Kalima

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kalima!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Filnik 18:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Palast der Republik 3.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Kalima!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Galleria-d-Arte-Moderna-Palermo.jpg is uncategorized since 16 April 2009.

File:Between Berlin and Spandau.jpg

File:Between Berlin and Spandau.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Alexrk2 (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Historical map of Teltow.jpg

File:Historical map of Teltow.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Alexrk2 (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Be- und Entwässerung Charlottenburgs.jpg

 

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. File:Be- und Entwässerung Charlottenburgs.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Kannst du bitte angeben, wie du auf "around1860" als Erstellungsdatum kommst? Ist außerdem ein Urheber der Karte angegeben?

Saibo (Δ) 23:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Saibo, ich habe die Quelle angegeben: Wilhelm Gundlach, Geschichte der Stadt Charlottenburg, Berlin 1905,soweit ich das jetzt aus dem Kopf sagen kann, Bd II (Karten) Springer Verlag. 1905 wurde das Buch herausgegeben. Der Urheber ist also mit Sicherheit länger als 70 Jahre tot. Vielleicht wurde die Karte auch 1890 angefertigt. Aber bestimmt nicht später. Den Verfasser kann ich derzeit nicht nennen. Vielleicht demnächst, wenn ich wieder in der bibliothek bin. Aber was soll das eigentlich? Die Situation ist doch klar. --Kalima (talk) 14:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Danke für deine Antwort. Nein, rechne doch mal nach - er muss nicht schon mehr als 70 Jahre tot sein. Beispiel: Karte 1900 angefertigt im Alter von 35 Jahren. Gestorben 1943 im Alter von 78 Jahren. Kein wahnsinnig hohes Alter und keine Werkerstellung im Kindergartenalter. Und 1943 wäre noch nicht mehr als 70 Jahre her. Danke für deine Hilfe! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Saibo, Die durchschnittliche Lebenserwartung von Männern Jahrgang 1865 betrug wahrscheinlich nicht 78 Jahre! Und wäre der gute Mann 1943 gestorben, liefe das Urheberrecht nächstes Jahr ab. Wenn ich mmmal wieder im Rathaus bin, kann ich ja im Gundlach nachsehen. Allerdings bin ich im Moment sehr beschäftigt. Viele Grüße --Kalima (talk) 15:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Der Durchschnitt vielleicht nicht, aber wenn wir annähmen, dass dies auch der Median sei, dann würden immernoch 50% der Männer älter als eben jener Median. Ein Urheberrecht, was nächstes Jahr abläuft ist eben dieses Jahr noch gültig und damit die Datei nicht frei. Und: meine Jahreszahlen waren ja auch nur ein Beispiel mit bewusst nicht fast absurd gewählten Zahlen. Danke für's Nachsehen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Der Median für Jahrgang 1856 liegt wahrscheinlich erheblich unter 78 Jahren. will heißen, es liegen weniger als 50 Prozent drüber..... wie willst du denn das jetzt regeln? Wonach willst du bestimmen, ob das Urheberecht abgelaufen ist. Es wird dafür doch Richtlinien geben. Habe mal gehört 100 Jahre nach Erstellung eines Fotos o. ä. Gruß--Kalima (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Es gibt nur für Bilder, die lokal in der de.Wikipedia hochgeladen wurden, unter Erfüllung der dortgenannten Voraussetzungen eine pragmatische Regelung mit "100 Jahre ...": de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Pragmatische_Regelung_bei_Bildern.2C_die_.C3.A4lter_als_100_Jahre_sind.
Die Richtlinien sind Commons:Lizenzierung. Wir können nicht nachweisen, dass {{PD-old-70}} zutrifft und sollten daher das Bild löschen. Wenn du nicht mehr recherchieren magst, dann würde ich einen Löschantrag stellen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 14:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Saibo, ich war heute im Rathaus und habe mir die Sache angesehen. Also ich konnt nirgendwo eine Angabe über die Erstellung der Karte finden. 1890 wurde die Kanalisation in charlottenburg eingeführt.

, System III war noch nicht fertiggestellt, System I und II fertiggestellt oder fast fertiggestellt. 1896 wurde das Wasserwerk für Charlottenburg Nord in Betrieb genommen. also irgendwo zwischen 1890 und 1896 würde ich die Karte ansiedeln. Die Aufnahme ist ja auch ziemlich verwackelt, ich habe jetzt weitaus bessere. Aber das Problem bleibt. Aber für die dt. wikipedia reicht es, oder? Grüße--Kalima (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Kalima, super, danke fürs nachsehen. Also gar nicht amal so alt, wie erst angenommen. ;-)

Auf der Karte ist keinerlei Anmerkung wer sie hergestellt hat? de:Vorlage:Bild-PD-alt-100 wäre die entsprechende Vorlage in der de.Wikpedia. Am Ende dieser stehen die Bedingungen, die zu erfüllen wären. Ja, wenn auf der Karte nichts steht und die auch per google (beispielsweise nichts über diese Karte finden kannst), dann ist das wahrscheinlich okay. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Saibo, alles klar, also wenn das Foto auf commons gelöscht würde, könnte ich damit leben, da ich inzwischen auch bessere Aufnahmen von der Karte habe. Dank und Gruß--Kalima (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Boat stop Rostrup.jpeg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Nikbot. Das ist mir alles etwas zu kompliziert. Gibt es nicht eine Vorlage. Mit der man die Fehlenden Daten korrekt einfügen kann. Ich habe sie vorerst so eingefügt. Ansonsten lade ich das Foto nocheinmal hoch, wenn ihr es löscht. Gruß--Kalima (talk) 11:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Heizkraftwerk Charlottenburg

Hallo Kalima, die Kategorie für das Heizkraftwerk Charlottenburg ist Category:Heizkraftwerk Charlottenburg (nicht Category:Berlin-Charlottenburg-Nord). -- 18:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC) -- Ies (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Charlottenburg around 1740 monochrome 800.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Charlottenburg around 1740 monochrome 800.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 02:17, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Map of Charlottenburg around Charlottenburg.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Map of Charlottenburg around Charlottenburg.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 02:18, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rhododendronpark in Rostrup.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rhododendronpark in Rostrup.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rhododendronpark in Rostrup.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rhododendronpark in Rostrup.jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 00:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Rhododendronpark in Rostrup.jpeg

File:Rhododendronpark in Rostrup.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Old Siemensbahn milestone.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Old Siemensbahn milestone.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 01:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)