Hektor

Welcome to the Commons, Hektor!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Jsc2006e39242.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 21:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• There seem to be two versions of the same image, one small (100 kb) and one large (1000 kb or so). I think that the added value to have an image ten times larger is low and the large one should be deleted. For some reason people who download the NASA image tend to favor the larger ones, which is not reasonable.Hektor 20:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Chapron_Delahaye.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chapron_Delahaye.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 20:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Tramway_valenciennes_ligne2.PNG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tramway_valenciennes_ligne2.PNG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 08:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

sorry

I will restore in a moment and once again I'm sorry :)Szczepan talk  08:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

done Szczepan talk  08:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Hektor 09:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocage pour violations de copyright répétées

Bonjour !

Vous avez uploadé plusieurs fichiers qui constituent des violations de copyright. Ceci dénote probablement une mauvaise compréhension de nos principes sur le copyright. Effacer ces fichiers est une tâche ingrate, aussi, pour vous éviter de causer davantage de problèmes, vous avez été bloqué sine die.

Ceci n'est pas une sanction, mais seulement une façon de vous empêcher de faire quelque chose de potentiellement problématique. Vous serez débloqué sur demande si vous vous engagez par écrit avoir lu et compris les règlements sur le copyright, et à y adhérer.

Vous êtes toujours en mesure d'éditer cette page de discussion. Si vous ne parlez pas français, veuillez contacter un administrateur qui parle votre langue.

Merci pour votre compréhension.

---

Deutsch | English | français | suomi | português | +/−

Rama 11:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

• Expliquez. Ces images sont des photos d'affiches produites par le gouvernement français sur lesquelles il n'y a pas de copyright. Ou est le proiblème. D'autre part vous parlez de violation répétées. Ses images ont été chargées en une fois. Vous pratiquez la zéro tolérance ? Et comment contacte t on un administrateur quand on est bloqué ?Hektor 11:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

• Tu peux me contacter par mail ou sur ta page de discussion, comme tu vois.
• Oui, nous pratiquons la tolérance zéro.
• Ces affiches ne sont pas produites par le gouvernement français mais par des cabinets publicitaires.
• Quand bien mêmes alles auraient été produites par le gouvernment, je ne vois pas du tout pourquoi elles ne seraient pas soumises au droit d'auteur ; tu confonds la France et les États-Unis d'Amérique.

Ce genre d'affirmations me confortent dans mon idée que tu devrais vraiment te mettre au courant de ces choses avant d'uploader des images n'importe comment. Rama 11:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Je demande à être débloqué. je n'uploaderait à l'avenir aucune photographie de document imprimé. 90.34.113.8 11:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

OK. Rama 12:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Olympic park.JPG

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Oxam Hartog 22:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Uijeongbu metro.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot_{(My Operator|My Contribs)} 00:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Re : Crau & autoroutes

Voilà, c'est corrigé. Bonne continuation. Sting (talk) 01:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tramway Bordeaux.svg

Hey.

I saw you edited the line B map to include up to Clavezux. Can you also edit this composite map to include up to Claveaux? Thanks. gren (talk) 00:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Hektor!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Troisvilles le fayt.jpg is uncategorized since 25 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Villa arpel.jpg is uncategorized since 26 April 2009.
• Image:Fernando Caldeiro.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Yvonne Cagle.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Patricia Robertson.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Jsc2009e208851.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2009.
• Image:Herve.jpg was uncategorized on 9 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:AMTP 020T Schneider.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

File:M bahn.jpg

Hello Hektor,

I made a new svg version of your File:M bahn.jpg. Could you add a valid license like {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}} or so to the file? Otherwise, both I and the tool derivativeFX don't know which license to use for the new (derived) file. --Michael Kümmling ✐ 09:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, now I've uploaded File:M-Bahn.svg. --Michael Kümmling ✐ 09:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Prisches.jpg

Hello Hektor, You uploaded the current image on File:Prisches.jpg over a previous file, I was wondering if you would bother if the two photos were split in two files, so that we would have two pictures of that church? Cheers, --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 18:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

