User talk:Myrabella/Archive/Archive 2012

Archive of 2012 discussions and messages

Bonne année !!

Je m'en veux un peu de venir gribouiller sur cette page toute propre, mais il faut bien que quelqu'un commence. Par le jeu des "listes de suivi", j'ai vu qu'il s'était passé quelque chose ici, alors je viens fureter, et je dépose aussi discrètement que possible mes vœux les plus sincères et les plus chaleureux pour cette année qui commence. Qu'elle te soit douce et profitable, et pleine de l'amour des tiens. Bonne année chère Myrabella !--Jebulon (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo Lucca cathedrale Lucques labyrinthe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 21:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonne Année

Bonne année pour toi et les tiens. Je suis avec intérêt cette discussion. Je suis très favorable à ton libellé. Peut être qu'il faudrait le présenter d'une façon formelle au vote ou doit on voter en suivant? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

éloge?

bonjour Myrabella.

merci infiniment de ton gentil message.

je t'institue bien volontiers légataire privilégiée, sinon universelle, du fonds iconographique déposé par Jebulon sur Commons, afin de le faire fructifier sur Wikipédia. Tu es donc chargée officiellement de piller mes galeries pour en coller un max sur l'encyclopédie. Sinon, pour ce qui est de ws, rien à dire, les échanges sont parlants. J'ai demandé conseil à User:Wsiegmund et je n'ai hélas pas été surpris. Le galimatias chèvre/chou habituel. Laissons tomber. Merci en tous cas, tu te doutes bien que j'ai perçu ton mot comme un amical encouragement, et je ne doute pas qu'il en ait été de même pour Dd.--Jebulon (talk) 21:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Coïncidence

10Mn avant de lire ton message je pensais à toi et je m’attristais de ne pas t’entendre. Je partage tes sentiments pour W.S. à qui je dois aussi bien des chose mais on ne peut pas discuter avec du granite. Travaille bien et reviens vite...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Versailles

félicitations pour la promotion en FP de ta Galerie des Glaces ! Pour info, le bandeau de promotion est chez le nominateur, User:Tomer T. Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup de ton soutien ! Je suis très contente que cette image ait reçu les trois labels — elle me rapelle une belle journée de découverte. Amitiés, --Myrabella (talk) 08:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

et une belle image du jour, aujourd'hui, en prime !--Jebulon (talk) 12:55, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgique Butte du Lion dit de Waterloo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.perhaps you could upload an alternate version with less foreground.--ArildV 10:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bataille Waterloo 1815 reconstitution 2011 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Identification

Je vais essayer de les identifier. Pas facile. J'ai vu d'autres photos des mêmes, et ça sent la FP, si tu veux mon avis.--Jebulon (talk) 11:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Merci bien. Je vais juste mettre "Soldats prussiens" pour le moment, comme sur ces images ([1], [2]). Comme la reconstitution portait sur les combats à Hougoumont, il devrait s'agir d'une des unités qui y étaient présentes. Et merci aussi pour l'encouragement, je vais essayer la nomination en FP ! --Myrabella (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bataille Waterloo 1815 reconstitution 2011 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bataille Waterloo 1815 reconstitution 2011 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris theatre de la Renaissance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Mes photos

Bonjour Myrabella,

J'espère que je peux répondre ici, je n'ai pas encore bien compris comment fonctionne l'échange de messages. Je copierai encore chez vous pour être sûre.

Merci d'avoir inséré mes photos dans la page sur l'interprétation de conférence. J'ai modifié la légende de la deuxième photo, car ce n'est pas l'hémicycle, mais une salle "ordinaire", la salle d'un groupe politique en l'occurence. L'hémicycle est beaucoup plus grand, comme on peut le voir sur la première photo.

