Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Outisnn!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Outisnn!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Doña Urraca de Zamora.png

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Doña Urraca de Zamora.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:CONVENTO DE SAN NORBERTO.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CONVENTO DE SAN NORBERTO.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

edit
  català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Outisnn,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

La Gioconda

edit

Hello Outisnn. I hope it doesn't matter the changes I did. You can undo them if you want. --Lcsrns (Talk) 22:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 00:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Borrado imagen Museo de Artillería de Cartagena-Posición apuntador.JPG

edit

Buenas tardes Outsin, he comprobado la foto que quieres boorar y efectivamente está duplicada, aunque con nombre distinto. Por mí parte no hay problema alguno en proceder al borrado de la misma.

Un saludo, --Yaco Erisso (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Encantado de saludarle

edit

Sólo quería decirle que he estado arreglando un poco el Museo Nacional de Antropología de España y que he creado una galería de imagenes para él en Commons. Pero como ando escaso de tiempo, y además no domino el tema de los fondos del museo, sólo he puesto en la galería las imagenes del interior y exterior y algunas de las pinturas. Pero si usted desea mejorarla vengo a animarle a que lo haga, aunque por supuesto sin ninguna obligación. Un cordial saludo.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 10:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gracias, un buen trabajo. Si puedo servirle en algo me tiene a su disposición. Un cordial saludo.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 07:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Acuarela

edit

Hola Outisnn. Creo que hay una pequeña discrepancia sobre varias acuarelas de Fortuny.

En es-wiki se define acuarela como: "una pintura sobre papel o cartulina con colores diluidos en agua."

Si como dices, "Las acuarelas y gouaches antes estaban inventariadas como pinturas, pero actualmente como dibujos." Me parece un error. Propongo categorizarlas en las dos categorías, pinturas y dibujos, para encontrarlas mas facílmente, aunque me sigue pareciendo un error de conceptos.

Quedaría así:
Category:Portrait paintings by Marià Fortuny
Category:Paintings by Fortuny in the Museo del Prado
Category:Drawings by Fortuny in the Museo del Prado
Category:18th-century portrait paintings in the Prado Museum
Category:18th-century portrait paintings ...

Un cordial sludo, --JMCC1 (talk) 07:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

La forma de catalogarlas por el funcionario de El Prado no la discuto, es su problema, pero me parece un error. Lo que te comento son las categorías de wiki para encontrar las imágenes con un criterio lógico. Copio el concepto de es-wiki: "el acto de pintar utiliza la mancha como recurso comunicativo mientras que el dibujo utiliza la línea."
Por ejemplo, buscaría en las categorías de pinturas:
       
Son acuarelas y óleos donde se utiliza la mancha como recurso expresivo.
Pinto acuarelas, como aficionado. He estudiado en mi carrera: dibujo, análisis de formas...
Creo que se deben categorizar como pinturas, y en su defecto , como pinturas y dibujos. En técnicas mixtas, también, como pinturas y dibujos en su caso. Un cordial saludo, --JMCC1 (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Re: Gracias por tu información Outisnn. Clasificar por el soporte está bien para el que almacena, cuida o custodia una obra. Lo considero una clasificación práctica, pero secundaria. Pintar y dibujar son dos técnicas diferentes, con clasificación primaria. Yo se muy bien cuando dibujo y cuando pinto, sin importarme el soporte utilizado, que es secundario.
Se llega al absudo de considerar la Pintura china como dibujo chino (habrá que cambiar los libros de arte). A los profesores que enseñan a pintar con acuarela se les comunicará que estaban equivocados. En Altamira, como tienen el mismo soporte, son todas pinturas o todos dibujos, aunque realmente hay dibujos y pinturas... La lista de despropósitos sería interminable.
Ha sido un placer hablar contigo. Un fuerte abrazo, --JMCC1 (talk) 07:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Pd: Se me olvidaba...
Categorías en commons:
Pinturas
Dibujos
Grabados, etc.
Pinturas al óleo
Dibujos con tinta
Pinturas al óleo sobre tabla
Dibujos con tinta sobre papel
Técnica → medio → soporte

El soporte sería clasificación terciaria, no primaria. No puede condicionar el nombre de la técnica utilizada, sería ilógico. Las técnicas mixtas las dejamos para otra ocasión. Un abrazo, --JMCC1 (talk) 07:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

OK. Utilizamos las dos Categorías en commons. --JMCC1 (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Judit con la cabeza de Holofernes (Nicolas Régnier).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Breskit (talk) 03:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
admin 1
COMMUNITY 3
Note 3
Project 1
todo 1
Verify 2