Nico-dk

archive1

Image:Kronprins Frederiks Bro2.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

is fix'ed now {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} -- Nico 15:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kronprins Frederiks Bro3.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

is fix'ed now {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} -- Nico 15:13, 23 February 2008

Image Tagging Image:Edvard Grieg.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Edvard Grieg.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This is missing name of photographer, date of death, country where taken and maybe date of publication. These are needed to determine whether image is truly in public domain. If photographer died before 1938 then image is PD-Old-70 (in Norway) and therefore Ok for Commons, if not then if first published in the USA before 1913 then is PD only in the USA (so Ok for english wikipedia, but not Commons). Otherwise image is not PD, neither in USA nor in Norway. Wikibob 17:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello nico-dk,

in this edit to Image:Edvard Grieg.jpg you added Permission={{PD-old}}.

However, there is still no evidence that the photographer did not die after 1938 (quite possible in the circumstances), so I removed the PD-Old tag.

The next edit (by User:85.164.215.23) gives this edit summary:

The photo must have before taken before 1907 when Grieg died more than 70 years ago and we dont know the name of the photographer and the place of publising. I think the photo is Pd-old-70)

The date of death of the photographer is what determines copyright duration, not the date of death of the subject.

The problem is Commons requires evidence that image is free, not a guess. Photographer may have died in 1939, making this image not free (neither on commons nor on english wikipedia). Fair use on en: may be possible, but requires a fair use rationale. -Wikibob 01:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I belived that when the photografer is unknown, we use the date of picture, and that must have been taken before 1907 where Grieg died. That's the rule in Denmark and Norway, so i think and hope it is okay. If not, i can't do any further; I've asked on norwegian Wikipedia, and they said the same, and had no further informations. -- Nico 06:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token d54b08e3da5b95985c903db11d5a9c94

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:KaloeVig fra MolsBjerge.jpg

Hvordan er det nu - er det jf. licensen nok at skrive "Foto: Wikipedia" - eller skal du faktisk krediteres med navns nævnelse? --Fod (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Formelt set skulle det vel være med navn, men det er nu ikke noget der bringer mit pis i kog, sålænge Wikipedia er nævnt - Nico (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JacquesOffenbach.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:JacquesOffenbach.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Maybe ok now ? - Nico (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I think we need a real source, so it can be verified that it is indeed a photo taken by Nadar. The English Wikipedia is not really a valid source, as we don't know where the uploader on the engl. WP got it from. --Kam Solusar (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry - i have taken it there, so that's all i've got -- Nico (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token dbe1cd9ca3825f9f813fd3e456ddbc1d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Silkeborg Kunstmuseum set fra indelukket.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

}} Fixed - Nico-dk (talk) 13:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Lindelse Nor 09.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:37, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

fixed - Nico-dk (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Nollsoyar PAll 50kr.png

BotMultichillT 20:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

:Hello - I'm sorry to tell that i can't help here; It a long time ago, and i don't remember it, but i think the image is from English Wikipedia at that time, but i'm sure that it is not PD-self by me. -- Nico-dk (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Oestergaard-tulstrup fraO.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

It's {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} . Nico-dk (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Monument Landsting.jpg

Hei Nico. Siden dette monumentet er oppført av Axel Poulsen (1887-1972) kan vi ikke ha bilde av det på Wikimedia Commons, se COM:FOP#Denmark. Jeg har (dessverre) derfor måtte slette bildet. Hilsen --Kjetil_r 14:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Gråbrødreklosteret-Viborg.jpg

Bonjour. Could you add author/source to this image. Thanks. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 17:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

done - Nico-dk (talk) 21:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 18:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Nico-dk!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Haveselskabet Clausholm.jpg was uncategorized on 9 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Alderslyst.jpg was uncategorized on 31 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Vinterlys i DenGamleBy.jpg was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry - done - Nico-dk (talk) 13:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Albert_R._Broccoli.jpg

File:Albert_R._Broccoli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Robert_falcon_scott.jpg

File:Robert_falcon_scott.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jappalang (talk) 08:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Foto af tårnet på Bavnehøj

Hej Nico

Til denne artikel om Ejer Bavnehøj http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejer_Bavneh%C3%B8j har jeg just indsat et nyere foto af tårnet. Foto nr. 2, hvor tårnet har stillads i buerne som led i en renovering i 2005, har du angiveligt taget og up loaded.

Må jeg venligst forslå, at dette forældede foto fjerne fra artiklen?

Venlig hilsen

Viggo

Selvfølgelig - fint billede :) Det gamle er også frwa en tid hvor vi passede mere på billedstørelse/opløsning, end det er nødvendigt nu, hvor teknikken kører bedre - Nico-dk (talk) 07:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Nico-dk, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Valgplakater2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

File:-Hobro 1900.jpg og {{DGA map}}

Hej Nico, User:Stefan4 har angivet (ved indsættelse af {{DGA map}}) på File:-Hobro 1900.jpg, at den er baseret på Geodatastyrelsens frie kort data. Jeg er ikke helt sikker på at det er korrekt. Gider du kigge på det? MVH Henrik/heb [T C E] 13:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Hej Heb , det kan da godt være at de gamle amtskort er blevet medtaget i de nye kortdata, men de amtskort og udsnit af dem (deriblandt bykort) der ligger på Commons nu, er nogle jeg affotograferede for en 4-5 år siden og lagde op under PD-old. - Nico-dk (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Ved nærmere eftertanke (og tjeck af metadata) tror jeg egentlig jeg scannede dem ind, efter at have opgivet affotograferingen :-) - Nico-dk (talk) 14:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Betyder inte det att filen behöver raderas? Om inte {{DGA map}} går att använda, torde Plakat ang. efterstikning af topografiske kort medföra att kartan inte kan användas fritt i Danmark. Jag tolkade det som att alla Geodatastyrelsens kartor omfattades av licensen, men när jag tittar efter igen, ser jag att kartan över Hobro är i skala 1:15000 och att {{DGA map}} inte verkar omfatta några kartor i den skalan.[1][2]

{{PD-old}} kan du bara använda om den person som ritat kartan dog före 1943, men det står inte vem som ritat kartan, så det går inte att veta när personen dog. Om en karta är anonym, använder man {{Anonymous-EU}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

{{Anonymous-EU}} eller {{PD-old-70-1923}} er nok mest korrekte; Jeg tolker plakaten som en henvisning til et bestemt kort fra 1831, men kan iøvrigt ikke se nogen mening i at det er sendt ud 2002 (en mulkt på 10 Rigsdaler giver ingen mening i dag), det ligner mere en databasefejl i retsinformation.dk; Hvis rettighederne stadig lå i staten ville de uden tvivl være på listen over frigivne kortdata. - Nico-dk (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Jeg tager den lige på engelsk for lethedens skyld, for det tilfælde at diskussionen skal tages i bredere kredse :)

It's a bit tricky. Initially I would like to point out, that a discussion on protection of another of Frems Amtskort was done on the Danish Wikipedia in 2011 for File:Koebenhavnsamt.jpg (then hosted on DaWiki). Here the conclusion was (-ish), that they are not protected. So precedent set on another WM project, with similar policies was that they are okay.

But what draws me towards another conclusion, is that the legislation giving non-expiring protection rights to all maps made by Kgl. Søekart-Archiv (from 1816), topographical maps made by Kgl. General-Qvarteermester-Stab (from 1831) and maps made by Videnskabernes Societet (was merged into Generalstabens Topografiske Afdeling in 1943) are still in effect under Danish Authors Rights legislation § 92. This would also cover any subsequent organizations that has "inherited" these rights per the Minister of Towns and Homes in 2001. Currently that organization is the Geodatastyrelsen. To make it a bit more clear, the names and organizations affected are as follows:

• Kgl. Søekart-Archiv: 1816-1973
  • Farvandsdirektorartet: 1973-1987
  • Kort & Matrikelstyrelsen: 1987-2012
  • Geodatastyrelsen: 2013-
• Kgl. General-Qvarteermester-Stab: 1831-1842
  • Generalstabens Topografiske Afdeling: 1842-1928
  • Geodætisk Institut: 1928-1987
  • Kort & Matrikelstyrelsen: 1987-2012
  • Geodatastyrelsen: 2013-

As linked to above these rights was confirmed by the then-responsible minister, and in February 2012 the Kort & Matrikelstyrelsen also stated that they have the rights of maps by the above organisations (though in a slightly different context). In 2001 a proposal was made, to revoke the three old laws concerning the map rights (among other changes as well, but this was dismissed. I'm quite certain it's not a database-error. It could be though, that they are a part of the mapping information still not released which is why it is not there (yet). --heb [T C E] 13:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