• I would have no problem whatsoever. The second picture is of bad quality unfortunately. I will try to come back there some day. Thanks anyway for checking this kind of things. Hektor (talk) 07:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I splitted the file, and the older image is now at File:Prisches 2.jpg, for your reference. I don't think it is of bad quality. Thanks for allowing this, now Category:Prisches has two images instead of only one. :) --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 23:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Plans du Grand Paris Express

Bonjour et merci pour tes plans du Grand Paris Express, ils sont de super qualité ! Serait-il cependant possible de les éditer afin de réduire leur taille réelle ? En effet, le format est trop petit pour lire les stations dans les pages descriptives (en tout cas pour les petits écrans), mais beaucoup trop grand en taille réelle afin de rendre leur lecture possible. Ce serait super, d'autant que le reste de l'article est aussi de qualité et que l'on pourrait proposer la labellisation. Cordialement, En-bateau (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

• J'ai réduit le plan principal. Hektor (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Pour info, Rome à rajouter au conditionnel sur la 14: http://www.stif.info/IMG/pdf/Metro_14.pdf - Gonioul (talk) 15:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Je ne crois pas, cette station est exclue du projet. Hektor (User talk:Hektor#top|talk]]) 10:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

T'as oublié de mettre la correspondance avec le t9 à Vitry Centre dnas le schéma de la ligne 15 AlexY75

File:Chemin de fer du cambrésis le cateau departure.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Complexe souterrain Châtelet.svg

C'est gentil d'avoir massacré les layers...

Gonioul (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Don't vandalize files.

Renominating something because you disagree with it being kept is one thing, but vandalizing the licenses of images because you think think it's legitimate is quite another, as you did here and here. Do that again, I won't hesitate in requesting you be temporarily blocked from editing. Fry1989 ^eh? 01:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

• Removing illegitimate tags is not vandalizing. -Hektor

Yes I'm afraid it is. Removing a valid license because YOU think it's illegitimate is vandalism. I won't tolerate it. You have been told this is too simple, you are going to have to live with it. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I put a section on the file talkpage so you can discuss it if you like. Penyulap ☏ 09:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

So thinking you are wrong and acting accordingly is vandalism ? what a fine wikimedia contributor you make. Ok let me explain again. The IOC will sue. I am 100 % sure of it. And then there will be a lawsuit between the IOC and the WIkimedia foundation. It will cost money, no matter who eventually wins. It might well happen that the IOC eventually loses, but there will be money spent. So my question is, aren't there better ways to spend the money of the Wikimedia Foundation than to defend the presence of this image on Commons and allow you to have your little ego trip, especially knowing that we can put it in the various wikipedias and claim fair use, which will make no difference to the casual user ? Hektor (talk) 07:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

I think the normal process is the IOC asking WMF to remove them. If the WMF decides to with an office action then end of story with no costs. If they decide to keep them then they wait for the IOC to make the next move. Then the lawyers on both sides weigh further costs vs principles. Our choice now should be to wait until the IOC contacts WMF. In other words we should wait for a decision from the WMF. Anyone is free to contact WMF legal liaisons if they wish and give them a heads up. --Canoe1967 (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

[1]

I have reported you for abuse of DR process, and am requesting you be temporarily blocked from editing Commons. Your repeated nominations of the same image, a total of 5 times in under a week is unacceptable. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

I've blocked you for 1 week, because you obviously don't understand our policies. I'm not sure what you are trying achieve through getting these files deleted, but know that if you do it again after the block expires, I'll indef you -FASTILY 18:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Villa Cavrois Belvedere.jpg

And also:

• File:Villa Cavrois Detail Chambre Parents.jpg
• File:Villa Cavrois Facade Sud Est 1.jpg
• File:Villa Cavrois Facade Sud Est 2.jpg
• File:Villa Cavrois Northeast Wing.jpg
• File:Villa Cavrois Pergola Terrasse.jpg
• File:Villa Cavrois Southwest Side.jpg

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 23:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Chérif Kouachi.jpg

Bonjour, J'ai corrigé la balance des blancs, et réduit l'image en hauteur. Cela me semble mieux. Ça va ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

• Oui ca va mieux. Je lui trouvai la tete extremement etroite, on aurait dit un personnage de Tod Browning. Hektor (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Question

What do you mean by "I suspect a prank, therefore I would like a check to be made on this item."?--Hipposcrashed (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Bonne année et restauration de fichiers

Bonjour et bonne année,

Juste un petit message pour prévenir que la ville Cavroix étant désormais dans le domaine public, je viens de restaurer plusieurs de vos fichiers précédemment supprimés, ceux-ci sont sur Category:Villa Cavrois.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Mise à jour des correspondances sur les tracés de lignes de transport parisiennes

Salut,Hektor,je voudrais que tu mets à jour (en 2016) les correspondances des stations, avec les lignes de transports (Métro, Transillien,Tramway ,Rer et lignes de Bus spéciales) soivent affichés et indiqués sur les plans des lignes horizontales et qu'ils soivent mis à jour (en 2016) que ce soit pour les correspondances avec les 16 lignes actuelles du Métro Parisien, les 9 lignes actuelles du Tramway d’Île-de-France, les 8 Lignes actuelles du Transillien, les 5 lignes actuelles du RER, les lignes de Bus spéciales actuelles (TVM et Bus 393) et certaines lignes du TER.Je veux que tu affiches la correspondance à distance comme sur les plans de lignes de la Ratp via ce lien (https://image.freepik.com/icones-gratuites/personne-qui-marche_318-29235.png). Je souhaiterais aussi que tu affiches les logos des lignes TVM,BUS 393,T6,T7 et du T8 pour qu'elles soient bien visibles comme correspondances sur les plans de lignes et afficher toutes les stations en correspondances avec un point blanc sur le tracé comme pour ce lien : http://p6.storage.canalblog.com/62/36/1127997/88297517_o.jpg. Et n'oublie pas d'afficher la correspondance avec le T9 à Vitry Centre sur le tracé de la ligne 15 Sud du Grand Paris Express — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexY75 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Catégories

Bonjour, Il faut corriger les catégories de tes photos de ski. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:2012 presidential france official posters.jpg

File:2012 presidential france official posters.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

File:2007 presidential france official posters.jpg

File:2007 presidential france official posters.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Source de File:Revue du Pays de Caux n2 mai 1902.djvu

Bonjour, pour File:Revue du Pays de Caux n2 mai 1902.djvu, tu as indiqué comme source "BNF", malgré des recherches, je ne retrouve pas de lien. Peux-tu être plus précis ?

Merci d'avance

--Newnewlaw (talk) 10:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Newnewlaw: . Bonjour. La source est plus précisément Gallica. Les fichiers Journal du Pays de Caux sur Gallica comprennent une année complète (cinq numéros chacun), et je les ai découpés pour des raisons de taille du fichier. Hektor (talk) 11:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Boissonnas, Un Vaincu, English, 1875.djvu

Copyright status: File:Boissonnas, Un Vaincu, English, 1875.djvu

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Boissonnas, Un Vaincu, English, 1875.djvu. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 14:07, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Extraits du Bulletin du Comité Olympique Suisse 1932.djvu

File:Extraits du Bulletin du Comité Olympique Suisse 1932.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Renard - Celui qui n'a pas tué, 1927.djvu

Copyright status: File:Renard - Celui qui n'a pas tué, 1927.djvu

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Renard - Celui qui n'a pas tué, 1927.djvu. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Renard - Celui qui n'a pas tué, 1927.djvu

Salut Hektor... Tu as importé ce fichier que j'avais téléverser sur WS pour le faire venir sur commons... On ne peut mettre les publications après 1923 ici... Il est déjà marqué pour effaçage ici... Il ne faudrait pas l'effacer sur WS! --Ernest-Mtl (talk) 23:57, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 95 crop).jpg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 95 crop).jpg

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 95 crop).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 95 crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 85 crop).jpg

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 85 crop).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 85 crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 47 crop).jpg

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 47 crop).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 47 crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 99 crop).jpg

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 99 crop).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 99 crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 103 crop).jpg

Copyright status: File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 103 crop).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Santos-Dumont - Dans L'Air, 1904 (page 103 crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960 (page 1 crop).jpg

File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960 (page 1 crop).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960.djvu

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960.djvu. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rosny aîné - Les astronautes - 1960.djvu]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Mémoires de la comtesse de Boigne Tome V 1923 (page 2 crop).jpg

File:Mémoires de la comtesse de Boigne Tome V 1923 (page 2 crop).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

131.176.243.9 08:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Ligne 14

Tu peux m'expliquer pourquoi tu rétablis qqn qui mets un plan 2020 sur un fichier qui s'appelle 2007?

C'est aussi pour ça que je demande le renommage du fichier sans année.

Gonioul (talk) 22:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

• J'ai demandé à l'atelier graphique de mettre à jour et tu as annulé tout le boulot du gars qui a travaillé. Tu fais quoi ? Hektor (talk) 22:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Il faut un nouveau fichier 2020, comme ce que j'ai fait et demandé pour le plan et le thermomètre - Gonioul (talk) 22:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

J'ai fait une demande à l'atelier graphique il y a une semaine. Hektor (talk) 22:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Surement, mais il ne fallait clairement pas mettre à jour un fichier thermomètre qui s'appelle 2007, et pour le plan, un fichier 2020 n'aurait pas été du luxe, j'ai donc fait les demandes de renommages nécessaires pour assurer la continuité, que tu as essayé d'annuler sans justification. Sans parler de tes reverts sans vérification, alors que tu insères des modèles d'aide aux débutants dans les articles... - Gonioul (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Je voulais juste un plan à jour. Hektor (talk) 23:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Mercure de France

Bonjour, Merci de ne pas renommer ces fichiers. Cela ne résout pas complètement le classement. Il vaut mieux utiliser {{DEFAULTSORT:}} Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

@Yann and Hsarrazin: Je croyais bien faire. Ok, faut-il que je rechange les noms ? Merci. Hektor (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

C'est déjà fait. Dans certains cas, la clé de tri doit être la date seule, et dans d'autres "Mercure de France + date". Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

@Yann, dans Wikisource, les nommages avant le numéro avant la date posent de vrai problèmes dans certaines catégories (où le DEFAULTSORT ne fonctionne pas) et aussi pour construire un modèle de Tomaison...

et après tout, c'est bien pour l'usage principalement sur wikisource que ces fichiers sont uploadés, non ? Hsarrazin (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Hsarrazin: OK. Il y a une question plus générale : faut-il faire des fichiers DjVu ? Pour le Mercure, ce n'est pas de la tarte... Yann (talk) 19:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

c'est mieux : certains outils ne fonctionnent QUE sur les DjVu...

perso, je passe par un upload sur IA, puis import sur Commons avec IA-Uploadbot... du coup, je n'ai pas besoin de m'occuper de l'ocr, NI de la conversion en Djvu...

Tu les récupères où, les fichiers ? Gallica ? Hsarrazin (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Catégorie des lignes du métro de Toulouse

Salut, du coup si la catégorie est renommée "Toulouse Metro line C", et les catégories des stations placées elles-mêmes dans une sous-catégorie, il va falloir assez vite revoir le nommage et l'organisation pour les deux autres lignes non ? Kuremu Sakura (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Octave-beliard-la-vie-d-un-parisien-au-21e-siecle-1910 (page 1.3 crop).jpg

Copyright status: File:Octave-beliard-la-vie-d-un-parisien-au-21e-siecle-1910 (page 1.3 crop).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Octave-beliard-la-vie-d-un-parisien-au-21e-siecle-1910 (page 1.3 crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Charlotte Goetschy-Bolognese Midjourney.png

File:Charlotte Goetschy-Bolognese Midjourney.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Belbury (talk) 17:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Midjourney Dali.png

File:Midjourney Dali.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Trypophobia midjourney.png

Hi, you wrote "own work", but Midjourney as author, which seems not to make sense. Also, you put it under PD-algorithm, wich is in line with Commons:AI-generated media#How should AI-generated media be handled?, but you also added a CC-license. --Túrelio (talk) 12:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Túrelio: It's fine to also have a CC license, since that is needed for reuse in the UK and Hong Kong. Nosferattus (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Verne - En Magellanie.djvu

File:Verne - En Magellanie.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMontagne en résidence (talk) 12:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Emmanuel Macron MidJourney.png

File:Emmanuel Macron MidJourney.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)