Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker

nl-N	Deze gebruiker heeft het Nederlands als moedertaal.

en-2	This user has intermediate knowledge of English.

de-1	Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf grundlegendem Niveau.

Hello there, welcome at my user talk page. This can be used to talk to me. But please read these notes:

This page has been semi-protected indefinitely because of vandalism.
Please use ~~~~, so we know that the message is from yours.
Assume good faith, even you disagree.
Be civil against anyone.
Do not make personal attacks and threats. These can result in being blocked from editing this wiki.
Vandalism is inappropriate and will be reverted.

Any discussion will be archived within 21 days after last message. This is being done by a bot.

<Unnamed section>

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

hello, what are you saying about removing license for these UK court judgments? The license is public domain, can you please set that up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupweb (talk • contribs) 16:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Rupweb: First, I'm not the one who has tagged those files but reverted your edits, and had warned you for removal of {{No permission since}}. Second, I'm not going about copyright of files because of I don't really know so much about that. Questions can be directed to EugeneZelenko, who has tagged the files. (But please don't forget to use ~~~~, as written in my edit notice.) Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^{Overleg • CA} 16:40, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

hello, what's ~~~~ ? Is there any chance you can update the copyright please ? These are UK high court judgments they are Crown copyright which is publically available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupweb (talk • contribs) 18:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Don't worry about it - the license is UK Crown

	This file is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0.

	You are free to: copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information; adapt the Information; exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application. You must, where you do any of the above: acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence; If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, you must use the following: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This licence does NOT cover: personal data in the Information; Information that has not been accessed by way of publication or disclosure under information access legislation (including the Freedom of Information Acts for the UK and Scotland) by or with the consent of the Information Provider; departmental or public sector organisation logos, crests and the Royal Arms except where they form an integral part of a document or dataset; military insignia; third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to license; other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade marks, and design rights; and identity documents such as the British Passport. Consult this guide for full details. Note: Since 2010, almost all information owned by the UK Crown is offered for use and re-use under the Open Government Licence by authority of The Controller of His Majesty's Stationery Office.^info See also: Meta for information on usage on Wikimedia wikis. Open Government License 3OGL 3true

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupweb (talk • contribs) 18:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Rupweb: I think that I'm going to refer to this 4 notes:

For now, copyright related questions I'm going to refer to Commons:Village pump/Copyright.
I've called this section an unnamed section, because you didn't use the new section link. For into the future, I wanna say this: By using a new section link, you can start a new section easily. At talk pages where are multiple discussions active, your message is automatically being placed at the bottom of the page after publishing your edit.
If you just want to add a link to a template quickly, you should use {{Tl}}. There you can find the documentation too.
By using ~~~~, the system will automatically add your signature. See also this page.

Greetings, Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^{Overleg • CA} 07:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dom van Utrecht

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Waarom is mijn bewerking teruggedraaid? De informatie die toegevoegd was, is juist. Nu klopt het bijschrift niet meer met foto.

Het jaar komt vanaf https://hetutrechtsarchief.nl/beeldmateriaal/detail/465ed979-594c-5a7d-a5d0-3b50bc0c1d35/media/28c4bdbc-8e32-ed92-2e31-0cdbd536cac0?mode=detail&view=horizontal&q=domkerk%20w.g.%20baer&rows=1&page=15, dat had ik vergeten te vermelden.Floris97 (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Floris97: Wat is de reden voor deze testbewerking? Maar goed, als je bepaalde dingen recht wilt zetten zeg ik met nadruk op het feit dat je goed moet opletten voordat je je bewerkingen gaat publiceren. Daarbij moet je o.a. erop letten dat Licensing geen sjabloon is maar een pagina in de MediaWiki-naamruimte, vandaar dat we {{int: gebruiken.

Ook raad ik je aan om de stappen op te volgen, beschreven op {{PD-Art}}.

Ten derde raad ik je echt aan om "Toon bewerking ter controle" te gebruiken om te zien wat de gevolgen van je bewerking zijn.

Ik houd het nu nog bij adviezen en ga bij deze nog geen waarschuwingen geven, want anders is het echt niet netjes van mij. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^{Overleg • CA} 11:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

User right removed

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker, I've removed your template editor rights as you were inactive for more than a year (policy). If you wish to return and have a need for the tools, don't hesitate to ping me and I'll grant the right again. Thanks. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic