Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ljuvlig!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Undvik överkategorisering

edit

Hej Ljuvlig. Med anledning av denna ber jag dig uppmärksamma rekommendationerna kring överkategorisering. Category:Baldersgatan 2 är en underkategori av Category:Lärkstaden som i sin tur sorterar under Category:Östermalm. På samma sätt ligger Category:Östermalm in the 2010s redan under Category:Stockholm in the 2010s Med vänliga hälsningar --I99pema (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Okej tack I99pema, då vet jag. Mvh Ljuvlig (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
File:En del av Bragevägen sedd från Engelbrektskyrkans torn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
chat 1
Community 2
HOME 1
languages 4
Note 1
os 3
text 3
web 1