Yelkrokoyade

Welcome to the Commons, Yelkrokoyade!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Flickr to Commons

Yelkrokoyade, when uploading images from Flickr to Commons, try using this automated tool, in order to minimize the possible errors and licenses mismatches. Cheers. --KveD (talk) 22:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, it was the first time. I'll be carefull next time.--Yelkrokoyade 04:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Logos de Wikimedia

Faites attention, s'il vous plaît, pour l'utilisation des logos de Wikimedia en captures d'écran. Voyez Commons:Screenshots pour plus information. Compliments, Sdrtirs (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Yelkrokoyade!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Vache charolaise et son veau.jpg is uncategorized since 1 May 2009.

• Image:Ventilation grain Diagramme Carrier.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Dynamisation manuelle.ogv was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Dynamisation mécanique.ogv was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Dynamisation manuelle.JPG was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Dynamiseurs mécaniques.JPG was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Dynamisation mécanique bis.ogv was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Pulvérisateur à dos.jpg was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Rythme anomalistique.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Lune descendante.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Lune ascendante.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Systeme solaire fr.jpg was uncategorized on 9 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Serrières - Saône et Loire.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:DSC 0188 DxO.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congratulations Yelkrokoyade! Your image Image:Islande - Rekjavik du haut de la cathédrale.JPG was the Wikipedia Random Picture of the Day! Clcik on this link to see what it looked like. - Presidentman (talk · contribs) Wikipedia Random Picture of the Day 01:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Amerling et wikimédiens

Bonjour.
Essayer l'humour dans une langue étrangère est toujours stupide. Mon propos était le suivant: en page de QI ne sont acceptées que les oeuvres de "wikimédiens". Or v.Amerling n'est pas utilisateur de "Commons". Donc cette image ne peut pas être prposée en QI.
Sauf que...
Sauf que je me suis complétement planté, l'œuvre photographique est de toi, qui est utilisateur de "Commons".
J'ai écrit et fait n'importe quoi sur ce coup-là, et c'est d'autant plus stupide qu'il m'est arrivé à plusieurs reprises de proposer en QI, et avec succès, des photographies de tableaux.
Toutes mes excuses donc pour cette bévue, qui m'aura au moins donné l'occasion de cet échange (j'aime bien ta page de présentation sur WP !)
Continue donc à charger de belles images comme celle-ci, sans t'arrêter à ma maladresse !
Cordialement, et sans rancune j'espère.--Jebulon (talk) 23:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich von Amerling - Study.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)I'm afraid this (nice) picture is not eligible for QI, cause I'm not sure Friedrich von Amerling was a wikimedian, sorry...--Jebulon 17:22, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Sorry, my mistake. --Jebulon 18:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Yelkrokoyade, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Yelkrokoyade, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 14:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tête grimaçante Franz Xaver Messerschmidt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Simplicity? If you say so... --Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House Wall on the River Egon Schiele 1915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great painting and QI for me --Kirua 10:26, 05 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mother with two children II Egon Schiele 1915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Kirua 10:26, 05 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loge im Sofiensaal Josef Engelhart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK I think. --Mattbuck 23:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dame in Gelb Max Kurzweil 1907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paul III Titien after 1546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of an african.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geological Institute of Hungary 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted clockwise? Mattbuck 23:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)  Done New file today --Yelkrokoyade 09:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC) OK Mattbuck 10:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)~

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Still life with nautilus cup Willem Claeszoon Heda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Mattbuck 21:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eugenio Lucas Velázquez - The Second of May 1808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can I decline because I think it's an awful painting? --Mattbuck 22:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC) What's nice and awful is something relative :) --Yelkrokoyade 05:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A merry company Pieter Symonsz. Potter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 09:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ and the adulteress - Lucas Cranach the Elder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marcantonio Trevisani by Tiziano Vecellio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 22:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC) --JLPC 22:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gisant de Jean sans Peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 16:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Nativity Robert Campin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 15:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Six personnages de Victor Hugo - Louis Boulanger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait de Madame Marthe - Hippolyte Petitjean 1899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Hatpin René Lalique in Calouste Gulbenkian Museum.jpg

Hello! Your recent upload, File:Hatpin René Lalique in Calouste Gulbenkian Museum.jpg is a great image, but the title is misleading. This is not a hatpin. It is a diadem, with an attached comb. See this scan from a book identifying it as a diadem Please can you consider requesting a rename and removing the "Hatpins" category as this is misleading - the other image of this piece is also misleadingly titled and I will request a rename. Best wishes, Mabalu (talk) 09:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello. When I take pictures in museums, I usually take the label describing the piece but I didn't do it this time ! I probably named the file from the same pictures that were already uploaded on Commons. I trust you for renaming the file and removing the categories. Thanks for your vigilance. --Yelkrokoyade (talk) 07:14, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In Serbia László Mednyánszky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A Mother from Alvito - August Riedel 1848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judith - August Riedel 1840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice digitization --Daniel Case 17:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Don Quichotte Honoré Daumier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Birth - Te tamari no atua Paul Gauguin 1896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 20:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dissonanz Franz von Stuck 1910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

PD-Art

Bonjour,

Tu as pris en photo un tableau, Dissonanz, et propose de partager cette photo sous une certaine licence.

Or, ce tableau est dans le domaine public. Par ce choix de licence, tu décides donc de t'accaparer du domaine public pour le proposer en lieu et place sous une licence Creative Commons. C'est exactement ce que nous reprochons aux msuées de faire : privatiser le domaine public pour conférer des licences. La différence est qu'eux le font en espérant un retour financier, là où toi le propose sous licence CC.

J'imagine que ce n'était pas ton but. Tu peux donc rectifier cela en lisant la section When you yourself personally took the photograph de Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag qui suggère deux pistes. --Dereckson (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Dereckson: Prendre des photos dans les musées, comme je le fais maintenant depuis plusieurs années, demande un investissement personnel (temps, voyage...), du matériel correct, et encore du temps pour détourer proprement les tableaux et traiter au mieux les fichiers RAW pour en faire des images exploitables pour WP. Je sais qu'il s'agit de reproductions en 2D qui normalement sont dans le domaine public mais c'est pour moi une négation du travail amont que je viens de décrire. C'est tellement vrais qu'il suffit de voir qu'il n'existe pas deux images identiques de ce même tableau [1] qu'il s'agisse de définition ou du traitement des couleurs : cela prouve bien que tout ne se vaut pas. Donc effectivement ça m'ennuie de voir ces images, parfois inédites sur WP, se retrouver sur tout un tas de sites sans aucune mention de l'origine (rien à voir avec un quelconque espoir de retour financier). Donc s'il faut laisser les tableaux avec leur cadre pour avoir une image en 3D qui puisse ainsi se mettre sous license CC, alors je le ferai. Mais reconnait que ce serait bien dommage pour la qualité des articles. Cordialement. --Yelkrokoyade (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, compris la problématique.

Je suggère dans ce cas comme stratégie un modèle spécifique de crédit d'auteur, pour demander explicitement que la photo te soit attribuée, à apposer sur chaque média.

Tu veux que je te prépare un tel modèle ? --Dereckson (talk) 14:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Oui, je veux bien voir à quoi ça ressemble. Merci. --Yelkrokoyade (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

You can use {{Licensed-PD-Art}}, for example: File:A Safe Escort (18850019652).jpg. --ghouston (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Institution, Creator

Nous disposons désormais de modèles pour identifier les musées et artistes, tu peux voir sur File:Dissonanz Franz von Stuck 1910.jpg ce que cela donne. J'ai créé Institution:Villa Stuck que nous n'avions pas encore. Si tu en as d'autres de musées manquant, je veux bien les créer aussi. --Dereckson (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grigorie Brâncoveanu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not perfect at full size, but good enough IMO.--Jebulon 08:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bread Line Nicolae Tonitza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! By the Sea Nicolae Grigorescu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good photo of the painting. --Peulle 11:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Young Woman Powdering Herself Georges Seurat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cansada Henrique Pousão 1882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Maybe a bit tight at the bottom.--Famberhorst 18:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Regasterios (talk) 07:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Portrait of the Duke of Richelieu by Jean-Marc Nattier.jpg

File:Portrait of the Duke of Richelieu by Jean-Marc Nattier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paul Hermans (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Decorative plate with peacock Chini & co.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Charles de Gaulle Bucharest.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)