For mig lyder det forrykt - de har været offentliggjort uden for diverse styrelser for over 100 år siden, men det letteste er vel at spørge kortstyrelsen, hvis du er så meget i tvivl. - Nico-dk (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Jeg er nu ikke "meget i tvivl". Det er kort, der er baseret på materiale fra Generalstabens Topografiske Afdeling (GTA), som jeg har svært ved at se skulle være andet en topografiske kort. Kortene er derfor afledte værker af beskyttede værker - og dermed beskyttet. Medmindre der er tale om en eller anden speciel rettighedsaftale mellem Frem og GTA der også tillader tredjepartsreproduktion, men det tvivler jeg umiddelbart på. Jf. COM:PCP bør kortene derfor slettes. Omvendt er det også en beskyttelse, der så vidt jeg kan se, er en del af delaftale 4 (idet jeg antager at de kortmæssige data brugt af Frem, er omfattet af FOT2007, men jeg er ikke sikker), så når de endnu ikke er frigivet er det givetvis blot fordi, GST ikke er nået dertil endnu og dermed tilsiger en pragmatisk tilgang at det går såmænd nok endda. Jeg vil ved samme lejlighed også gerne gøre opmærksom på, at grunden til jeg deltager i denne diskussion, er fordi jeg i forbindelse med udformningen af {{DGA map}} fik erhvervet en del viden om dansk kortmateriale (herunder diverse institutioner) gennem tiden. Jeg har absolut intet forhold til Frems kort, der tilsiger at jeg føler jeg bør løfte en finger for at slette/bevare dem, men hvis der bliver oprettet et sletningsforslag på dem, vil jeg selvfølgelig bidrage i diskussionen så godt som jeg nu kan. MVH heb [T C E] 10:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Da jeg alligevel skulle have fat i GST i anden anledning, valgte jeg at spørge dem alligevel. Så må vi se hvad de svarer. --heb [T C E] 14:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Fint nok - jeg håber du gjorde dem opmærksom på at de ikke er kopieret fra dem, men fra Frems Amtskort. Jeg håber på et positivt svar; - selv om vi har fået adgang til det store materiale fra gst, er det gode kort, og der ligger et ret omfattende arbejde i at sætte dem sammen. - Nico-dk (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Published

Hello! Just want you to know that one of Sweden's biggest newpappers Aftonbladet used you picture to illustrate their article about Emma Maersk --Civilspanaren (talk) 09:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank You for let'n me know - Nico-dk (talk) 09:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:BederSogn.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BederSogn.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 02:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

This da:Wikipedia-diskussion:Kilder/Arkiv1#vedr._Sognekort is a permission (in danish) from the autor, send to me, before the OTRS-system was made. See also Category:Maps_by_Svend-Erik_Christiansen - Nico-dk (talk) 09:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:BjeragerSogn.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BjeragerSogn.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

This da:Wikipedia-diskussion:Kilder/Arkiv1#vedr._Sognekort is a permission (in danish) from the autor, send to me, before the OTRS-system was made. See also Category:Maps_by_Svend-Erik_Christiansen - Nico-dk (talk) 09:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:BrabrandSogn.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BrabrandSogn.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:BjeragerSogn.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BjeragerSogn.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Jcb (talk) 17:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hummelsø set mod sydvest.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hummelsø set mod sydvest.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

[[File:Camera Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] Für das tolle Foto der Burg Stein an der Zwickauer Mulde! Aarp65 (talk) 22:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, but i'm sorry to say, that it is not my picture, - i've just tranfered it from German Wikipedia; The image is taken and edited by de:user:Caulobacter subvibrioides - Nico-dk (talk) 07:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:MårsletSogn.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MårsletSogn.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

• File:OdderSogn.png
• File:TisetSogn.png

Yours sincerely, 1989 20:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

The source is: |Source= http://www.dis-danmark.dk/kort/kort.htm (originaly at http://www.e-bachmann.dk/genealogy/dis-danmark.dk/index_da.php ) and it's noe on the requested files - Nico (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

I have try'd severel times to make clear, that all those maps have a permision, so please redo:

{{|Author=The map is made by Svend-Erik Christiansen og bearbejdet af Nico-dk. - [[:da:Wikipedia-diskussion:Kilder/Arkiv1#vedr._Sognekort]] is a permission (in danish) from the autor, send to me (Nico-dk), before the OTRS-system was made. |Permission={{PermissionOTRS|2014021710018465}} - Nico (talk) 06:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Marseliborg Slot set fra Mindeparken.jpg

Hej. Vidste du at dit billede fra Mindeparken optræder i en bog? Jeg mener ikke hverken du eller WikiCommons er krediteret. Så det til min overraskelse for nyligt, da jeg bladrede i bogen ved boghandleren. RhinoMind (talk) 12:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Tak for tipset, kan du huske hvilken bog ? Jeg har været ude for det nogle gange før, men jeg plejer ikke at gøre noget veddet, men det er da meget rart at vide. bemærk for øvrigt at jeg har skiftet commonsnavn ifm. internationaliseringen af brugernavne. - Nico (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hej. Jeg husker det som om det var en nyligt udkommet bog om Marguerit-ruten. Med et lysegrønt omslag. Jeg checker lige efter for god ordens skyld, næste gang jeg er forbi boghendleren, for det kan godt være det var en anden.

Jeg nævner det faktisk også lidt af personlige årsager, for jeg stod og bladrede i en rejse-guide til Østjylland, da udsnit fra mine egne billeder (fra Commons) tonede frem på siderne! Og jeg var jo heller ikke krediteret (eller blevet spurgt). Jeg ville gerne finde ud af, hvad man kan/bør stille op og så danne mig et indtryk af hvor omfattende det egentligt er. Jeg synes det er lige groft nok, når der tjenes penge på bøgerne. Måske har "forfatterne" så heller ikke selv skrevet teksten? Man bliver jo lidt mistænkelig.

Tak for tippet med navne-ændringen. Men hvorfor og hvad betyder det? RhinoMind (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Navneændringen betyder at jeg har samme brugernavn på alle wikiprojekterne, og ikke skal logge af og på når jeg skifter. Omvendt betyder det ogå at jeg ser ud som en ny bruger på f.eks commons; Man kan (endnu (?)) ikke flytte billederne til det den nye konto. - Nico (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Hej, tilbage igen. Jo den er god nok, bogen er:

• Margueritruten, Jørgen Hansen, Legind (2015)

Dit billede optræder på side 162. Der er muligvis masser af andre WikiCommons uploads i bogen. RhinoMind (talk) 21:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wikitravel.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikitravel.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Tjele Manor

Tjele hovedbygning

Hi there Nico-dk, just have a quick question about one of your photographs. Is this photograph of the same Tjele Manor where the Tjele helmet fragment was found? It seems correct, but my Danish geography is nonexistent so I don't want to add the photo to the article incorrectly. Thanks! --Usernameunique (talk) 05:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Usernameunique, I havent heard about it before, but as i read the source ( http://samla.raa.se/xmlui/bitstream/handle/raa/3139/2006_323.pdf ) it was found on a plateau between da:Tjele Langsø and da:Skals Å in thi area:

Object location	56° 33′ 40.01″ N, 9° 40′ 07.38″ E	View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap

and not near the Tjele Manor . You can try to find it on http://www.kulturarv.dk/fundogfortidsminder/Kort/ Good luck, - Nico (talk) 08:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

DR

Hej! Dit billede er blevet brugt i en artikkel] på dr.dk. Jeg synes at de burde have nævnt dit navn, ikke mindst når der står i licensen at det skal man. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Hej, tak for at gøre opmærksom på det. Det sker desværre jævnligt, men som regel reagerer jeg ikke på det, men det er rart at vide hvor de bliver brugt. - vh. Nils Jepsen /user:Nico (talk) 18:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Julemarked i den graa hal.jpg

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 17:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Tustna Aure komm.png

File:Tustna Aure komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 12:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

No problem, it have been replaced - Nils Jepsen /user:Nico (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Ravnsbjergkirken døbefont2.jpg

File:Ravnsbjergkirken døbefont2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Erik Heide is still alive, so the rights haven't expired yet. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

TherasTaneel (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Ravnsbjergkirken døbefont.jpg

File:Ravnsbjergkirken døbefont.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Erik Heide is still alive, so the rights haven't expired yet. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

TherasTaneel (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)