Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MirkoS18!

-- 17:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, MirkoS18!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Izvor.png

edit
 
File:Izvor.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Kraljevina_Srem_1282-1316_of_Serbian_king_Stefan_Dragutin_i_današnji_ZVO.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PANONIAN (talk) 18:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Sremsko_vojvodstvo_1527-1530._i_današnji_ZVO.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PANONIAN (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mape

edit

Zamolio bih te da ne ubacuješ ovamo prepravljene verzije mojih mapa tvrdeći da si ti njihov autor. To što si nacrtao jedan crveni krug na mapi te nikako ne čini autorom te mape. Drugo, ne slažem se sa korišćenjem tih mapa u članku "Joint Council of Municipalities" na engleskoj vikipediji. Šta bi te mape trebalo tamo da predstavljaju? Nekakvo propagiranje srpskih istorijskih prava na teritoriji Hrvatske? Svih ovih godina koje sam proveo na Vikipediji se dosledno borim protiv propagiranja takozvanih "istorijskih prava" bilo koje države ili naroda prema svojim susedima, a ti očigledno nisi ni svestan šta možeš uraditi svojim ponašanjem: prvo ćeš iznervirati hrvatske korisnike na vikipediji, a neki od njih će onda hteti da uzvrate na tvoj propagandni napad na njihovu državu pa će onda vandalizovati moje mape koje si ti prepravljao i moraću onda par meseci da se objašnjavam sa njima zbog tvog ponašanja (a mnogo više volim da radim nešto kreativno nego da se sa nekim objašnjavam oko gluposti). te mape su rađene za ilustraciju istorije Srbije, a ne za ilustraciju istorije Hrvatske i svaki pokušaj propagiranja srpske državnosti na području Hrvatske je isto toliko neprihvatljiv koliko i pokušaji propagiranja hrvatske, mađarske, bugarske (ili čije već) državnosti na području Srbije. PANONIAN (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

odg.

edit

Kada sam karte uzimao za pisanje članka nisam znao ko je njihov autor, niti sam se time htio baviti jer se materijali sa wikipedije mogu slobodno koristiti? Ja se slažem da možda nije lijepo koristiti nečije materijale u suprotne svrhe nego je predviđeno, ali kada na wikipediji objaviš materijale to se jednostavno dešava. Iako vjerujem da to nisam dužan uraditi, budući da si me zamolio da ne koristim mape koje si napravio i omogućio javnu upotrebu, suzdržaću se ubuduće od njihovog korištenja. Da li se slažeš ili ne slažeš sa objavljivanjem neke mape u nekom članku to je naravno stvar za raspravu i tu se možemo složiti ili nesložiti, na kraju će se sukladno pravilima (ukoliko ne dijalogom) stvar razrješiti (iako si ti te mape već uklonio, a ja ih nisam vratio pa mi nije jasno u čemu je problem). Iskreno, ja se čak i slažem da su te mape vjerovatno bile suvišne za konkretnu temu iako možda nisu suvišne za nekakav članak pod drugim naslovom. E sad, što se tiče optužbe o propagiranju nečijih istorijskih prava par riječi. Iako se na osnovu objavljenih mapa možda dalo tako zaključiti, cilj ovih mapa je bio pokazati da Srbi u Podunavlju i Srbiji odnosno Vojvodini čine jednu zajednicu- što apsolutno ničim ne prejudicira i državno jedinstvo. Zar bi onda i neki potomci Monola na Kavkazu kada objave kartu srednjovijekovne Mongolije trebali prejudicirati obnovu te države? Naravno sve su te karte vrlo proizvoljne i svaka politička istorija je strašno opasna jer određenu (recimo to i kao bilo čiju) laž predstavlja kao temelj za obračun sa nekim ili nečim. Ja sam svjestan da nekoga mogu naljutiti ali ne mislim da se zbog tih koje će to naljutiti nešto treba ili ne treba napisati. Ja ne vjerujem u demokraciju bez žestoke svađe (odnosno iskrenosti u razmjeni mišljenja, bez autocenzure i bez obzira na decibele). Da li takva svađa tebe sprečava da radiš nešto kreativno ja ne znam, ako je tako meni je žao (i ne kažem to cinično).Poz.--MirkoS18 (talk) 13:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK. Vidi, materijal na vikipediji jeste slobodan za upotrebu ali samo uz uslov ako se znaju poreklo i autor materijala. Znaci, korisnici Vikipedije mogu ovde da postavljaju svoj rad i da ga daju u slobodnu upotrebu, ili mogu postavljati stare slike ciji je autor umro pre vise od 70 godina cime one vise ne podlezu autorskim pravima. Uz jos par izuzetaka, sve druge slike su zasticene autorskim pravima i ne mogu se koristiti na ovom sajtu. Sto se tice mojih mapa, ti imas pravo da ubacis njihove prepravljene verzije (kao sto si i uradio), ali si prema pravilima sajta duzan da navedes da su tvoje mape u stvari prepravljene verzije mojih i da sam ja autor originalnih mapa. U ovom slucaju ti nisi autor jer si samo modifikovao rad drugog korisnika (ti bi mogao sebe pisati kao originalnog autora samo ako nacrtas potpuno novu mapu na praznom lejeru u fotošopu i kao takvu je ubaciš na sajt - sve ostalo je "derivative work"). Dakle, ne zameram ti što si prepravljao mape već što nisi naveo njihovo poreklo. Ako ti ubaciš mape gotovo identične mojim i ako napišeš da si ti njihov autor time ćeš umanjiti i vrednost mog rada jer drugim korisnicima neće biti jasno ko je od nas autor tih mapa i samim tim će njihov status slika slobodnih za upotrebu biti doveden u pitanje. Dakle, ako prepravljaš tuđe slike, samo navedi poreklo slike i originalnog autora a sebe kao prepravljača i to je to. Drugo pitanje je upotreba tih mapa na engleskoj vikipediji. Da ih nisam ja sklonio iz članka, to bi sigurno uradio neki hrvatski korisnik, koji bi onda došao na wikimedia commons i predložio i tvoje i moje mape za brisanje kao primer "velikosrpske propagande". To govorim zato što sam već doživeo takve napade na moj rad, a rasprava oko tačnosti tih mapa mi zaista oduzima vreme koje bih radije potrošio na nešto kreativno. Inače, nisu nikada obrisali ni jednu moju mapu sa ovog sajta, ali sam potrošio mnogo vremena na raspravu oko sadržaja na nekima od njih. Te mape su crtane za ilustraciju istorije Srbije, a pošto su istorijske granice bile takve kakve jesu, neke teritorije prikazane na tim mapama obuhvataju i delove nekih susednih država, zbog čega su neki korisnici pokušali da me optuže za "velikosrpsku propagandu". Zato se trudim da se upotreba ovih mapa ograniči na članke vezane za Srbiju, jer realno gledano ni meni se ne bi sviđalo da neko stavi mapu NDH ili velike Mađarske u članke o Srbiji ili Vojvodini. Jednostavno, mislim da se o istoriji etničkih zajednica u bilo kojoj državi može pisati bez nečega što nekome može ličiti na propagiranje "istorijskog državnog prava" susednih država, bez obzira da li je tako nešto zaista nečija namera ili ne. PANONIAN (talk) 06:26, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Joint_Council_of_Municipalities_Collage.jpg

edit
 
File:Joint_Council_of_Municipalities_Collage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fred the Oyster (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Folklorna_manifestacija_ZVO-a.png

edit
 
File:Folklorna_manifestacija_ZVO-a.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AFBorchert (talk) 22:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Православна црква у Маркушици.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Православна црква у Маркушици.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 00:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:ТРПИЊА.jpg

edit
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ТРПИЊА.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 00:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:ŠIDSKI BANOVCI.jpg

edit

Mirko, when you taken the photo on the top and how old are you? Kobac (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

In my past life :). Im just kidding of course. In fact there is no copyright owner for that picture (at best there are a lot of them). And if even someone could ask some sort of right on the picture, this right to this date has expired since the image is very old. Much bigger problem which is there now is a problem with my other pictures that you marked for deletion. How to solve this now? I do not know why it is not clear that I agree with the publishing of pictures if I published them, what I failed to do? Have a nice day. --MirkoS18 (talk) 15:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Zastave općina u Hrvatskoj

edit

S pravom sam uklonio kategorije sa tvojih slika jer ja sam postavio kvalitetnije inačice tih istih slika, pa nema potrebe da se ista datoteka pojavljuje više puta. Ti si te kategorije vratio iako si primjetio nove datoteke, pa u čemu je onda štos? Isto tako, nazivi datoteka nisu dobri. Ovo je Zajednički poslužitelj, što znači da se svaka slika može koristiti na svakoj Wikipediji, stoga je preporučljivo korištenje engleskog jezika kod imenovanja datoteka. Ubuduće se toga pridržavaj. Pozdrav! --IvanOS (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kao što reče preporučljivo je, nisam još saznao da je obavezno. Ti si napravio duple datoteke, ako misliš da nije dobro da se duplo pojavljuju mogao si nove verzije učitati i na originale. Zbog toga sam ja vratio i kategorije na originalne slike te sam na tim novim, dosta boljim verzijama, naveo ko je autor istih, od kuda su prenijete i dodao opis i na srpskom jeziku i ćirilici koji si ti, gle čuda, nekim slučajem po ko zna koji put htio izbaciti sa zajedničkog poslužitelja. Ipak, najvažnije je da će opštine o kojima govorimo sada imati još bolje i ljepše članke. Volim i ja tebe i lijep pozdrav.--MirkoS18 (talk) 17:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ta Ivanova napomena o imenovanju datoteka nije tačna. Može da se koristi bilo koji jezik pošto je ovo višejezički projekat. Za više informacija pogledati Commons:Language policy: Files can be named in any language. Drugim rečima, sasvim je prihvatljivo korišćenje srpskog (ćirilica i latinica), hrvatskog ili bilo kojeg drugog jezika po izboru autora konkretne datoteke. mickit 09:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Застава општине Борово.jpg

edit
 
File:Застава општине Борово.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Застава општине Ердут.jpg

edit
 
File:Застава општине Ердут.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Застава општине Негославци.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Застава општине Трпиња.jpg

edit
 
File:Застава општине Трпиња.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Odgovor

edit
 
Hello, MirkoS18. You have new messages at Micki's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Evo i mene

edit

Tvoja slika Marija Bursać s commonsa je osporena na sh wikipediji pošto je navodno reč o sliki Milje Marin. Ajde budi dobar pa reši taj problem nekim izvorom, pre nego što te i ovde napadnu zbog te slike.

Sliku Marije Bursać već ima sr wiki.--Rjecina2 (talk) 08:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Zastava Srba u Hrvatskoj.png

edit
 
File:Zastava Srba u Hrvatskoj.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 19:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Sava River Basin.png

edit
 
File:Sava River Basin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 19:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Serbs of Croatia.jpg

edit
 
File:Flag of Serbs of Croatia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 21:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Sava River Basin.png

edit
 
File:Sava River Basin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VaKol (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

edit

File:NEGOSLAVCI COAT OF ARM.png

edit
 
File:NEGOSLAVCI COAT OF ARM.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY 00:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:TRPINJA COAT OF ARM.png

edit
 
File:TRPINJA COAT OF ARM.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY 00:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Prvo Bugarsko carstvo 803-814 i današnji ZVO.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Sremsko vojvodstvo 1527-1530. i današnji ZVO.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:MAP OF TRPINJA.jpg

edit
 
File:MAP OF TRPINJA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 14:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Borovo 1.jpg

edit
 
File:Borovo 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 14:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Markusica 1.jpg

edit
 
File:Markusica 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:NEGOSLAVCI 1.jpg

edit
 
File:NEGOSLAVCI 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 14:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:ТРПИЊА.jpg

edit
 
File:ТРПИЊА.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IvanOS (talk) 16:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Tirana International Hotel (BLGU Spring School 2013).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 22:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 14:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Central Library of Serbs of Croatia 2.JPG

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Central Library of Serbs of Croatia 2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Central Library of Serbs of Croatia 2.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tovarnik-Товарник.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tovarnik-Товарник.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ilača-kolaž.Илача-колаж.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ilača-kolaž.Илача-колаж.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Херцег Нови

edit

Поздрав имаш ли можда слику из споменика народним херојима Спасићу и Машери из Херцег Новог? --Pinki (talk) 21:25, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Nikola Tesla on NLB billboard in Ohrid North Macedonia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
admin 1
chat 1
COMMUNITY 28
INTERN 6
Note 26
USERS 5
Verify 2