Pour ce qui est de la loi française sur les droits d'auteur, j'avais bien lu le bandeau d'avertissement et j'avais cru l'avoir compris. Il y a déjà des photos du Parlement européen, de l'extérieur comme de l'intérieur, ainsi que de la Cour de Justice, c'est pourquoi je pensais que c'était en ordre. Mais ces photos-là sont peut-être aussi en violation de la loi? Il me semble qu'il n'y aurait violation des droits d'auteur que si j'essayais de dégager un revenu de l'exploitation commerciale de l'oeuvre en question, ce qui, de toute évidence, n'est pas le cas. J'ai fait quelques recherches et j'ai pu constater, en effet, qu'il n'y a aucune photo du Centre Beaubourg ou du Viaduc de Millau (il y en a plein sur google images!). Ca me paraît tout de même bien étrange... je dirais même que c'est un obstacle à l'information. Les citoyens du monde n'ont-ils donc pas le droit de savoir à quoi ressemblent Beaubourg ou le viaduc de Millau? Cela n'empêchera pas un architecte à l'autre bout du monde de faire une copie de ces constructions. Les personnes qui contribuent à wikimedia n'en tirent aucun revenu. La loi est la loi, bien sûr, même si je n'en comprends pas le bien-fondé. Pensez-vous donc que mes photos du Parlement européen et de la CJE seront retirées? Les photos sont bien les miennes, prises avec mon appareil photo. Les photos en tant qu'oeuvres m'appartiennent et je choisis librement de les partager avec la cyber-communauté.

Sinon, pour ce qui était de ma première question, pensez-vous que je puisse créer une catégorie "Interprétation de conférence"? Ai-je le droit, en tant que débutante, de créer une catégorie?

Merci de votre réponse et à bientôt

--BiiJii (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour BiiJii, j'ai répondu à votre première question sur votre page de discussion, où la conversation avait débuté. --Myrabella (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Denis Dagobert tombeau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI. Shame of the distracting elements.On fait un concours de nécropoles?--Jebulon 21:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Théâtre de la Renaissance

Salut Coyau,
Une de tes images va certainement remporter le label VI pour le scope "Théâtre de la Renaissance" - je suis verte, j'enrage ! Je plaisante, je t'écris juste pour t'inviter à retailler cette photo, comme cela a été suggéré durant la revue... @+, --Myrabella (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Salut Myrabella,
Est-ce que c'est de ma faute si tu viens faire des photos sur mon terrain de jeu ? Blagues à part, j'ai recadré.
Tant que je suis là, on va faire une sortie photo à Provins le 24 pour faire des tas de VI, si ça te dit de venir, c'est ouvert à qui veut bien et tu seras la bienvenue. Les détails sont ici. Si tu vois d'autres gens que ça peut intéresser, préviens-les.
À bientôt. --Coyau (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

tu es vraiment fâchée, Myrabella ? ;)--Jebulon (talk) 20:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Mais non, pas du tout ! Et même, je vais sauter sur l'occasion d'aller à Provins, merci Coyau ! --Myrabella (talk) 20:49, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Dagobert I.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Yes, it is the best in the scope.--MrPanyGoff 23:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Denis Louis XII Anne de Bretagne tombeau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Vassil 12:44, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Denis portail nord tympan archivolte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très beau travail. --Vassil 08:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Denis portail nord tympan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucca Cathedral digital labyrinth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Maybe I'd add in the scope that it is a digital wall labyrinth ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you for the suggestion, word "digital" added (not the word "wall", because this labyrinth is carved on a pillar). --Myrabella (talk) 14:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
• I think it is better now, thanks. Obviously best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 00:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Merci pour tout ! --Coyau (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Je t'en prie, c'est la meilleure, merci à toi  ! Myrabella (talk) 17:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Blog Feature

Hello Myrabella,

My name is Elaine and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We're starting a new feature on the Foundation blog to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. Given that your photo is scheduled for 9 April 2012, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD.

If you're interested, please let me know by email at communicationsinternwikimedia.org.

Thanks,

Elaine CommIntern (talk) 19:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Denis Louis XII Anne de Bretagne tombeau 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Apparently two different light temperatures for background and foreground. White balance for foreground seems OK while in the background everything is greenish. --NorbertNagel 11:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)  Info There aren't two different light temperatures. The colors are faithful here: the greenish tone of the backround is due to the light filtered through the stained glasses, whose colored parts are mostly green (pale green and frank green). --Myrabella 13:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC) I know the place. Agree with explanations. QI.--Jebulon 14:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Louis XII and Anne of Brittany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 12:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerotowing glider remorquage planeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Paul d'Ispagnac, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support it as best in the scope though I wonder when we are going to standardize the scope names.--MrPanyGoff 12:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

• I agree we should reopen the discussion... to really decide something. Question asked there (thread "Toponymy"); a proposition for language issue here, § "Buildings", second point (concerns not only buildings but whatever site, in fact). --Myrabella (talk) 15:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

 Support DimiTalen (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC))

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerotowing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - There is one more good candidate but this seems best in the scope to me.--MrPanyGoff 17:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:42, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Provins ville-haute place du Chatel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice point of view and beautiful light --Taxiarchos228 20:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brie de Provins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 16:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiale Saint-Quiriace Provins sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Jebulon 21:59, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiale Saint-Quiriace Provins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Iifar 16:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ in majesty Saint-Quiriace Provins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good--Jebulon 17:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armoiries Provins hotel-Dieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Carschten 10:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombage ville haute Provins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Coyau 17:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

FP

Bonsoir Myrabella.

