die wollen die vorlagen löschen!

edit

hi Magadan. heute hat nach langen jammern die abstimmung begonnen, ob es auf den commons animierte "language templates" geben soll: Commons:Village pump#Vote about blinking kannst du da mal deine stimme abgegeben (ich rechne mit deinem pro) und so viele wie möglich mobilisieren? Schaengel89 @me 16:10, 4 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Schaengel! Ich hab die Abstimmung noch nicht ganz verstanden, irgendwie sehe ich noch nirgendwo eine genaue Fragestellung, zu der ich pro oder kontra sagen kann. Animierte Fähnchen machen mich ehrlich gesagt auch eher etwas wirr, und ob ich beim Anblick einer kapverdischen Fahne gleich wüsste, dass das portugiesisch sein soll, weiß ich auch nicht. Ich denke, wenn sich sogar die selbsternannten Herren der Welt in Nordamerika mit einem englischen Fähnchen abfinden können, sollten die Österreicher auch mit unserem fertig werden können, oder? Und ein Schweizerkreuz ist als Symbol für eine Sprache nun gar nicht geeignet (außer viell. für rätoromanisch ;-) Liebe Grüße Magadan 10:52, 5 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi, what damage did I cause. --Mayhem 15:38, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Klasse Karten

edit

Hallo Magadan ... welch nette Überraschung für meine erfreuten Augen, als ich hier so ganz zufällig auf die tollen Kartenausschnitte zu Brandenburg stieß. Einfach Klasse! Falls Du weitere ähnliche Brandenburg-Berliner Großtaten vollbringst, bitte irgendwie irgendwo hinschreiben - Nachricht per Eule, mail, posting auf den Diskussionsseiten der de:Portale oder wie auch immer. Gruß --Lienhard Schulz 13:32, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Umkategorisierung von historischen Brandenburg Karten

edit

Hallo Magadan, ich würde gerne die historischen Karten von Brandenburg (z.B. Image:Brandenburg Kr Arnswalde.png) in die zu erstellende Category:Historical maps of Brandenburg einordnen und die einordnung in Category:Brandenburg und Category:Historical maps of Germany aufheben. Die neue Kat. soll stattdessen dort eingeordnet sein. Dadurch könnten diese Kategorien etwas übersichtlicher werden. Dürfte ich dazu an deine Vorlage User:Magadan/Kreiskarten/Brandenburg ran? Grüße --Dabbelju 13:48, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ja, gerne. --Magadan [[User Talk:Magadan|<small> ?! </small>]] 14:37, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Engl. Fahne

edit

Hi Magadan, ich hatte mir letztlich Dein gelungenes Bildbeschreibungsformat mit dem Text nebeneinander und den Flaggen de + en drüber geklaut - seit heute besteht die en Flagge aus einem roten Kreuz. Ist das gewollt/korrekt? Gruß --Lienhard Schulz 14:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

... hat sich wohl erledigt, zumindest sieht es im Moment wieder aus wie zuvor (?) :-).
Das rote Georgskreuz ist die Flagge von England (im Gegensatz zum britischen "Union Jack"). In meiner Vorlage verwende ich die europäische Flagge. Bei uns lernt man nicht den Engländern zuliebe Englisch, sondern als "Lingua Franca" für Europa. Du kannst Dir die Vorlage gerne kopieren und für Dich anpassen. Grüße --Magadan [[User Talk:Magadan|<small> ?! </small>]] 14:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Category:Frankfurt am Main

