Oakenchips

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Oakenchips!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Pie de Monet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La fuite des nymphes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage à Heist.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intérieur, femme en bleu fouillant dans une armoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le chantier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madame Alexandre Bernheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Nino Verde 21:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Les Iles Sanguinaires.jpg

File:Les Iles Sanguinaires.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La fileuse, chevrière auvergnate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Nation Bruxelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais du parlement de Bretagne, Rennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola di fontainebleau, presunti ritratti di gabrielle d'estrées sua sorella la duchessa di villars, 1594 ca. 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For a shot without tripod very good. --Stepro 01:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola di fontainebleau, presunti ritratti di gabrielle d'estrées sua sorella la duchessa di villars, 1594 ca. - detail (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 14:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gabrielle d'Estrées et une de ses sœurs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope must point to a category, and describe precisely what is presented.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment look at the syntax of scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! François Ier Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Francis I by Jean Clouet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Not sure. Don't you think that File:Francis1-1.jpg is better? Yann (talk) 16:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Even if I'm not sure with the colors, I think the quality and size of this one is far much better (iMO)--Jebulon (talk) 20:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
• Regarding the colors, well, I think the 5D Mark III can be trusted for a faithful & neutral color rendering. --Oakenchips (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
• Maybe, but it depends of the light in the room too.--Jebulon (talk) 08:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Une Scène de Déluge Girodet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Seems ok --Christian Ferrer 21:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Sibylle de Tibur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Louis, roi de France, et un page.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Arènes d'Arles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please apply perspective correction. --Cccefalon 15:11, 16 August 2014 (UTC) OK Well, it's done. Oakenchips 00:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC) Well done and good quality! --Cccefalon 07:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salle du jeu de paume de Versailles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Magpie by Claude Monet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, best colours and QI. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Bohémienne endormie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:36, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Trois Femmes Fernand Léger.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trois Femmes Fernand Léger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Sleeping Gypsy by Henri Rousseau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawah Ijen crater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 17:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Trois Femmes Fernand Léger.jpg

File:Trois Femmes Fernand Léger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Coldcreation (talk) 05:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Trente Kandinsky 1937.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trente Kandinsky 1937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good rendition of the original image. --Peulle 22:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! W. Kandinsky - Bild mit rotem Fleck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monet - Mer agitée à Etretat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louis Le Nain - La Charrette.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
W. Kandinsky - Bild mit rotem Fleck.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I haven't been to the Musee d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris since 2002 and don't remember what this painting looked like. There are two pictures in this category. Please explain how and why this is the better of the two. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - OK, I see your reasoning. Keeping in mind that we are judging only how useful the image is as a thumbnail in a web-posted article, it could be argued that because of its greater brightness and even posterization, File:Kandinsky - Bild mit rotem Fleck.jpg is more easily visible, and therefore, more useful. But it also looks like it's missing details your photo has; is that correct? If it's correct, your photo is best in scope even as a thumbnail, but please address this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - I'll take your word for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Sueur - Le Retour de Tobie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, very unusual perspective in this painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Façade mosaic tympanum Santa Maria del Fiore Florence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La Bohémienne endormie.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Bohémienne endormie.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:La Bohémienne endormie.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for English Wikipedia POTD

Hi Oakenchips,

This is to let you know that File:La Bohémienne endormie.jpg, an English Wikipedia featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 21, 2023. A preview of the POTD can be seen and edited at en:Template:POTD/2023-05-21. If you have any concerns, please place a message at en:Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Trente Kandinsky 1937.jpg

File:Trente Kandinsky 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Freedom4U (talk) 04:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)