alles etwas kompliziert ist. Wenn man mal durch das Kategoriensystem durchgestiegen ist, macht es aber auch Spaß. Bis dahin biete ich Dir gerne Unterstützung an: Wenn Du neue Bilder aus München einfach mit Category:Munich versiehst, werde ich eventuelle Fehlkategorisierungen gelegentlich gerne korrigieren. Voraussetzung ist aber, dass die Datei im "Description"-Feld einigermaßen gut beschrieben ist: Beim Efeu-Haus oben war die Beschreibung anfangs wenig aussagekräftig, und ich musste ziemlich lange suchen, bis ich herausgefunden habe, welches Haus das ist. Oder frag mich bei Zweifeln gerne einfach auf meiner Diskussionsseite. Viele Grüße, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Danke für diese Ausführungen ... langsam habe ich den Eindruck, daß ich doch mal sowas wie einen Kurs besuchen muss um das alles zu kapieren. Aber ausdrücklichen Dank, es ist toll, wenn sich Leute so engagiert in dieses Projekt einbringen...
HALT STOPP! Ich glaube dir, dass das nicht so einfach mit dem Kategorisieren am Anfang ist. Aber dann fang auch bitte langsam an und mache nicht gleich haufenweise Bearbeitungen. Ein Beispiel: File:Thomas Müller 2703.jpg ist in der Kategorie Thomas Müller, diese wiederum in der Kategorie Players of FC Bayern München und diese in FC Bayern München. Also hilft es nicht weiter das Bild direkt in die FC-Bayern-Kategorie einzusortieren, da diese sonst nur unglaublich unübersichtlich werden würde. Und das ist bei ziemlich allen Fußballern so und da gibts viele Leute, die sich Mühe mit der Kategorisierung geben. Und mit einem Klick bei Cat-A-Lot machst du da ganz schnell mehrere 100 Dateien kaputt die mühsam per Hand nachgearbeitet werden müssen. Früher oder später könntest du dir mit solchen massenhaften falschen Edits auch eine Sperre wegen Vandalismus einfangen und das will ja niemand. Wenn du Probleme mit der englischen Sprache hast, kannst du dir auch ruhig das Kategoriesystem in der deutschen Wikipedia anschauen, dass sehr ähnlich funktioniert, nur dass es dort Artikel und keine Bilder sind die kategorisiert werden. Schönen Abend --Indeedous (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Tja, da sag ich leise sorry. Ich lasses jetzt - eigentlich versteh ich nicht, mit FC-Bayern .... die Kategorie wurde mir angeboten, nach FC kam das automatisch. Mit der englischen Sprache hab ich eigentlich kein Problem, nur dieses: bei manchen Dateien schaltet das einfach in eine andere Sprache um, sodass ich ja zunächst in der von wiki vorgegebenen Sprache anfangen muss. Na ja ... las mal gut sein!Nur abschliessend noch eines: was bitte ist "Cat-A-Lot" das kenn ich nicht und ich habe höchstens 30 Fussballer drin und nicht 100 wie du meinst. Von "massenhaften edits" kann also keine Rede sein. Also: ich lasses jetzt
File:Peter Herrmann 0910.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notice
editHello. I have raised a thread discussing legal issues that appear to involve you at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_53#Legal_action_resulting_from_photographs_by_Haraldbischoff. Your comments or thoughts are welcome there. If you are not comfortable writing in English, please do contribute in German. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Verteilung von Abmahungen
editIs ja klar, die CC-Diskussion ist schon alt und wird langweilig, wenn da nicht qualifiziert diskutiert wird. z.B. braucht man keine Hochschulreife, zum Befolgen der Lizenzbedingungen, wenn man ein Bild ausserhalb von Wiki verwendet. Die Verwendung ist ja erst durch die Einhaltung dieser Lizenzen möglich, deswegen ist ein Klick auf die Bildbeschreibungsseite hilfreich und wird erwartet. Dort wird die korrekte Nachnutzung n i c h t von mir sondern von der verwendeten Lizenz bestimmt.
Hallo Haraldbischoff, wie jedem anderen Urheber steht dir natürlich das Recht zu, gegen missbräuchliche Verwendungen Deiner Werke vorzugehen. Allerdings solltest du und nicht Dein Anwalt entscheiden, wer abgemahnt wird. Dass Deine Abmahnungen zu mehr lizenzkonformer Nutzung führen ist natürlich ein positiver Aspekt. Ich hoffe, die versendeten Abmahnungen sind dahingehend verständlich — für Menschen mit und ohne Hochschulreife — wie die korrekte Nachnutzung deiner Auffassung nach zu erfolgen hätte.
Ferner würde ich dich bitten, zukünftig Deine Diskussionsbeiträge mit vier Tilden (~~~~
) zu signieren. -- Rillke(q?) 20:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Privat Winter 273933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Floating Pears 8431.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Floating Pears 8431.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Floating Pears 8431.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Floating Piers 8431.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hallo Haraldbischoff, kannst Du bei Gelegenheit einmal in der Dateibeschreibung klarstellen, wann das obige Foto denn nun tatsächlich entstanden ist? Das wäre hilfreich. Besten Dank! --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Dominoe
editHallo Haraldbischoff, Du hast ein Foto von Angie Buchzyk hochgeladen und es mit "Jane Bogaert" überschrieben. Ich habe jetzt mal die Beschreibung geändert. Vielleicht wäre es gut, wenn auch der Fototitel geändert würde? Ich pflege bzw. schrieb die Artikel von Dominoe und Robert Papst. Und ich kann das Dir aus "erster Hand" berichten ;-) LG --NellsPort (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Rex Motorfahrrad
editHallo, du hattest 2012 nebenstehendes Foto hochgeladen mit dem Jahreszahlvermerk 1946. Lässt sich nachvollziehen, woher diese Angabe kommt? Der mir vorliegenden Literatur nach (Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift Jahrgang 1953) wurde die Produktion dieses Motorfahrrads bei Rex erst im Jahr 1951 begonnen. Brisant ist die Frage deshalb, weil es sich dabei konstruktiv/konzeptionell möglicherweise um den Ursprung aller späteren Mopeds handelt. Danke für Rückmeldung und Grüße, --Max schwalbe (talk) 02:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
File:G8-Heiligendamm 2129.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Werner Brix 5877.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Werner Brix 5888.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Fancy-03a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |