Jo Weber

Welcome to my talk page!

Welcome to the Commons, Jo weber!

--SieBot 22:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Westalpen-Gebirgsgruppen nach Rochlitz & Bacher 2006.svg

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 23:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Problem fixed --Jo 23:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images: Mineraly.sk_-_sutina.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello, the first page generally describes w:gravel. The second one is about w:peat, while the image shows w:ferns. As a Slovak-English dictionary you can use e.g. http://slovniky.atlas.sk/ or ask me again (may take a while until I answer). Or ask at the Slovak Wikipedia (Slovenian is another language, BTW) to translate the descriptions to English. ~~helix84 15:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The adjective is Slovak, BTW. No offense taken :) ~~helix84 19:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Klimaänderungen im Phanerozoikum

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo. Du hast bei der Übersetzung des Diagramms "Klimaänderungen im Phanerozoikum" das Kurzzeitmittel und das Langzeitmittel vertauscht. Gruß Fanny —the preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.116.228.80 (talk • contribs) 09:54, 4. Apr. 2008

Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe den Fehler korrigiert. Jo 12:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deprecated License

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It has been found that Image:Anthophyllite in Komatiite.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 14:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Problem fixed.--Jo (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Schema der Eifelflüsse

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Jo, kannst Du bitte in Deinem Schema der Eifelflüsse noch die Warche mit ihren Nebenflüssen in die Amel fließen lassen. In der Cat. fehlt z. B. noch der Bayhon, der die Grenze zwischen den Gemeinden Waimes und Malmedy bildet. Danke.--G. C. Friedrich (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Duhon, die belgisch/luxemburgischen Flüsse sind bis auf wenige Ausnahmen eigentlich Ardennenflüsse, keine Eifelflüsse, oder täusche ich mich da?--Jo (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Jo, da kommt wieder das nicht so recht zu lösende Thema Eifel / Ardennen durch. In keinem wiki-Artikel wird ein Machtwort gesprochen, habe jedenfalls noch nichts gefunden. Die Quellen von Hill, Rur und Pouleurbach / Hogne liegen jedenfalls nur wenige hundert Meter entfernt auf der Hochfläche von Botrange im Deutsch-Belgischen Naturpark Hohes-Venn / Eifel. Warche, Holzwarche, Kyll und Our entspringen ebenfalls nur wenig entfernt rund um Losheimergraben. Die belgische Polzei nennt sich in diesem Gebiet POLIZEIZONE EIFEL. Von Ardennen keine Spur. Vielleicht stöberst Du ja mal bei Gelegenheit in den Artikeln der Gegend ( z.B. Portal EIFEL ). Tschüß --G. C. Friedrich (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ich kenne das Problem gut. Selbst wenn die Polizei (und auch der größte Teil der Deutschen Gemeinschaft) sich als Eifel versteht, entspricht das nicht unbedingt dem allgemeinen Konsens. Meist wird dabei die Grenze zwischen Eifel und Ardennen an den Landesgrenzen gezogen, auch wenn man ebenso gut argumentieren könnte, dass die Sprachgrenze Deutsch/Französisch/Letzeburgisch die beiden Gebiete abgrenzt.

Diesen konkreten Fall sollte man nicht hier diskutieren, sondern auf einer der von Dir angesprochenen Seiten. Aber gib mir bitte Bescheid, damit ich die Diskussion verfolgen kann und eventuell meinen Senf dazu beitragen kann. Gruß, --Jo (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ardennes

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Guten Abend, Jo,

thank you for your geological map.

But it could be better: River Ourthe has two almost equal sources, Ourthe occidentale (You marked it.) and Ourthe orientale. And further important rivers passing through or coming out of the Ardennes are the Sambre, the Oise, and the Sauer/Sûre.

Also: Außer der von dir eingezeichneten Ourthe occidentale hat die Ourthe einen zweiten, fast gleich großen Quellfluss, die Ourthe orientale. Als Teil der nördlichen (und westlichen) Begrenzung der Ardennen ganz wichtig ist die Sambre. Die Oise sollte mit hinein als einer der wichtigsten Flüsse Nordfrankreichs und die Sauer/Sûre als Sammler allen der Mosel zufließenden Ardennenwassers.

Gruß

Ulamm (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ulamm, die Flüsse sind hier nicht die Info, die die Karte geben soll, deshalb sind nur zwei eingezeichnet. Die anderen sollen da nicht rein, dafür wäre eine eigene geographische Karte der bessere Ort. Gruß, --Jo (talk) 06:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jo Weber!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 16:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Europrobe - Avalonia Basement Europe.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:GeorgeBuskKensalGreen01.jpg was uncategorized on 20 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Everything fixed --Jo (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Geology_of_Germany

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Geology of Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Arcalino (talk) 15:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mitteleuropäische Varisziden Karte

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, sag mal hast du vielleicht noch eine Rohfassung von deiner Karte https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontinentales_Tiefbohrprogramm_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland#mediaviewer/Datei:Gliederung_der_Varisziden_in_Mitteleuropa.jpg ? Die zeigt nämlich sehr schön Deck-, Grundgebirge sowie Fränkisches Lineament Bayerischer Pfahl und wäre leicht verändert in vielen anderen Artikeln sehr hilfreich. --Christian b219 (talk) 12:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Da sind einige Betriebssystemsupdates drübergegangen ... Ich suche mal nach.--Jo (talk) 18:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Geht nicht so ohne Weiteres. Ich bleibe dran (wahrscheinlich nächstes Wochenende). Gruß, --Jo (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:PacificNW volcanics.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PacificNW volcanics.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Sly Mill.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sly Mill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:AR Ouachita Mountains.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:AR Ouachita Mountains.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 14:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Bedaccelerograph.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bedaccelerograph.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Taunus Naturräumliche Gliederung mit Relief.png

Yours sincerely, — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic