Webysther

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Webysther!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Watermarks

Hi Webysther, please respect Commons:Watermarks and do NOT watermark your images. -- Ies (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014

Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014 Patrimônio Natural

File:Jericoacoara Ceará.jpg

Oi, Webysther:

Estamos na reta final do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014! Você ainda poderá submeter mais fotos até o dia 31 de maio e ampliar suas chances na premiação de até R$2.500,00! Além da premiação em dinheiro, as melhores fotografias serão publicadas na edição de Agosto da revista impressa Fotografe Melhor da Editora Europa.

A comunidade Wikimedia Commons agradece a sua participação desde já, obrigado pelas 24 fotos envidas, esse material será usado em vários dos nossos projetos. Acesse o site do concurso e submeta mais fotografias! Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook

Em breve anunciaremos novidades sobre os vencedores e a exposição das melhores fotografias do concurso.

Atenciosamente,

Movimento Wikimedia

Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014

Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014 Patrimônio Natural

File:Jericoacoara Ceará.jpg

Olá, Webysther:

É com imensa satisfação que anunciamos os vencedores do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil. Recebemos cerca de 7.000 fotos com a participação de mais de 900 fotógrafos de todos os cantos do Brasil, as fotos submetidas contribuirão para a melhoria de vários artigos da Wikipédia e demais projetos Wikimedia. Confira a seguir a lista dos vencedores da etapa nacional do concurso:

Vencedores

Categoria Melhores Fotografias

• 1º Carlos Perez Couto

• 2º Roberto Pavezi Netto

• 3º Eduardo Muruci

Categoria Melhores contribuições

• 1º Diego Rego Monteiro - contribuições

• 2º Jonathan Wilkins - contribuições

• 3º Lauro Sirgado - contribuições

Lista completa com todos os vencedores e a relação das 10 fotos que representarão o Brasil na etapa internacional do concurso: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014/Brasil/Vencedores

Exposição

Realizaremos uma exposição fotográfica durante o 10° Paraty em Foco - Festival Internacional de Fotografia de 24 a 28 de Setembro, que será realizado em Paraty - RJ. Nesta exposição exibiremos as fotos vencedoras e as melhores contribuições submetidas pelos participantes do concurso. Para saber mais sobre o evento, acesse http://paratyemfoco.com/. Publicaremos maiores informações sobre a exposição na do concurso e em nosso grupo no Facebook

Revista Fotografe Melhor

A revista Fotografe Melhor publicará na edição de Agosto os vencedores e demais informações sobre o concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil. A revista estará disponível em formato digital a partir do dia 28/07 e nas bancas de todo país a partir do dia 4 de agosto.

Obrigado pela participação, Movimento Wikimedia

File:Webysther 2015031703 - Mapa dos locais aonde ocorreram manifestações no dia 15 de março de 2015.png

File:Webysther 2015031703 - Mapa dos locais aonde ocorreram manifestações no dia 15 de março de 2015.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 18:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Pedido de fotos

Vi teu pedido de fotos na esplanada. Posso dizer que muitas das cidades do Rio Grande do Sul eu visitei e fotografei. Da uma olhada no commons Category:Municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Legal Paulo, estou querendo fazer o mesmo tipo de trabalho em São Paulo! :D --Webysther (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Então já posso te dar uma dica, não inventa categorias, já existe uma árvore de categorias pronta. É só colocar as fotos em suas devidas categorias. Quando criar uma nova veja o nome da cidade na wikipt, fica mais facil se usar o mesmo nome. Um bom exemplo de confusão é o Rio de Janeiro, tanto o estado com a cidade. Sem querer me gabar, estou conseguindo deixar o Rio Grande do Sul bem organizado, se precisar de exemplos da uma olhada.Se tiver dúvidas sobre copyright fala com Gunnex ele sempre me ajudou nesta parte e conhece o assunto a fundo, é fluente em ingles, portugues e alemão.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Webysther 20150321171849-2 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Webysther 20150321171849-2 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20150409032418 - Pitaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 06:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Sugestão de corte

Olá Webysther! Vi que você é novo no Commons; então seja bem-vindo. Eu sugeri um corte para a sua foto: File:2013-10-25 Visita FiveCom 023.jpg, pois eu irei nominá-la para Commons:FPC. Há uma região que se localiza na parte inferior direita e que é perturbadora, isto é, incomoda a apreciação da imagem. Veja que no histórico do arquivo eu carreguei uma versão teste para a foto, mas com pouco MB (apenas 4,3 MB). É apenas uma sugestão. Saudações, 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Sem problemas, manda ver! E já adianto que comigo não tem frescura, pode mexer no que quiser -- Webysther (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Detalhe, se precisar de algo que vá além de um crop o ideial é fazer com o raw, eu posso te passar da imagem que achar útil ou você pode me falar o que precisa para eu implementar. -- Webysther (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Infelizmente, o meu programa de edição (PhotoScape) não aumenta o MB da foto a cada edição (o MB tem que ser maior que 9,7), ocorre uma espécie de "perda de informação" (não sei explicar direito). Você consegue cortar sem diminuir o MB? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Posso, mas só quando chegar em casa. Mas acredito que vai perder um pouco do tamanho do arquivo de qualquer forma. O medo é seu programa perder o DPI, valor fundamental para impressão. -- Webysther (talk) 21:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Seria bom também se a foto tivesse uma legenda com mais informações. Aliás, que foto! Conte como você fez para encontrar esse lugar na praia e tirar essa foto incrível, diga-se de passagem! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Vou detalhar melhor sim a legenda, já anotei na minha lista de tarefas. Poxa, eu vi um ponto com bastante cor bem na beira da pedra, fui descendo enquanto um grupo me filmava esperando o pior, o local do GPS é preciso, no mapa aonde tem uma região onde bate a água no sentido do oceano é aonde está essas maravilhas. Eu não sei o nome delas e precisava de ajuda de algum biólogo. Se você morar em Vitória pode fazer uma imagem melhor (mais nítida). Tirei umas duzentas fotos para chegar a essa, é necessário paciência para saber quando a água do oceano vai bater forte o suficiente para sair bastante e você precisa tirar a foto quando ela termina de bater na pedra. -- Webysther (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

O maravilhoso é que além disso, é possível ver ouriços-do-mar atracados nas rochas. É realmente difícil capturar um momento como esse. Está de parabéns pelo seu trabalho! É de pensar que a natureza é "supreendentemente supreendente", principalmente no nosso país. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Percebi também que a foto parece meio duplicada em algumas partes, eu acho que talvez isso seja assim por que ocorreu mais de um tiro para se montar a foto. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Na verdade foi por causa da exposição, mas você me deixou com uma pulga atrás da orelha, eu não lembro se essa imagem é HDR, caso seja eu posso utilizar as novas técnicas que edição RAW para garantir uma melhor qualidade, antes eu não sabia trabalhar tão bem com o Adobe Lightroom e agora aprendi já como ajustar melhor o equilíbrio de branco, ruído e outros problemas que eu achava que era impossível de se ajusta em pós-produção sem afetar a legitimidade da imagem. -- Webysther (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Na imagem deve ter Echinoidea, mas conversei com um amigo da USP que vai achar um biologo para ajudar nesse trabalho. --Webysther (talk) 23:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Locais de São Paulo

Você sugeriu que eu desse para você o nome de lugares de São Paulo que não têm fotos boas, aqui estão alguns:

• Category:Sala São Paulo
• Category:Catedral da Sé
• Category:Estação da Luz
• Category:Museu Paulista
• Category:Buildings in São Paulo city
• Category:Ponte Octavio Frias de Oliveira

O User:The Photographer contribui muito para as imagens destacadas do Brasil, veja Category:Featured pictures of Brazil by User:The Photographer. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Obrigado! Vou trabalhar nisso, eu moro no centro de São Paulo, dá para ir andando em todos os lugares que você citou. Inclusive nunca dei importância por achar que já existia imagens boas. -- Webysther (talk) 10:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

O ceú amanhã entre as 7 e 9hs vai estar pacialmente nublado, você mora aqui em São Paulo mesmo? Estou pensando em ir tirar foto de algumas de suas sugestões. :) -- Webysther (talk) 00:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Pedido de edição da foto

Por favor, se você puder, você consegue editar a foto File:Gisele Bundchen2.jpg consertando o(s) erro(s) que foi(foram) mencionado(s) aqui? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Alterei também o balanço de branco para melhorar a cor dos olhos e pele. -- Webysther (talk) 16:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Muito obrigado pela edição. Por sua causa, ela já tem 4 apoios na FPC. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Vendo a sua lista de uploads, encontrei essa: File:Webysther 201503151822160117 - Vista do MASP em direção a consolação.jpg. Talvez se ela recebesse uma corte acima do guarda-chuva azul, uma remoção de aberração cromática verde no topo dos postes e uma correção de inclinação para a direita (está inclinada para a esquerda, se for analisá-la), acho que ela poderia ser uma FPC. Só acho. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC) A imagem é interessante, mas falta nitidez.

Eu fiz uma nova versão dessa imagem, eu estava com um monitor ruim a só a algumas semanas que comprei um que é sRGB 99% e percebi que eu estraguei muitas imagens, estou corrigindo aos poucos elas. Olha novamente essa. -- Webysther (talk) 00:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Também acho que essa foto – File:Balão boituva 7035.jpg –, caso seja corrigida sua inclinação, poderia ser uma FPC. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Consegui fazer as correções da foto do balão (uma rotação e uma correção de perspectiva, que eu esqueci de falar), mas como eu já disse, o MB ("qualidade JPG, informação JPG ou tamanho") diminui. Eu achei que ficou até bonito, mas eu já fui advertido duas vezes por causa das minhas edições que causam este tipo de coisa, como você pode ver aqui. Se você quiser refazê-la do seu jeito... Ficou boa a minha edição? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Eu sumi esses dias pq estava me recusando de tirar fotos até resolver o problema da compra de um tripé, resolvido. Já corrigi essa imagem também. -- Webysther (talk) 00:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Olha que imagem impressionante que eu encontrei: File:Trindade simonemarinho.jpg. Ela precisa apenas de uma rotação/correção de inclinação e uma remoção de aberração cromática e ela se torna uma potente FPC. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Só o equipamento que ela usou para fazer essa imagem é 10x mais caro que o meu. Vai demorar bastante eu ter um mark... Falo isso pq o equipamento ajuda muito na nitidez, a lente que ela usou também, sem comentários. :D -- Webysther (talk) 02:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Só queria saber o que aconteceu com o "Metadados". Lá o nome do fabricante da câmera está "ne Mar" e o modelo da câmera, "inho". Que significado tem isso? Algum erro no upload do arquivo? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Acho que é um problema na Wikimedia, o arquivo exportado está com os metadados corretos aqui. -- Webysther (talk) 02:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Reverti a sua versão só para ver se voltava ao normal e voltou. Agora veja que os metadados estão normais. Depois, reverta você para a sua versão editada e veja que as palavras erradas reaparecem. Estranho. :S 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Isso não vai resolver, a página já foi criada. Eu falo isso com certa certeza pq sou programador. Melhor deixar do jeito que está pq eles vão corrigir ou pode ser um bug na versão nova do software que estou usando, o que acho difícil. -- Webysther (talk) 02:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Uma coisa: não acha melhor antes de colocar para FPC uma imagem nomear para imagem de qualidade antes? Imagens especiais tem que ter um "q" a mais, sem contar que uma imagem de qualidade é observado apenas os detalhes técnicos, o que pode ser um filtro bom para o FPC. -- Webysther (talk) 02:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Com certeza, sem nenhuma dúvida. Mas os únicos problemas da QIC são: geralmente as imagens são promovidas ou reprovadas com apenas um avaliador e; a QIC só (e apenas só) aceita trabalhos de autoria própria de usuários da Commons. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Parceira: objetivos

São Paulo

• Fotografar locais de São Paulo; ( Em progresso)
• Fotografar animais em São Paulo via Parque Zoológico de São Paulo; ( Para combinar)
• Produzir panoramas de São Paulo. ( Para combinar)

Outras cidades

• … ( Para combinar) -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20140125062438 - Balão boituva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20150427002640 - Edifícios Terraço Itália e Copan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- RTA 11:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For your nice pictures of São Paulo City in hight quality. I hope take pictures with you someday, nice work, well done The Photographer (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painel Tiradentes by Candido Portinari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --Hubertl 14:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20150428110918 - Edifícios Terraço Itália e Copan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Qualidade. É sempre a qualidade.

Olá! Eu concordo com você em que muitas imagens do Brasil de alto nível de encantamento, de fascinação, se perdem por causa da qualidade. Pelo lado do encantamento, da fascinação, o Brasil tem potencial com as FPC. Aqui, encantamento, fascinação, significam "wow" (uau em português). Veja algumas imagens com wow, mas que não possuem boa qualidade:

Boas fotos! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Poxa vida, que crueldade!!! Definitivamente esses lugares merecem novas imagens, apesar de essas imagens tirarem o meu fôlego (wow)! -- Webysther (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Mas eu aposto as minhas fichas na segunda e na última no sentido de que, se melhoradas as suas qualidades técnicas, poderiam, no mínimo, adquirir o selo de QI. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Atualmente estou sem computador, mas vou trabalhar nelas, me dê um tempo (mesmo demorando alguns dias ou semanas) mas vou enviar para você. -- Webysther (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

 Question O que você acha desta imagem: File:1 leblon aerial 2014.jpg? Ela poderia, se melhorada a sua qualidade, ser, pelo menos, uma QI? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Pode fazer um favor para mim? Nomeie esta foto lá? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done Webysther (talk) 20:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

 Question Você acha que esta foto aqui pode se tornar uma FP? Se você puder, você pode nomeá-la lá. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Não para os critérios de nitidez que eles seguem, e que aprendi a trabalhar com ele, mas se você quer uma boa notícia, agora fez 12 horas que estava processando uma imagem (na verdade 60 imagens) para chegar a essa imagem que com certeza vai ser QI, FP, VA... Espero que goste. :) -- Webysther (talk) 12:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Wohow! Incrível! QI, VI, FP, Imagem do ano… tudo que tem direito! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Mas acharam problemas, vou precisar gerar a montagem novamente... D": -- Webysther (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Mas eu tenho certeza de que você vai corrigi-los e de que esta imagem vai se tornar uma FP. Ela tem potencial. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Sim dá para resolver, vou ter que fazer quase que manualmente, mas dá para fazer sim. Só que desanima... D: -- Webysther (talk) 16:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Mais erros. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Boas notícias!

Olá! Tenho boas notícias! Entrei isso, isso e isso. Boas imagens! Se você quiser (é claro), você pode nomear essas: File:Buteogallus meridionalis Pantanal.jpg e File:Coat of arms of Brazil.svg. É que eu já tenho duas ativas: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013 02 Foz do Iguacu 248.jpg e Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cemitério da Consolação, São Paulo city 04.jpg. Ha! E consegui resolver (eu acho) o problema de MB baixo, veja. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Está corrido esses últimos dias, eu vou dar uma olhada com calma, só peço um pouco de paciência. -- Webysther (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Convite - Concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015

Bem vindo ao Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Natural

Olá Webysther,

No ano anterior você participou da primeira edição do concurso fotográfico Wiki Loves Earth Brasil enviando ótimas fotografias!

O concurso foi um grande sucesso graça a sua participação e ajuda!

Este ano estamos repetindo o sucesso do ano anterior, já são mais de 1.000 participantes e mais de 7.500 fotos recebidas até o momento.

Você poderá participar do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 até o dia 31 de Maio e concorrer a R$9.000,00 em premiações!

Esta ano, estamos premiando 2 categorias, categoria melhor foto onde premiaremos as 3 melhores fotos do concurso e a categoria melhores contribuições onde premiaremos os usuários que mandarem a maior quantidade de fotos úteis. Até o momento os 3 participantes que enviaram mais fotografias enviaram respectivamente 356, 297 e 93 fotografias.

Além da premiação em dinheiro, as melhores fotografias serão publicadas na edição de Agosto da revista impressa Fotografe Melhor da Editora Europa.

Agradecemos a sua participação desde já e obrigado pelas fotos enviadas no ano anterior!

Para maiores informações e para submeter suas novas fotografias, acesse o site do concurso e participe!

Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos e colegas e também curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.

Em breve anunciaremos novidades sobre os vencedores e a exposição das melhores fotografias do concurso.

Atenciosamente,

Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015

Grupo Wikimedia Brasileiro de Educação e Pesquisa, Rodrigo Padula (talk). message left by IlyaBot.

Nomear para FPC

Olá! Eu gostei da sua imagem File:Webysther 20150409032418 - Pitaya.jpg. Ela tem o meu apoio de você nomeá-la. Obrigado. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Webysther 20150509172554 - Estação da Luz.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Chronus (talk) 06:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Convite

CONVITE - CONCURSO FOTOGRÁFICO Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Histórico

Olá Webysther,

Obrigado por ter participado do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014.