edit

Hallo Magadan, hab gerade deine Aufräumarbeiten in den in letzter Zeit ausgeuferten Frankfurt-Kategorien und -Artikeln bewundert. Du hast wirklich Mut, dich an so eine Sisyphus-Arbeit zu machen. Besten Dank! --Flibbertigibbet 19:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ja, man muß die ganz große Heugabel nehmen, sonst kommt man gar nicht durch. Der FFM-Artikel hatte viel zu viele Bilder. Wie findest Du die Lösung mit dem einen "Appetitanreger" plus Link auf die Unter-Galerie? --Magadan [[User Talk:Magadan|<small> ?! </small>]] 14:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Das ist klasse geworden. Du hast wirklich ein Händchen fürs Kategorisieren. Es lohnt sich inzwischen fast, öfter mal auf den Commons zu surfen. Und ich dachte bisher immer, das sei nur eine Art Datenbank! --Flibbertigibbet 20:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Naja, die zentrale Mediensammlung für alle WM-Projekte. Wäre ja blöd, wenn Du die Bilder irgendwelcher Ratsherren nochmal hochladen müßtest, wenn Du eine Ratsverordnung von 1625 in Wikisource einstellst, oder wenn Du einen WP-Artikel ins Englische übersetzen willst. Ich nutz in Commons lieber die Fotoalben als die Kategorien, bzw. ich kategoriesiere die Alben, nicht die Bilder selbst. Ich habe übrigens Deine Galerie in das Album Persönlichkeiten von Frankfurt am Main übernommen, wenn Du möchstest, kannst Du dort etwas rumwüten, die meisten Bilder sind ohnehin von Dir. Grüße --Magadan [[User Talk:Magadan|<small> ?! </small>]] 15:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Kategorie in Redirect

edit

Hi, ich befasse mich erst seit kurzem mit Kategorien und überhaupt mit den Commons und kann daher nicht so ganz verstehen, was das hier soll. Unter Category:Hesse, welche ich erst gerade neu mit Landkreisen strukturiert habe, finde ich den Artikel „Rhein-Main-Flughafen“, unter Category:Frankfurt am Main habe ich den Eintrag vergeblich gesucht, bis ich Frankfurt International Airport gefunden habe. Könntest du das eventuell etwas übersichtlicher gestalten und/oder ggf. den Sinn erklären? Gruß --Andrew-k 17:45, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aaalso,
Die Frankfurter Fotoalben haben deutsche Titel. Damit auch englischsprachige Menschen sie finden, gibt es Redirects, die alle unter "?" einsortiert sind. Auf diese Weise bleiben alle zusammen.
Die eigentlichen Fotoalben (also die mit deutschen Namen) stehen in der Kategorie unter ihren jeweiligen Namen, der Rhein-Main-Flughafen also unter R.
Eine Kategorie kann jedoch nur 200 Elemente anzeigen. Das würde völlig reichen, wenn man nur die Alben, nicht die Bilder selbst kategorisieren würde. Da aber fleißige Menschen massenweise Bilder in die Kategorie gelegt haben, sind jetzt schon über 500 Elemente drin, meistens Bilder.
Wenn Du die Kategorie aufrufst, werden nur die alphabetisch ersten 200 Elemente angezeigt, und zwar sowohl Unterkategorien, Artikel/Alben als auch Bilder. Wenn Du also den Flughafen suchst, der mit "R" anfängt und deshalb nicht unter den ersten 200 ist, mußt Du ein paarmal auf "Nächste 200" klicken.
Und ja, das ist eine wirklich bescheuerte Sache, und es wurde schon tausendmal darum gebeten, die Software so zu ändern, daß erst alle Unterkategorien, dann alle Artikel und erst dann alle Bilder angezeigt werden. Bisher ist leider nichts geschehen.
So, ich hoffe, ich konnte helfen. Liebe Grüße von Magadan 18:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 18:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ok, ich glaube ich habe es verstanden. Vielen Dank für deine Mühen. Was die 500 Elemente betrifft, die könnte man doch mal in Unterkategorien einsortieren, wie beispielsweise in Stadtteile und/oder nach Objekten, die darauf zu sehen sind, oder spricht etwas dagegen? --Andrew [?] 10:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Man könnte evtl die Bilder in Unterkategorien einordnen und die Alben in der Hauptkategorie lassen. Was hältst Du davon? --Magadan 10:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Klingt ganz gut... Momentan sehe ich da auch noch keine Probleme (bei knapp 500 Bildern), aber Frankfurt ist groß und das werden immer mehr. Irgendwann wird es zu viel und zu unübersichtlich. --Andrew [?] 01:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Image deletion warning Image:Marijke.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Effeietsanders 14:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC) .Reply

Brücken Ffm + Mainufer

edit

Hi Magadan, mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass es da eine von Dir erstellte Kategorie "Brücken und Mainufer in Frankfurt" gibt, die sich mit der "Brücken in Frankfurt"-Kategorie überschneidet. Vielleicht kannst Du das mal zusammenbasteln, damit es da keine unnötigen Redundanzen gibt? dontworry 09:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Ayasofia.JPG

edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ayasofia.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 19:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Adler klein.gif

edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Adler klein.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. |EPO| da: 20:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image:Hagiasophia1.jpg

edit
Image deletion warning Image:Hagiasophia1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image:Adler_klein.gif

edit
Image deletion warning Image:Adler_klein.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Lokal_Profil 14:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:European-parliament-strasbourg.jpg

edit
Image deletion warning Image:European-parliament-strasbourg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 22:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Mk Berlin Tram 2.jpg

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.48.243.148 18:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Bettina_von_Arnim.jpg

edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bettina_von_Arnim.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 20:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

...ich habe deiner Userpage aus gegebenem Anlass den unbeschränkten Troll-Schutz gewährt. Grüße, abf /talk to me/ 13:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

...und drei Monate für die talk gratis, geht wohl nicht anders. abf /talk to me/ 11:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Danke! --Magadan (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Paul_Ehrlich.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Paul_Ehrlich.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Paul_Ehrlich.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lokal_Profil 16:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Magadan!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Frankfurter Belagerungsplan von 1552, wie zitierbar?

edit

Hallo Magellan, ich baue für meine Examensarbeit das Grundgerüst eines Quellenwikis. Meine Arbeit ist eher Geschichtstheoretisch, also werde ich keine 200 gut ausgewählten Quellen einstellen, aber ich hätte gerne den Belagerungsplan eingestellt.

Du gibst ja 2 Literaturangaben, einmal eine Internetquelle eines Nachdrucks und einmal im Artikel über Conrad Faber von Creuznach. Aber gibt es das ganze irgendwo "ausleihbar"? Also belegbar? Oder in irgend einem Museum in Frankfurt? Es würde mir sehr helfen, da die Quelle zwar nur als Beispiel dienen soll, ich es Schülern aber theoretisch ermöglichen will, selbst heuristisch zu überprüfen dass die Quelle keine Fälschung ist.

Da ich nur noch 2-3 Wochen Zeit habe würde ich mich freuen wenn du dich bald mal auf der Diskussionsseite meines Benutzerprofils bei der Wikipedia (nicht bei Wikimedia Commons sondern hier meldest. Ich muss mal herausfinden wie ich einstelle dass ich eine Email oder so bekomme wenn mir dort jemand was schreibt... oder das gaze als RSS feed abonniere :) mal sehen.


Bis dann

-- Foundintheflood (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please help replace this outdated license

edit

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Frankfurt Merian Möchsturm.jpg

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Please delete that image. I mistyped its filename. Correct name is File:Frankfurt Merian Mönchsturm.jpg. --Magadan (talk) 01:27, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template:Frankfurt Navigation

edit

Hallo Magadan, ich wollte gerade die obige Vorlage mal benutzen, um einige neue (alte) Straßen hinzuzufügen. Gibt es schon eine spezielle Kateogrie oder eine bestimmte Kennzeichnung für nicht mehr existierende Straßen in FFM? Sonst würde ich nach dem Vorbild Category:Former streets of Paris einfach eine entsprechende für Frankfurt anlegen und ggf. dein Template noch um einen entsprechenden Schalter erweitern. --Mylius (talk) 16:26, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Das klingt gut... mach das! --Magadan (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Done (auch dank den Jungs aus der Vorlagenwerkstatt) -> Template:Frankfurt Navigation Alt-Frankfurt, werde am WE mal versuchen, ob man die nicht noch per Schalter zusammengeschmolzen kriegt --Mylius (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Und noch ein Leckerbissen

edit
 
Christian Friedrich Ulrich: Geometrischer Grundriss der Freyen Stadt Frankfurt und Sachsenhausen mit ihrer fruchtbaren Umgegend bis auf 1/4tel Stunde Entfernung im Jahr 1819.

Kannst ja noch ein bissl kategorisieren, wenn du magst... :-) --Mylius (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ah, Ulrich, wurderbar :-) Danke! Wo hast du den denn ausgegraben?
Ich sitze ja gerade daran (und daran ... to-do), das ist genau die richtige Zeit. Hab zuhause die Ausgabe von 1811, die könnte ich auch mal hochladen.
Findest Du die Planwerk-Vorlagen eigentlich sinnvoll? Wir haben (aus gutem Grund) sehr viele Ausschnitte von historischen Plänen, ich dachte, da gibt's ne Menge Aufräumarbeit. Viele Grüße --Magadan (talk) 18:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Gekauft auf eBay... 43 Euro. Wenn man bedenkt, für was der im Antiquariat hängt... das Ding professionell scannen lassen war teurer. Ist deiner von 1811 auch das Original? Feine Sachen hast du im Brutkasten, insbesondere der zum Fischerfeldviertelartikel war lange überfällig. Lass dir mal bloß nicht so viel Zeit wie ich immer! ;-) Tipp: "Frankfurter Bürgerhäuser des 19. Jahrhunderts" von Vogt ... zwar teuer, aber ein Standardwerk zu dem Thema. Und jo, es gibt Unmassen an Aufräumarbeit hier auf Commons. Ich habe ja selber lange ohne Sinn und Verstand hochgeladen. Deine Stadtplan-Vorlage klingt nach einer guten Sache... nur man überhaupt erstmal einen Überblick gewinnen, was alles überhaupt da drunter fällt.
P.S.: Guck dir auch mal die überarbeitete Vorlage Frankfurt Navigation an... bin jetzt gerade dabei, die sie benutzenden Seiten zu überarbeiten. Mein ehrgeiziges Ziel ist es, dass zumindest alle Straßennamen des Altstadtbereichs zur Zeitstellung 1943 (erarbeite ich anhand des amtlichen Adressbuchs) eine eigene Kategorie bekommen. Mit der Verfeinerung "kreuzende Straßen" und "anschließende Straßen" hat man bei den Alt-Frankfurt-Bildermassen dann irgendwann mal sowas wie Google Street View für Arme in S/W... ;-) Gruß --Mylius (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fischerfeldviertel

edit
 
Fischerfeld

Vielleicht kannst du mit diesem Ausschnitt aus der 5. Auflage des Merianplans von 1770, den ich für meinen in Kürze fertigen Schopenhauerhausartikel benötige, ja auch etwas anfangen, Sprichwort Fischerfeldviertel? Ich habe das Fischerfeldviertel zudem mal als Kategorie der Innenstadt hinzugefügt. --Mylius (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Stadtansicht von H. Worms vom Mühlberg, etwa 1845
Danke, wollte ich auch schon machen, ich ahb hier auch noch eine Reihe Planausschnitte auf dem Rechner. Liebe Grüße --Magadan (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Und noch eins, läuft auch gerade bei FP... würde mich über deine Stimme freuen. --Mylius (talk) 15:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Mist, zu spät! ;-) --Magadan (talk) 19:38, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Frankfurt_Hauptbahnhof_Briefmarke_Guinea-Bissau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 20:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Putzfimmel

edit

Habe mal die Kategorie "Matthäus Merians Vogelschauplan von Frankfurt am Main" beseitigt und stattdessen welche für 1628 und 1770 eingerichtet. Nur zur Information. Dein Template habe ich auch abgeändert, damit alles weiter passt. --Mylius (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Das war richtig. Oki, danke. Nimm alles, was ich so tue, als Vorschlag und Verhandlungsgrundlage ;-)
Ich hatte die Kategorien für einzelne Planwerke angelegt, damit wir mit unseren vielen Detailausschnitten nicht übergeordnete Kategorien wie z.B. "Mattäus Merian" vollmüllen ;-)
Grüße --Magadan (talk) 09:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Frankfurt_Hauptbahnhof_Briefmarke-Block_Moçambique.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maidonian (talk) 12:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Pomerania10FieldCoats.gif