As-tu vu que nous avions des admirateurs inconnus en page FP ? Bonne chance à ton bleu ! (un peu sous-exposé, non ?)

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Bonsoir Jebulon, Merci de l'alerte ! On verra bien... C'est drôle, moi aussi j'ai admiré des œuvres de Germain Pilon il y a peu : .

Bien amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Mon admirateur à moi a retiré sa proposition, finalement... Il a bien fait. J'ai toujours été fasciné par les tombeaux de Saint-Denis, il y a là, en plus de la beauté artistique des monuments, tout une suite d'histoires et de rituels intéressants à connaître pour qui aime l'Histoire (comme moi, peut-être as-tu remarqué... ;) il va falloir que j'y retourne un de ces jours (peut-on y venir avec un trépied ?). Intéressant de comparer aussi, notamment avec la crypte funéraire des Habsbourg que j'ai visitée à Vienne il y a peu, qui est bien différente, et d'ailleurs toujours en usage.

Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 08:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

QI

Bonjour Myrabella.

Décision pénible en QI, désolé...

J'espère que tu ne m'en veux pas.--Jebulon (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Ouinnn ! Je suis toute dépitééee ! :'( Je pensais que le sujet principal, le retable, était suffisamment net, pour cette prise à main levée, sans pied ! Eh bien tant pas, c'est la vie des QI...

Pas grave, d'autant que ce retable n'est pas très remarquable en soi. Le plus beau dans cette église est celui-là, que je tenterais bien en VI une fois créée la catégorie, et tout ça...

Bref je ne t'en veux pas et même je te remercie d'avoir évalué cette image. Amitiés, --Myrabella (talk) 07:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerisier du Japon Prunus serrulata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:49, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulsatilla rubra Haute-Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 14:42, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prunus serrulata (Japanese Cherry), blossoming.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:22, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castelbouc gorges du Tarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me (file is updated). --Aleks G 22:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris pseudacorus iris des marais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me it's QI. --T137 22:40, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Lucca seen from Torre Guinigi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 02 Lucca seen from Torre Guinigi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 08:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Ayoul Provins statues-colonnes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 11:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiale Saint-Quiriace Provins tronc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 07:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome Lucques Duomo San Martino Lucca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition & quality. --Selbymay 06:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castelbouc gorges du Tarn.jpg

Hi Myrabella. I nominated there your picture. Please also see User:Slaunger's comment. Tomer T (talk) 05:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much, TomerT! I have just replied to Slaunger. I am particularly pleased that you have noticed and nominated this picture, it is a place I really like since a long time. --Myrabella (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral of St Martin in Lucca (Duomo di Lucca), facade and campanile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloitre Cordeliers Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good exposure of the contrastful illumination. Visitors bringing life into the scene, not disturbing. --Ikar.us 15:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruches Haute-Savoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 05:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Balme-de-Thuy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 07:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Collegiale Notre-Dame Crecy-la-Chapelle.jpg

Ta collegiale passe sur VI... au cas où tu ne le saurais pas. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, et merci pour l'info ! Je ne l'avais pas vu, mais j'ai des soucis de réseau et de connexion internet en ce moment, toujours pas résolus... --Myrabella (talk) 07:56, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauges Roc des Boeufs Cret du Char.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 13:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butte Montmartre from centre Pompidou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!I like the raw of chimneys --Moroder 15:58, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin mont Veyrier mont Baron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

VI

Salut! C'est Commons qui dois te remercier pour les belles valued images. Category:Universities in Paris il n'y a pas beaucoup des photos. J'espere que tu va prendre quelques VIs sur ces sujet bientot.--Paris 16 (talk) 18:43, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foin meule Roumanie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --Iifar 14:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chisinau Stefan cel Mare monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruna Romania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bran seen from Bran Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stephen the Great Monument, Chişinău.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse-drawn transport forage Romania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruche traditionnelle osier torchis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Firilacroco 08:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chisinau Stefan cel Mare park fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 06:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcut village eglise fortifiee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigognes Vladeni Roumanie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladeni Brasov Roumanie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fenetre bleue Jurilovca Musee Village Bucarest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valea Morilor Lake, Chişinău.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 08:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valea Cetății Cave, Romania.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucarest Musee Village Castranova poutre cheval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau Peles porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Milestii Mici winery (interior), Moldova.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Крест Штефана.

На фотографии памятника Штефану чел Маре господарь держит в руке крест.Этот крест (новодел) появился в 1992 году,до этого крест был другой.Если посмотреть фото до 1990 года,то в этом можно убедиться.Куда делся оригинал не известно большинству граждан Молдовы.Может кто-то знает?

Au clair de la Luynes...

....mais où va-t'il chercher tout ça...

Oui, franchement, je trouve que comme ça fait "redescendre" un peu le château, et ça lui donne plus de présence dans l'image, ça doit sûrement s'expliquer par des lois d'optique, mais intuitivement, comme ça, moi, je préfère.

Voili voilou.

(Heureux de te retrouver, Myrabella !)--Jebulon (talk) 23:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

• Oui, moi aussi finalement.

(Itou) --Myrabella (talk) 07:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau-la-Valliere menhir Pierre Vaujours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Vamps 07:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau du Lude facade est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good enough --Vamps 08:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau Luynes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 10:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)...Mais j'aurais coupé un bout en bas, moi, jusqu'à la haie. Non ?--Jebulon 16:37, 18 September 2012 (UTC)  Done More pleasant compo, thank you. --Myrabella 06:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barques lac Val Joyeux Chateau-la-Valliere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Iifar 05:43, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Chateau Peles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Biopics 06:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Barques lac Val Joyeux Chateau-la-Valliere.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barques lac Val Joyeux Chateau-la-Valliere.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biserica veche monastere Sinaia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 06:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Merci !

Bonjour Myrabella.

Merci de ton travail de recatégorisation de mon image du portique du "Partal", reflet de ton efficacité et de ta discrétion... C'est une image que je dois retravailler, je crois, mais je devrais pouvoir en faire quelque chose de présentable.--Jebulon (talk) 14:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise fortifiee Prejmer cour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 14:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduc Luynes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bran castle courtyard round tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 16:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sinaia Monastery, the Old Church (Biserica veche) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedrale Saint-Guy Prague facade sud fenetre grille or.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 07:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Aqueduc Luynes.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aqueduc Luynes.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedrale Saint-Guy Prague facade sud mosaique Jugement dernier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Iifar 06:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Last Judgment Mosaic (St. Vitus Cathedral), Prague.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. Very good work. --JLPC (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cathedrale Saint-Guy Prague facade sud mosaique Jugement dernier.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedrale Saint-Guy Prague facade sud mosaique Jugement dernier.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chocolaterie Menier moulin Saulnier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chocolaterie Menier moulin Saulnier 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Iifar 13:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cite ouvriere Menier Noisiel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd prefer it sharper, but ok. --Mattbuck 16:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saulnier watermill, Noisiel, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chocolaterie Menier Cathedrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 09:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Noisiel Marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Myrabella/Archive, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 23:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Very strange

But thank you :) Amicalement --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 07:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col Aubisque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful --Moroder 23:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Blocage VI

Bonjour, parmi tes pouvoirs as-tu celui de clore les SET VI qui sont en attente depuis longtemps? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, Clore les sets VI n'est pas un pouvoir, c'est juste une très pénible procédure manuelle, décrite ici. Cette partie du projet VI n'a jamais été automatisée et la clôture doit se faire entièrement à la main, de la catégorisation jusqu'à la remise du label sur la page de discussion du nominateur. Je sais le faire, ainsi que George et Ikar.us. J'essaierai de faire un passage ce soir, au moins sur quelques sets, mais aaaargh, je vois qu'un des sets contient 15 images, je ne pense pas que je le traiterai à ce moment là, celui-là ! --Myrabella (talk) 09:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

J'ai vu, j'ai compris, j'ai essayé, j'ai vu que je n'avais rien compris, j'ai pris un café, j'ai recommandé... et...j'ai compris pourquoi personne ne le faisait...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

J'ai traité 7 sets, je m'arrête là pour la beauté de la chose, ou plutôt parce qu'il se fait tard. --Myrabella (talk) 00:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Lauréat de Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 en France

Votre photo File:Aqueduc_Luynes.jpg fait partie de la sélection du jury français pour participer au concours international et se classe 5e dans le concours en France. Vous avez gagné un chèque cadeau d'une valeur de 100€ pour acheter du matériel photographique et vous êtes invité à la cérémonie de remise des prix qui aura lieu de 30 novembre 2012 à Paris. Pour plus d’information n’hésitez pas à contacter Wikimédia France par e-mail à l'adresse info@wikimedia.fr.

