Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Robinsons Galleria

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Robinsons Galleria

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Pompeia (wife of Caesar) "Caesar's wife must be above suspicion": Inhibition of Nominator in all FOP cases Philippines our of Delicadeza and Impartiality: Fervent appeal to editors and administrators to Only Put On Hold the FOP Philippines Nominations for Deletions by herein Nominator pending Reply to Emails or Letters to DOJ Secretary or IPO Directors, past and present on Commons FOP uploading vis-à-vis Probable Cause of 2012 Cyber Stalking Crimes on habit or schemes - FOP Philippine Mass Deletions carefully planned since September 2, 2020 by Smart One - Parent and Child with Check User on Hold

  • Prefatory: a) when I was practicing law, I usually phone call the LRA Administrator's Legal Office to elevate on Verbal En Consulta - that is oral query to question a Bulacan Register of Deeds' refusal to register my documents; the written Consulta with Reply often takes months; hence, the Register of Deeds, upon my entry in the Primary Entry Book of my Verbal query notes, automatically decides of my Registration; b) in1 985 at a Maritime Law Office, I phone call the Legal Departments of Several Government agencies and I write them on their phone replies to protect our Boss, Law Office from legal attacks by our clients;
  • My legal challenge, With All Due Respect to my almost Daily Talk Page Visitor Nominator: why don't you just email your specific FOP Deletions to the DOJ Secretary or IPO Directors, and await the Replies, before your ask for Deletions? While trickles of deletions may not be bad for Commons, they are bad precedents for snakes waiting to bite; meaning therefore, the Smart One and Check-user may use the push button deletion as precedents to Again Again and Again Continue Mass Deletions to the irreparable damage and injury to Commons Wikimedia Foundation ownership of all these photos;
  • Legal support of my stance - Nominator must be above suspicion "A judge, like Caesar's wife, must not only be clean but must be above suspicion. The credibility of the judicial system is dependent upon the judges who man it. For a democracy to thrive… every judge must discharge his judicial functions with integrity, impartiality and intellectual honesty ..."
  •   Keep I register a very strong Legal objection to the Deletion and PREMISES CONSIDERED, * I further object to the deletion on the ground that our Copyright law expressly contains the Extinctive prescription of 4 years unlike 3 years in American Jurisprudence; so from 2016 uploading, any and all photos of Commons can no longer be deleted much less be brought to the Special Court even by the creator artist or assigns of the artist sculptor, Dura lex sed lex; the IPO, DOJ and the Special Court will forthwith throw the case by Motion to Dismiss or Motion to Quash due to Prescription; even Commons lawyers will agree with our Copyright Law proviso on Extinctive prescription read in connection with the Implementing 2019 Circular on Special Courts' creation and jurisdiction over Copyright cases including FOP here; with this I register a very strong Legal objection to the Deletion Judgefloro (talk) 06:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
How many times I will tell you that copyright may subsist in government-commissioned works? For your reference, see COM:Philippines#Government works and COM:Philippines#Commissioned works. There's no need for another query to IPOPHL et cetera: IPOPHL has quoted relevant passages from R.A. 8293 that a government-owned work doesn't necessarily mean it isn't copyrighted. Refer to Section 176.3 of the copyright law. Also, see Sec. 178.4 for rules on commissioned works: unless "there is a written stipulation on the contrary", the due treatment is that the person who created the work owns the commissioned work, while the owner only owns physical ownership. Take note, much of your statement claiming that only Commons admins will take action if the copyright holder sends notice do not comply with COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle: Commons cares for the copyright holders most especially those who designed or created the works that are found in the image (including sculptures and buildings), even if many people do not. Only when FOP is introduced here is when we can now host images of your problematic buildings and sculptures. Per Commons policy on respecting copyrights deletion first is the right approach. Commons already has experienced tremedous loss for deletions of thousands of w:Burj Khalifa images, see Category:Burj Khalifa-related deletion requests. See also Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests/deleted. Category:French FOP cases/deleted alone has more than 2,000 case pages, perhaps including thousands of deleted images. But that is the essence of respecting the copyrights of the creators of these architectural and sculptural works of art, as we should not assume that they will agree to have images of their works licensed freely without their knowledge. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Rejoinder: I disagree with the above-submitted discussions and opinions on the following legal grounds: a) the cited deletions in other countries have no application to Philippine FOP; your cited Webinar among others clearly states that everyone may email the IPO director for specific queries; b) I have repeatedly quoted and copy pasted my 2 letters filed with the IPO Director and Directress; I am armed with 2 written evidence; c) in my 1st Query with a top lawyer of the IPO 5 March 2014, 13:28:43, I, as Judge and lawyer formally discussed the FOP Commons Uploading and the Reply, though verbal, but official, was that there is no Copyright Infringement in FOP Commons Uploading, until, until and until a S.C. Case is decided on the matter; what is not prohibited is allowed, so to speak; d) on the other side of the fence, you have cited the Webinar among others, but unlike me, you never presented as Counter-argument against my legal submissions any formal request and letter on your stance; d) it is unfair for us editors to wait and wait as your promised or stated and posted here my handwriting letters to Editors, that IanLopez would file the draft being finalized; but suddenly we editors are now shocked why no such letter was filed or easily emailed; e) in argumentation and debate, your word, their word and my word against others' words; Commons has policies and if you can take a cursory perusual of my Archived talk pages - Archive 1 12 November 2007 to 18 12 05:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC) and User talk:Ramon FVelasquez/Archive 1 to User talk:Ramon FVelasquez/Archive 6 01:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC) : I usually submit no objection to FOP Deletions; but the Nominators are assorted, editors and admininstrators; f) starting with the Mass Deletions on September 3, 2020 of the Smart One, Parent and Child Check-User on Hold, both flooded my talkpages with deletions requests; g) while your continuous and almost daily visits on my talk pages redound to billboards ads etc, I cannot just copy paste affirmative replies to your requests ... I have to voice my legal opinion; and this is how Commons works; h) in SUM, I suggest that, even if you opine that you do not need to email the IPO Director, it would not be so bad to allow other editors to Nominate FOP Deletions and put them on my Talk Page; there are so many Filipino editors and they are capable also of putting DRs on my talk pages on FOP;
  • PREMISES CONSIDERED, I respectfully submit to Commons editors, my above-Legal rejoinder to your opinion and messages, as I humbly submit to the sound discretion of the Commons Community of Editors on whether to delete or not to delete the FOP photos that I repeatedly asked to be Kept Judgefloro (talk) 08:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

File:09973jfBarangays Igulot Roads Bocaue Bulacanfvf 08.JPG

File:09973jfBarangays Igulot Roads Bocaue Bulacanfvf 08.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:09973jfBarangays Igulot Roads Bocaue Bulacanfvf 08.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfBolacanTuro9251Bocauefvf 17.JPG

File:JfBolacanTuro9251Bocauefvf 17.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfBolacanTuro9251Bocauefvf 17.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 11.JPG

File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 11.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfBulacanCiudaddeVictoria9871PhlArenaStadiumfvf 11.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfBulacanPhilArena9907IglesiaStadiumfvf 20.JPG

File:JfBulacanPhilArena9907IglesiaStadiumfvf 20.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfBulacanPhilArena9953IglesiaStadiumfvf.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:JfBulacanPhilArena9953IglesiaStadiumfvf.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfCiudadINC34PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG

File:JfCiudadINC34PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfCiudadINC34PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfCiudadINC36PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG

File:JfCiudadINC36PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfCiudadINC36PhilArenaStadiumfvf.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfDuhatArena9529BocaueBulacanfvf 09.JPG

File:JfDuhatArena9529BocaueBulacanfvf 09.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfDuhatArena9529BocaueBulacanfvf 09.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfDuhatArena9529BocaueBulacanfvf 18.JPG

File:JfDuhatArena9529BocaueBulacanfvf 18.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfDuhatArena9529BocaueBulacanfvf 18.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfDuhatAtlasArena9566BocaueBulacanfvf 05.JPG

File:JfDuhatAtlasArena9566BocaueBulacanfvf 05.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfDuhatAtlasArena9566BocaueBulacanfvf 05.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 35.JPG

File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 35.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 35.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 38.JPG

File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 38.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:JfTuroBocaue9301Bulacanfvf 38.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lumbac, Pulilan, Bulacan

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

I stay and remain Neutral on Nominations to delete my photos: Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines : I was informed by 2 Church workers that they are very willing to answer my queries and or refer them to the Central Office regarding architect engineers, but they said that all their Churches are in Google, and Philippine Arena is not built just for them but for all the Filipino people

  • The only difference between my/our Catholic Churches and their Churches, is that there are no statues, and all the moral rights of architects are transferred Ipso Facto that is Inherent (law) in the Church buildings owned and administered by the Tagapamahalang Pangkalahatan ng Iglesia ni Cristo) - while our Titutar Bishop or Archbishop of the Diocese of the Parish Church building owns the Church and accessories, statues, and more importantly including the 100% transferred absolute and moral rights of the architects and engineers; see Administration and organization Architecture
  • Commons has policies and if you can take a cursory perusal of my Archived talk pages - Archive 1 12 November 2007 to 18 12 05:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC) and User talk:Ramon FVelasquez/Archive 1 to User talk:Ramon FVelasquez/Archive 6 01:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC) : I usually submit no objection to FOP Deletions; but the Nominators are assorted, editors and administrators; however, starting with the Mass Deletions on September 3, 2020 of the Smart One, Parent and Child Check-User on Hold, who, in concert, flooded my talkpages with deletions requests plus a Third Filipino editor's continuous and almost daily visits on my talk pages redound to billboards ads etc.; I cannot just copy paste affirmative replies to their requests ... I have to voice my legal opinion; and this is how Commons works, for it is not censored;
  • PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit the foregoing Comment, Inputs and Legal Discussion for the consideration and sound discretion of the Commons Community regarding the matter: and I would like to stress that I remain NEUTRAL in all the Deletions Requests that I receive from any and all Commons Editor like what I did since 2007; if you will require the Permission from the Baliuag District Minister here Bulacan District Office of the Iglesia ni Cristo; in Baliuag Category:Iglesia Ni Cristo churches in Baliuag, Bulacan please tell me, thanks and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
      • By way of rejoinder, I strongly state that I stay neutral, and I AM NOT in favor of excluding the Philippines from COM:PCP, all, with due respect to opposite views of Filipino editors who worked hard to take photos of National Treasures and Landmarks (they would not like their photos deleted); the precautionary principle is based on good and not bad law, but it has exceptions also in American and Philippine Jurisprudence;
  • Both the Balance of interests and Clear and present danger doctrines were adopted by both the Supreme Court of the United States and Philippines "to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms (Bill of Rights) of speech, press, or assembly. The test was replaced in 1969 with Brandenburg v. Ohio's "imminent lawless action" test." The tests vis-à-vis the FOP Copyright Infringement provisos or sections of our Law should enlighten us on the matter of editing if ever, the Commons policies; " I end xxx with a reminder from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes - that the market place of ideas is still the best alternative to censorship. The market place of ideas makes freedom of speech robust and allows people to be more tolerant of opposing views. It has been said that freedom of speech is not only to freely express oneself within the context of the law but also to hear what others say, that all may be enlightened, regardless of how obnoxious or erroneous the opposing views may be (Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 40 S. Ct. 17, 63 L. Ed. 1173 - 1919)"
  • The very lis mota or crux of the matter as far as FOP Nominations for deletions boils down to the following: a) whether or not the Commons community of editors would first delete, then undelete later if the IPO Directors or DOJ Secretary will rule otherwise, or if Congress will pass a FOP in the Philippines b) whether or not the Commons community of editors would vote to put on hold all deletions pending issuance of clear and specific replies from the IPO Directors or DOJ Secretary and c) whether or not the Commons community of editors would vote or are in favor of excluding the Philippines from COM:PCP?;
  • The Balance of interests doctrine defines the grey area of considering on the one hand, a) the moral rights of architects and engineers and on the other, b) the informative, educational and cultural values of the FOP photos under deletion vis-a-vis the youth and future beneficiaries of knowledge from Commons; respectfully submitted to the sound and kind discretion of the Commons editors as a Community Judgefloro (talk) 04:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:0548jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 10.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

No objection to the deletion on the sole ground of "no longer used commercially"; however, as comment, a) in law, I legally submit regarding the application of the 4 years extinctive prescription as legal bar to deletion (having in mind a different view by USA Jurisprudence of 3 years, and the other editors' views of counting the 4 years not from the uploading or publication in Commons uploading) b) and the focus of the photo is the dilapidated or should be condemned building plus the Barangay of Manila; submitted Judgefloro (talk) 04:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:0622jfGrand Marian Exhibit of Pasig 2016 Pasig City Museumfvf 01.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Birds of the Philippines

Affected:

And also:

Extended content

* File:09668jfRiver Districts Candelaria Delta Macabebe Pampangafvf 31.jpg P 1 9 9   16:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

No objection to the deletion and I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons editors especially the bird and pigeon lovers watchers here and all over the world; Vide: Category:Flocks of birds sitting on electric wires in the Philippines Category:Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines
Just a few words: a) Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban is one of the avid bird watchers (with most expensive telephoto lens) in Category:Candaba, Pampanga Wetlands Bird Sanctuary| Category:Candaba, Pampanga Wetlands Bird Sanctuary; I could not even get closer to our Mayang Simbahan and Costa except in cages in Church patio; b) my Nikon AW100 can has very short zoom power and so, I cannot really take a good picture of birds on wires or flocks in flight - except in Calumpit, when Great Egrets are pestering the nag-aararo farmer as they eat insects and small fishes; c) this bird sits on wires it is so cute; d) same with this cutest bird this migratory bird it was Dec 28 2015, so nostalgic, only, the Starry Starry Night of Vincent could not be copy pasted since this is blue sky but not night this one is overcast background, remember your request to overcast Balite Drive? these pair of lovers or FB friend too close to call; closer this lonely guy not an alien not superman or UFO it is real in flight but far far far from my lens a formation flock of praying mantis its not a plane not batman Going home para humapon Hahapon na sila kasi Orasyon na 11 March 2016, 16:41:10 and I recently learned this from my trike driver and onlookers at San Simon, Pampanga, that every Orasyon about 5-6 pm, all the migratory birds would rest on the trees and they fly in flock; however, they dance and dance to have a last bite of insects and they slowly rest on the trees in PRAYER but farther higher since they do not want to go nearer the people beside me in the Wharf beside the Dirties River in the world where here, in this bridge, FOR more that 5 Months, I walked together alone alone and alone with my former best and only Friend from St. Mary's Meycauayan to my home at # 4 Calvario, Meycauayan and he to his Malhacan house store where I met Apolinar his father many many time and his mother; in seriatim Virtual rite of passage Mystic romance of birds here under I and he played and prayed at the St. Francis of Assisi Church of Meycauayan, I and he as Sodality of Our Lady of Crusaders of Christ Grade IV students St. Francis of Assisi is a lover of these flock of birds in Flight Candelaria ]https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:09668jfRiver_Districts_Candelaria_Delta_Macabebe_Pampangafvf_30.jpg (Delta), Macabebe] on wires
If St. Francis and Vincent Van Gogh would vote to Keep all these, I vote NO OBJECTION to the deletion, for a very mystic reason: I desire to erase from the Memories of Mankind every step I did in Meycauayan and Ateneo 3 Schools as I stated above "Kung maibabalik lang ang nakaraan, I would not have enrolled and studied at the 3 Ateneos: Q.C. Padre Faura and Buendia Extension" sincerely telling a Bird Mystic Story tale Judgefloro (talk) 05:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:05864jfMaligaya Sevilla Bridge San Juan River Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 14.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

No objection to the deletion of these 2 photos, for they are already used and no longer necessary but informative about how eye-sores and commercial garbage about like mushrooms in Metro Manila; I could have uploaded a new version for that but I needed to name the street and boundary of Barangays for Categorizing hence I needed those ads and billboards at that time Judgefloro (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:05880jfSevilla Bridges Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong City Santa Mesa Manila fvf 02.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

No objection to the deletion and Maraming Salamat po sa inyong pagtangkilik at paglilinis ng puspusan sa aking mga Road and Landscapes pictures; in my anglebyangle walking photography of road and overpasses, I am really at a loss when I gaze at the sun and the views thereunder; I could not keep my hand careful in too many photos; I had a trauma lately when Taal Exploded: you know - why should I have not taken so many pictures of Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and Category:San Nicolas, Batangas - they were - are annihilated and obliterated almost by Category:2020 Taal Volcano eruptions; I would like to take photos of the NLEX from Guiguinto to Balintawak, but even my sibling has 5 cars, he has no jeepney without glasses; I was told that all vehicles must close their windows; I do not like to take photos with the car or bus or truck glasses blocking my camera; I also wanted to take the Skyway, but they would not permit yet the 400 cc motors; just telling my storytale ... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I was at a loss in searching for the jurisdictional boundaries of Caloocan barangays, and after asking people, I found this Tarpaulin : sayin Barangay 21 a) it is required by law DPWH and LGUs should post notices on public places regarding i) amount, source, beginning and finishing of project b) and of course the winning bidder, to tell people, file Graft case if there is ghost, white elephant projects or road to neverland; well of course, the handsome politicians smile; I asked so many trike drivers, why? they could not answer correctly - pampapogi, level up, for the next election, I said no: the correct song is: they are very very very happy jumping with ecstasy for they will be richer, and it is one way of winning the lotto; when I was in Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, Fiscal now Retired Judge Judge Edmundo T. Acuña, Regional Trial Court, Caloocan City, Branch 123 WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Edmundo T. Acuña is found GUILTY of impropriety and is REPRIMANDED therefor. He is STERNLY WARNED that the repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely.; he repeatedly told me that my arch enemy Br. 72, is bragging of winning Sweepstatkes, and even had a certificate; I told Judge Ed, the crying Judge of Calokohan City, when in only son Ed at age 24 died of aneurysm and after finishing Law and passing the Bar exams; He could not accuse me of Cursing since As Philippine Angel of Death, I told him repeatedly, Don't be afraid, I won't hurt you! but Mark my work, they will regret it! (taking my robes, gavel and golden throne Br. 73); he confessed that my suspension was born and cooked at Malabon Canteen, which with all court salas except mine was totally burned exactly on 2000 July a year after I was suspended for 69 months; he also confessed that he encountered many pera pira temptations; he asked me to pray for him;
I write this tale of the reason why the Law on procurement, now requires the tarpaulin announcement of transparency; hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community
No objection to the deletion of these 2 photos this one is obsolete finished product so to speak hence functus oficio
This one is the official Category:Mass schedules in the Philippines created on 2014 as sub-category of Category:Mass schedules ; it is very informative and tells the faithful the Category:Schedules in the Philippines hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

File:2144Paang Bundok, La Loma, Quezon City 32.jpg

File:2144Paang Bundok, La Loma, Quezon City 32.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

This may be considered Advertisements in the Philippines; since Aling Mila is the Queen and Matriarch of La Loma Lechon, and plus, I eat here weekly when I go to the San Lazaro Races or go to the OTB in front which is La Loma Cockpit; if, if if this ad is in other places, then, it may be copy vio, but but and but, since this spot is the Top Lechon Tourist Destination of Phil plus plus plus, Lechon is now for me and many the National Food, then this tarpaulin ad is Tourism related, hence outside the scope of Copy Vio sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 10:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