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pomerania10FieldCoats.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pomerania10FieldCoats.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JDavid (talk) 01:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fehler im Liniennetz der ehmaligen Offenbacher Straßenbahn - Verlauf Linie 16

edit

Hallo Magadan, in Ihrer Abbildung zum Liniennetz der ehemaligen Offenbacher Straßenbahn (Eigene Zeichnung - Version vom 26. August 2005)(verwendet auf den 2 Seiten "Straßenbahn Offenbach" und "Kaiserstraße (Offenbach)) habe ich folgenden Fehler entdeckt: Die rote Verlaufsmarkierung für die Linie 16 ist zwischen Mathildenplatz und Altem Friedhof nicht korrekt, da die Markierung auf der Mathildenstraße gezeichnet ist. Die Linie 16 führte zwischen Mathildenplatz und Altem Friedhof jedoch nicht durch die Mathildenstraße, sondern durch die Bieberer Straße (graue schräge Linie unter der fälschlicherweise rot markierten Mathildenstraße). Vor der Bahnunterführung an der Bieberer Straße zweigte die Linie 16 dann auf die parallel zur Bahnlinie verlaufenden Hebestraße ab, wo sie dann vor dem Gelände des Alten Friedhofs in die Wendeschleife einfuhr (Blockumfahrung über das Gelände des ehemaligen Straßenbahndepots - heute OVB-Depot - in Richtung Querstraße und in die Friedhofstraße wieder zurück zur Bieberer Straße). Auf Ihrer Zeichnung ist die Wendeschleife fälschlicherweise im Bereich Mathildenstraße/Mühlheimer Straße/Friedhofstraße)rot markiert.

Viele Grüße, Historyfan2009

edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tramkatwijk.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Details_from_3rd_Military_Mapping_Survey_of_Austria-Hungary_maps has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


5.157.100.123 17:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

User tempaltes

edit

Hi Magadan, there are two templates, User:Magadan/NichtMeine and User:Magadan/Faber, you are using that are not based on the {{Information}}. Would you mind to redefine or even remove them? --Arnd (talk) 11:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I would mind. --Magadan (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Schlacht bei Höchst Merian 1622.jpg

edit

Guten Tag Magadan. Die History dieser Datei zeigt dich als ersten Bearbeiter. Hast du vielleicht mehr Information zur Herkunft oder eine Idee, wo man eine Version mit besserer Qualität herbekommen könnte?
(Beobachtung: Die vom Schrifttyp her offensichtlich später hinzugefügte Unterschrift "Die Schlacht bei Höchst, Merian 1622" scheint irreführend bis falsch zu sein.) Schönen Gruß - 2.247.243.219 11:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Mk Frankfurt EschenheimerTor Pharusplan.jpg

edit
 
File:Mk Frankfurt EschenheimerTor Pharusplan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

mritz (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Danke für den Hinweis. Bitte löschen. Grüße --Magadan (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bild wurde geklaut

edit

Tach Michael,

FYI: Das Bild wurde von de:Bernhard Herrmann (Politiker) ohne Einhaltung der Lizenzvorgaben misbräuchlich verwendet. --Julius Senegal (talk) 14:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Äh. OK. War ich daran irgendwie beteiligt? --Magadan (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 00:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
Community 10
HOME 1
Intern 2
languages 3
mac 4
Note 14
os 37
text 3
Users 1
Verify 1
web 7