--PierreSelim (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

WLM 2012

chère Myrabella,

j'ai délibérément boudé cette année le concours, mais je suis heureux de te féliciter pour ce beau succès !

bien amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 23:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup Jebulon, je suis très ravie de cette distinction - et espère que tu auras envie de participer à la prochaine édition. Bien amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 00:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirque de Gourette Pic de Ger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Félicitations aussi !

Merci, Myrabella, mais c'est plutôt à moi de te féliciter puisque tu me précèdes au classement avec une photo qui, comme les huit autres, le mérite bien ! -- Peu au fait des mécanismes du concours (règlement lu en diagonale), j'avais apposé le modèle "Wiki Loves Monuments 2012|fr" sur ma photo... pour voir s'il fonctionnait (!). Après quoi, j'ai oublié... -- Mes félicitations ne vont pas seulement à ton aqueduc, mais à l'ensemble de tes photos, et surtout au soin que tu mets à les choisir, soin que je n'ai pas toujours. -- Très cordialement. JLPC (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basco-bearnaise brebis troupeau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cevennes Florac Mimente depuis Causse Mejean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. --Selbymay 11:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Causse Mejean Lacaune ovins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 10:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Tout le plaisir a été pour nous !

Bien trouvé ton mot dimanche soir, très tard, après notre retour au bercail. Nous avons partagé le plaisir de ta rencontre, malgré la brièveté du temps imparti aux discussions particulières : il fallait faire vite pour échanger deux mots avec ceux ceux qu'on ne connaissait que par les photos... Mais c'était bien, je dirais même plus : vachement bien ! En tout cas, le lien vers ta photo semble le suggérer ! Dans l'intervalle, ma blonde des Pyrénées à moi finissait sa lente agonie (paix à son âme !) sous les coups répétés de reviewers « virils mais corrects », autrement dit exigeants mais justes.-- Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC) ---- P. S. : As-tu remarqué que, depuis, "notre" Selbymay a pris la quatrième place en finale ? Super, non ?

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chenonceau Vierge Enfant Mino da Fiesole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JLPC 09:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vence, Alpes-Maritimes, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci et bravo !

Je reçois à l'instant l'avis de promotion de mes deux sets en attente sur la page VI depuis le mois d'octobre. Je ne m'en faisais pas pour eux : ils étaient en lieu sûr puisque je ne pouvais pas y toucher ! En effet, il y a une dizaine de jours, j'ai tenté de terminer le processus pour un set d'Archeodontosaurus et... j'ai lamentablement saboté le travail ! Il a fallu que Slaunger lui-même, inventeur de cette page, intervienne pour que tout rentre dans l'ordre. Je te remercie donc pour ton travail mais, surtout, je te félicite pour avoir accompli une démarche que, par impatience ou par étourderie (à moins que ce ne soit un effet de l'âge), je n'avais pu mener à bien. Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

		The VIP Barnstar (1)
		For your hard and successful wok in promoting sets that lots of men were unable to promote ! --JLPC (talk) 14:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC) 1 - Valued Image (set) Promoter

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Salut Myrabella ! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année ! Respectueusement, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël!

et bonnes fêtes de fin d'année --Moonik (talk) 08:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

...Vu que j'allais écrire à peu près la même chose, je "squatte" ce message pour m'associer à ces vœux !--Jebulon (talk) 20:05, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Y a pas de raison d'aller ailleurs : BONNES FÊTES! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Demande d'aide

Peux tu faire une redirection de Category:Smerinthus ocellata vers Category:Smerinthus ocellatus ? Il s'agit d'une erreur de nomenclature. Si par ailleurs un pékin de base peut les faire je veux viens apprendre la syntaxe. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

WLM Barnstar

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!

Re:Bonne année 2013 !

Merci pour ton message qui m'a fait beaucoup plaisir. Je suis partante pour les balades photo ensemble dans des jolies endroits, et ce dès qu'il fera le temps meilleur. Au plaisir de te revoir, excellentes fêtes encore une fois et à bientôt. --Moonik (talk) 14:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Je devrais être autorisé à te présenter mes meilleurs vieux, mais c'est un peu usé. Alors trève de plaisanteries : bonne année 2013 à toi et à tes proches. -- Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 10:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)