Vammpi

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vammpi!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Vammpi!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Odrinski vojvodi.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Danail Krapchev.jpg is uncategorized since 8 June 2009.
• Image:Burgas Schule Iwan Wassow und Technikum für Elektrotechnik.jpg was uncategorized on 21 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Burgas Grundschule Kjanz Boris I.jpg was uncategorized on 21 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

It has been found that Image:Gorno Brodi.PNG has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 07:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I change it. thanx--Vammpi (talk) 07:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

It has been found that Image:Altsankov.jpeg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 10:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi The website http://www.mfa.bg/en/index.php?option=com_selfpage&Itemid=253 “is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License”. see on the website right --Vammpi (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

It has been found that Image:K.georgiev.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 10:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

I change it. thanx--Vammpi (talk) 10:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Teodor Teodorov.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Racho Petrov.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Map Byzantine Empire 1045 2000px svg.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Preslaw Goldene Kirche.jpg

File:Preslaw Goldene Kirche.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Jappalang (talk) 06:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Einige Burgasbilder bearbeitet (Drehung, Tonwertkorrektur

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Wenn dir meine Bearbeitung nicht gefällt dann revertiere sie einfach. --Bin im Garten (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Dankeschön. Wie hast Du es gemacht?--Vammpi (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Mit GIMP 2 (ist Freeware) (drehen und beschneiden; und für die Tonwertkorrektur: in der Menüleiste - "Farbe" - "Tonwertkorrektur") (siehe Tonwertkorrektur); http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVMJuXL4SKM&feature=related; Gradationskurve bearbeiten (s-förmig); http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKFOpIKoVio; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kcF-tWpbpg&feature=relmfu

"Schiefe Gebäude" (stürzende Linien korrigieren; nicht ganz wegkorrigieren - noch weitgehend reduzieren): im "Werkzeugkasten" ist das Pictogramm "Perspektive", um stürzende Linien zu korrigieren (das 4. Pictogramm nach dem Skalpell) - gleich links neben "Spiegeln" - oder: Menüleiste- "Werkzeug"

- "Transformieren" - "Perspektive"; vorherRaster einschalten (Menüleiste: "Ansicht" - "Raster anzeigen"; eventuell noch die Rastergröße noch vergrößern oder verkleinern - Menüleiste: "Bearbeiten" - "Einstellungen"), dann stürzende Linien entfernen (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUvCW9thGpw) - das Bild wird wie ein Gummituch gedehnt, die oberen Ecken weiter nach außen ziehen (und gleichzeitig um ca. den halben Betrag nach oben), zum Schluss mit dem Skalpell das Bild beschneiden. Pictogramm "Perspektive" (http://www.digitipps.ch/uploads/pics/grafik_gimp_gifsymbole.gif - ist im Bild markiert); http://www.alschim.de/gimp/perspective/; Farbkurve korrigieren: http://www.hannes-birnbacher.de/computer/gimp.html; eine leichte s-förmige Korrektur der Tonwertkurve wie in diesem Tutorial ist oft gut (und evtl. dabei gleich mit die rechten und linken Seiten der Tonwerte mit beschneiden): http://www.fotosoftware.biz/2008/12/26/bildbearbeitung-velvia-und-vibrance-mit-gimp/ oder in diesem Wikibook: http://de.wikibooks.org/wiki/GIMP/_Tutorials/_Farben; --Bin im Garten (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Budschaka und die Hafeneinfahrt von Sozozpol.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Sofia National Bibliothek.jpg

File:Sofia National Bibliothek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.245 08:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sofia National Bibliothek (2).jpg

Yours sincerely cmadler (talk) 13:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgas1980.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Burgas1980.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgas1980.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 12:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ivan Fichev2.jpg

File:Ivan Fichev2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 16:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tombul-Moschee13.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tombul-Moschee13.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Sofia Brutalism strikes back!.jpg

Здравей, Вампи! Какво общо има тази снимка със София? В източника (Фликър) София не се споменава. Според мен се отнася за Сърбия - видях на снимката табели с надписи на сръбски, а във Фликър долу вдясно има ключови думи Югославия и Сърбия. Поздрави! --Elkost (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Plan of Lazur Stadium.jpg

File:Plan of Lazur Stadium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Flickrworker (talk) 23:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Stadion Lasur Burgas.jpg

File:Stadion Lasur Burgas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steak (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Burgas Lasur Stadion.jpg

File:Burgas Lasur Stadion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steak (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

File:National Park, South-East Bulgaria.jpg

File:National Park, South-East Bulgaria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tomer T (talk) 10:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Burgas Old Clock.jpg

Copyright status: File:Burgas Old Clock.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Burgas Old Clock.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 22:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgas Old Clock.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Burgas Old Clock.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgas Old Clock.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

JuTa 16:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sofia Hl. Sofia Kirche (4).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)