File:2626San Agustin Malabon City 54.jpg

File:2626San Agustin Malabon City 54.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

this photo is of Category:Pablo Virgilio Siongco David ; Bishop confirms death threats; this is the Official Photo and not covered by Copyright law, of the Diocese of Caloocan; it is the Church voice to pray of Bishop David, now the Highest CBCP next in rank to be President thereof; hence I submit that is is not a copy vio, and I leave the matter to the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:NLEx Harbor Link 10.1 project beam transport and girder erection (C-3 road-Dagat-Dagatan Avenue, Caloocan-Malabon City)

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I neeeded this Notice to Public, in order to properly Categorize Category:NLEx Harbor Link 10.1 project beam transport and girder erection (C-3 road-Dagat-Dagatan Avenue, Caloocan-Malabon City) ; the "project beam transport and girder erection" which I added is very technical in mechanical and civil engineering, without this notce I would be at a loss' may be this is closer I wanted to look at the closeness .. since my zoom lens is poor duplicate perhaps
By the way, I really wanted to go to this place this as all should know, the Skyway and Connector was stated to be open from Buendia to Balintawak NLEX I do not know about this one towards DagatDagatan, No Objection sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 10:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

File:0408jfAurora Boulevard Immaaculate Mariana Kaunlaran Balete Drive Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:0408jfAurora Boulevard Immaaculate Mariana Kaunlaran Balete Drive Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Opo, No objection to the deletion, the road sign seems to be a poor shot due to camera difficulty, and I took better ones there ... just wondering why this site is eerie and I interviewed many people thereat, and they told me that there in no such thing as ghost, and few accidents; however, I interviewed a vendor there living near the San Juan River, and she saw a silhouette... I Juander, yung mga Media fanatics lang and nagpapalaki nito at leverage lang nila para maraming viewers; and I exhort viewers of my photos never never believe the Paranormal experts in TV, if in Tagalog Wikipedia there maybe Bulaang Propeta, lots of them in TV raking money just .... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

File:8114Balete Drive Quezon City Landmarks 45.jpg

File:8114Balete Drive Quezon City Landmarks 45.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:8114Balete Drive Quezon City Landmarks 45.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, No objection to the deletion, the road sign seems to be a poor shot due to camera difficulty, and I took better ones there ... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Primer_of_the_Katipunan

 

Primer of the Katipunan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Done: a) I put photos in the category Category:Primer of the Katipunan and put New Category therein; the name is English and I could nave named the Category to * [[:Category:Kartilya ng Katipunan| Category:Kartilya ng Katipunan] of Kartilya ng Katipunan; I would consider it my oversight not to have put some photos in this Category:Primer of the Katipunan or b) to have Re-directed to a to be created Category:Kartilya ng Katipunan as Original Name of the Article; at any rate you stated in the Nomination for Deletion pageto Keep some of these photos hence I put the photos in the empty Category Category:Primer of the Katipunan thereat;
Kartilya ng Katipunan is the Andres Bonifacio’s Decalogue, and the Kartilya ng Katipunan Decalogue of Duties of the Sons of the People The Katipunan Code of Conduct;
IN FINE, I leave the matter of re-naming it to the Original Kartilya ng Katipunan or let this remain with some photos I put inside at Kartilya ng Katipunan or re-direct the same to another new Category, if ever, sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

File:287Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 18.jpg

File:287Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 18.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:287Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 18.jpg 120.29.104.171 09:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Done; I put the template and Uploaded a new version; No Objection to the deletion sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 10:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

File:287Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 17.jpg

File:287Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 17.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:287Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 17.jpg 120.29.104.171 09:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Done; I put the template and Uploaded a new version; No Objection to the deletion sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 10:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Rejoinder and good point: I always wanted to take photos of interiors of very important Parish Churches with open lights; this only happens during Sundays; more often, when I arrive in Churches from Batangas to Isabela, most Churches are closed and if open their lights are not open; so, if my itinerary is near the place, I would drop by the Church again; my main problem is the exact time of the Mass beginning or ending; more often than not, Mass schedules are posted poorly and erased in time, except those by Jollibee or Malayan Insurance; hence, I did file a good comment on the Mass schedule, for I think it is the only one remaining; Category:Mass schedules in France has only 20 photos and most are poorly built; here, when Parish Priests are transferred, Mass schedules are changed, and I had to get them ... submitted to the sound discretion of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 08:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Good argument and discussion: My photos used by International public domain I took time to search them in Google, since I accidentally saw when browsing, that many of my photos are and were used continuously by International books, magazines and newspapers inter alia; and no one could guess, what picture of the 1.7 million files they would use; so, as many editors here listened to me, I did ask often: why should we or they or anyone prevent the Public Domain World Planet from being choosy, weird and or ignorant of the good or better photos that they should use?
And I desire to UNDERSCORE my Lamentation like that of Jeremiah, why why and why did I not put in Commons floods of Photos of the ERASED Annihilated Category:San Nicolas, Batangas and Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and nearby almost obliterated Towns due to Taal Explotion?
IN FINE here, a) I desire to quote here what Justice Category:Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. said to console me 36 hours of my no-sleep on July 20-22, 1999, Longest Suspension of a Judge in World History: "She was appointed by Cory, but she just sits down reading Briefs ... she did not experienced what I and many Trial Judges had ... I went home Sats and Sundays bringing volumes of Transcripts ... !" She is the Ponente who Signed your Suspension ... if only Category:Andres Narvasa had not retired at 70 ... I repeatedly told CJ Davide my Cebuano ... "It would be a feather on your cap if you can put Floro and Category:Arturo Brion the husband of my seatmate classmate Tonette Brion ... b) It is utterly different when you go to the field of great dangers, take photos of villages for 4 hours, and travel from Bulacan to Pangasinan or Isabela, Ilocos Sur or Batangas for 16 hours and then sit down to edit and upload vis-à-vis, sitting down and Putting Nominations for Deletions; b) perhaps, the Inclusionary Philosphy of many here is not shared by some, and this is the heart of Commons which is Not Censored; c) It is just on what side of the coin you are, or were, or did change habits as in FOP and Com Spam; d) I am ahead of my time, I am not of this world, and ergo, I leave the matter to the sound discretion of the Commons Community;

sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 08:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Common houseflies eating banana peeling

Affected:

And also:

Extended content

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I happen to have met a biologist while in a computer shop uploading and he noticed by pictures; the Macro photography -
Vide Category:Musca domestica to Category:Close-up photographs of insects
I discussed with him the macro angle by angle photos of tiny movements of these little damned animals to die in just few weeks and reproduce as Salot sa Lipunan;
If these photos are of ordinary schools, grass or churches, maybe maybe maybe there are redundant; but it takes so much muscle flexing and silence, iyong Pulso ng Kamay to take these DRAMATIC macros; I am therefore not in a position to conclude that these photos are redundant duplicates or Spam, since I would defer these matters to Wikimedia Commons insect or biologist lovers experts on the matter sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Category:Wish FM Bus has only 12 photos, Vide very notable articles DWNU Breakthrough and Milestones Productions International; patrickroque01 and Author Julan Shirwod Nueva and Own Author Kindrei with one each; and I only took 9 photos in different area, and mine is at SM Baliwag; but the shots were taken at different angles, since it is very hard to take a complete shot of the entire bus; please take a closer look and the angle by angle photography, there are no look alikes or redundancy; hence, I submit my comment for the sound discretion of Commons as Community ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 

Category:5th_Avenue_LRT_Station_(C-3_Road_East_&_Road_West_corner_Rizal_Avenue_Extension,_Light_Rail_Transit_Authority,_Grace_Park,_Caloocan_City) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 

Category:Circumferential_Road_3_East_(Grace_Park,_Rizal_Avenue_Extension,_Caloocan_City_section) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Judgefloro/Archive 21".
  NODES
admin 12
COMMUNITY 15
Idea 2
idea 2
INTERN 3
Note 6
Project 10