Ao longo destas duas edições contamos com a participação de quase 3.000 fotógrafos e recebemos ao todo mais de 20.000 imagens que estão sendo usadas para ilustrar artigos da Wikipédia e enriquecendo o nosso repositório de imagens aqui no Wikimedia Commons. Devido ao grande sucesso das duas edições do WLE, decidimos trazer para o Brasil o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo, que será realizado de 1 a 30 de setembro de 2015.

O Wiki Loves Monuments é organizado em vários países do mundo e é considerado desde 2011 pelo Livro dos Recordes como maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Estamos aqui para te convidar a fazer parte da historia e do maior concurso fotográfico já realizado!

Acesse o site do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 - Patrimônio Histórico confira nossa lista de monumentos a serem fotografados e submeta suas imagens para concorrer a premiação de R$6.000 em dinheiro.

Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.

Atenciosamente,

Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015

Grupo Wikimedia Brasileiro de Educação e Pesquisa, Rodrigo Padula (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC).

File tagging File:Webysther 20160309 - Brasão USP.svg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Webysther 20160309 - Brasão USP.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Webysther 20160309 - Brasão USP.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Gunnex (talk) 00:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Webysther 20160310 - Brasão USP.svg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Webysther 20160310 - Brasão USP.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Webysther 20160310 - Brasão USP.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Gunnex (talk) 00:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20160331120144 - Monumento a Ramos de Azevedo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but the top crop is faaar too tight, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 19:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)  Done New version --Webysther OK Poco a poco 10:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Webysther 20160306 - Logo IME-USP.svg

And also:

• File:Webysther 20160309 - Logo IME-USP.svg

Yours sincerely, czar 08:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not edit war

---

You currently appear to be participating in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

   FDMS  4    01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Wait all my edits, please. After, we discuss. :) -- Webysther (talk)

I have reverted some of your edits for the reasons given, thus you must discuss before reinstating them.    FDMS  4    01:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

1º Original with OTRS confirmed make this a derived work and we confirm this change on website in one day PR change, this PR not important afterall, the original image change all images before.

2º The font used is TM, not possible to cite "font only", create a problem of we dont need. The logo without background was converted to only vector path -- Webysther (talk)

I'm not sure I get what you're trying to tell me (there apparently is a language barrier), but when a derivative work is too simple to be protected by copyright the original licensing is irrelevant, as is what the original author claims. The font used is irrelevant with regards to copyright or trademark protection as well, see w:Wikipedia:Public domain#Fonts. The restrictions {{Trademarked}} refers to are non-copyright restrictions – for example, a corporation might not the PHP logo as visual identification for another programming language.    FDMS  4    01:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

If you don't revert yourself right now I will ask for your account to be blocked.    FDMS  4    01:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for my EN. Yes, you is correcty, but, make this clear, made wide use of this logo, for decades logo php dont have a license, i burn 3 months ask for license clear and open. This format "text only" is the better for wikipedia, because the original have a format ugly, i change all pages to reflect this one. I expect people see this image like CC-BY-SA not PD. -- Webysther (talk)

Took you answer and believed that you had accepted my arguments, I am trying to come to an agreement on common and resolve the misunderstanding. What do you have to lose by leaving a more appropriate license than the present? -- Webysther (talk)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20170619072151 - Pedra do baú vista do bauzinho.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but it might be better to take this photo later on the day (when shadows are smaller) --Michielverbeek 07:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20160207091237 - Jiboia Boa constrictor constrictor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20150906183737 - Rio São Francisco, Xique-xique - Bahia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a gorgeous sundown! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20150907164050 - Palácio Rio Branco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20150907165153 - Mercado modelo e baia de todos os santos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments horizon needs a rotation to the right, IMO right crop is not well done (remove the lantern) --Michielverbeek 07:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Well done, now --Michielverbeek 05:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Webysther 20170619072151 - Pedra do baú e a direita Vale do Paiol Grande.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20170619072151 - Pedra do baú e a direita Vale do Paiol Grande.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Webysther 20150501201754 - Interior Sala São Paulo.jpg

Será que você não teria como reproduzir essa imagem da mesma perspectiva? É que eu gostei muito dela, mas o problema que foi apontado era de mudança de foco de um tiro pro outro.

Aqui, já que falou que estava pra ir em Minas, podia passar nas cidades históricas de Ouro Preto e Mariana para conseguir cliques dos museus e igrejas barrocas que têm lá. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Vou trabalhar nisso! Acho que eu posso refazer o panorama com outra ferramenta e ver se resolve, acho que o problema não era o foco e sim o junção. Já tomei nota das cidades! --Webysther (talk) 16:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20170619072151 - Pedra do baú e a direita Vale do Paiol Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Credit the work please

I was reviewing your recent upload which is a photograph of a fisherman. Although FOP is OK in Portugal, you need to credit the author of the work wherever possible per Portugal law. Do you know who did the sculpture? Would you mind adding more info for the sake of respecting the work and abiding by the copyright law? Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 05:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please ignore my previous comment, I did not know that the work is located in Brazil. Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 13:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015739 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015739 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015750 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015750 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015713 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015713 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015603 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015603 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015543 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015543 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015416 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015416 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015341 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015341 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015432 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015432 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Padre Reni 20180507015640 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg

File:Padre Reni 20180507015640 - Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-05-01 Filmagem Padre Reni do Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.webm

File:2018-05-01 Filmagem Padre Reni do Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leon saudanha (talk) 13:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

IME

Salve. Como é que você produziu a imagem aérea do IME? --Joalpe (talk) 00:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Opa, peguei um drone emprestado com um amigo, demorei anos para encontrar alguém para me emprestar... hehehe --Webysther (talk)

Image Permission

Dear Webysther,
I am a retired professor and currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book. I would like to use your image which I think belongs to your copyrights and I reach from
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Webysther_20180212160350_-_Catedral_Metropolitana_Nossa_Senhora_Aparecida.jpg
I will appreciate if you let me know your terms and conditions for the image's usage permission. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part.
Yours Sincerely
Prof. Arch. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--Mustidede (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20190219234306 - Fruta do cambuci (Campomanesia phaea) verde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality, but as XRay pointed out, you should request a renaming for this file. --PtrQs 00:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20190126135602 - Aplastodiscus ferido e com lavas de moscas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality but per XRay, please, rename the file. --Poco a poco 06:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20190219233752 - Fruta do cambuci (Campomanesia phaea)- na esquerda é o fruto maduro e na direita é o fruto verde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality but per XRay, please, rename the file. --Poco a poco 06:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20190223144228 - Cambuci - Campomanesia phaea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. for me - could you add English file description please? --J. Lunau 17:43, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20190306142828 - Praça da Sé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Webysther 20190306142509 - Catedral Metropolitana de São Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Top crop a bit on the tight side, but otherwise o.k. --Granada 08:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/ I'm standing in for FPC Bot since it's not working. --Cart (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Usuário Webysther.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Full IPA Chart 2019

Olá! Aqui nesta Category:Full IPA Chart 2019 parace que falta a versão em inglês. Algum problema? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

• @Tuvalkin: Oi, tem sim, a versão em inglês não tem a versão mais recente, veja aqui: https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/keating/IPA/IPA_charts_2019_trans.html

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil

Saudações. Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque, em outro ano, participou da competição fotográfica Wiki Loves Monuments. Escrevo em nome do grupo organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments deste ano para convidá-lo/convidá-la a participar de novo!

O Wiki Loves Monuments é o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Permite ampliar o conhecimento global sobre o Brasil, mostrando a riqueza cultural e histórica do país. Neste ano, ampliamos enormemente as listas de monumentos a serem registrados e isso ajuda na difusão da diversidade brasileira.

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil e ganhe prêmios! Serão premiadas as melhores fotografias e também aqueles e aquelas que mais contribuirem com registros fotográficos diversos do patrimônio cultural e histórico brasileiro. Leia as instruções com cuidado!

De novo, obrigado por participar do Wiki Loves Monuments e melhorar o conhecimento livre disponível na internet! Se tiver dúvidas, não hesite em entrar em contato!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲»22:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Webysther 20190306143154 - Catedral Metropolitana de São Paulo.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20190306143154 - Catedral Metropolitana de São Paulo.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Castelinho de Pirituba

Olá Webysther! Notei que você enviou algumas imagens de Santa Catarina para o Wiki Loves Monuments, e por isso agradeço bastante! Não sei se viu, mas em nossas redes sociais temos publicado diariamente sobre monumentos que ainda não foram ilustrados em diferentes estados e localidades. Em São Paulo, por exemplo, não temos imagens do Castelinho de Pirituba. Será que você pode nos ajudar a ilustrá-lo? Outros monumentos, já ilustrados ou não, você encontra na lista de monumentos de São Paulo. Obrigado e boas contribuições! EPorto (WMB) (talk) 21:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

• @EPorto (WMB): Não sabia, comecei a seguir! Não vi na lista dos monumentos nem a categoria do castelinho, poderia me mandar? Posso fazer um registro sim de lá antes do fim do mês, anotado.

Premiação Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 Brasil

	Maiores contribuidores
	Esta comenda reconhece sua atuação no Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil. Na edição de 2021, você foi um(a) dos(as) editores(as) que mais ilustrou monumentos e/ou sítios históricos que não possuíam imagens livres associadas a eles nos projetos Wikimedia. Parabéns pelo seu empenho e muito obrigado pelas suas colaborações!
	Por favor, verifique seu e-mail para a premiação a partir de segunda-feira (6/12)!
	-- EPorto (WMB) (talk) 20:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2022!

Olá! O maior concurso fotográfico do mundo está de volta! Que tal participar mais uma vez (ou pela primeira vez!) do Wiki Loves Monuments? A etapa nacional da competição, que este ano está com novidades na faixa de premiação, ocorrerá de 01 a 30 de setembro.

Este ano, teremos novamente três categorias de premiação e um aumento na faixa de prêmios:

• Melhores Imagens, com prêmios de até R$2.500
• Maiores Contribuidores(as), com prêmios de R$200
• Melhor Imagem do Estado do Espírito Santo, com prêmio de R$2.500

Ficou animado(a)? Acesse aqui os mais de 15 mil monumentos listados para a competição deste ano! Fotografe-os e publique suas imagens no Wikimedia Commons durante o mês de setembro.

Ano passado o Brasil ficou em primeiro lugar na etapa internacional do Wiki Loves Monuments com a foto do Real Gabinete Português de Leitura, no Rio de Janeiro, tirada pelo fotógrafo lituano Donatas Dabravolskas. É a nossa chance de repetir este feito!

Para mais informações, confira a página do concurso!

Abraços, --EPorto (WMB) (discussão) 22:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Você recebeu esta mensagem pois já participou do Wiki Loves Monuments ou do Wiki Loves Earth anteriormente. Caso não queira mais receber essas comunicações, deixe uma mensagem em minha página de discussão ou envie um e-mail para eder.portowmnobrasil.org.

Participe do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2023!

Carnaval de Maragogipe, por Fernando de Freitas Barbosa

Olá! O mês de março chegou e o Wiki Loves Cultura Popular, etapa nacional do concurso Wiki Loves Folklore ainda está acontecendo! Como você já participou de outros concursos fotográficos anteriormente, lhe convidamos a enviar suas fotografias, vídeos e áudios que registrem a cultura popular brasileira. Em 2023, serão premiadas os 5 melhores arquivos de mídia enviados ao concurso, além de 10 prêmios para os participantes que mais ilustrarem tópicos de interesse da cultura popular, que podem ser acessados aqui. Participe do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular e concorra aos seguintes prêmios:

• Melhor mídia do Pará: R$ 2.500,00
• Melhor mídia: R$ 2.500,00
• 2ª melhor mídia: R$ 2.000,00
• 3ª melhor mídia: R$ 1.500,00
• 4ª melhor mídia: R$ 1.000,00
• 5ª melhor mídia: R$ 500,00
• 10 maiores contribuidores de mídias: R$ 200,00

Todos os prêmios serão oferecidos sob a forma de vale-presente.

É imprescindível que o participante tenha inserido um endereço de e-mail válido para contato em sua conta Wiki.

O período de entrega do prêmio depende de alguns fatores, como avaliação do júri, contagem de contribuições e contato. Esperamos realizar a entrega até 30 de maio de 2023.

Leia mais sobre a etapa nacional do concurso na página do evento, Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2023.

Venha participar do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2023! --LBelo (WMB) (talk)

Convite para participar do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2023

Olá, @Webysther! O Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2023 começou dia 1º de setembro!

Em uma semana, já conseguimos mais de 3600 fotografias de mais de 13 estados brasileiros. Este ano, teremos três categorias de premiação: Melhores Imagens, Maiores Contribuidores e Melhor Imagem do Pará.

Gostaria de te convidar a participar do concurso este ano novamente! Por favor, confira as listas de monumentos ou o aplicativo de mapa para enviar suas fotografias do patrimônio histórico brasileiro!

Abraços, EPorto (WMB) (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)